THE FOUR DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE
PART THREE: THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE
COMING SOON!!!
PLASMA COSMOLOGY
ELECTROSTATIC PROPULSION
GRAVITY Will be moved here from Part One
ANTIGRAVITY AND GRAVITATIONAL REPULSION
TRACTOR BEAMS
SUSPENDED ANIMATION AND "TIME" MANIPULATION
CLOAKING
PRACTICAL USES OF GRAVITY DEVICES
SUBQUANTUM KINETICS
GENIC ENERGY AND CONTINUOUS MATTER CREATION
MATTER SYNTHESIS
PLANETARY EXPANSION
FREE ENERGY
ENERGY ACCELERATION
ARP COSMOLOGY
GALACTIC FORMATIONS
THE HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE
CLAIRVOYANCE
FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT
FOUNDATION: SEEING THE PAST AND PREDICTING A FUTURE
THE PHYSICS OF HYPERSPATIAL RIFTS AND REALITY MANIPULATION
RIFT DEVICES
TO BE A RIFT RUNNER
COLONIZATION BEYOND EARTH
PLANET BUILDING
TYPES OF EARTHLIKE PLANETS
DYSON SPHERES
GRAVITY
All physical objects in the infinite universe, matter and antimatter, share a common force with infinite or should I say an instantaneous range within a continuity of space and time. This force is of course, gravity. What actually is the physics behind gravity is still open for debate. Einstein said gravity is due to the curvature of space and time. Particle physicists say its due to these dreamed up particles called gravitons. John Kierein of Ball Aerospace thinks gravity is due to photons pushing against matter and antimatter together. Plasma physicist and Nobel Laureate Hannes Alfvén believed gravity is the result of electromagnetic fields neutralizing each other. I highly disagree! Which one? All of them.
First of all, I believe that space and time are not malleable as Einstein suggests (click here to see information about gravity being a dimension). Why? Because time is not the fourth dimension. The fourth dimension is actually another spatial dimension which results with the universe having infinite three dimensions. So gravity could not be due to the curvature of space and time.
A major mistake that anyone can make is to assume that something is there, when in the end they find out that it is not there at all. I am talking about gravitons. I am a person that believes that all the rules of the scientific method should be followed when hypothesizing something. Yes, this includes observation and experimentation. Theories like the Big Bang, black holes, darkmatter, cosmic strings, etc. result when certain rules of the scientific method are skipped on purpose to avoid the possibility of them being proven wrong. So, do gravitons exist? I say, "Not a chance!"
One of the most interesting theories of gravity is proposed by John Kierein. He proposes that photons push matter together. So this means that gravity is actually a push not a pull. This raises various problems that I just cannot ignore. If gravity is due to photonic push, then how come the attraction of matter toward gravitating bodies differ from each other. Matter is pulled down faster on Earth than on a less massive body of matter like the Earth's moon. If John Kierein is correct, then gravity should be the same everywhere despite the differing masses of matter. But gravity does differ between differing masses. The problem with superlight is that it originates from black holes. If gravity is caused by the push of superlight, then how would black holes form?
To find out what gravity is and the ability to generate it is considered to be the "holy grail" of physics. And anyone who can do this will win the Nobel Prize for sure. However, to date, no one has been able to do this. Albert Einstein was considered to be the greatest mind of the twentieth century, but for the last thirty years of his life he failed to unify the electromagnetic and gravitational forces. From where he failed, I feel that I may succeed. There is plenty of evidence of what gravity is, you just have to know where to look. And I have found that evidence.
The first bit of evidence is probably extra-terrestial in origin. I am talking about crop circles. There are television programs that present crop circles as hoaxes created by people, not extra-terrestrials. But this does not mean that all crop circles are hoaxes. The fake ones are created by simple flatterning tools built by people. However, the genuine crop circles are simple vortex patterns, where electromagnetic radiation is emmitted from crop husks and is detectable by sensitive electronic equipment. Vortex patterns and electromagnetic radiation is clear evidence to what gravity really is.
Another bit of evidence is actually based on plasma physics, a branch of physics founded by Swedish Nobel laureate Hannes Alfvén. He knew exactly how galaxies are formed and this theory is what he proposed: In a given area of space there exists two plasmoids, plasmoids are clouds of matter that are super heated to a plasma state where the electrons and the protons are no longer bonded, but free floating. Plasma is the fourth state of matter after solid, liquid, and gas. Now imagine one of the plasmoids with ions on top and electrons on bottom and imagine the other plasmoid with electrons on top and ions on bottom. The electrons of one plasmoid are attracted to the ions of the other plasmoid and vice versa. But at the same time the electrons of one plasmoid are repelled by the electrons of the other and the same for the ions. Since the electrons are free floating in a plasmoid, that plasmoid produces an electromagnetic field. Electrons move faster than protons, so electrons move towards the protons. Because of the attraction of electrons and protons between the two plasmoids and the repulsion of like particles between the two plasmoids, the plasmoids begin to rotate around each other. Eventually, the two rotating plasmoids would flatten out and produce the galaxies that we observe with our telescopes. The formation of galaxies is very similar to the formation of hurricanes. For example: At the equator in the Atlantic Ocean, there is a tradewind from the north and a tradewind from the south, both rotating in a counterclockwise direction. Since both tradewinds are rotating in the same direction, they rotate around each other producing a counterclockwise vortex of air masses forming what is known as a hurricane. When the two tradewinds rotated around each other, they neutralized themselves. The tradewinds of a hurricane are much like the plasmoids of a galaxy. You need to have two or more tradewinds to form a hurricane and you need to have two or more plasmoids to form a galaxy. It is impossible for a single air mass to all of a sudden rotate in a certain direction to form a hurricane and it is the same for a galaxy with just a single plasmoid. So Hannes Alfvén believed that gravity results when electromagnetic forces neutralize each other. Another piece of evidence found. Read this nice tribute to Hannes Alfvén by Eric J. Lerner, author of The Big Bang Never Happened.
This is a picture of Nobel Laureate Hannes Olaf Gösta Alfvén (1908-1995). He was the father of plasma physics and also a major critic of Big Bang Theory.
The final bit of evidence was found quite accidently. Back in the 1980's, there was this amateur physicist in Vancouver by the name of John Hutchison who built a device with unusual effects. His invention used electromagnetic fields and a Tesla coil. A Tesla coil is a capicitor of electricity developed by the electrician and inventor, Nikola Tesla, whom most of his inventions were probably suppressed by the U.S. government. Hutchison's invention produced an effect similar to gravity where objects, even nonmetallic objects were being pulled towards the electromagnetic fields. This effect was dubbed the Hutchison Effect, but it was not quite gravity. The U.S. Air Force heard of his device and paid him a little vist. But, unfortunately, the device was disassembled and he was never quite able to rebuild the device and recreate the effects that were seen on his home video footage. Fortunately, this knocks him out of the race for the Nobel Prize and it gives me a chance to receive it.
I conclude that gravity is indeed a pull. But the question is, a pull between what? According to Plasma Cosmology, galaxies rotate as a result of the attraction between electrons and ions. So, as Hannes Alfvén believed, gravity results when electromagnetic fields neutralize each other. The problem with Plasma Cosmology is that it is only half way there to explaining the rotation of bodies like galaxies. Plasma Cosmology does not explain how completed matter (electrons orbiting around protons and neutrons) rotates in a galaxy propelled by incomplete matter (electrons and ions).
My theory is that once electrons, protons and neutrons are together, completing matter by means of electromagnetic and strong nuclear forces, there is still particle attraction between completed matter. This left over particle attraction is of course, gravity. My particle attraction theory of gravity seems to be the most plausible reason of what gravity really is and let me explain why. Imagine an area of space, where there are nothing but hydrogen atoms spread out almost evenly within an extremely short distance from each other. The electron of one hydrogen atom is attracted to the proton of another hydrogen atom and vice versa. When the two hydrogen atoms came together, their combined particle attraction increases the strength of the pull of gravity. More hydrogen atoms are pulled towards the pair of hydrogen atoms, becoming a cluster of hydrogen atoms as the combined particle attraction increases. Meanwhile, other clusters of hydrogen atoms are forming here and there within this area of space. The electrons and protons of these hydrogen clusters attract each other to form larger bodies of hydrogen atoms until they become one large mass of hydrogen atoms.
As the hydrogen atoms are pulled down towards the center of gravity of this one large mass of hydrogen atoms, the hydrogen atoms are also attracted to each other from side to side. As a result, this large mass of hydrogen atoms begins to rotate. It is much like a chain, where the links are pulled along with the lead link and the lead link is being pulled by its tail end. As this large mass of hydrogen atoms rotates, it begins to take the shape of a spherelike structure as a result of the hydrogen atoms being pulled down evenly towards the center of gravity. As this mass rotates, friction occurs when the hydrogen atoms scrape by each other. This friction is then converted into heat. This large mass of hydrogen atoms becomes so hot that fusion of hydrogen atoms to become heavier elements begins to take place. This fusion process causes the large spherical mass to release photons into space. This large mass of hydrogen atoms has now become a star.
Suppose a smaller amount of atoms, mostly iron and nickel and some other solids and gases, were in an area of space at a close proximity to each other. Like the hydrogen atoms in the previous example of my partcle attraction theory of gravity, the electrons and protons of one iron atom are attracted to the electrons and protons of another iron atom. As the particle attraction of the combined atoms increases, more iron and nickel atoms are attracted to become a cluster of iron and nickel atoms. Other clusters of iron and nickel form here and there and they cluster together to form a spherical, solid body. The atoms are not just attracted downward towards the center of gravity, but they are also attracted from side to side. The solid begins to rotate, causing friction between the iron and nickel atoms. This friction is converted into heat and since iron and nickel are "heavy" atoms, the heat travels downward towards the center of gravity like a centrifuge. This body of iron and nickel is seperated into shells, starting with the outer shell (the crust) and the most inner shell (the core). Since heat from friction travels downward towards the center of gravity, the further down into this body of iron and nickel, the hotter it becomes. The outer shell is the coolest and the core is the hottest. I have just described the birth of a terrestrial planet like Earth.
Now that I have answered that question, the new question is: "How do we generate gravity?" We must first convert a type of evergy into gravity. The most common form of energy we use in the modern world is electricity. A possible part of this device would be a solenoid. A solenoid is a coiled metal wire where electrons move from one end to the other causing an electromagnetic effect within the interior of it. Instead of coiling the wire in the shape of cylinder, it should be shaped as a vortex. When a current of electricity is introduced in the base of the cone-shaped coil of wire, it flows down towards the tip of the cone. As electrons flow towards the tip of the vortex-shaped coil of wire, they pull the protons of matter down towards the rotational axis of this gravity device. So, the greater the voltage, the greater the pull of gravity is.
Entrance
Table Of Contents
Part One: Four Dimensional Cosmology
Part Two: Critiques Of The Big Bang Universe (Currently undergoing changes!)
Summary
Glossary
Click here for the black and white version of this webpage and website.
THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
