Pyewacket was one of the familiar spirits of a witch detected by the
notorious "witch finder general" Matthew Hopkins in March 1644 in his own
town of Maningtree, Essex, UK. According to his story, he spied on the
witches as they held their meeting close by his house, and heard them
mention the name of a local woman. She was arrested and deprived of sleep
for four nights, at the end of which she confessed and named her familiars.
They were:
The incident is described (with a frequently reprinted woodcut of the witches and their familiars) in Hopkins's pamphlet "The Discovery of Witches" (1647), which I have in the Scolar Press facsimile reprint titled _Witches and Witch-Hunters_ (E. Ardsley: S.R. Publishers, 1971).
Hope this clarifies matters somewhat.
BE
Bill Ellis
Associate Professor, English and American Studies
President, International Society for Contemporary Legend Research
Highacres, Penn State University--Hazleton, Hazleton, PA 18201-1291
Voicemail: 717-450-3026 FAX: 717-450-3182
Home page: http://www.hn.psu.edu/faculty/bellis/
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 10:16:42 -0400 From: James SerpellBill Ellis is quite right, of course, about the names of the familiars illustrated on the frontispiece of Matthew Hopkins's "Discoverie of Witches....1647". Pyewacket does not appear in my files because his/her name does not appear in the assize records from 1645, either in Elizabeth Clark's confession, or in the witness depositions of either Hopkins or John Stearne, his confederate. I should have remembered this.Subject: Pyewacket
In the trial records the only names mentioned are 'Holt' (a young white cat), 'Jeremarye' (a sandy-coloured spaniel), Vinegar Tome (in the likeness of a greyhound), and 'Sacke and Sugar' (a black rabbit). In Hopkins's later account of the trial he adds a polecat called 'Newes', and the names of various familiars belonging to divers other women known to Clarke. Here the names 'Ilemauzer', 'Pywacket', 'Peck in the Crown' and 'Griezel Greedigut' appear for the first time. John Stearne, in his account of 1648, only mentions the two dogs, the cat, the rabbit and the polecat/ferret, and only names the spaniel 'Jermarah'. Both these later accounts also add exotic features to the animals that are not mentioned in the trial records. Hopkins describes Jarmara as having no legs, while Stearne says that his legs are no longer than a finger; Hopkins says that Vinegar Tom has a head like and ox, and Stearne says that he has legs like a stag, etc.
Clearly, we have a case here of evidence being invented after the fact by the the notorious witchfinders as a way of sensationalizing an otherwise fairly mundane description of four or five relatively commonplace pets. James Serpell