Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
 
The Palm Beach Post
navigation

Weekly Sections
A&E
Food & Dining
Home & Garden
TGIF
Travel

Past issues
Today
Yesterday
Wednesday
Tuesday
Monday
Sunday
Saturday

Post services
• Subscribe to Post
• Scan classifieds
• Write letter to editor
• Search our archives
• Save with Gusto
• Contact newsroom
• Find internships
• Share news tips
• Order photo reprints
• PostFacts research
• Company history

Post departments
• Advertising
• Comm. Relations
• Education
• Marketing

Opinion Thursday, August 26
 
GoPBI

Opinion
Write your letter
Voice your opinion
Don Wright's cartoons
Vote in NEWS 12 Poll
Columnists' archive

More services
Shop online
Free e-mail alerts
24-hour chat rooms


Editorial: Old Sparky goes first, then the death penalty

The Palm Beach Post
Thursday, August 26, 1999

Attorneys went before the Florida Supreme Court Tuesday to argue whether the state should kill people with electricity or drugs. They were arguing the wrong case. The debate should be over why Florida continues to embrace a practice that could kill an innocent person.

After the July 8 execution of Allen Lee Davis turned into a bloody mess, attorneys for the next condemned killer in line revived the argument of two years ago that the electric chair violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. It was a rerun of arguments from 1997, when another electrocution went wrong. That case also got to the state high court, which upheld use of the chair but hinted that the Legislature should switch to lethal injection. If the justices, two of whom are new since 1997, rule differently this time, the state will have to switch.

Ideally, that move will lead to arguments about the death penalty itself, and the premise on which capital punishment rests: The state never makes a mistake.

On Sunday, The New York Times reported that 82 people awaiting execution have been cleared nationally since the Supreme Court reinstituted capital punishment 23 years ago. Nearly half of those went free during this decade, as more groups have taken up the cases of condemned murderers, often using the same technology that prosecutors employ to make their cases.

Reasons for the mistakes vary. Some defendants had lawyers who knew little or nothing about capital cases. In other cases, testimony or evidence that seemed solid fell apart. In the most egregious instances, prosecutors withheld information.

Many defendants went to Death Row before refinements of DNA testing that might have cleared them. A Florida man was released in 1997 after six years on Death Row because tests showed that hair in the victim's hand came from a white man. The condemned man is African-American.

Most of the 376 people (four women) on Florida's Death Row are guilty. By their crimes, they have forfeited their right to live in society. For Gov. Bush, the Legislature and Attorney General Bob Butterworth to assume that the state could not have made mistakes is arrogant and reckless and lowers the state to the killers' level. Ending capital punishment will not and should not end arguments about guilt or innocence, but it will end the chance of the state wrongfully killing in the name of justice.

navigation
©1999 Cox Interactive Media
Contact Us
CIM Logo How to advertise on GoPBI
Privacy Policy

By using Palm Beach Interactive, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement. Please read it.
Registered site users, to edit your personal profile, click here.