Special forces and the
reality of military operations in Afghanistan
By Charles Cutshaw,
Editor of Jane’s World Armies
We have heard a lot about Special Forces since the terrorist attacks on New York
and Washington on September 11, and the media is full of briefings and diagrams
detailing just how the US and UK Special Forces are going to win the ‘War on
Terrorism’.
The brutal truth is that there are nothing like enough Special Forces to do the
job on their own. By their very nature Special Forces come in extremely small
numbers. Real Special Forces soldiers are hard to find. For example, a soldier
in the UK Special Forces generally serves for at least three years before being
considered for the Special Air Service (SAS) selection course. Military sources
say that for every 100 soldiers that volunteer for selection, only about 15 are
accepted for training; of this 15, probably 10 actually complete the training.
These soldiers are different: they have to be intelligent, lateral thinkers,
superbly fit and have the mindset that keeps them going when others would give
up. For all of the credible armies in the world, their small number of Special
Forces soldiers are the ‘ace up their sleeve’. They have to be used
sparingly and only when there is no other option. The loss of Special Forces
soldiers is a disaster for any army. Replacing them quickly is impossible and,
even in the longer term, finding replacements of the right calibre is never
easy.
Even these highly trained Special Forces soldiers are not the supermen of the
Hollywood movies. They can carry out tasks that the normal soldier would find
almost impossible and they remain operational in the field for much longer than
anyone else. However, even they get tired, they wear out during prolonged
operations and above all they have morale just like everyone else. These
soldiers are not Kamikaze pilots. They need to know that they have a high chance
of survival and that the politicians and the generals are mindful of their
concerns. Even the toughest operators in the SAS worry about who will look after
their wives and children if anything should happen to them. To expect Special
Forces to carry out raid after raid against targets in Afghanistan – targets
that are stoutly defended by a well trained and resolute enemy – over an
indefinite period is unrealistic. Within a very short space of time there could
be very little of the Special Forces left.
There is confusion over what constitutes a Special Forces soldier and a real
problem is the way in which different countries classify their Special Forces.
In general terms, real Special Forces include the US Delta Force, Green Berets
and Navy Seals, plus the UK SAS and SBS (Special Boat Service). Other highly
trained soldiers such as the US Rangers and the UK's Royal Marine Commandos do
not really fall into this category, although they do have soldiers who have
special skills and can undertake more difficult and arduous operations than
other soldiers. This is not for one second to downgrade the superb skills and
specialist military operations that some of these formations are capable of.
However, their selection process is different from that of the Special Forces
and in general terms they are organised and equipped for much larger-scale
operations. These types of troops fall into the category of ‘Raiders’, as do
the US 82nd Airborne Division and the UK's 16 Air Assault Brigade.
While the US and the UK have a small number of Special Forces, they have much
larger numbers of Raiders, and it probable that the main effort of the land
campaign in Afghanistan will have to be the responsibility of Raider troops.
Special Forces will undertake the identification and close reconnaissance of
likely targets, and the targets will then be attacked by Raider units –
probably in at least company strength of between 100-150 soldiers. In some
cases, an assault might be made by Raiders in much larger numbers.
However, others are going to have to be involved. At some stage the allies are
going to have to establish some forward operating bases inside Afghanistan;
there is no other credible military option if the allies are serious about
closing with and destroying their enemy. These forward operating bases will have
to be in either Northern Alliance-controlled areas or in inaccessible areas in
the south of the country. Forward operating bases, from which Special Forces and
Raiders may have to operate, will require some serious defences. This will
generate a requirement for conventional light infantry to man the defensive
perimeter and if necessary to provide defence in depth by patrolling out into
the surrounding countryside (possibly out to 10 km).
A long campaign will require considerable manpower. Troops operating in this
environment could tire quickly and units will have to be rotated between
operations and rest. If the Taliban fail to ‘crack’ under the pressure of
the air campaign and the overall campaign continues through the winter and into
next summer, the allies may well need every soldier that they have: Special
Forces, Raiders and light infantry.
It is now almost inevitable that there will be a land campaign, once the weather
improves during the spring of next year. In the meantime, expect a series of
harassing attacks by allied forces against targets in Afghanistan throughout the
winter. Once the fighting starts, what the politicians have described as ‘a
different war’ will almost certainly follow one of the golden rules of
military operations: ‘Always attack in overwhelming strength, since the more
you use, the less you lose.’