This section will just be for, basically random thoughts and feelings. Since my thought process is mostly random you can probably expect this to be updated frequently. Back to Previous Pennys. Back to Pen Penny.
At first I considered doing something about perception part 2 since only the perceptive were able to perceive the perceptive perception perceived by myself in that very perceptive piece about perception. Perceptively, the message originally intended was lost in the perceiving stage due to complicated circumstances in perceiving. Actually, the point that 'Perception' was making was actually perceived after the perception of parts of the piece. Leading, heretofore only the perceptive could perceive the ingenious and highly intellectual perception perceptively presented. Anyway, even after all that I decided to scrap it for no other reason than I didn't really feel like going through the work of perceiving it. Maybe, I'll perceive a great perception about perception that will be used as a second part of Perception. However, the said perceptive piece ties into this one, and now that I've wasted a paragraph of time that is probably very upsetting, leading to large veins pulsing out of your head (you should really get that checked), and a redness in the face due to the fact that the perceptive perceive that I've used 'perception' and it's relating counterparts near a hundred times in this, which doesn't really have a whole lot to do with perception at all. Also, by these statements referring to this very subject the paragraph continues. It just drones on and on, leading the reader to question their own sanity, as it just doesn't seem to stop and continues to repeat the same things about being perceptive and such with perception. Also, by these multiple uses of perception and the like, it may have caused those who are not as perceptive as the perceptive-elite to get lost and end up reading the same line multiple times, because perception and perceptive and perceive are used so much (a keen perception). All in all, this is really a waste of everyone's time, even mine. After all, in what way does this paragraph benefit the topic at all? The reader doesn't really even know what the topic is yet so they don't know if it does or not (a perceptive point). What kind of piece has a very long opening paragraph, without identifying what the subject is even going to be (both profound and perceptive)? It's completely absurd. The smart thing to do would be to just quit this paragraph, and pretend like it never happened, beginning with some new perceptive topic instead of repeating the same things over and over like a messed up record. I mean, really, why on earth is this paragraph continuing? This is getting very long for a paragraph. What if it never ends? After all, we all know the guy who is writing this is psychotic; he's admitted it several times. Who knows what his demented psyche would do to writing such as this. This person probably could make a paragraph keep droning on forever as his mind probably is like a broken record. A very evil and demented record at that, with the label peeled off, making the owner not really know what it is. Then, when it plays, it's that one horrible song that the owner really hates because it's related to some very horrible and agonizing event in their past, then when they are dismayed the record explodes, killing the owner. THAT kind of record (if you didn't pick up on it, bad). Why is the paragraph talking about records anyway? What does that have to do with anything? In what way could records possibly have anything to do with the topic? What is the topic? Is it about records? I really don't want to read anything about records, and I hope the author doesn't want to write anything about them. Could this be an ingenious lead into non-music records? No. Has the author begun referring to himself in the third person? Perhaps. Is the author insane? Without a doubt. This paragraph should be killed. It should be beaten with a mallet first, to make it nice and tender, and then thrown on a fire. Those who desire, probably the twisted author being one of them, could then eat the paragraph in some strange attempt to gain its destructive and evil power. This topic was originally going to go into something, I think. It was at least referred to at some point in this immensely large and pointless paragraph. I do believe I remember it. I'm not quite sure anymore, it seemed like such a long time ago. I wonder if there is a record for pointless paragraphs that drone on endlessly and continuously point out that it is in fact pointless and does actually drone on endlessly. Could that be why it mentioned something about records earlier as well? It could also find some new words to use instead of just saying drone all the time, for instance words like drone… okay, maybe not. Anyway this sort of drones on (have I mentioned this) and doesn't stop, blah, blah, blah, drone, blah, blah, blah, eat people, blah, blah, blah, psycho, blah, blah, blah, evil, blah, blah, blah, drone, blah, blah, blah, drone (once again), blah, blah, blah, perception (not this again), blah, blah, blah, some reference to cannibalism (because cannibalism is funny, to demented people like the author), blah, blah, blah, drone (the author seems to have run out of things to say… after about the third sentence), blah, blah, blah, perceive perception (now the author isn't even trying), blah, blah, blah, drone (wait, what is that), blah, blah, blah, drone (could it be), blah, blah, blah, author is evil (I see a light), blah, blah, blah, cannibalism, perception, and drones (is that the end), blah, blah, blah, sort of like a cannibalistic drone that is very perceptive (it is!), blah, blah, blah, end.
(Paragraph 2… finally, a new paragraph, at long last the other paragraph ended) At first I considered doing something about perception part 2 since only the perceptive were able to perceive the perceptive perception perceived by myself in that very perceptive piece about perception. Perceptively, the message originally intended was lost in the perceiving stage due to complicated circumstances in perceiving. Actually, (Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!) -10/20/02