"I was two seats away and couldn't believe someone would just go and sit
right on the bishopric's stool," said deacon brother Gilbert Redding. "Why would anyone presume to act
on their own initiative and just sit at the most convenient place?" A minister who wished to remain anonymous
for fear of reprisal said, "Well, after morning service everyone was invited to join in noon lunch by the
Bishopric. We cannot expect a visitor to know all our seating traditions like gender separation, separation by
age, as well as status and popularity positioning. But I have to admit it was strange that the visitor left just
because there were no empty places. We do have a second seating!"
In the church's defense, the much venerated retired titular archbishopric
Emil Runnurb remarked, "Our customary seating arrangements have developed carefully over generations. It is
not often that an outsider comes to visit our church so instructions are not deemed necessary for seating and proper
placement. Besides with so many people moving forward to the dining area and sitting in their normal fashion you
wonder why the stranger just didn't ask someone." [human
see, human do]
Right before the prayer when everyone was anticipating ham sandwiches on
rolls and donuts with coffee, milk, or tea, members suddenly saw a commotion at the section where the active and
retired clergy sit. "I could not figure out what was happening," said serving single sister Sarah Servant.
"Then this stranger gets up and sort of moves about in confusion for a moment and heads for the doors! They
didn't even stay for lunch and missed out on some good sandwiches.... who was that anyway??" noon
fellowship hour
Bishops pause and consider how to deal with golf playing member during a deer hunting expedition
Jester, Iowa--In a quiet moment after bagging a buck several area bishops conferred about dealing with
a retired member who Still plays golf despite being reminded it is not spiritually edifying. "We were very
excited about the beginning of hunting season," said bishop Cliff Twister. "I had been carefully making
my presence known to the deer in an attempt to drive him into position so bishop brother Bill Overdue could aim
directly from his perch in the tree. Suddenly two shots rang out, the first one just past my face with yells of
joy accompanying it. I knew Bill's rifle found it's target."
Upon hearing the shot go past his ears Cliff instinctively ducked but quickly
composed himself and engaged in the passion of the moment by offering a "whoa" then started to run toward
the others in his party.
"Just when I started running something made me stop right there,"
said Cliff. "I was reminded that the day was Wednesday and brother Ted was probably out playing golf. I shuddered
at the thought and felt convicted in my heart to express my concern to the brothers at this time."
Bill recalls the situation. "I was becoming impatient after hours of
waiting then suddenly I saw the most incredible buck of my life and was extremely excited. He was polishing his
rack on a sapling. Just witnessing him flail the small tree and proudly lift his head as if surveying his domain
was spectacular. I prayed that he would continue toward me. I tried to calm down, to keep my heart from beating
out of my chest. I knew I needed to shoot it before the brothers gently driving it toward me came into the crossfire.
I could not move and was fighting off an adrenaline rush. Suddenly primordial instinct took over and everything
became as clear as an unmuddied lake. I took the shot but missed. The deer jumped forward and slowly trotted away
as if he were daring me to try again. I fired again and hit him causing him to stumble forward, his rear legs lifting
into the air as he somersaulted forward on his neck and head."
Bill, still being somewhat excited while explaining, took his right arm
and moved it in an arch showing the way the bucks hind legs flipped over.
"I screamed with delight," said Bill. "The other brothers
were running toward the deer, yelling, jumping, and raising their arms with excitement and envy as it was obvious
my kill was going to be the prize of the season. I was elated! I just sat down in my stand and thanked God for
such a great morning."
As the group gathered round the ten point buck estimating his weight at
well over 200 pounds, brother Cliff walked up with an expression of burden on his face. Everyone recognized this
and became
quiet. He said he had been pondering his next move against brother Ted for playing golf every Wednesday.
Cliff related how Ted was pensive about causing offense but could not understand
how golf was spiritually or physically dangerous. Cliff shared how Ted confessed to playing once a week for a few
hours and believed his health was improving because he was outside and doing something active yet serene. Ted was
also said to have made several friends on the golf course who enjoyed listening to Ted speak about his faith in
Christ.
Cliff explained to the others how he reminded Ted that by participating
in sports it could arouse and stimulate the flesh to attitudes and actions of pride, anger, impatience, dishonesty,
revelry, etc. Ted became quite apprehensive when Cliff told Ted he could cause offense to a weaker brother and
may cause his brethren to stumble.
"The reason I have so much concern for brother Ted," said Cliff,
"is because of his weak heart. He could have another heart attack out there if he is excited too much. That
makes the recreation dangerous for him, not to mention he may be injured by a stray ball."
Cliff assured Ted that he would receive a great blessing and his anxiety
about causing offense would surely leave when he submits to church counsel. He also reminded Ted that submission
involves obeying the authority even when one does not agree.
The Group spent several minutes discussing various mandates to consider
since other members have been known to participate in diverse sports activities. They were very receptive to Cliff's
concern since all regard him the No.1 outdoors teacher and one of the most skilled and responsible hunters there
is. He leads by example and was dubbed "team captain" by the hunting party years ago.
"We sincerely sought revelation on how to deal with this situation
and could feel the unity of spirit-led deliberations among us as we stood around this magnificent beast in a quiet
moment of reflection," said highly respected bishopric Romp Stomper. "An array of emotions struck me,
including honor and joy mixed with a sense of humility for being able to share in the conquest of the creature."
"What came to light in those few minutes was more than many ever realize
in a lifetime of outdoor activities," continued Romp. "The buck was radiating the perfection of order,
the beams were thick, the rack was flawless, each tine was an identical match to the corresponding one on the opposite
beam. Even the brow tines were proper. I could not stop thinking about proper order. I imagined him running, walking,
rutting and feeding. I thought of the great significance of his role in nature and the overwhelming significance
of mine. Shooting the buck was not about vanity or self-importance. We were demonstrating our roles in the natural
order of creation.At that moment I felt the significance of our role just as strongly as I did when I first became
bishopric. I was overwhelmed to share in this euphoric activity with my fellow bishops. To be reminded of our distinction
in nature and it's similitude to the spiritual care of our own little lambs and sheep just bring a tear to my eye."Although
brother Romp was a spectator and not a participant in the hunting expedition all were grateful to have him with
the team because of his depth of insight since this topic came up.
Bishopric Romp Stomper will also be going along with the team as they plan to consider these things further
during a long planned and very anticipated fishing trip next month in brother Bill Overdue's new boat.
Also read: A
Race for Salvation
New member now cleansed from former unclean baptism
Dunkumagain, Kansas--In a blessed baptismal ceremony on Sunday new member Gabe Freshwater was rebaptized
according to local custom and now allowed full membership privileges in the fellowship of saints. Gabe said, "I
was baptized two years ago after undergoing a tremendous spiritual conversion and have been walking with Christ
ever since." Gabe was rebaptized by bishop brother Aaron Dipper.
Said Dipper, "Gabe is happier than ever that he has undergone an additional
baptism into our blessed fold."
During the afternoon service Dipper, wielding his whet tongue like a sword,
magnificently communed and encouraged the congregation with smooth speeches supporting the custom.
He also justified the tradition saying, "In many Christian churches
confession and baptism are somewhat different than in our faith. We confess to Man and God and have a proving before
we are taken into the body of believers. We feel that it is beneficial to the faith if someone, even if they have
already been baptized, comes in and the body has no testimony of a proper conversion experience."
Witnesses at Gabe's re-baptism
|
When interviewed just after Gabe was rebaptized local deacon Hal Hipikritte
said, "Rebaptism for me would be a display of open shame, rather than a testimony, to the work of Christ.
As it was, I came from the sister church and was only asked to give my testimony. If they requested that I submit
to another baptism I would have surely refused. Even our founder, Samuel Frohlich, refused to be rebaptized by
immersion although he was only baptized by sprinkling. He knew the scripture, one Lord, one faith, one baptism
and he knew he had just one true and one sincere conversion. I knew if Gabe submitted to another baptism it would
prove we did the right thing, since no one would allow himself to be rebaptized if he truly underwent a proper
conversion the first time. I am honored to be a part of his initiation into our blessed faith."
A nearby Bishop upon hearing Hal offered corresponding words, "We have
come across the situation numerous times. We have seen those brought into the faith with and without baptism. Those
not from the sister church always lacked some crucial thing in their conversion process, whether it be open confession,
laying on of hands, etc. When a person joins from the sister church it is known that their tradition is the same,
and not baptized again. When someone joins from a different denomination, they are given the opportunity to be
baptized in the same way. We have found that without rebaptism the new members tend to feel they are not close
members of the brotherhood of believers."
As the bishop started to leave he turned back and offered these last words,
"Another thing, why would they become part of our fellowship if they have already found salvation? It is obvious
they see our faith as having something theirs did not have."
At first Gabe had some serious second thoughts about submitting to another
baptism but he was convinced and comforted by the adept counsel of the area bishops who have had multitudes of
experience with this kind of situation. Gabe said, "They provided me with a carefully written paper containing
a verse in the bible supporting rebaptism and convinced me with good words and fair speeches." We have provided
the paper, below, given to Gabe and are pleased to share it with you.
SCRIPTURAL REFERENCE SUPPORTING REBAPTISM
I CORINTHIANS 12:13
FOR BY ONE SPIRIT ARE WE ALL BAPTIZED INTO ONE BODY, WHETHER WE BE JEWS OR GENTILES, WHETHER
WE BE BOND OR FREE.
Commentary:
It is the oneness of the same spirit that is the key. By being rebaptized, the soul enters into
the oneness of the same spirit of the body of believers of which it then becomes a part.
Rebaptism is not a renouncement of a valid baptism but a symbolic entry into the particular church
or brotherhood of believers that the soul is to become a part of.
Scriptural precedent for rebaptism is recorded in Acts 19. Those that were rebaptized received
a beautiful blessing. There were likely many who had been baptized by John the Baptist who were not rebaptized
but who nonetheless had the hope of life eternal.
Baptism can be considered as a "writ of entry" such as when the Jews passed through
the Red Sea. It was referred to as a baptism. Hence, when a soul enters a particular body of believers, rebaptism
can be considered as a writ of passage into this body.
When a soul suffers persecution, endures a great affliction or resists a strong temptation it
is sometimes referred to as a 'baptism of fire." These trials may occur several times during a lifetime.
By being rebaptized into a particular body of believers, there is great edification of the entire
body and strong bonding of the new member into the body. It is like a marriage. The rebaptism enjoins the new member
to the body of believers and they become spiritually as one flesh. It is a strong enhancement of being unified
in one mind, one spirit and one body and establishes a bond of love, caring and support within this particular
body of believers.
The fear that rebaptism is an offense to the Lord is felt to be unfounded unless the rebaptism
is into a false body of believers. If the soul is led by faith to believe that the body into which it is to be
joined is a true body of Christ it should be willing to be rebaptized.
|
Sunday School superintendent let's young girl know she is 'full of evil'
Offence, Alabama--We have verified a rumor that several months ago Sunday school superintendent Richard
Rank effectively informed young 12 year old Brandy Bright she is full of evil for asking so many hard questions
during class.
This tension had been occurring for some time until Sister Eunice who teaches
the class eventually informed the superintendent of the problems she was having with Brandy. "Brandy was always
asking difficult questions," said Eunice. "I finally had it when Brandy asked regarding chapter five
in Romans, "Since everyone will go to hell because of Adam's sin this should mean everyone will go to heaven
because Christ died for all." Eunice informed her that she misunderstood the verse and although Christ provided
atonement for man there will still be those who are unrepentant and therefore unsaved.
Brandy then remarked, "But everyone had to take Adam's sin. Nobody
had a choice; everyone has to share. So if Jesus is stronger than Adam shouldn't everyone share in Jesus work too?
Shouldn't everyone share in heaven?" Then Brandy pointed to First Corinthians, chapter fifteen, verse twenty-two
that she said she found in a concordance. She read it to Eunice in front of the class, "For as in Adam all
die, so in Christ all will be made alive." Brandy also noted that she could not find the term "unsaved"
in the concordance that her teacher affirmed was true.
"At this point I told Superintendent Rich what was happening,"
said Eunice. "I expressed to him that I was sore displeased by her words and had to wonder how such evil can
come out of the mouth of a babe, especially since God reveals things only to the wise and prudent." The very
next Sunday Rich sat in Brandy's class and explained to the children that even though Christ had died for men many
will not share in the hope of eternal life because they do not repent and take the gift of salvation. Brandy then
told Rich, "Jesus is stronger than death and God is stronger than the devil. Isn't that true?" Rich said,
"Yes dear Brandy, I agree." Then Brandy said, "Well, God said he wills all men to be saved in First
Timothy, chapter two, verse four. So if people go to hell it will be against God's will, and the devil wins."
Rich then told Brandy to read cautiously because she will not understand
the bible unless it is with the guidance of church counsel and because, "she is unconverted and too young."
Brandy continued reading Timothy and said, "Jesus gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time."
Then she said, "That's what I read. What does 'in due time' mean? Does it mean maybe you don't understand
salvation yet?" Rich firmly told Brandy, "YOU do not understand the process of salvation because YOU
are unrepentant and full of evil and YOU must be converted before YOU can realize the truth of the Gospel."
Brandy then ran out of Sunday school crying, "The Gospel means 'Good News' and you are speaking bad news and
I AM GOING TO BE WITH JESUS!"
Sources report Brandy no longer comes to Sunday school and has not been
seen in church since. Rich was later quoted as saying, "It is better that she is no longer with us because
if she were to continue questioning our well-thought-out and long-held-beliefs it might cause one of these little
ones to stumble. God forbid that to occur."
TOP STORY
Member accused of calling another Christian, 'Brother'
Legalistown, Iowa--The closed member meeting of brother Jon Blundier is set for Friday the 13th. He
is accused of associating with non-members and has been heard referring to them as "Brother". Jon had
attempted to defend his action but the local leadership is determined to make an example of his divisive attitude.
[What have I done?]
Said area bishopric brother Jack Attack, "We would be more lenient
toward Jon but his refusal to submit to our spirit led guidance and authority in this serious matter forces us
to take immediate action in an attempt to quell this inappropriate and offensive designation for non-members before
others can question our practice and be led astray by confusion."
Supporting bishop brother Diligent Search added, "We have a policy
that any non-member, believer or not, is to be referred to as a 'friend of the faith.' Those other believers are
generally not like-minded with us in practice and tend be somewhat nominal in in their walk with the Lord"
Sources relate how this occurred when Jon invited some members to his home
for a singing. After the singing everyone was standing or sitting around enjoying fellowship with some tasty finger
foods Jon's wife prepared during the day. Then one of Jon's friends comes to the door. Jon hugged him, let him
in and they disappeared into the bedroom for a moment. When his friend left Jon was said to say, "I love you
brother."
Brother Joshua Overhear said, "I heard him with my own ears and thought
to myself; is this some brother from another one of our churches I am not familiar with? So I asked Jon who he
was. Jon told me he is was a longtime Christian friend who attends another church. I was stunned to hear him refer
to that guy as a brother so I did not ask any more questions. I did begin to tell others what I heard though."
Brother Jack and a couple other bishops engaged in a concerted effort quietly
visiting with Jon for many months asking him to further explain his actions and to "hear his views."
They went out of their way to visit Jon at his workplace, at his home in the evening, or any time of day and night
most convenient for the bishops.
"During this time we felt it was important to conduct an inquiry into
brother Jon's private life, to search out his action in word, association and deed. We performed visitations with
other members concerning Jon and we tactfully brought his name up during spontaneous visits with friends and family
to see what information could be gathered," said brother Diligent.
Brother Jack commented, "Jon told us he always referred to his friend
as a brother in the Lord and that his friend was instrumental in convincing Jon to repent."
Jon was told in various manners that it is the church's custom not to refer
to another believer as a brother. Jon was reminded that submission to spiritual authority brings a "promise
of liberty" to all who obey. Likewise, Jon was reminded that it was the church's position to teach and encourage
it's membership to avoid any and all associations with other believers. After thinking about these things carefully,
Jon apologetically expressed that while he was sympathetic to the conviction he did not feel he could in good conscience
concur with this "beloved" tradition. [Who
told you to think?]
Jon had hoped to continue in dialogue with the bishops and pleaded with them but the bishops were already convinced
of the next proper step. As one bishop put it, "I think the best thing we can do for brother Jon at this point
is to wholeheartedly pray for him. I will try to remain faithful in that purpose."
Jon's insistence that he could find no valid historical scriptural support
for such a tradition led the bishopric to firmly remind everyone of proper church order in this written statement:
Portion of Response of Bishopric
It is part of the doctrine of our church that final authority among men for interpretation of the Bible rests
with the ordained elder.
It is obvious that there are times when the spirits are not properly discerned as there are numerous examples of
diabolically opposed interpretations of the Word which have been proposed and defended throughout the history of
Christianity.
For the sake of order, there must be spiritual authority upon this earth and we believe this duty is entrusted
to the body of elders. The prayers of a loving and respectful body of believers are extremely important.
The word is very clear about the responsibility of brethren to submit to and obey the spiritual leadership.
The simple key to maintaining the proper scriptural balance in this matter of authority and submission is to have
an abundance of genuine Christ-like love and mutual respect on the part of all who are involved.
We believe and unequivocally testify that the overwhelming majority of the large number of members we know personally
have this kind of love and respect.
The tremendous reserve of appreciation and love for our heritage of faith including the "beloved" traditions
is not based on blind, robotic submission by spiritually immature members of a long established biblically based
church.
We believe the church leadership has a responsibility to establish directives, positions, etc. in certain areas
where there are no specific scriptural commands.
We sincerely plead for your prayers so that when we give an account to the Lord for our stewardship some day for
each of the lambs and sheep entrusted to our loving care we will be found faithful. [in
time you will learn] |
The bishopric also had many other great swelling words and concluded with,
"Jon is in serious error by insinuating these traditions are to be compared with rules based on the rudiments
of the world system referred to in Colossians chapter two. That is a gross misunderstanding and we must quickly
deal with this. Jon, by continuing to engage in the practice of referring to other non-members as brethren is sowing
seeds of discord and division among the brethren."
It is hoped that a firm loving hand of discipline will bring brother Jon
back into good graces with the rest of the fold and that this procedure will produce the fruit of repentance redirecting
his misguided and confused steps in his quest for truth.
Newly installed minister just what congregation ordered.
Nepotism, Minnesota--In a blessed Sunday afternoon ceremony, Sunday school superintendent John Kiester joined
the ranks with several other ministers bearing the same name. Bishopric brother James Kiester, who happens to be
John's father, remarked, "We are fortunate the Lord has provided us with another fine ministering brother
who will uphold our precious faith with all
its doctrines and customs."
Last month, brother Mark Kiester, also a son of the bishopric, was voted to deacon from minister. That change left
a ministerial position vacant. Over a year ago aging bishopric brother Matthew Kiester desired to retire from his
role as bishopric. Visiting bishops sought the congregation's direction in filling the bishopric's role. It was
determined that, "then" deacon brother James Kiester should fill the role of his father as head bishopric.
What followed was a series changes throughout the ranks of the ministry from the top down. Some in the congregation
desired a minister from the Miester or Pfiester families and voted accordingly but the Kiester relations that comprise
about 70% of the 400 member congregation outnumbered them. "There is a long heritage of Kiester ministers
that have proven to be beneficial in maintaining church standards through out the ages," said the retired
bishopric; "I am always careful not to remove an ancient boundary stone."
Just now, several Kiesters are up in arms over the new Sunday school superintendent vacancy. The front running
candidate is Sunday school teacher Eugene Miester, who obtained the position just after marrying John Kiester's
daughter, Kay.
"We are concerned," said John-Mark Kiester, "about maintaining church order and loyalty for support
of the heritage." John-Mark Kiester, the youngest male member of the Kiester clan, and the only serious threat
to Eugene, is very concerned about his families' heritage. He would like to obtain this position, being the true
son of John Kiester. John-Mark has positioned himself well by leading in song worship and the responsibilities
of ushering with his brothers and cousins whenever possible.
After thinking about it for a moment, John Kiester remarked with a smile, "I would be overjoyed to have either
my youngest son John-Mark, or my new son-in-law Eugene, take my former position as Sunday school superintendent
and am convinced the congregation, after careful spirit led prayer, will chose the appropriate candidate."
The contents of this web page are not endorsed by the Apostolic Christian Church of America