JESUS AND NICODEMUS
John 2:23 - 3:21
“Come now, and let us reason
together,”
Says the LORD,
“Though your sins are as
scarlet,
They will be as white as snow;
Though they are red like
crimson,
They will be like wool. (Isaiah
1:18).
It has been observed with some degree of accuracy that
Christians are a strange breed. We talk
about being born again, even though we reject reincarnation. We talk out loud to a Person we cannot
see. We commit our entire future to One
we have never met because of a book we believe He wrote, even though we did not
see Him do it. We say we are followers
of Christ, but sometimes we act like the devil. We claim to be citizens of heaven, but we walk around on earth.
What is a Christian?
From the above description, we would suppose that he is a contradiction
in terms and a walking paradox. Ask
most people the question, “What is a Christian?” and you will be astonished at
the wide variety of answers you receive.
• It
is someone who follows the teachings of Jesus.
• It
is a person who goes to church.
• It
is one who tries to be good.
• It
is someone who has religion or spirituality -- whatever that is.
I know of no better passage in the Bible that defines what
is a Christian than the third chapter of John.
It has been heralded as the chapter of the gospel of God. There have probably been more sermons
preached from this chapter than any other single chapter of the Bible.
What I find fascinating about such an observation is that
this is not one of the great sermons of Jesus.
This is not an oration delivered before thousands. It is not an elaborate coast-to-coast
televangelism production. Instead, it
is a simple conversation between two men.
It is a midnight dialogue. We
could entitle it, “Tabletalks with Jesus.”
I think there is a lesson here. We get to thinking that significant ministry can only be
accomplished when it is done in front of a crowd. Sometimes I think the reverse is true, especially when I look at
Jesus. Certainly there were times when
He preached in front of multitudes.
But, more often, it was these quiet tabletalks that produced the real
and lasting fruit. That is what we
shall see here.
THE MINISTRY IN JERUSALEM
23 Now when He was in Jerusalem at the Passover,
during the feast, many believed in His name, beholding His signs which He was
doing. 24 But Jesus, on His part,
was not entrusting Himself to them, for He knew all men, 25 and because He did not need anyone to bear
witness concerning man for He Himself knew what was in man. (John 2:23-25).
Jesus had come to Jerusalem to celebrate the Passover. It was a festive time; a time of remembrance
and rejoicing. Worshiping Jewish
pilgrims had gathered from all over the world.
The celebration would continue for an entire week. It would begin with the Passover on the 14th
of Nisan and it would continue for the next seven days in the Feast of
Unleavened Bread.
During this time, the news begins to travel throughout
Jerusalem about what this young Galilean rabbi has done in the temple; how he
has taken a whip and driven the temple franchise businesses from the Court of
the Gentiles. Who is this man? Is He a prophet from God? Is He perhaps the promised Messiah? As speculation increases, many of the Jews
flock to meet this stranger from Galilee.
1. The Belief of the People: Now when He was in Jerusalem at the
Passover, during the feast, many believed in His name, beholding His signs
which He was doing (2:23).
There were a large number of people
who initially responded to Jesus in a positive manner. This passage tells us that they believed
in His name. At the same time, we
ought to notice something about their faith.
This belief was not based upon what Jesus had taught. It was, instead, a faith based on the
spectacular miracles that Jesus performed and upon the actions of Jesus in
clearing out the temple.
Do you see the implications of
this? Their faith was based upon the
dramatic and the spectacular. Because
of this, it was a shallow faith. When
the day came that these miracles would no longer be produced before their eyes,
the real test of their faith would be at hand.
Jesus did not need to wait until such a test took place. He already knew the extent of their faith.
2. The Distrust of Jesus: But Jesus, on His part, was not
entrusting Himself to them, for He knew all men, 25 and because He did not need anyone to bear witness concerning
man for He Himself knew what was in man. (2:24-25).
Verse 23 says that many of the Jews
believed on Him. The Greek tense that
is used to describe that belief is an aorist tense. It signifies a point in time.
They believed in Him.
In verse 24, there is a change of
tenses. We read that Jesus was not
entrusting Himself to those who had believed.
This is described in the imperfect tense. It describes an ongoing state of affairs.
The People |
Jesus |
They believed in Him (action
takes place in a point in time) |
He was not entrusting Himself to
them (continuing action in the past) |
We would probably have rejoiced to have all of these
new converts. We would have gone about
establishing new churches and launching a membership drive. Jesus did not do any of that.
The People |
Jesus |
They saw the miracles |
He did the miracles |
They did not fully realize who
Jesus was |
He knew what was in man |
They believed in His name |
He did not entrust Himself to
them |
They needed someone to bear
witness of the truth |
He did not need anyone to bear
witness concerning man |
Jesus knew the strength of their
faith. They were looking for the
spectacular. They fed on the
dramatic. They were interested in the temporary
and the temporal. And yet, there was an
exception. There was a man who was
different. His name was Nicodemus.
NICODEMUS COMES TO JESUS
Now
there was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews; 2 this man came to Him by night, and said to
Him, “Rabbi, we know that You have come from God as a teacher; for no one can
do these signs that You do unless God is with him.” (John 3:1-2).
Most people treat the chapter divisions found in our English
Bibles as though they were inspired by God and a part of the original
text. In reality, they were not added
until many hundreds of years later. I
am not opposed to having these chapter and verse divisions. Their presence makes it much more convenient
to refer to a specific passage. But we
should not make the mistake of thinking that, just because there is a chapter
division present, we should regard the text on either side of that chapter
division as being separate. Our passage
here in John is an example of such a case.
1. A Man in Contrast: Now there was a man... (3:1).
The Greek text does not begin with
the word “now.” Instead, it uses the
Greek conjunction de (The phrase
reads: Hn
de anqrwpoV). We ought to
translated it, “BUT there was a man...”
This points to a contrast with the previous verses.
The Jews |
Nicodemus |
They had a measure of faith |
He had a measure of faith |
They came in crowds to see Jesus |
He came by night to see Jesus |
Jesus did not entrust Himself to them |
Jesus did entrust Himself to him |
Do you see the contrast? Jesus knew all about men. He knew what was in their hearts. He knew that they were not to be
trusted. But there was a man who was
different. This was a man who could be
trusted.
2. A Man in Religion: Now there was a man of the Pharisees,
named Nicodemus (3:1).
The name Nicodemus was common among
Hellenistic Jews and Greeks. Nicodemus
was a Pharisee. The Pharisees were a
select denomination. Literally, the
name meant “separated ones.” Unlike
many Jews of that era, the Pharisees chose to remain separate from Greek
philosophy and Greek culture. They did
this by holding fast to all of the Jewish traditions. They held, not only to the written Law of Moses, but also to the
oral traditions that had grown up around Judaism. This man had a Greek name,
but he had chosen to follow a Jewish lifestyle.
The Pharisees were the evangelicals of orthodox
Judaism. They held to the authority of
the Scriptures. They believed in the
supernatural, in angels and in a life after death. We can best understand them when we see them in contrast to the
Sadducees.
Pharisees |
Sadducees |
Name means “separated ones” |
Name means “righteous ones” |
Held to the authority of all of the Old Testament
Scriptures as well as of the oral law |
Viewed the Torah as having greater authority |
Believed in miracles, angels & immortality |
Rejected the miraculous, angels & immortality |
Held to a future resurrection |
Denied any resurrection |
Popular in the synagogues |
Ruled the Temple |
It is interesting to note that
Jesus almost never disagreed with the doctrinal stance of the Pharisees.
Then
Jesus spoke to the multitudes and to His disciples, 2 saying, "The scribes and the Pharisees
have seated themselves in the chair of Moses; 3 therefore all that they tell you, do and observe, but do not do
according to their deeds; for they say things, and do not do them. (Matthew
23:1-3).
Do you see what Jesus says? He says that the Pharisees have the correct
teaching; you are to do and observe all they tell you. It is not their teaching that was in error. It was their manner of life that was in
error. Their problem was not one of poor
doctrine. Their problem was that there
was no lifestyle to back up their doctrine.
There is a principle here. It is that you can have the most correct
doctrine in the world, you can hold to all five points of Calvinism and even
add an extra one for good measure, but if your life is not different, then it
is absolutely useless.
3. A Man in Authority: Now there was a man of the Pharisees,
named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews (3:1).
Nicodemus held a position of
authority. His name means “victor over
the crowd” and he was indeed a ruler of the Jews. It is likely both from this passage as well as from later
references in the Gospel of John that he was a member of the Sanhedrin, the
supreme court of Israel.[1] There were seventy members of this
distinguished body. To be a member was
considered to be one of the highest honors in the land. Nicodemus was a judge in the highest court
of Israel.
Nicodemus is only mentioned by name within the Gospel of John (3:1-21; 7:50-52; 19:39). These passages give us the progression of a man who began as a searcher and then a follower and finally a disciple.
4. A Man by
Night: This man came to Him by night
(3:1).
A lot has been made of the fact
that Nicodemus came to Jesus during the night.
Some commentaries have suggested that this was because he was afraid or
ashamed to be seen with Jesus in the daytime.
I do not think this to be the case.
Later on, Nicodemus will not be afraid to speak out in defense of Jesus
(John 7:50-52). There are many other
reason he might have had for coming by night.
Perhaps he was too busy in the daytime.
Or maybe he wanted to talk to Jesus at a time when there would be no
interruptions.
We can imagine this prominent
Pharisee making his way out of Jerusalem after the evening prayers. He makes his way to the place where Jesus is
staying, whether it is a tent outside the city walls or perhaps with friends in
one of the nearby villages.
5. A Man of Respect: This man came to Him by night, and said
to Him, “Rabbi...” (3:2).
The term “Rabbi” is a Hebrew one. It is taken from the Hebrew word rab,
meaning “great one.” Rabbi is more
formal. It means, “My great one.” It was an official term used to describe a
teacher of a high office. An English
equivalent would be “Doctor” or “your Honor.”
It was a title of high respect.
6. A Man Convinced: “Rabbi, we know
that You have come from God as a teacher; for no one can do these signs that
You do unless God is with him” (3:1).
Notice that Nicodemus is speaking
in the plural. He says, “WE know that
you have come from God...” It seems as
though he is representing others who are of his same mind. Perhaps he is even here officially
representing the Sanhedrin.
He begins by affirming that he and
those whom he represents know that Jesus is a teacher from God. The reason they know this is because of the
signs. It is possible that some of the
critics of Jesus had tried to explain away the first few miracles of Jesus.
• “It
was just a case of mass hysteria.”
• “Those
people only imagined they saw a miracle.”
• “That
blind man only thinks he can see.”
As time went on, these critics
faced a problem. Jesus had not limited
himself to only one or two miracles. He
had performed many miracles. As
Nicodemus comes to meet with Him, He is still performing them. He has continued to perform miracle after
miracle until even the most hardened skeptic has been forced to admit there is
a special power here at work.
Nicodemus recognized that there was
a power here and that it was from God.
What he had not yet recognized was his own need.
A NEW BIRTH
3 Jesus answered and said to him, “Truly, truly,
I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”
4 Nicodemus said to Him, “How can a man be born
when he is old? He cannot enter a second time into his mother's womb and be
born, can he?”
5 Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you,
unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of
God. 6 That which is born of the
flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. 7 Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be
born again.’ 8 The wind blows where
it wishes and you hear the sound of it, but do not know where it comes from and
where it is going; so is everyone who is born of the Spirit.” (John 3:3-8)__in
.
Nicodemus had begun this interview by paying a compliment to
Jesus. I want you to notice what Jesus
is going to say and also what He is not going to say. He will not say, “Thank you for calling me a rabbi. That is a very impressive title coming from
one who is as high up the educational ladder as you are.” He will not say, “You have been very
observant if you have already recognized that I have come from God.” He will not say, “You have seen some of my
miracles? Tell me, which one impressed
you the most?”
Instead of talking about any of the things Jesus had just
mentioned, He changes the subject. He
does not beat around the bush. He does
not talk about the weather or about Nicodemus’ career or his church life or any
other side issues. He comes right to
the point.
1. A Vital Emphasis: Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to
you (3:3).
The Greek reads, “Amhn, amhn, legoi soi.” The word is amhn
a transliteration from the Hebrew. It
has the same connotation of the English word “truly.” The fact that it is used twice is meant to emphasize the truth of
what is about to be spoken. It is as if
Jesus is saying, “Don’t miss this, Nicodemus!”
2. A Special Birth: “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one
is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” (3:3).
The Greek text of this verse can be understood in
one of two ways. It is an example of a
homonym. There is a word here that has
two possible meanings. Usually, you can
tell a homonym from the context, but in this case, either meaning makes
sense. The phrase “born again” can mean
one of two things:
• Born
again.
• Born
from above.
Which meaning is intended here? Is Jesus speaking of being born again or is
He speaking of being born from above. I
am not certain. Either one is
doctrinally accurate. Either one fits
the context of this verse.
Born Again |
Born from Above |
The reply of Nicoodemus indicates that he assumes Jesus is
speaking of a second birth |
In verse 31, Jesus speaks of how He who comes from ABOVE
is ABOVE all. |
Focuses upon the contrast with the physical birth. |
Focuses upon the divine origin of our spiritual life. |
3. A Kingdom Need: “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one
is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” (3:3).
Something that is often missed when
people read this passage is its kingdom emphasis. This is a subject that would have been relevant to
Nicodemus. He knew all about the
kingdom. He was a ruler of the Jews
and, as such, he would have been well acquainted with the Jewish
Scriptures. He was familiar with all of
the prophecies regarding the kingdom.
He knew that the kingdom would come at a time when the Messiah was
revealed and that He would begin His kingdom in Jerusalem and that it would
extend to the whole world.
John the Baptist had come on the
scene, announcing that the kingdom was at hand and that it was about to be
manifested. He had urged people to repent
and to be baptized, bringing forth a changed life as evidence of that
repentance as they made themselves ready to meet their King.
Now Jesus is saying something
new. He is saying that it is not enough
to repent. It is not enough to be
outwardly prepared. It is not enough to
be baptized by John. Something else is
needed. That something is a different
sort of birth. A new birth. A birth from above.
4. A Natural Misunderstanding: Nicodemus said to Him, “How can a man be
born when he is old? He cannot enter a second time into his mother's womb and
be born, can he?” (3:4).
Nicodemus misses the point
entirely. He does not realize that
Jesus is speaking of a spiritual birth.
He thinks only in physical terms.
He interprets the words of Jesus with a rigid literalism.
There are a lot of people who do
the same thing today. They look at the
prophecies of the Bible and they see tanks and helicopters and nuclear missles
and credit cards. By trying to gind
physical and overly literal fulfillments, they miss the spiritual truhs that
are so plainly taught.
5. A Twofold Requirement: “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one
is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God (3:5).
There have been a number of
suggested interpretations to this verse.
The question revolves around the identity of the water in verse 5. What does it mean to be “born of water”? Several answers have been put forth.
Water Baptism |
Those who hold to a baptismal
regeneration point to this verse as indicating that one is saved by the
physical act of baptism. The problem
is that the Scriptures are clear elsewhere to say that we are saved by grace
through faith and apart from any outward ritualism such as circumcision or
baptism. |
An alternate view sees the
water, not only in a literal sense, but also and primarily as symbolic for
the cleansing power that is represented in baptism. |
|
Physical Birth |
This view sees Jesus as making a
contrast between the physical birth versus the spiritual birth and identifies
being “born of water” as a reference to the physical birth. One obvious weakness of this view is that
there is no precedence (either Jewish or otherwise) for identifying physical
birth with water. Over against this
argument is Isaiah 48:1 that speaks of Israel coming from the waters of Judah
(the KJV follows the literal Hebrew text). |
The Word of God |
This view looks to passages such
as Ephesians 5:26 (cleansed by the washing of water with the word) and 1
Peter 1:23 (you have been born again... by the word of God) and sees this
water as a reference to the Scriptures. |
The Holy Spirit |
This view translates the word
“and” (kai) as “even” to say that one is born of water, even the
Spirit. This view has the advantage
of an Old Testament connection that would have been understandable to
Nicodemus (Ezekiel 36:25-27 speaks of how God would sprinkle clean water and
give a new heart and a new spirit to His people). |
a. Water Baptism: This view is held by the
Roman Catholic Church.
• The
reference to water is taken literally.
• There
are other passages that also link the ideas of baptism with salvation (Romans
6:3; 1 Peter 3:21; Mark 16:16; Acts 2:38; 22:16).
• This would fit the
context in that John the Baptist had already been mentioned in the previous
chapter.
• This
passage need not be understood as baptismal regeneration in that the reference
to water batism can be seen as that which represents the cleansing purification
of salvation. Thus it is not the act of
baptizing that saves, but rather the purifying salvation that the water
represents.
• There
are some who see this specifically as a reference to the ministry of John the
Bapstist and thus see the water representing the repentance that John said was
necessary to partake of his baptism (this view was held by A.T. Robertson,
Tenney and G. Campbell Morgan).
b. Physical Birth.
There is a clear contrast in the passage between
“flesh” versus “spirit” This is seen as a parallel to the mention of “water”
and “spirit.”
First Birth |
Second Birth |
Born initially |
Born again |
This birth is taken for granted |
This birth is necessary for entrance into the kingdom |
Born of water |
Born of the Spirit |
That which is flesh is flesh |
That which is Spirit is Spirit |
This view sees this same contrast as being carrried
over into verses 5 and 6 as Jesus further develops the same theme.
Verse 5 |
Verse 6 |
Water |
Flesh |
Spirit |
Spirit |
The problem with such a view is
that the Bible never elsewhere describes physical birth in terms of being “born
of water” and it is wondered whether Jesus would introduce such a misleading
description.
c. The Word of God: This view has been
held by such diverse peoples as Unger, Walvrood and the Jehovah’s Witnesses.
• It
is claimed that the phrase “I say unto thee” can point to the words of Christ
being the method by which a person comes to the new birth. The problem is that this phrasing is
regularly found in the teachings of Jesus.
• Other
Scriptures refer to the Word of God in terms of water (Ephesians 5:26; 1 Peter
1:23).
• Water
was used in Rabbinic literature as a symbol of the Torah.
• The
problem is that there is nothing in THIS passage that would indicate such a
connection.
d. The Holy Spirit (held by Calvin, Zayne
Hodges and Wuest).
• One
preposition governs the two nouns “water” and “spirit.” The passage literally says that a person
must be “born of water and spirit.”
This could indicate that the two are one and the same.
• The
Greek term translated “and” (kai) can
carry the force of “even.” We would
thus say that you must be born of water, even of the Spirit.
• Water
is used as a symbol of the Holy Spirit elsewhere in the gospel of John (4:14;
7:38-39).
• The
Old Testament spoke of how God would sprinkle clean water on His people and
given them His Spirit (Ezekiel 36:25-28).
This same link is seen in Isaiah 44:3 where God says: I will pour out water on the thirsty land
And streams on the dry ground; I will pour out My Spirit on your offspring.
Which of these views is
correct? They all have some good points
to suggest, though there is an obvious problem with that view calling for
baptismal regeneration. With that
exception, I believe that they all have a valid point insofar as they all point
one way or another to the purifying work of God as promised in the Old
Testament.
I personally believe that the
reference of being born of water points to the saving act of purification that
comes to us via the cross and which was represented by the water of John’s
baptism and which today is brought to us through the Scriptures and applied to
us by the Holy Spirit, resulting in the new birth.
6. A Spiritual Contrast: That which is born of the flesh is flesh,
and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit (3:6).
Nicodemus has made the mistake of
confusing that which is flesh with that which is spiritual by nature. These two are not to be confused. Accordingly, Jesus continues to explain the
contrast between the physical birth of which Nicodemus has spoken and the new
birth that is of the Spirit. In effect,
He says that each gives birth after its own kind. This is not a new concept to Nicodemus. The first chapter of Genesis repeats again and again how things
are created to produce after their own kind.
And
the earth brought forth vegetation, plants yielding seed AFTER THEIR KIND, and trees bearing fruit,
with seed in them, AFTER THEIR KIND; and God saw that it was good. (Genesis
1:12).
And
God created the great sea monsters, and every living creature that moves, with
which the waters swarmed AFTER THEIR KIND, and every winged bird after its
kind; and God saw that it was good. (Genesis 1:21).
And
God made the beasts of the earth AFTER THEIR KIND, and the cattle AFTER THEIR
KIND, and everything that creeps on the ground AFTER ITS KIND; and God saw that
it was good. (Genesis 1:25).
Even when it came time for Adam and
Eve to bear children, we read that this same principle continued to be in
effect.
When
Adam had lived one hundred and thirty years, he became the father of a son in
his own likeness, according to his image, and named him Seth. (Genesis 5:3).
Adam and Eve were created in the
image of God. They were designed to be
like God. That does not mean God has
two arms and two legs or that He is merely a glorified man. It does mean that man has been created to be
God’s representative on planet earth and that he has been invested with a
stewardship over the planet. Man has
been given to assume the role of rulership over the world. There is a sense in which he stands in the
role of being God to the world.
Furthermore, God is described in
the Bible as having personality, emotions, intellect and will. The fact that we share in those might
reflect other ways and means in which we are also in the image of God. That pattern was distorted when Adam
sinned. Sin affected every part of his
life. His personality became
self-centered. His emotions became
subject to sin. His intellect became
clouded. His will fell under the
bondage of the flesh.
This same distortion of God’s image
has been passed on to Adam’s descendants.
Adam’s children were not make in the image and likeness of God. They were born in Adam’s own image and
likeness. They were polluted by the
effects of sin in the same way that Adam reflected this polluted image. His descendants gave rise to a fallen race.
God is the Perfect Image |
® |
Adam made in God’s Image |
® |
Adam sinned |
® |
Adam’s children born in his sinful image |
It took the work of a second Adam
to restore us to the image and likeness of God. Just as the condemnation had come upon all the world through the
sin of a single man, so also through the obedience of a single man has come
salvation to all.
45 So also it is written, "The first man,
Adam, became a living soul." The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. 46 However, the spiritual is not first, but the
natural; then the spiritual.
47 The first man is from the earth, earthy; the
second man is from heaven. 48 As is
the earthy, so also are those who are earthy; and as is the heavenly, so also
are those who are heavenly. 49 And
just as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of
the heavenly. (1 Corinthians 15:45-49).
The first Adam was given life and
became a living soul. The last Adam
gave life to the world by laying down His own life. The first Adam sinned by eating of the fruit of the tree. The last Adam obeyed by dying upon the
tree. The first Adam brought
condemnation and death to all who bore his image and likeness. The last Adam brings justification and life
to all who enter into union with Him.
It is through Jesus Christ that man
is able to return to the place of a true and even better pattern of the image
of God.
7. A Mysterious Example: The wind blows where it wishes and you
hear the sound of it, but do not know where it comes from and where it is
going; so is everyone who is born of the Spirit” (3:8).
Jesus brings out an illustration of
the new birth. The reason for this
illustration is because Nicodemus is having problems understanding that which
he has never seen or experienced.
Jesus uses the example of the
wind. It is not only a fitting example,
but it is also a play on words as the term for “wind” and the term for “spirit”
are identical in both Greek and Hebrew.
The Greek word is pneuma.
Why does Jesus use this play on
words? I think it is because He wants
to make a comparison. He wants to paint
a picture of the work of the Spirit and He does this by picturing the work of
the wind.
Try to look at the wind. You cannot see it. You do not know from where it comes. You do not know where it is going. But you believe it is there.
Why? Because you see how it affects the physical world around
you. You see the leaves swirl. You see sailboats move across a churning sea. You see these evidences of the wind and they
convince you that the wind is at work.
That is what the new birth is
like. You cannot see it. You do not know from where it comes. But you can believe it is there when you see
how it affects those who have partaken of it.
I have had the opportunity to pilot
both a motorboat as well as a sailboat.
Piloting a motorboat is easy.
You just start the motor and point the boat in the direction you wish to
go and you go there. A sailboat is
different. It does not carry its own
power. It relies on the wind. When the wind blows, the sailboat goes. If the wind does not blow, the sailboat does
not move. The pilot’s task is not to
generate more wind; it is only to do what is necessary to catch the wind and to
be moved by the wind.
The spiritual life is like
that. We cannot turn it on and
off. But we can allow ourselves to be
moved by the Spirit when it does blow.
Moses could not produce a burning bush, but when he was
confronted by that manifested presence of God, he was able to allow it to
change him. How about you? Has the Spirit of God been at work in your
life? Are you different today because
of the blowing of God’s Spirit in your life?
If it is not, then don’t try to fake it. You will be like the little boy who spreads his sails and then
blows to make the sound of wind. Don’t
settle for cheap sound effects. Spread
the sails of your faith and then look for the Lord to move you with His Spirit.
THE EVIDENCE OF A WITNESS
9 Nicodemus answered and said to Him, "How
can these things be?" 10 Jesus
answered and said to him, "Are you the teacher of Israel, and do not
understand these things? 11 Truly,
truly, I say to you, we speak that which we know, and bear witness of that
which we have seen; and you do not receive our witness. 12 If I told you earthly things and you do not
believe, how shall you believe if I tell you heavenly things? 13 And no one has ascended into heaven, but He
who descended from heaven, even the Son of Man. (John 3:9-13).
At this point, Nicodemus was both confused and a bit
exasperated. Instead of finding
clarity, he has found more unanswered questions. I can picture him scratching his head and thinking to himself, “I
never got any of this in seminary!”
At the same time, there is a wonderful attitude that I see
at work in Nicodemus. In spite of a
lack of understanding, he does not evidence any rejection of the truths Jesus
is sharing. He only notes that they are
beyond his understanding. This is often
the first step to growth.
Can you identify with Nicodemus? Maybe you have heard of the new birth that comes through faith in
Christ and it sounds good and you wish that you could partake of it, but it all
sounds too complicated. After all, you
are not a theologian or a scholar. You
don’t have a degree in theology. How
can you possibly understand?
There is good news for you.
God is ready to meet you where you are as long as you are willing to be
guided to where He is. God will accept
you the way you are, but He will not leave you there. He will bring you to the place where He wants you to be.
1. The Teacher is Questioned: Nicodemus answered and said to Him,
"How can these things be?" (3:9).
Notice the use of the definite
article with the word “teacher.”
Nicodemus is not merely one of many teachers. He is known as THE teacher.
He must have been considered to be one of the highest teachers in the
land.
Jesus asks him, in effect, “Do you
mean to tell me that you have a PhD in theology and you do not know what I am
talking about?” -- "Are you the
teacher of Israel, and do not understand these things (3:10).
There
is a lesson here. Just because a man
has a degree in theology does not mean he has an “in” with the Lord. When Jesus was choosing men to be His
disciples, He did not go down to the local Bible college or seminary and pick
the twelve students with the highest grade point average. Nicodemus had all of the highest degrees
from the top universities, but for all of his learning, he was a spiritual
baby.
2. The Witness is Given: Truly, truly, I say to you, we speak that
which we know, and bear witness of that which we have seen (3:11).
Notice that Jesus is speaking in
the plural. He does not say, “I speak
that which I know.” Instead, He phrases
His statement in the plural. He says, WE
speak that which WE know, and bear witness of that which WE have seen.
Of whom is Jesus speaking? Who is meant by this “WE?” One possibility is that Jesus is referring
to Himself and to the other members of the Godhead. While this might be doctrinally correct, it does not really seem
to match to context of this discussion with Nicodemus.
I want to suggest that Jesus is
referring to Himself and John the Baptist.
It has been Jesus and John who have been witnessing to the nation of
Israel. Their preaching has gone far
beyong the theoretical. Their message
is one they have experienced.
There is a sense in which we are
included in this group. When we share
the gospel with a friend or co-worker, we are sharing that which we have
experienced. Our witness is like that
of a beggar telling another beggar where to find bread.
4. The Witness is Rejected: We speak
that which we know, and bear witness of that which we have seen; and you do not
receive our witness (3:11).
Once again, the pronoun is
plural. This is not very clear in our
English translation, but it comes across clearly in the Greek text. We could translate it to say:
All of you do not
receive our witness.
Jesus is speaking to Nicodemus as
the representative of the Jewish leaders.
Even at this early stage of His ministry, the Jewish leaders had begun
to reject Jesus as well as John the Baptist.
5. The Earthly is Disbelieved: If I told you earthly things and you do
not believe, how shall you believe if I tell you heavenly things? (3:12).
Everything that Jesus has told
Nicodemus up to this point falls under the heading of “earthly things” -- that
is, things that take place upon the earth.
The new birth is that which takes place on the earth and which deals
with people living upon the earth.
On the other hand, there is a whole
realm about which Nicodemus has yet to hear.
It is the realm of the heavenly things.
It is not until you believe the first that you can partake of the
second.
6. The Heavenly is Described: And no one has ascended into heaven, but
He who descended from heaven, even the Son of Man. (3:13).
Jesus has told Nicodemus earthly
things and has been met with astounded unbelief. He would like to go on to tell him of heavenly things. Perhaps Nicodemus wonders how Jesus could
tell him of heavenly things. The answer
is given here.
It is because Jesus has been
there. He is an eye witness. He is the only eye witness. No one else can authoritatively tell
Nicodemus what heaven is like. Only
Jesus can do that.
Nicodemus has expressed doubt when
he asked the question, “How can these things be?” He has indicated doubt as to the truthfulness of the teachings of
Jesus about the new birth. How can
Jesus know of such things? Jesus has
responded with the evidence of an eye witness.
But there is something more.
Jesus is more than just a witness from heaven. He has come on a mission of much greater importance than to only
be a witness. That mission is now
revealed.
WHY JESUS CAME
And
as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man
be lifted up; 15 that whoever
believes may in Him have eternal life. (John 3:14-15).
Up to now, Nicodemus has been confused. Now Jesus says
something that he can begin to understand.
He gives an illustration from the Old Testament. He refers to a familiar incident that had
taken place over a thousand years earlier.
It is an incident that goes back to the birth of the nation
of Israel; back to the days of its exodus from Egypt. Moses had led the Israelites out of their bondage in Egypt. The multitude had been traveling slowly
through the Sinai desert. During this
time, God provided for their food and water in a miraculous way. He brought forth a stream of water in the
desert to quench their thirst. Each day
He brought forth manna on the ground to satisfy their hunger.
In time, the people began to murmer and complain. They grew tired of the monotonous taste of
the manna and they grumbled against the Lord.
In His anger, He sent forth “fiery serpents” among the people.
5 And the people spoke against God and Moses,
"Why have you brought us up out of Egypt to die in the wilderness? For
there is no food and no water, and we loathe this miserable food."
6 And the LORD sent fiery serpents among the
people and they bit the people, so that many people of Israel died.
7 So the people came to Moses and said, "We
have sinned, because we have spoken against the LORD and you; intercede with
the LORD, that He may remove the serpents from us." And Moses interceded
for the people.
8 Then the LORD said to Moses, "Make a
fiery serpent, and set it on a standard; and it shall come about, that everyone
who is bitten, when he looks at it, he shall live." 9 And Moses made a bronze serpent and set it on
the standard; and it came about, that if a serpent bit any man, when he looked
to the bronze serpent, he lived. (Numbers 21:5-9).
Can you imagine what it would have been like to be in the
camp of the Israelites, suffering from deadly snakebite and feeling the poison
beginning to work its way through your nervous system? Suddenly, someone runs by your tent.
“Moses has told us that the Lord has provided a way of
treatment.”
“What must I do?”
“You have to go out into the middle of the camp and look at
the bronze image that sits on the pole.”
“An image! What does
the image represent?”
“It is the image of a bronze snake/”
“Oh, no! Not
another snake!”
I cannot help but to wonder how many within the camp of
Israel died that day because they refused to go out and to look at that image
that had been lifted up on their behalf.
Nicodemus was familiar with this story. Jesus does not have to go into further
detail. What he does now is to draw a
point of comparison between the story and Himself.
The Serpent |
Jesus Christ |
The people of Israel had spoken against God and Moses. |
All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. |
God sent fiery serpents that bit the people. |
Sin threatens to bring on the judgment of God. |
Many people died from having been bitten. |
The wages of sin is death. |
A bronze serpent in the likeness of those that had bitten
the people was prepared by Moses. |
A body was prepared for Jesus in the likeness of sinful
flesh, yet without sin. |
The serpent was lifted on a standard. |
Jesus was lifted up on the cross. |
Anyone who had been bitten could look on this bronze
serpent and be healed. |
Anyone may believe in Jesus Christ and receive pardon and
life from God. |
The serpent had been lifted up on the standard so that those
who looked upon it could be healed. In
the same way, Jesus went to the cross and was lifted up so that whoever
believes will have eternal life.
THE LOVE AND THE JUDGMENT
OF GOD
16 For God so loved the world, that He gave His
only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have
eternal life.
17 For God did not send the Son into the world
to judge the world, but that the world should be saved through Him. 18 He who believes in Him is not judged; he who
does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the
name of the only begotten Son of God. (John 3:16-18).
We have just seen that it is necessary for the Son of Man to
be lifted up. This brings us to a
question. What is the source of this
necessity? Why must the Son of Man be
lifted up? Why must Jesus go to the
cross?
The justice of God does not require it. The justice of God only requires that sin be
judged. Every descendant of Adam and
Eve could have been judged and condemned and that would have satisfied the
justice of God. The need for the cross
is seen in the love of God.
1. The Fact of God’s Love: For God so loved the world... (3:16).
This is the first time the Bible
ever says that God loved the world. The
Jews knew that God loved Israel. They
never dreamed that this love would be extended to the Gentiles.
Jesus is saying something new. He is saying that God loved the world. This was a new and a revolutionary teaching.
Notice that God SO loved the
world. He didn’t just love us. He SO loved us that He gave. The measure of God’s love will be seen in
what He gave.
2. The Measure of God’s Love: For God so loved the world, that He gave
His only begotten Son (3:16).
The love of God produced an
effect. The effect of God’s love was
that He gave His Son. Both of these
verbs (“love” and “gave”) are given to us in the aorist active indicative.
• The
aorist tense looks to the point in time when God’s love produced the effect
that He gave His Son.
• The
active voice demonstrates that it was God who actively accomplished this
action.
• The
indicative mood points to the reality of these facts. This is not mere wistful thinking. This really happened in history.
God loved so much that He
gave. The strength of love is seen in
what it does. The strength of a loving
gift is seen in what it cost. The love
of God produced the most precious gift imaginable.
3. The Uniqueness of God’s Gift: His only begotten Son (3:16).
The gift God gave to the world was
unique. It was His “only-born”
Son. This title emphasizes two aspects
of the person of Jesus.
• It
emphasizes the unique birth of Jesus.
His birth was totally different from any other birth in history. He was born of a virgin and without sin.
• It
emphasizes the unique position of Jesus.
He is the Son of God in a way in which no other man or angel can ever
claim. He is unique and one of a kind.
4. The Simplicity of Acceptance: That whoever believes in Him should not
perish, but have eternal life (3:16).
The word “that” introduces a
purpose clause. This phrase will tell
us the purpose of God in giving His Son.
He gave His Son so that something might take place. This gives us an insight into the purpose
and plan of God. God’s plan is that
salvation is to be a free gift to all who will believe in His Son.
Faith is the key that unlocks the
door to God’s salvation. This does not
mean that faith is the cause of your salvation. Rather it is the instrument through which you receive that
salvation.
For example, when I take a fork and
feed myself, I do not say that the fork has satisfied my hunger. It is merely the instrument by which that
which did satisfy my hunger was brought into effect.
The distinction is an important
one. Faith cannot save you. You can have a tremendous amount of faith,
but it will not in itself do you a bit of good. Only faith in a worthy object will help you.
I am a fire fighter by career. In that profession, I have often depended
upon certain types of equipment. I have
had the opportunity to hang suspended from a rope, 25 stories about stone
pavement. My life depended upon the
proper function of that equipment and I put my faith and my trust in that equipment. If a certain portion of that equipment had
failed, then my faith in that equipment would have killed me.
Here is the principle. Faith in an unworthy object is as bad as no
faith at all. The strength of my faith
is only as valuable as the worthiness in which it is placed.
5. The Result of Faith: Whoever
believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life (3:16).
The result of faith is brought out,
first as a negative and then as a positive.
The negative deals with death while the positive deals with life.
Should not perish but Should have eternal life |
The contrast between perishing
versus having eternal life is made even stronger when we look at the Greek text
from which this is translated.
• The
phrase “should not perish” is an aorist middle subjunctive. The aorist tense looks to a point in time
where this destruction takes place. The
use of the subjunctive mood indicates that the outcome is uncertain. It depends upon whether or not the person in
question believes.
• The
second phrase, “should have eternal life” is a present subjunctive. The present tense sees the believer as
having eternal life right now, in contrast to those who do not believe and who
look to a time in the future when they enter into destruction.
Do you see the point? A Christian does not merely look to the
future for eternal life. He has eternal
life RIGHT NOW.
6. The Purpose of God’s Coming: For God did not send the Son into the
world to judge the world, but that the world should be saved through Him
(3:17).
This was completely opposed to
Jewish thinking. The Jews believed that
the Messiah would be sent for the express purpose of judging the world.
It is true that Jesus will judge
the world, but that was not His primary purpose in coming to the world. He did not come to destroy, but to save from
destruction.
My career as a fire fighter has
been a career of saving people. To be
fair, there is a certain amount of destruction that I have wrought in bringing
about such salvation. There are times
when I have taken doors off hinges and when I have broken windows and cut holes
in buildings. It was not destruction
for the sake of destruction. It was a
destruction that was designed to stop the spread of fire. The coming of Jesus was like that. He came to save the world.
7. The Escape from God’s Judgment: He who believes in Him is not judged (3:18).
Up to this point, we have only
emphasized the plan and purpose of God in saving mankind. But now, the emphasis shifts to mankind and
his reaction in either accepting or rejecting Jesus.
There is a contrast introduced
here. It is a contrast that we shall
continue to see throughout the rest of this chapter. It is a contrast between those who believe and those who do not
believe.
The One who Believes |
The One who does not Believe |
He is not judged. |
He has been judged already. |
He has believed in God’s only-born Son. |
He has rejected the unique Son of God. |
The one who believes is not judged. Notice the use of the present tense. This one is never judged.
8. The Realization of God’s Judgment: He who does not believe has been judged
already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of
God (3:18).
This time, the tense of the verb changes. It is no longer a present tense. This time, it is a PERFECT tense. The perfect tense describes an action that
took place in the past and which has continuing results. The judgment that is described here took
place in the past and its results continue forever.
The unbeliever does not have to
wait for some future judgment to find out whether God will find him innocent or
guilty. He has been judged
alreadyd. His condemnation is certain. He only awaits the carrying out of his
sentence.
This brings us to a question. What is the nature of this judgment? In what sense are men judged who have not
believed in the Son? The answer is seen
in the next verse.
THE LIGHT AND THE DARKNESS
19 And this is the judgment, that the light is
come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the light; for
their deeds were evil. 20 For
everyone who does evil hates the light, and does not come to the light, lest
his deeds should be exposed. 21 But
he who practices the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be manifested
as having been wrought in God. (John 3:19-21).
There are two principles at work in the world today. They are at odds with one another. They are opposites.
Light and darkness Life and death Good and evil Faith and unbelief Love and hate |
We know what light is and what it represents. Jesus is the light (John 1:9). God is light and in Him there is no darkness
at all (1 John 1:5). Light is what
allows you to see things as they are.
We know what light is, but what is darkness? Darkness is simply the absence of light.
In verse 16, we were told that God loved the world. Now we are told that men loved darkness
rather than light. When God showed
forth His love to man, instead of returning that love, men turned away to give
their love to that which is at enmity with God. Why did this happen? Why
did men turn away from God? The answer
is given in the next phrase. It is
because their deeds were evil (3:19).
1. An Evil Motivation: Men loved the darkness rather than the
light; for their deeds were evil (3:19).
Why is it that some men turn away
from God and do not want to have anything to do with Him? I used to think that perhaps it was because
they had not heard and they did not understand. I used to think that maybe it was because men had examined the
Christian faith in an analytical manner and had found it to be lacking. Or maybe it was because they had never seen
the evidence that upholds the claims of Christ. I used to share the reasons why we know God exists and why we
know the Bible to be the word of God and why we know we have eternal life in
Christ. I would share those things and
I would wonder that men still did not believe.
That is not why men do not
believe. The real reason is given here
in this verse. It is because their
deeds are evil. It is because men are
in sin and they want to remain in their sin and they will reject anything that
points out the sin in their lives.
Many years ago when we were living
in another dwelling, Paula and I faced a problem not commonly discussed in
polite circles. It wa a problem of
cockroaches. I don’t mean the little
tiny ones. I mean the great, big
palmetto bugs that grow to be several inches long. You could walk into a dark room and turn on the lights and
suddenly you would see one or two of these monsters on the kitchen floor. A soon as the lights came on, they would
run. They hated the light. As long as you left the room in darkness,
they would be comfortable. As soon as
the lights came on, they would scurry away.
They hated the light.
Men are like that. They can be comfortable and somewhat happy
in the midst of their sins. But let the
light of the message of a holy and righteous God come into their presence, and
suddenly there is a strange scurrying.
2. An Evil Hatred of Light: For everyone who does evil hates the
light, and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed (3:20).
Men are not naturally drawn to the
gospel. They are not clamoring to hear
the message we preach. If they are,
then maybe we are preaching the wrong message, for this passage tells us that
it is a message that is naturally hated.
10 ...as it is written, “There is none
righteous, not even one;
11
There is none who understands,
There is none who seeks for God;
12
All have turned aside, together they have become useless;
There is none who does good,
There is not even one.” Romans
3:10-12).
If it is true that no one ever
seeks after God and that all turn away, then how is it that anyone is ever
saved. It is only as a person is
changed on the inside and given a new birth and drawn by the Holy Spirit that
he will come to God. This is why Jesus
introduced this entire section by talking about the ministry of the Spirit and
how the Spirit blows where He wishes.
No
one can come to Me, unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise
him up on the last day. (John 6:44).
It is only when God reaches down
and draws a man to Himself that he will stop hating the light and running from
it. At this point, you might be
thinking to yourself, “Wait a minute, John.
I know people who are not Christians and yet they are nice people. What about them?”
I want to suggest to you that the
reason people are not offended by Christianity when they do not embrace
Christianity is that they do not understand Christianity. When a person is confronted with the claims
of Jesus, he will always have one of two reactions. Either he will reject Jesus or he will turn to Him in faith.
If he rejects Christ, if he does
not trust in Jesus as His Lord and Savior, then a hardening process will
begin. From this time onward, the more
he is exposed to Christ, the harder will be his resolve in his resolution.
Have you ever noticed that the
world cannot ever agree on anything, except that it agrees it does not like
Jesus? People can be confronted with
all sorts of beliefs and philosophies and not be bothered by them, but if you
speak out on the gospel of Jesus Christ, you will meet a resistance that was
not previously there. The man who said
he did not like to talk about religion was not talking about the new age
movement or about reincarnation or about evolutionary thought. He was talking about Christianity.
3. A Contrasting Character: But he who practices the truth comes to
the light, that his deeds may be manifested as having been wrought in God
(3:21).
This verse concludes with a
contrast between the one who has rejected Christ versus the one who has come to
Him.
Unbeliever |
Believer |
He does evil. |
He practices the truth. |
He hates the light and does not come to that light. |
He comes to the light. |
Does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be
exposed. |
Comes so that his deeds may be manifested as having been
wrought by God. |
He is not judged (3:18). |
He is judged already (3:18). |
Verse 20 describes the
characteristics of the man who has rejected Jesus Christ. The reason he will not come to Christ is
because the light will illuminate the true nature of his life. It will reveal that he is evil.
Verse 21 describes the
characteristics of the believer. He is
not afraid to come to the light because his deeds will not condemn him. On the contrary, it will be demonstrated in
the light that those deeds have been “wrought in God.”
A similar contrast is found in the
opening verses of John’s epistle.
Unbeliever |
Believer
|
If we say that we have fellowship with Him and yet walk
in the darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth (1 John 1:6). |
If we walk in the light as He Himself is in the light,
we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses
us from all sin (1 John 1:7). |
If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving
ourselves, and the truth is not in us (1 John 1:8). |
If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to
forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness (1 John 1:9). |
If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar,
and His word is not in us (1 John 1:10). |
If anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father,
Jesus Christ the righteous (1 John 2:1). |
This brings us to a question. In which group are you?
Have you entered into the light?
Have you come into a place of fellowship with the Father? Have you trusted in Jesus Christ as your
Lord and Savior?
If you have not, then I have some good news for you. It is not too late. You can come to Christ in faith right
now. You can believe in Him, entrusting
yourself to Him. You can enter into
God’s family right now. That is the
good news.
But if you will not do so, then there is no good news for
you. If you will not trust in Christ,
then there remains no other way of salvation.
There remains only the judgment of God.
[1] John 7:50 describes Nicodemus as one of the group known collectively as “the chief priests and Pharisees in a context that indicates this group governed the religious affairs in Jerusalem.