The Independent (London)
Joseph Fiennes has served his time as a lovelorn
support. Now, as a lovelorn
Shakespeare, he's the main man.
Maggie O'Farrell met him.
In the forthcoming film Shakespeare in Love, there is
a scene in which an
emerging young playwright pursues the object of his
desires by boat down the
Thames. As he steps into the boat, the boatman does a
double take, hesitates,
then says, "Are you an actor?" The playwright, played
by an emerging young
British actor, rolls his eyes skywards. "Ye-es," he
snaps, simmering with and
frustration.
The British actor is Joseph Fiennes, and we are meant
to believe the
playwright is Shakespeare (not that we do, of course,
and herein lies the
film's success). It is a question Fiennes the Younger
will have to get used to
answering. His Will Shakespeare has all of his brother
Ralph's intensity,
but is tempered and leavened with a kind of febrile,
edgy intelligence and no
small amount of comic bite. It's this impassioned
energy that's been missing in
Fiennes's earlier film appearances. If you'd watched
him in Stealing Beauty (he
plays the small but crucial role of the boy who
finally relieves Liv Tyler of
her virginity) [Note: that was not Joe's character] , Martha - Meet Frank, Daniel and
Laurence or Elizabeth you'd be
forgiven for thinking Fiennes only has three gears:
lover, hangdog, and
hangdog-lover. Casting him opposite the beautiful but
always bland Gwyneth
Paltrow, director John Madden (Mrs Brown) mercifully
keeps the number of his
leading man's limpid-eyed gazes down to a minimum,
coaxing from him a
career-altering performance.
I met him in the over-furnished lounge of a west
London hotel. My first
impression was that he's smaller than you might
imagine - compact and lithe in
the way male ballet dancers can be. The second is that
he's incredibly shy and
ill at ease. Dressed in a black vest-top, black
combats and blue New Balance
trainers, he sidled into the room sideways as if he
was the waiter, or would
rather be. He was also eager to please and very nice,
lacking that patina of
self-assurance - that conviction that
I'm-the-star-of-the-production-I-like-to-call-my-life
-
most actors have. I positioned my tape recorder near
him and asked him if it
would put him off. "It will," he admitted, fidgeting
with his cropped fringe.
"But don't worry," he added hastily. "It'll be fine."
Seeing Fiennes in the flesh precisely one hour after
watching him on
screen, running about Elizabethan London in a state of
high passion, was like
seeing a blackboard wiped clean. He folded himself
into the corner of a sofa,
crossing and recrossing his limbs around him as if I
might, at any moment, leap
over the table and attack him. Although, at 28, he's
two years older than me, he
made me feel like a bossy aunt demanding to know how
school's going. I asked him
if he felt at all daunted by playing Shakespeare.
"Yes," he whispered, looking
round the room as if for help, "I did."
Shakespeare in Love is a bit of improvisation on a
what-if idea: what if
Shakespeare had writer's block during the writing of a
comedy called "Romeo and
Ethel, the Pirate's Daughter"? What if he suddenly
falls in love with an
unattainable woman? And what if this experience feeds
into the play he's
writing, to make it the tragedy of doomed love we all
know?
It has the potential to be disastrous, heinous even.
But Madden's energetic
direction, a crackling, pacy script courtesy of
Elizabethan aficionado Tom
Stoppard, and several committed performances make it a
fast, rude, passionate
film with a distinctly Shakespearian structure: a
bawdy romantic comedy of
mistaken identities with a larger theme running just
beneath the surface - the
processes of and pressures on artistic creation.
It's only when I tell him that I liked the film that
he's a bit more
forthcoming: "Shakespeare's sacred ground, isn't he?
An academic's hero.
Everyone's hero. So there was a feeling of trepidation
in taking him on, yes."
He admits to being "a bit shocked that Shakespeare was
being approached in this
Disney fashion," but is full of nothing less than
elegiac praise for Stoppard.
"The script isn't an in-depth look at Shakespeare and
whether he really was the
genius behind the pen. It's Stoppard's play on wit.
If you want to make idols
accessible - which I think Shakespeare should be -
then you have to bring a
human touch, make it self-effacing and warm. And
that's what Tom does. What
he's saying is that 400 years ago isn't that long and
the parallels between the
Elizabethan age - and its competitive nature in terms
of the different theatres
- is probably very similar to London or LA. I love the
world Stoppard's
invented. I think he's come close to how people really
did exist - I imagine it
must be like MPs going to Soho peepshows, all those
people at court crossing to
Cheapside to watch Romeo and Juliet."
He is surprisingly pragmatic and self-effacing in his
approach to acting,
referring to it as "a job I've been doing for seven
years." Preparation for the
role consisted of "visiting a library. Reading some
plays was a real chance for
me to catch up on the horrendous schooling I had". But
Fiennes doesn't really
believe in preparation: "there's a fine marriage
between the information you
collect and the world of the script. Often you can do
too much. You have to be
prepared to give yourself and your ideas up to the
writer's imagination."
Inevitably, I found it difficult not to mention the
R-word. I ask him,
tentatively, if he's found it difficult having a
famous actor as a brother, and
it's the only time in our 45 minutes that he displays
any glimmer of a
temperament beyond co-operative shyness. "That is one
of the few journalistic
angles which is the obvious one," he says rather
tersely. Then he collects
himself: "and I can't blame them. I mean if I was a
journalist, I'd do the
same. But it hasn't. Really. Not at all. Ralph and I
don't sit about discussing
acting, you know."
He is the youngest in a family of seven. His father,
Mark, is a
photographer; his mother, Jini - who died in 1993 -
was a writer and
artist. The children had a peripatetic upbringing,
moving about between London,
the West Country and Ireland. "I wish I could paint a
picture for you of a kind
of bohemian idyll, but it wasn't. It was a normal,
messy, smelly, noisy
environment." He is unmistakably proud of his
siblings: "we're all more or less
involved with movies. One is a director Martha, who
directed Ralph in Eugene
Onegin , one a composer Magnus , Sophie's a producer,
but Jacob, my twin, is a
gamekeeper."
Joseph left school at 16, initially to study art, but
after a year he moved
to London, got work backstage at the National Theatre
(where Ralph was already
appearing), and began acting in various youth
theatres, gaining himself an
agent and then a place at Guildhall School of Music
and Drama. From there, he
progressed to stints with the RSC and in various West
End productions. "Working
backstage as a teenager made me realise there's not
much glamour in this
profession - just lots of hard work. That's a good
thing to learn early on."
Next in the ascendant career of Joseph Fiennes is a
part in the screen
adaptation of James Hawes's novel Rancid Aluminium.
And this time, it's goodbye
to lovelorn swains: "I play an Irish lawyer who tries
to save his best friend's
business from the taxman. Halfway through you realise
he's not the sort of
lawyer you want handling your books." Does he like
playing the baddie? "Oh
yes," he says, then thinks for a moment before adding,
"although I see him as
completely sane".
After that Fiennes is heading for the first time to
Hollywood for a Paul
Schrader movie and another bad guy: "I'm very excited
about it. It's a piece he
wrote in the 1970s which he hasn't updated so it's
very much of its time. My
character is an all-American kid who changes identity
and comes back to wreak
revenge and to get the girl. But he's all scarred and
she obviously will find
him quite horrific. There's lots of prosthetics and
nastiness - a revenge
tragedy."
Fiennes is adamant that the lure of Hollywood won't
keep him in
America. He will come back to London - and the
theatre. "I like language, and
in film language is diluted by the visuals and the
music. Theatre is what I was
trained for." Is he tempted now to take on a
Shakespearian role? He shuddered
visibly. "No. I couldn't bear to walk onstage knowing
that half the audience
knew the play better than me and were mumbling it
along with me. I'd rather do a
production no one's ever seen. I think Shakespeare
should be given a rest."
January 17, 1999, Sunday
BY: Maggie O'Farrell