Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Some words on...




Starving kids in Africa...

We place ourselves infront of the or television sets and watch the news. On the screen we see a couple of million people in some camp down in Africa, starving to death because of the fact that their entire, so called, country can be quite vividly described as a barren sandbox.

Now, there is a rather funny analogy between a sandbox and these African countries: in the sense that in children play around in sandboxes. For those who are somewhat retarded, the clarified statement is that the people down in African catastrophy zones are like little children jumping around in sandboxes, getting into rather explicit trouble (like children sometimes do because of their lacking intellectual capability). Indeed, viewing the situation in an objective manner reveals little more than the mere fact the there is an outrageous stupidity dwelling in these regions. Let us indulge in a few examples.

First of all. It lies in the primitive culture of the population of these regions to produce a large number of offspring. This is due to the notion that the old people must have younger people who takes care of them. Since the death-rate has always been rather high among children in these countries (as it also was in what is now the industrilized world), many children was needed in order for a few to survive. Now, this tactic of survival at first sounds very logical and good. However, there are limits of how much (and in what situation) a concept should be used. When you have reached a point where millions of people are sitting out in the desert with nothing to eat but flies, this fashion of having lots of children does no benefit anyone. Instead it simply helps worsen the situation for these people. Still, these people does not seem to get this. Maybe they are using sexual activity as a substitute for food or something, we do not know. But we can conclude this: There is no reason to feel the least bit sorry for these people, since the situation they are in is obviously exactly what they want. If this was not true, they would quit fucking (at least without preventive methods).

A number of years ago there was action taken by good samaritans around the world to send condoms to an African catastrophy area. Not much later we could indulge in the news that these condoms had been used for far more fun activities, making balloons, that is. This, again, means that the balloon making people are, 1, to stupid to understand what a condom is (i.e. even though it surely must have been explained to them before the goods was handed out), 2, or simply cannot be bothered to use them. Saying that these people are stupid is something which would be called rasist. It is forbidden to call anyone stupid in our soceity, especially when someone has really fucked up. Infact, the only one's who presently ever run any risk of being called stupid, are people who's superior reasoning abilities cause them to become subjects of jealusy. Secondly, it seems plausible that these people are actually intelligent enough to understand the basic use of a condom, after all, they are humans just as you and the creator. Hence, the second thesis (i.e. that they cannot be bothered) seems to be in order. But then again we find ourselves in a situation where we really have no reason at all to feel the least bit sorry for these people. Feeling sorry for their problems would be much like feelings sorry for the chain-smoker who is fully aware of the harmfull effects of his favorite drug. It would be like feeling sorry for a guy who smashes himself in the head with a sledgehammer, knowing exactly what he is doing.

And the wars that lie as the foundation for all the above troubles, these events should actually be dealt with as a topic of their own. There is a quite interesting question about these little civil wars. Why? For what reason? The reason is of course, superficially, the fact that the European colonizers screwed up the ancient tribe-boarders of the continent, and then suppressed the population so that it did not develop. Leaving much psychological (social) tension. When the French, the Spics and the Britts left, everything turned to crap.

Some parts of the world is about to colonize the moon, some parts are still killing eachother because of prehistoric cultures. It can of course be argued that these wars are really about money, and nothing else. But this on its own does not make them less ridiculous. Secondly, the argument is not true, because no sane movement would try to acheive wealth in a fashion that destroyed all possibilities of success. It can be argued that these fighting tribes cannot be named stupid because they do not have our "education". But surely, they should long ago have seen the results of their behavior (just like the sexoholics in the catastrophy camps). It should be very simple. Merely putting two and two together.

So, if they are not stupid, they should understand the stupidity of what they are doing and quit it, and since they do not do just this in reality we have to conclude that these wars (with all their effects) are wanted and wished for consciously. But why, then, should anyone feel sorry for them, or try to "help" them. Trying to help these people is like trying to help an alcoholic who simply cannot wait to drink himself to death. In the end, of course, all the above is simply meaningless points, superficial. For indeed, these people are stupid. Not more or less stupid than people in any other part of the world, simply stupid. They cannot help it all, we cannot "help" them, all because of the same reason, namely: stupidity. Hence, fuck them, they suck, we will never move a finger to "help" them.


Back

Email: totalscorn@hotmail.com