RETURN TO INDEX |
Dialectics [1991[?]; written for a south Wales International Socialist Group education meeting] It is said that men are the logical sex, whilst women possess greater intuition. Intuition is an inexplicable hunch or feeling, whilst logic is a system with definite rules and outcomes. In this way bourgeois ideology attempts to label women as emotional and irrational whilst men are controlled and methodical. At the same time this myth implies that there is something lacking, something lifeless and unfeeling, in the so-called logical approach. So what is logic? There are three fundamental laws of formal logic:
These laws are used by all of us, women and men, every day. They are the axioms, or basic assumptions, of most mathematics and of digital computing. They are very useful for many practical purposes and all correspond to reality - if we omit motion. However, if we look around us we see that in reality everything is in perpetual motion. All things, be they plants, animals or social systems, are born, develop, age and die. We therefore need laws that reflect this and approximate to reality more closely than formal logic. This is what dialectical logic attempts to do, though matching laws totally to reality is impossible, precisely because reality is in continuous motion. Dialectics is therefore an open and continually developing system, part of the endless process of acquiring and refining knowledge. It does not reject formal logic but absorbs it as a useful tool, whilst being clear about its limits. Dialectics can be summarised as:
Every thing comes into being and exists as a result of definite, or determinate, conditions and causes. But this is only half the truth: things also develop and pass away, a process called negation:
The fundamental cause of all motion, or self-movement, is the internal contradictions of the changing thing. Contradiction is the co-existence of elements opposed to each other, called opposites. The unity and interpenetration of opposites is a keystone of dialectics. There is a struggle within every thing, between that which exists and that which is coming into being. This struggle gives rise to change and is eventually resolved by negation, whereby the previously subordinate qualities become dominant.
Negation is not simply about destroying, it is also its own opposite. It is sometimes termed transcendence, to signify elements of conservation and development as well as destruction. Out of a negation comes a new affirmation, which in turn contains the seeds of its own negation. Negation of the negation implies returning, via two negations, to the original affirmation, though at a higher level. Changes which maintain the structure of a thing are called quantitative. At a certain point these changes transform the object: a qualitative change has occurred. This is called the transformation of quantity into quality. The coexistence of opposing elements within a structure is not random but forms a structured totality or whole, governed by specific relations. These elements at the same time struggle to break up that whole. When studying an object it is necessary to not only analyse its contradictory elements but also how these synthesise to form a totality. Dialectics attempts to look at an object in all its aspects and understand its movement in its totality. We must look at things not in isolation but in all their interconnections and indirect connections, or mediacies.
How well any theory corresponds to reality can only be determined by practice.
|
Return to index |