This piece is being written in January - the coldest month of the year in Minnesota. It will consist of a written indictment against the summertime immodest in particularly Minnesota and especially of Twin Cities metro-area girls plus younger and other women.

You might wonder why I am going to express my opinions about this NOW, being that the same women are temporarily bundled up in long-sleeved winter coats and cowboy-type boots! [However, a substantial number of them still either ignorantly or deliberately flaunt their overly-erotic non-chignoned or non-ponytailed LOOSENED long hair (longer than mouth-level) to the general heterosexual-oriented public (whether or not concurrently and partially covered with stocking caps of all designs and colors) almost all of which general public have not asked and do not ask to be so harassed and assaulted with the indecent sight of such lurid and perverted immodesty (violating reasonable and enlightened interpretations of RSV's and NASV's Numbers 5:18 plus Song of Solomon 7:5 and KJV's First Corinthians 11:14-16 in respective associated contexts).

Well, I have a good memory, and slightly-overfed-and-thus-somewhat-overweight elephants don't easily forget. And yes, I did vote for mostly Republicans in the General Election of 2004 because of their Scripture-like platform.

Speaking of George W Bush.....
Ever since our secretively-pre-planning Commander-in-Chief deciding one fine day to shock all of us non-insiders by springing his Saddam-get-outa-your-palace demand with force to questionably dethrone President Hussein and his Baathist government of Iraq, world and notably American media has been seriously focused on the very-modestly-attired islamic-fundamentalist moslem women of not only the Taliban weaker sex of Afghanistan but substantially the less-veiled-but-still-long-robed-and-shawled inferior gender of Iraq who themselves were and are somewhat capable of sporting anti-invader/crusader machine guns and suicide bombs under their Persian summer fashions.

So the U.S.A.'s summertime bikini-clad at public beaches, imposing their lewd looks of naked sleevesless arms, nude shorts-bared legs, and sockless sandeled feet, took it upon themselves (commandeering their own Support-Our-Soldiers invaders) to inflict hometown-based enforcement of their obscene brand of self-righteous vengeance-based persecution consisting of hypocritical licentuous and lascivous pollution against the law-and-order stability of the so-called intolerably-cruel dictator.

But - some object - what about antisemitic Saddam overbroadly calling the Christian Coalition and Moral Majority (along perhaps with Billy Graham) "the Great Satan?" Strange, I myself never did hear Saddam specify authentic Christians alone as such. Had he targeted the Antagonistic Criminal Lawyers Union, Planned Parentlessness, feminist-sexist National Organization Against Women, disgustintly-perverted Homohuman Rites fagoqueers, evolutionists, abortionists, and their ilk.....well....

Of course, there was the foreign oil Saddam was PERHAPS planning on strong-arming OPEC to deprive us of. After all, the man did invade Kuwait and humiliated Bush Senior. But THAT was cause enough for Bush Junior to get on his own retaliatory high horse? God knows how much environment-worshipping demoncrats prevented and prevent us from becoming non-dependant upon the antisemitic arab-oil cartel. But don't get me wrong: I'm all for the creation, mass assembly, tax credits, advertisement, and deployment of civilian electric cars and trucks.....though I don't know if the gas-pump-price-raising service stations will go for it.

Rather than even STARTING to mindlessly and subversively rant, blather, and yak on like childishly-silly demented TRIPE-UNE editorialists, let's cut to the chase:

For WHAT CAUSES do american gals mis-exhibit themselves (especially during warm summer days) like whoring perverts with their despicable sleeveslessness, slackslessness and sockslessness?

They claim that:

(1) it is hot out and that gives them the privilege and constitutional right to not die of light-white-cotton/air-conditioned heatstroke, get and show off tan, and thus immodestly shove their partial nudity into the non-soliciting faces of hapless victims who are rather incapable of avoiding it, and/or
(2) to advertise themselves for sex to the general public in the hope that one? particular guy [and "screw" all others!] who they MIGHT decide to like will....and let's put it Scripturally: "know" them, "lay with" or (best yet, and most promising) "go into" them. And they never heard of discreet online and other dating services???

"SCREW?" Ah, that gets us to the English-language word choices of watered-down words for too-little-sex too-much-sex Bible readers by their compromising-semantics too-little-sex too-much-sex Bible translators!>

Why do I get the impression that either the original Hebrew Old-Testament and original Greek New-Testament words, allegedly inspired by God Himself and His Spirit, were lamentably prudish and therefore absurdly deficient in relaying to us perfectly acceptable and vital human-sexual-activites information........or the warped and twisted immentality of guilty-conscience fearful-of-whoever translators resulted in depraved locked lingo far too vague and wimpish? If the latter is the case, why the inane and irresponsible pablem linguistics?

C'mon now. To KNOW someone - to any person with a REASONABLE understanding of dictionary definition - means to be ACQUAINTED with them. KNOW means KNOW - and only that. Let's not give multiple meanings to the same word and thus cause insidious divisive confusion. To merely LAY with a (clothed, and maybe even unclothed) woman will not cause a baby to pop out of her. To "go into" (her bedroom or even into her Hebrews 13:4 bed) simply will NOT cause pregancy either. To cause a man's semenizing penis to contact her any part of a woman's vagina FREQUENTLY WILL cause a child and not simply fetus to be conceived and formed (as the words NONBORN BABE and ALREADY-BORN BABE are given the EXACT SAME Greek word in Luke 1:41 and Luke 2:16).

The to-some-considered SLANG word and to other (weaker persons) considered unspeakable nonmentionable vulgarity word "fuck" need not be villified by ludicrously, ridiculously, and needlessly importing a inappropriate sense of screwing someone (i.e. cheating them badly), but CAN be kept to an exclusively COITAL connotation. Clearly, it should indeed, rather than being misused as a demeaning expletive. Moreover, the cutesy words and phrases "have sex with, make whoopie, score, get it on, hit on, make love to" and other moronic equivalents don't cut it.

WHAT words, then, should REALLY be used in the Bible when alluding to X-to-XXX-rated-type human copulation non-erotically described in the Sacred Text?

Well, some combination of Greek and Latin prefixes and suffixes are possible, but I certainly would not want to blatter STUPID buzzwords like "homophobic" (although the term 'phobohomic' does have a certain understandable ring to it, descriptive of the phenomena of wisely refraining from nosing around in the filthy feces of homogay fools).