ABEHM
A Brown Eyed Handsome Man

NOTE: I'm not using any templates, and my HTML coding skills are rudimentary at best. Therefore, there are no permalinks. If you look under ARCHIVES, to the right, you'll generally find an active link to a copy of the current day's page. If you want to link to something on this page, you should, instead, link to the archive copy, under this day's date. The stuff on this page changes; the archive copy should stay put.

The ARCHIVE heading itself is a link to a page where you can see what's become of my two previous blogs, MAJOR ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT'S WEBBLOG and DOC NEBULA'S EASTERN OREGON DUM DUM DEPRESSION BLOG.

Due to some publishing stuff that may or may not actually happen with some of my writing, I recently got a PAY PAL account, and since I got a PAY PAL account, and I'm currently unemployed and broke, and I think I'm a good writer and my writing should be worth money, I figured I'd stick a PAY PAL button on this site. Obviously, its use is entirely optional, but hey, if you feel I provided you with something of worth and you feel moved to make a donation, knock yourself out. I wanted one of those cool little 'don't forget to tip the website' buttons all the big kids seem to have, but I guess they aren't available as one of Pay Pal's free options. The button is at the top of my links list on the right of the blog itself. Go nuts.

And if you think I'm a soulless mercenary or just, you know, dreaming that anyone is gonna PAY me for this nonsense, you're probably right. There's a comment thread below. Go nuts there, too.

Saturn's Day, June 21, 2003, early

Haven't had any real sleep yet; I was just nodding off when I thought I felt something crawling on my hand... got the light on and stared around for a couple of minutes and didn't see anything and was just about to turn it off again when a palmetto bug roughly the size of a Dodge Caravan crawled out from behind the dresser onto my wall. I hit it with about forty megatons of RAID and killed it deader than shit, but, well, I haven't gotten to sleep since. Brrrrrrr. Bugs. In the dark. Ew.

Paul has this annoying tendency to fall asleep with the TV blaring, so when I try to be nice and not make him turn it down, what happens is, suddenly it's 4:30 in the morning and apparently he's STILL WATCHING BUFFY. So I get up and go to the door and tell him "Paul, if you're going to watch TV all night, at least turn it down," and he goes "Huh? Whah?" because, obviously, I've just woken him up. Little asshole. I'm lying awake because the TV in the living room is too goddam loud and he's sound asleep four feet away from it.

Paul couldn't talk about anything else all week long (since the Orlando trip, anyway) except that HULK was opening this weekend and we had to go. Well, now it's this weekend and he's being a wimp. He doesn't want to call anyone with a car and try to set up a movie trip. He's not sure he wants to take a cab over because money is getting scarce. He doesn't know if he should because he didn't get some stuff done at work yesterday and they might call him in today. I recognize this tendency in him because I have it myself; he doesn't want to have to initiate anything at all or make any effort, he just wants someone else to magically organize his entire life for him. If it turned out that one of his friends was going to the movies this weekend and they invited him along, well, that would be ideal, but he just digs his heels in at the thought of actually taking his thumb out of his ass and trying to make it happen. All things should simply coalesce around him exactly the way he desires without him having to lift a finger to make it happen.

As I say, I understand this desire because I have it myself... I suspect most of us long, on some level, to have some guardian angel or perpetual mommy figure just arrange our entire lives for us so everything we want to happen just occurs without us having to do a goddam thing about it. But unfortunately that isn't how reality works. And I don't know Paul's friends well enough to call them up and ask them to drive me over to the theater, so if he gets sulky on me, I don't get to go see HULK this weekend. And since it's been raining every goddam day for the last two weeks, I haven't been out of this house to do much of anything... well, since the Islands of Adventure trip on Tuesday. And I'm starting to get pretty grumpy about it, too.

Ah, pay no attention to my bitchiness; it's lack of sleep and a goddam sinus headache and cabin fever and, you know ::shudder:: gigantic palmetto bugs crawling around in my room in the dark. GAH.

I've gotten some interesting email lately. Much of it is from my editor at JoeBob Briggs, who assures me I'm still working for them and they've ordered the various books I asked for and he has my new mailing address and someday, who knows, I might actually get one or some or all of them in the mail. Several others are from Colin Campbell, commenting on two other Martian Vision articles... not error corrections this time, either, which is a relief. And one of them, pretty amazingly, was from Heidi Allisson Roome-Seiler, a woman I have something of a complicated history with (although not really recently) who apparently stumbled across my RPG website (I assume she did an ego search on Google) and read something I'd said about her under the 'Players of Note' section. Her note was for the most part cheerful and pleasant, which is perplexing, since I'd thought she and I were on each other's 'Do Not Disturb' lists forever over some email back and forths we'd had a year or so ago. In fact, she was one of the very old acquaintances I found in my electronic mail address book that I sent out a general greeting to at New Year's this year, giving details of what I was up to, including my then private blog page... and when The Supervisor I Loathe The Most busted me a few days later for saying mean things about her on said private blog, I kind of assumed Alli had, in a fit of high piss off at me, passed the URL along to T.S.I.L.T.M. to get me in trouble.

Anyway, maybe I misjudged her (although Alli is perfectly capable of being much much more devious than that) and if so, well, I apologize for my evil thoughts. Maybe she just deleted my New Year's note unread, not realizing who it was from. Maybe someone else gave T.S.I.L.T.M. the private blog URL. Or maybe she was pissed off at me and then forgot about it when she came across the mention of her on my RPG page; Alli is pretty whimsical. She sent the note to the WorldofEmpire at yahoo dot com email address from the RPG page, which I don't check very often, so it had been sitting there since May 12. And she mostly sent it to laughingly tell me I'd been wrong in how I'd described her on the RPG page, so perhaps she just couldn't resist a chance to correct me. I don't know. I was just amazed to hear from her, and kind of pleased. But I never could figure Alli out even back when we saw a lot of each other, and I certainly can't figure her out now, fifteen to twenty years later.

Other interesting emails I've had recently include a reply from S.M. Stirling, one of my favorite SF authors, to a note I sent him after reading the first three chapters of a new book he's working on over at his website. S.M. doesn't like me all that much, but he seems to get very little email (which surprises me, he's a best selling author, at least, his TERMINATOR novels have been on the best seller's list) so sometimes he answers mine. I also heard from someone named John O'Neill, who, it turns out, I submitted a bunch of stuff to nearly (or maybe more than) a year ago, since his fantasy mag, BLACKGATE, accepts electronic submissions. I'd forgotten all about it. His notes were apologetic; he completely underestimated the amount of electronic submissions he'd get (uh... yeah, dude... talk about crying havoc and letting slip the dogs of war; when a magazine editor says he'll accept electronic submissions, that's not so much like opening the floodgates as it is simply dynamiting the fucking dam) which was why it took him so long to respond. Then, of course, he rejected my submissions, the putz. He said he liked the stuff I'd sent, but it 'wasn't perfect' for BLACK GATE. Like something being 'not perfect' is a valid reason for NOT GIVING ME MONEY, goddamit.

More seriously, it's a good thing John didn't like anything I sent him. I'd completely forgotten I'd submitted the first couple of chapters of WARLORD OF ERBEROS to him. It would have been embarrassing if he'd decided he wanted to publish it, at the same time THRILLING MYSTERIES IN SPACE is serializing it.

Okay, I take it back, I just looked and Colin Campbell did send me a note full of picky little corrections, this one about my DR. STRANGE article. He informs me that Arnold Drake never wrote Dr. Strange, but Denny O'Neil, Jim Lawrence, and Raymond Marais all did, and that the Englehart DR. STRANGE comic was never called DR. STRANGE, SORCERER SUPREME, that was the title of a later volume by Peter Gillis. It's good to have someone out there letting me know every single little manner and detail in which I completely suck.

AGLoomis also responded to my email to him, which I admit was kind of snarky, since I read his blog and discovered he was an avid raving drooling pinhead of a Harry Potter fan, and I mean, holy mother of GOD, if the world ever needed a vigilante with a time machine to undo something, it has to be the entire writing 'career' of J.K. Rowling. Go ahead, call me a muggle under your breath, I don't care; Harry Potter and 'his' fans give geekdom a horribly bad name, even worse than Trekkies. How ANYone can like a series of books featuring a supposedly powerful wizard named >gak< DUMBLEDORE I cannot begin to fathom, and I'll tell you, when Harry Potter references start creeping into BUFFY for God's sake (Willow called Giles 'Dumbledore' early this season) it's time to start emptying the missile silos. Harry Potter is a cultural plague. It must be wiped out.

Anyway, AGLoomis seemed to find my casual description of his favorite fiction as 'tripe' to be somewhat offensive, and he got a bit snarky with me back, which is understandable, except MY favorite authors are people like Robert A. Heinlein and Roger Zelazney and Barbara Hambley and Lois McMaster Bujold and Chelsea Quinn Yarbro and Ursula K. LeGuin, and, um, well, Samuel Clemens, too, come to think of it, while his are Rowling and Douglas Edwards, and honestly, if either of us can justifiably get snarky over what the other one likes to read, I think it's me. Plus, he said he only liked the first book in the Chronicles of Narnia and 'couldn't get into the other ones'. I mean, CHRIST. You see what I have to put up with here?

Since I'm getting back into annoying stuff, Angelfire and Squawkbox between them seem to have neatly sabotaged any chance I might have had of getting many comments on Thursday's entries, since Angelfire was only intermittently allowing my blog to appear all Thursday and most of Friday, and Squawkbox was fucking around with my comment threads for much of that same period. And this entry won't get a goddam thing because it's a weekend entry, and people only read blogs and post comments on them when they're at work, which certainly says something interesting about 21st Century electronic office work ethics. All of which means I'm just not gonna bother doing an overview of the 4th Season of BUFFY until Monday, when people will actually read it.

Instead, I'm going to rerun something from my private blog...

And I just killed ANOTHER goddam roach. This one, at least, was one of the customary small German cockroaches I'm more used to back here. Little bastard.

Anyway, what I'm rerunning is yet another of my things about men and women and dating, and when I ran it the first time I got bitch slapped around by all the usual suspects, and I imagine I'll get bitch slapped around this time, too... but maybe not, since no one reads this thing or posts comments on the weekend. Here's hoping, anyway. ;)


EVERY WOMAN IN THE WORLD, AND ME

Here's something I found in my private blog archives that speaks to a lot of the stuff I wrote about a few days ago. I've cleaned this one up a bit and removed its previous date stamping (although it was originally published on November 23, 2002, for those of you who just have to know, for a private audience of, apparently, not much less than I have now, on my 'public blog' (although folks like AGLoomis and Jim whatshisname do occasionally post stuff out of nowhere and surprise me, and I always appreciate it, too).

As always, this will probably get me a lecture from any and all women reading it which, I believe, at this point, means from sister in law Erica and cuz in law Melanie. (EDITOR'S NOTE: It did.) But it discusses my reasons for not dating single moms, and it also talks about some of the 'code' men and women use when they begin to negotiate their intimate relationship boundaries with each other, and certain codes women use (especially in their personal ads) that truly exasperate me. And while I've said much of it before, it's well written and entertaining and certain to piss off any chick who reads it, and if they won't sleep with me (and they won't) then there's no reason I shouldn't rattle their cages once in a while by saying the stuff that every guy actually already knows, but none of us will ever dare to say if we have any hope of ever getting laid again.

So, let's go...

Rambling seems to be the general style here, so I won’t apologize for this entry meandering all over the place, as I set down a few of the bits of wisdom I gleaned from my recent six months long experience with a Yahoo personals ad:

Number One:

Nobody wants a single mom.

This is an exaggeration; my brother Sean, in fact, just got married to a woman with three kids and is just as happy as a hog in a wallow to suddenly go from having one adopted son to five kids (my adopted nephew Hunter, Erica’s three kids from her previous marriage, and their own first baby, Austin).

But Sean’s a rarity (and now, ladies, he is firmly taken, so drop those nets and tranquilizer dart guns and sit back down). Most guys don’t want kids at all; we have to be eased into the whole idea over a long period of time, at least, if we have any say in the matter, we do. (A lot of times, I’m aware, guys don’t.) Still, even the idea of spending the next twenty years being massively inconvenienced by our own damn DNA incarnate in hyperactive rug rat form is enough to make most of us go a whiter shade of pale. Accepting that level of comprehensive annoyance on behalf of some competing male’s genetic code? Oh HELL no.

Or at least, that’s my analysis of what is, in most guys, and yes, in me, simply an instinctive negative response to a come-on from even the comeliest of women, when she arrives shackled to one or more grubby little goddam urchins. They may be the cutest kids in the world and have the disposition of little angels (although, y’know, that never actually happens, they’re always monsters, at least, when mom’s new boyfriend is in the house), but still… Other Guy’s Kids. Nuh uh.

Beyond that instinctive NO!, though, I think there are more intellectual and logical reasons why guys – or at least, I – shy away from the Instant Family. And my primary one is simply that I’m looking for a relationship with someone who is going to put me first in her life… ahead of her career, ahead of her friends, and, yes, ahead of her family. My psychology is, when I’m dating someone, my girlfriend is the most important thing in my life, and I expect to be the most important thing in hers. If I have free time, she gets it… or at least, she gets first refusal on it; if she wants to go out with her friends that night or something, fine, I'm a free agent. But I check with her first, and I want a woman who checks with me similarly. And let’s face it, with a single mom, that’s not going to happen. She’s going to put her kids first, and I don’t blame her… if she weren’t the kind of person who put her kids first, I couldn’t possibly have any respect for her.

However, I’m just not the kind of guy who is patient with a lot of ‘well, I know I said we’d go see a movie, hon, but I forgot Emily has a Brownie meeting tonight, what can I do?’ The answer that particularly non-musical question is, ‘date somebody else, sweetie’, but that’s an answer best served before the relationship ever begins. So my dating profile firmly says ‘NO DAMN KIDS’, and, well, that’s absolutely not negotiable.

The are other very practical reasons for this, too. I’m not one of those guys who finds virginity to be attractive (frankly, I prefer someone who already knows her way around a little bit), so I can deal with the notion that whoever I’m dating is going to have an ex or two (or, in the case of one of my ex-girlfriends, 19 or 20…). However, when you’re dating a single mom, at least one of her exes (the father of the kid[s], or fathers, if you really know how to pick ‘em) is probably still going to be part of her life, and he’s got a legitimate entrance, too… you have to put up with the sonofabitch, and constantly overrule the more typical and perfectly reasonable response you want to take to any guy who has slept with your current amour and who insists on continuing to hang around with her on occasion, namely, to beat him about the head and shoulders with a thick phone book or heavy piece of sculpture until he perceives his lack of welcome in your living room and wanders dazedly away.

So… other guy’s DNA on pudgy little legs, screaming in your ear every time your new babe gets snuggly. Ex boyfriends wandering through her living room pretty much at will that you’re not allowed to throttle, or even tell in your best alpha male voice to get the hell outta your CRIB before you take a hockey stick to his sorry dumped ass. And last but not least, all your plans with your new squeeze are tentative, because at any moment, li’l Chuckie might start throwing up and then you’re sitting at home by yourself with a Chevy Chase video instead of in a hotel suite with your punkin, watching her try on that new negligee you bought her for her birthday.

No, thank you. I may have kids someday (I admit, it doesn’t look good at this point, but as my mom would wistfully point out, You Never Know), and I assume they’ll be little monsters like everyone else's kids, and they’ll contort my life into a massive knot of inconvenience and emotional trauma, and it will be worth it because they’ll be my damn kids, so I’ll deal with it.

But someone else’s kids? Oh NO. Sorry, hon. I feel your pain, but I’ll do it from over here, thanks.

Moving on to other things I noticed while I was dabbling in the online meat market:

No woman anywhere in the world wants to deal with ‘head games’ or ‘players’.

Conversely, every woman in the world says she is looking for a ‘nice guy’.

I’d say 80% of the ads online from women looking to hook up (perhaps 100%, since an unknown but significant percentage of the ads aren’t actually real, they’re come-ons for adult websites or 900 numbers) include somewhere in them a variation of the phrase ‘tired of players’, ‘tired of head games’, ‘no head games, please’, etc.

The same percentage, in general, mentions, usually in pretty goddam wistful tones, the fact that ‘all I’m looking for is a nice guy… are there any left out there?’

And… well. Where do I begin.

Let's try this: one of the fundamental reasons why men and women have such difficulty communicating with each other, on nearly any subject, but especially on the subject of intimate relationships between the genders, is a very simple one: both men and women speak in code about this stuff.

I could write ten thousand words on why people do this, and maybe I will somewhere else, some other time, but it all boils down to, we speak in code to potential mates about our interrelationships because if we tell the truth about what we want, and what we're willing to give in exchange for it, we won't get it.

In other words, not only do head games work, but in point of fact, they’re pretty much essential. You won’t get anywhere telling someone you’re trying to get next to the truth about what you want from them, whether you’re a woman or a man. It’s just that simple.

Why? Because, for the vast most part, the two genders want to achieve significantly different things from their interactions, and the barter system whereby we exchange our goods for their services (and vice-versa) is always an uneasy one. If someone on one side of the sexual divide ever makes the foolish mistake of actually admitting what they honestly want, all negotiations immediately cease, generally because the other party just left the table in a big hurry.

If a woman wants to get to a spot where she can introduce a guy as her boyfriend without him boggling like Marty Feldman, doing a spit take, and saying "WHAT the hell are you talking about?" (always embarrassing in front of the girlfriends, much less the fam), and let’s not even talk about getting the poor bastard to marry her, she pretty much has to lie, at least, at the start, and ease him into the leg irons one toe at a time, usually over a course of months, weeks, or years. And, in general, if a guy wants to get laid, he has to lie too; generally, he has to act like he’s more interested in a romantic relationship than he actually is, in order to get the object of his desire to come across with some nookie. This is just the way things work (in free will relationships between the two genders; commercial sexual transactions and same sex relationships function by different parameters). Both genders play head games when dealing with each other. They always have, and they always will.

Imagine, if you will, the mythical 'guy who doesn’t play head games':

NO HEAD GAMES GUY: Hi. You’re gorgeous. I really want to fuck you. I don’t know you at all so I have no idea if I want to have a relationship with you after I climax two or three times with your help, but damn, I SERIOUSLY want to fuck you. How about it? I’m a nice guy, I’ll try to make sure it’s fun for you, too.

Entire teams of women from every race, religion, and social class are now cooperating in a skilled and dedicated effort to rapidly construct a working replica of a medieval catapult to fire that foolishly straightforward fellow out of… but let’s be honest, guys, isn’t that exactly what we’d say, if we really lived in a world where women rewarded a ‘nice guy’ who ‘doesn’t play head games’ with, you know, actual sex? Wouldn’t it be kind of a relief?

Relief or no, the simple fact of the matter is, that doesn’t work, so we tend not to say shit like that.

Similarly, let’s take a mental look at the girl who doesn’t play headgames:

NO HEAD GAMES GIRL: Hey, you look like a really good provider and I find you more or less acceptable physically, too. I admit it, I’m not actually all that wild about sex, but I’ll give you a reasonable amount of it at the start of our relationship to hook you in, and then when I’ve got you broken to the bridle I’ll ease you off to maybe once a month, if you’re lucky… maybe once a week, if I think I’ve got a shot at getting you into a church and saying ‘I do’ that way. But once you’re locked down, well, there’s a honeymoon period, of course, but after that I want kids and all my sexual energy is going to be re-channeled into child care. However, you damned well WILL be monogamous and faithful, you creep, regardless of whether I've given you any in the last six months or not, or I’ll damned well divorce your cheating ass, slap you with alimoney and child support, and you’ll never make a nickel for yourself again as long as you live.

Now, mind you, a woman would probably have written that paragraph significantly differently, and she can, too, on her own damn blog. But this one is mine.

My point is simple: it ain’t just guys playing head games, ladies. Y’all do it, too, and when the women play head games, they aren’t just looking for a bit of the old in-out. No, ma’am. They’re looking for a lifelong lockdown, where they get what they want (the Relationship) set to Always On position, and the guy gets what he wants (Sex, baby, just plain damn ol’ SEX)… well, once in a while, maybe, if he hasn’t pissed you off too much in the last 48 hours, and you really feel like it.

Mind you, I’m not a player… trust me, I know what a player looks like, one used to live across the hall from me, and I ain’t that guy. I’d actually like to have a relationship; I genuinely enjoy romance and holding hands and cards on special days and sending flowers and candy and eternal love and all that stuff. But, nonetheless, hopeless romantic and sentimental daydreamer though I am, I’d also like to get laid once in a while, and frankly, walking up to some hottie and SAYing that just plain damn does not work. So some ‘head games’ are inevitable to the success of any relationship, whether one is a ‘player’ or a ‘nice guy’. And women do it, too.

And, on the nice guy thing… what’s interesting is that, while both genders speak in code to each other about what they want from intergender relationships, women not only speak in code to men, they also speak in code to each other, and even to themselves.

And the particular piece of female code we're going to look at (see, you knew I'd bring it home again eventually) is 'all I want is a nice guy' or 'there aren't any really nice guys left', or any of the various other typical wails that desirable, yet still somehow single, women ululate to themselves and each other (and occasionally, when feeling especially embittered, to their male co-workers, as if it's OUR fault), to represent their enormous dissatisfaction with the fact that, contrary to Homer Simpson’s favorite song, it is in no way, shape, or form, raining men.

At least, not the kinda guys these li’l fillies are looking for, nohow, noway.

And look, I don’t object to people being picky. God knows I could be coupled up with any number of women who weigh more than I do, or who are extremely pleasant sociopaths most of the time, or who happen to have two kids already and be pregnant with their third by the husband they’re now separated from. So getting in someone else's shit of either gender simply because they have some kind of standards and they’re going to stick with them and not ‘settle’ just so they can have a date on major holidays (however toothless, nicotine stained, or generally scrofulous that date might be)… no, that’s not my thing. You want to be picky, knock yourself out. I’m there for you, babe.

However, as a genuine Nice Guy who can categorically point to a personals ad which specifically identifies me as such and that received only three unsolicited responses in six months, and that got no positive 'sure, let's go out and see how it works' responses to the hundreds of emails I sent out to women whose ads I liked, I’m here to tell you, this particular bit of code has got to go. If you’re going to bitch about the lack of guys you want to jump on, fine, knock yourself out. But knock it off with this ‘I just want a nice guy’ crap. And I mean, now.

First and foremost, as indicated immediately above, this notion that there aren't any nice guys left out there who are single is, bluntly, horseshit. I'm still out here, and while I'd like to believe I'm the last nice single guy left in the world, I know it's not true. There are plenty of nice guys still out here, and honestly, if any single one of you babes who spend all your time bitching about how we don’t exist were to give us so much as a long lingering look, we’d fall at your feet and worship you like goddesses. However, since you tend to stare at us in distaste if not outright horror whenever we can contrive to actually get your attention, we never quite get to that particular stage.

The truth is, when babes say they want 'nice guys', well, that isn’t quite the entire truth. Sure, they want nice guys. They want nice guys who look like actors on a WB show, who drive XK-Jaguars, who are about to make partner in a ritzy downtown law firm, and who haul down at least six figure salaries.

Now, I'm not talking about some laughable ideal that we cherish in our heart of hearts but never realistically expect to get our mitts on. Yes, guys all want to be with Katie Holmes or Kristin Kruek, but unlike women who whine about the lack of ‘nice guys’, we're a little more realistic than that. Yeah, sure, we want a woman we're physically attracted to, no arguments there (no apologies, either… if I’m going to have sex, I’d like it to be with someone I find sexually attractive; why is that so hard to figure out?). However, most of us are aware that Halle Berry isn't going to get a flat she needs fixed anywhere near us at any point in our foreseeable futures.

So we fix our sights on more accessible women, and we're content with that. As long as, you know, they're babes, and they haven't been so injudicious as to permanently mingle their DNA with that of some other guy, and they laugh at our jokes, and they give us head once in a while, we're fine.

But women... at least, desirable women... honestly seem to think that they're going to walk out their door one day and bam! the Richard Gere character from Pretty Woman is going to pull up in his Lambourgini, peer out at them with his eyes charmingly befuddled beneath his wind blown, tousled locks, and ask them, pretty please, for directions to Presidio and Main. After which, Their Lives Will Never Be The Same.

And that would be fine, honest to God, if you chicks would just admit to it. Put ‘aren’t there any Richard Gere characters from Pretty Woman out there’ in your personal ads and I’ll have no objection. (I’ll point at you and laugh for being awfully goddam silly, but hey, that’s just gravy.)

And I have little doubt that the sheer absurdity of this proposition is exactly why women insist, not just to the Enemy in the Battle of the Sexes (us Evil Males) but also to each other, and even to themselves, that 'all I want is a nice guy, is that so much to ask'? Because on some level, they realize that in point of fact, what they're looking for... Prince Charming in a casual but expensive Izod lounging outfit, sitting behind the wheel of a Porsche, still single or, even better, recently divorced by some bitch he desperately needs to get over... well, this is not only ridiculous, it's pretty goddam shallow.

And 'shallow' is one of those words that women in our culture get to insult all us men with (and I don't deny it, we look for pretty before we look for anything else), so under no circumstances do they want to have to apply it to themselves. Hence, the code.

However, as should be plain by now, as a Nice Guy, I object to the fucking code. Let me put this as simply as possible: if a desirable woman wants a nice guy, I'm right here. And while I’m a pretty singular fella, I am not, in this regard, unique. There are plenty of nice guys left out there, ladies. Most of us don’t look a damned thing like Richard Gere in Pretty Woman, and a lot of us don’t make much money, but still… if you’re seriously looking for Nice Guys, guess what… it actually is raining men. Get out your buckets.

The problem is, and again, this is what really annoys me as a genuine Nice Guy… women don’t want real nice guys. They want alpha males who also happen to be nice guys... successful Nice Guys, hopefully good looking successful Nice Guys, not too old (after all, they want to get a nice ride out of him) and, if possible, naturally color coordinated to make a pleasing aesthetic combination with themselves. (Yeah, I was a little surprised to learn that women think in these terms, but they really do. Guys want a hottie, but honestly, we don't care what the two of us look like together. Color coordination isn't a biggie with us. We'll stroll down the street with Tyra Banks or Reese Witherspoon on our arms, or hell, some green alien chick with antennae on her forehead if she's got a sweetly symmetrical heart shaped face, big dark eyes, soft pouty lips, and a body that stops traffic. If she's a babe we don't give a shit whether her colors clash with our colors, frequently we don't care if our pants clash with our shirts. But to women, not only is how their MAY-un looks important, but how he looks WITH THEM is important, too. I mean, for God's sweet sake, will no one help the son of a widow?)

And aside from being offensive to those of us genuine Nice Guys who couldn’t get a date with any of these babes without using hypnotism and/or outright blackmail, what this also is is just plain fricking stupid. Why? Because alpha males are never nice. At least, not on this planet.

Successful guys, pretty much to a man, are bastards. They’re pricks. They’re sand sharks, bad asses, mean motherfuckers who’d chew up and spit out a 9 year old kid if that 9 year old kid was standing between them and making partner in their prestigious law firm. The way you get successful in our culture (assuming you didn’t pick your parents right) is to successfully compete with all the other alpha males out there, which means you have to be a real whirling sonofabitch to claw your way up to that corner office, gorgeous sports car, and six figure salary. You do not get there by being a ‘nice guy’.

Hand in glove with this is that, as alpha males tend to be predators, so too do they tend to be liars, cheats, and yes, players. They are the guys who always have a wife and a girlfriend, and who are usually porking their secretaries two or three times a week in the copy room, too. If you want to date one of them, fine, but they will put their career ahead of you, they will spend more time with their buddies watching sporting events than they will spend with you, they will lie to you about where they are (or were last night, and who they were with), they will go behind your back, they will fuck your younger sister or your hot best friend (and eventually, maybe, divorce you for her), and you will end up, after a string of relationships with these assholes, maybe putting a personal ad in the paper or on a website wondering ‘gee, why do I always run into players’ and/or ‘aren’t there any nice guys out there’?

Baby, here’s the simple truth: if a guy is that damn sexy, he should have a girlfriend or a wife by now, right? Now, if he does and you go after him anyway, fine… if you shoot and miss, you’re embarrassed (and maybe your sister or your best friend isn’t talking to you any more, you go, girl).

If, on the other hand, you nail the guy, well, congratulations… you now have a male hottie that you know for a scientific fact will cheat on his girlfriend and/or wife (once again, you go, girl).

On the other hand, if he’s that damn sexy and he’s still single… well, you don’t think you’re the first woman who’s noticed how well he fills out those Dockers, do you? Trust me, if this guy is a male hottie, he’s had plenty of you throwing themselves at him in the past, and if he’s still single, it’s because he wants to be.

In other words, you want a male hottie? Fine. If he’s already hooked up, then either he’s going to stay with who he’s with, or he’s a slut. If he’s not already hooked up, he’s a player.

Do I have to say ‘you go girl’ one more time?

So, if some babe really wants a ‘nice guy’, here I am. If you want a rich successful guy, well, take your best shot, but if I were you, I wouldn’t expect him to be ‘nice’.

Either way, I don’t care. However, please stop asking if there are any ‘nice guys’ left out here, if you’re too goddam shallow to really want one.

Yeah, okay, that definitely rambled, and probably didn’t say much that everyone reading this (all six or seven of you) didn’t already know. But what the hell.


THE INEVITABLE DISCLAIMER

By generally accepted social standards, I'm not a likable guy. I'm not saying that to get cheap reassurances. It's simply the truth. I regard many social conventions in radically different ways than most people do, I have many many controversial opinions, and I tend to state them pretty forthrightly. This is not a formula for popularity in any social continuum I've ever experienced.

In my prior blogs, I took the fairly standard attitude: if you don't like my opinions or my blog, don't read the fucking thing.

Having given that some more thought, though, I'm not going to say that this time around, because I've realized that what this is basically saying is, 'if you don't like what I have to say, tough, I don't want to hear it, don't even bother to tell me, just go away'.

And that's actually a pretty worthless attitude. It's basically saying, 'I don't want to hear anything except unconditional agreement and approval'. And that's nonsense. This is still a free country... for a little while longer, anyway... and if you really feel you just gotta send me a flame, or post one on my comment threads (assuming they actually work, which I cannot in any way guarantee) then by all means, knock yourself out.

Unless your flame is exceptionally cogent, witty, or stylish, though, I will most likely ignore it. You do have a right to say anything you want (although I'm not sure that's a right when you're doing it in my comment threads, but hey, you can certainly send all the emails you want). However, I have an equal right not to read anything I don't feel like reading... and I'm really quick with the delete key... as various angry folks have found in the past, when they decided they just had to do their absolute level best to make me as miserable as possible.

So, if you don't like my opinions, feel free to say so. However, if I find absolutely nothing worthwhile in your commentary, I will almost certainly not respond to it in any way.

Stupidity, ignorance, intolerance... these things are only worth my time and attention if they're entertaining. So unless you can be stupid, ignorant, and/or intolerant with enough wit, style, and/or panache to amuse me... try to be smart, informed, and broad minded when you write me.

Like it? Hate it? Hit me with your best shot.


 

ALL DONATIONS GRATEFULLY ACCEPTED


WHO IS THIS IDIOT, ANYWAY?

ARCHIVES:

Friday 4/18/03

Saturday 4/19/03

Sunday 4/20/03

Sunday, later, 4/20/03

Monday, 4/21/03

Tuesday, 4/22/03

Wednesday, 4/23/03

Thursday, 4/24/03

Friday, 4/25/03

Monday, 4/28/03

Wednesday, 4/30/03

Friday, 5/2/03

Sunday, 5/4/03

Tuesday, 5/6/03

Thorsday, 5/8/03

Frey's Day, 5/9/03

Day of the Sun, 5/11/03

Moon's Day, 5/12/03

Tewes Day, 5/13/03

Woden's Day, 5/14/03

Thor's Day, 5/15/03

Frey's Day, 5/16/03

Satyr's Day, 5/17/03

Tewes's Day, 5/20/03

Woden's Day, 5/21/03

Frey's Day, 5/23/03

Satyr's Day, 5/24/03

Day of the Sun, 5/25/03

Tewes's Day, 5/27/03

Woden's Day, 5/28/03

Thor's Day, 5/29/03

Frey's Day, 5/30/03

Satyr's Day, 5/31/03

Day of the Sun/Moon's Day, 6/1&2/03

Woden's Day, 6/3/03

Thor's Day, 6/5/03

Satyr's Day, 6/7/03

Moon's Day, 6/9/03

Tewes' Day, 6/10/03

Thor's Day, 6/12/03

FATHER'S DAY, 6/15/03

Tewes' Day, 6/17/03

Thor's Day, 6/19/03

OTHER FINE LOOKIN WEBLOGS:

Pen-Elayne on the Web

Inkgrrl

Blue Streak by Devra

Emily Jones

Dean's World

BROWN EYED HANDSOME ARTICLES OF NOTE:

ROBERT A. HEINLEIN, MARK EVANIER & ME: Robert Heinlein's Influence on Modern Day Superhero Comics

KILL THEM ALL AND LET NEO SORT THEM OUT: The Essential Immorality of The Matrix

HEINLEIN: The Man, The Myth, The Whackjob

BILL OF GOODS: The Words of A Heinlein Fan Like Nearly Every Other Heinlein Fan I've Ever Met, But More Polite

FIRST RAPE, THEN PILLAGE, THEN BURN: S.M. Stirling shows us terror... in a handful of alternate histories

DOING COMICS THE STAINLESS STEVE ENGLEHART WAY!by "John Jones" (that's me, D. Madigan), & Jeff Clem, with annotations by Steve Englehart

JOHN JONES: THREAT OR MENACE!

FUNERAL FOR A FRIENDSHIP

Why I Disliked Carol Kalish And Don't Care If Peter David Disagrees With Me

MARTIAN VISION, by John Jones, the Manhunter from Marathon, IL

BROWN EYED HANDSOME GEEK STUFF:

Doc Nebula's Phantasmagorical Fan Page!

THE OMNIVERSE TIMELINE

World Of Empire Fantasy Roleplaying Campaign The Jeff Webb Art Site

BROWN EYED HANDSOME FICTION (mostly):

NOVELS: [* = not yet written]

Universal Maintenance

Universal Agent*

Universal Law*

Time Watch

Endgame

Earthquest

Earthgame*

Warren's World

Warlord of Erberos

Return to Erberos*

ZAP FORCE #1: ROYAL BLOOD

Memoir:

In The Early Morning Rain

Short Stories:

Positive

Good Cop, Bad Cop

Leadership

Talkin' 'bout My Girl

No Good Angel

No Time Like The Present

Pursuit of Happiness

The Last One

Pursuit of Happiness

Return To Sender

Halo

Primogenitor

Alleged Humor:

Ask A Bastard!

On The Road Again

Meeting of the Mindless

Star Drek

THE ADVENTURES OF FATHER O'BRANNIGAN

Fan Fic:

The Captain and the Queen

A Day Unlike Any Other (Iron Mike & Guardian)

DOOM Unto Others! (Iron Mike & Guardian)

Starry, Starry Night(Iron Mike & Guardian)

A Friend In Need (Blackstar & Guardian)

All The Time In The World(Blackstar)

The End of the Innocence(Iron Mike & Guardian)

And Be One Traveler(Iron Mike & Guardian)

BROWN EYED HANDSOME COMICS SCRIPTS & PROPOSALS:

SERAPHIM 66

AMAZONIA by D.A. Madigan & Nancy Champion (7 pages final script)

AMAZONIA (Alternate Draft 1)

AMAZONIA (Alternate Draft 2)

AMAZONIA (World Timeline)

TEAM VENTURE by Darren Madigan and Mike Norton

FANTASTIC FOUR 2099, by D.A. Madigan!

BROWN EYED HANDSOME CARTOONS:

DOC NEBULA'S CARTOON FUN PAGE!

DOC NEBULA'S CARTOON FUN, PAGE 2!

DOC NEBULA'S CARTOON FUN, PAGE 3!

WEIRD WAR COMICS COVER ART.

ULTRASPEED!

Help Us, Batman...

JLA Membership drive

Don't Leave Us, Batman...!

Ever wondered what happened to the World's Finest Super-team?

Two heroes meet their editor...

At the movies with some legendary Silver Age sidekicks...

What really happened to Kandor...

Ever wondered how certain characters managed to get into the Legion of Superheroes?

A never before seen panel from the Golden Age of Comics...

BOOM!

E-MAIL