Movie Sequels

Jurassic Park was great (mostly because I was 9 when I saw it and dinosaurs rule), but Lost World? Jurassic Park 3? And now 4? Matrix was great, but Matrix 2 (was fun to watch at least), but Matrix 3 was TERRIBLE! Star Wars Episodes 1 and 2???? C'mon, people who say these movies are good are just saying it so they don't have to admit the originals were ruined.

And how many horror sequels do we need? Say, lets make all the horror monsters fight each other (Freddy vs. Jason, Aliens vs. Predator). Then we'll make another Chucky movie. And more superhero movies, cause there aren't enough of those.

The worst ones are the sequels not even made by the original cast or director; the sole purpose of these movies is to generate money based of the name - Dumb and Dumberer, anyone?

Movie sequels ruin great movies by trying to use the same dynamic that worked the first time. The problem is, it's just never the same the second time around.

I dare you to name a good movie here - if you can, it certainly wasn't as good as the first one, right? Either that, or you saw the sequel first. And if you like Matrix Revolutions, you are a retard.

Back to Main