The Philemon Epistle
Rex Banks
Lesson 21
Authorship
Paul (vv 1, 9, 19). On Paul
the apostle, see
our Paul’s Epistles,
Introducing Paul (Book4). Once again, Timothy is
associated with Paul in the greeting (see our notes at 2 Corinthians, Philippians,
Colossians, 1 and 2 Thessalonians) but in this letter, the first person
singular occurs throughout. In v 9, the
writer makes an appeal on the basis of that fact that he is “such a person as
Paul, the aged, and now also a prisoner of Christ Jesus.” In v 19 he says “I, Paul am writing this with
my own hand.”
External evidence
(1)
Clarke points out that this short letter was “by the general consent of
the Church of God, from the highest Christian antiquity…received into the
sacred canon, not only as a genuine production of St. Paul, but as a piece
designed by the Holy Spirit for the edification of the Church.” Evidently, “this very piece was held so sacred that even the ancient heretics did
not attempt to impugn its authenticity or corrupt its matter, while making
dangerously free with the four gospels, and all the other epistles” (ibid).
“Origen cites the epistle
as a Pauline letter addressed to Philemon concerning Onesimus. Tertullian refers to the brevity of this
epistle as the “sole cause of its escaping the falsifying hands of Marcion”
(Against Marcion 5.21). Eusebius refers
to it as one of the “universally acknowledged Epistles of the canon”
(Ecclesiastical History 3.25). Jerome
and Ignatius also allude to it. It is
quoted infrequently by the Fathers, evidently because of its brevity. Its coincidences with the Colossian epistle
attest to its authenticity” (Unger’s
Bible Dictionary).
Moreover,
Ignatius knew the letter, it is listed in the Muratorian Fragment and Origen
regarded it as a composition of Paul.
(2)
Examples
“For it was needful for me to have been
stirred up by you in faith, exhortation, patience, and long-suffering. But inasmuch as love suffers me not to be
silent in regard to you, I have therefore taken upon me first to exhort you that
ye would all run together in accordance with the will of God” (cf. Phile 8, 9)”
(Ignatius Epistle to the Ephesians chapter 3).
“Now concerning those bishops which have been
ordained in our lifetime, we let you know that they are these…Of
Colossae, Philemon” (Constitutions
of the Holy Apostles 7.46).
(3)
Pauline
authorship was denied by some in the 4-5th centuries mainly on the ground that
the epistle was of no value for edification. Jerome, Chrysostom and others successfully met this argument. Then again in the 19th century, some Biblical
critics like F. C. Baur refused to accept that Paul
wrote this short personal epistle, but they were motivated to do so by the
desire to destroy the corroborative value of this epistle to the other
so-called “prison epistles” (Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians).
Composition: Date, Place and Circumstances
(1)
It is clear that Philemon was
written at the same time and from the same place as the Colossian epistle. Paul concludes his letter to the Colossians
with a word to a faithful brother called Archippus, reminding him to “take heed to” and “fulfil” his ministry (
(2)
Philemon’s connection with
(3) Finally, when we compare Col 4:10-14 and Philemon 23-24, we note that five of the six who send greetings in the Colossian epistle also do so in Philemon. In both cases, Onesimus arrives at the same time as the letters.
(4)
Since it seems most likely that
Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians were written from
(5)
From the letter we learn that
Philemon had a slave called Onesimus, who appears to have run away to
(6)
In
(7)
Paul would gladly have kept
Onesimus with him. We are not told of
the slave’s feelings on the matter but there is nothing in the letter which
suggests that he was reluctant to return to his master. In light of Paul’s teaching elsewhere, it is
likely that, as the law required, Paul sent Onesimus back to Philemon his
master. However, some argue that it
cannot “be inferred that he was in favour of sending back runaway slaves to
their masters” (Barnes).
The apostle sends this letter along with the returned slave, a missive
which, according to Tenney “contains the finest picture of the
meaning of forgiveness that can be found in the New Testament.”
Addressees
(1) From the fact that Philemon owned at least one slave we can conclude that he was a man of some means, and the fact that Paul refers to the “church in your (sing) house” may (but need not) indicate some degree of affluence. Paul speaks of his “love” and “faith” (v 7) and of the “joy and comfort” which he himself had received as a result of Philemon’s having “refreshed” the hearts of the saints (v 7). The apostle calls him his “fellow worker” (v 1), an indication that Philemon was a committed worker for the Lord. Paul is confident that this is a man of integrity who will do the right thing as regards Onesimus (“even more than what I say” - v 21).
(2) Verse 19 (“you owe me even your own self as well” ) suggests that Paul had converted Philemon, and since it is likely that Paul had not visited Colossae, it may be that Philemon heard the gospel while Paul was at Ephesus (Acts 19:26). Paul addresses him as a “partner” (v 17) and has no hesitation requesting that Philemon provide lodging for him (v 22).
(3)
Included in the greeting are
“Apphia our sister” and “Archippus our fellow soldier” (v 2). The former is generally believed to have been
Philemon’s wife and the latter their son but this is not certain. We are not given details of Archippus’
“ministry” (
(4)
According to one
tradition, Philemon became “bishop of
Purpose, Theme
and Characteristics
The Slavery Question
The New
Testament does not call for the abolition of slavery - but it does undermine
the foundation upon which slavery is built by emphasising the spiritual
equality of all men and the need for universal love. Under the influence of
Christ, slavery withers and dies.
I cannot recall the source of the following quotation from Chr. Wordsworth but it is worthy of note:
“That short
Letter, dictated from ‘the hired house’ of the aged Apostle, ‘Christ’s
bondsman’ at Rome may be called a divine Act of Emancipation; one far more
powerful than any edict of Manumission promulgated by Sovereign and Senates;
one, from whose sacred principles all human statutes for the Abolition of
Slavery derive their virtue. Its silent
influence, such as characterizes all genuine Reformations, gradually melted away
and thawed the hardships of Slavery, by softening and warming the heart of the
Master with the pure and holy flame of Christian love; and while it thus
ameliorated the condition of the Slave, it did not impair the just rights of
the Master, but greatly improved them by dignifying service and by securing
obedience to man, as a duty done to Christ, and to be hereafter rewarded by
him; and by changing the cunning and
fearful slave into an honest loving servant, and a faithful brother; and by
binding every Onesimus in bonds of Holy communion with every Philemon…in the
worship of the same Lord, and in the heritorship of
the same heaven.”
Slavery is a
social problem, and the Christian answer to social problems is not violent
upheaval but rather the promulgation of Truth.
“It is clearly
incongruous for a Christian master to ‘own’ a brother in Christ in the
contemporary sense of the word, and although the existing order of society
could not be immediately changed by Christianity without a political revolution
(which was contrary to Christian principles), the Christian master-slave
relationship was so transformed from within that it was bound to lead
ultimately to the abolition of the system” (Guthrie, New Testament Introduction).
Paul’s dealing
with Onesimus/Philemon provides a concrete example of the outworking of
principles taught elsewhere in the New Testament. Among them the following:
·
Masters
themselves have a “Master in heaven” and they must therefore grant slaves
“justice and fairness” and “give up threatening.”
·
Slaves
are to render service “as to the Lord” and to “be well pleasing, not
argumentative” while not pilfering, taking care to adorn the doctrine of Christ and giving all due honour to their masters
“for conscience sake”
(
·
In Christ, all are one (Gal
·
In
Christ, the slave is “the Lord’s freeman” and while temporal freedom is
desirable, if this is not possible he is to “remain with God in that condition
in which he was called” (1 Cor
Paul’s aim and approach
In this very personal
letter, the apostle asks Philemon to forgive Onesimus and to accept him back as a beloved brother
and in so doing he demonstrates how Christianity transforms our relationships
with one another. Note that:
·
“(This)
letter is a model of Christian courtesy.
The task which confronted Paul was one of peculiar delicacy. He must compose a message which would win the
favor of Philemon yet would not offend Onesimus” (Erdman). It is “exquisitely beautiful
and delicate...a model of courtesy and politeness...gentle and persuasive, and
yet the argument is one that…probably was, irresistible” (Barnes).
·
Paul
has authority as an apostle ( Rom 1:1;1Cor 5:3-4; 9:1; 2 Cor 10:13-14; 12:12;
Gal 1:1) and he could “order” Philemon to “do that which is proper” (v 8). Instead, Paul addresses his friend as a spiritual man who can be relied upon to do the right thing. He speaks of Philemon’s “love” and “faith” (v
7) and of the “joy and comfort” which he himself had received as a result of Philemon’s having “refreshed” the hearts of the saints (v
7). The apostle calls him his “fellow
worker” (v 1), an indication that Philemon was a committed worker for the
Lord. Paul is confident that this is a
man of integrity who will do the right thing as regards Onesimus (“even more
than what I say” - v 21). He wants
Philemon’s “goodness” to be “not...as it were by compulsion, but of (his)...own
free will” (v 14).
·
Paul
appeals to his own circumstances. He is
“such a person as Paul, the aged, and now also a prisoner of Christ Jesus” (v
9). Clearly it would be difficult to
refuse such a venerable, suffering figure.
He speaks of Onesimus’ usefulness to him (v 11) and the words “in your
behalf” (v 13) suggests that Onesimus served Paul in place of Philemon. Paul is expressing his belief that had
Philemon known of Paul’s need, he would have
encouraged Onesimus to continue to render service to him. Perhaps Onesimus has admitted theft to Paul
or perhaps the apostle simply has in mind the fact that the master has been
deprived of the slave’s services, but he adds:
“if he has wronged you in any way or owes you anything charge that to my
debt” (“charge” elloga is an accountant’s term). Verse 19 amounts to a “promissory note” and a
gentle reminder of Philemon’s debt to Paul.
Perhaps the instruction “prepare for me lodging” can be viewed as
“gentle compulsion” (Lenski), the prospect of an imminent visit
lending weight to Paul’s request.
·
There
is a reminder to Philemon that God’s hand may well have been in all this: “For perhaps he was for this reason parted
from you for a while that you should have him back forever, no longer as a
slave, but much more as a beloved brother” (vv 15-16). Note the contrast between “a while” and
“forever.” Note the contrast too between
“slave” (a demeaning role) and “beloved brother” (a rich everlasting
relationship in the Lord). A “beloved
brother” may be a servant, but he is no longer a “thing” to be used and
exploited. Paul’s request that Philemon
“accept (Onesimus) as you would me” (v 17) is another difficult appeal to
ignore - let Philemon receive Onesimus as he would Paul himself and thereby
provide further proof of his love for Paul.
“When Onesimus
is sent to his master ‘no longer as a slave, but as a dear brother’, formal
emancipation would be but a matter of expediency, the technical confirmation of
the new relationship that had already come into being”
(F. F. Bruce, Paul).
Outline
(1)
Salutation (Phile 1-3).
(2)
Thanksgiving and Prayer (Phile
4-7).
(3)
Plea for Onesimus, along with a
request for lodging (Phile 8-22).
(4)
Greetings and Closing
Salutations (Phile 23-25).