By
Tanya Mannes
UNION-TRIBUNE
STAFF WRITER
PEGGY PEATTIE /
Union-Tribune Josefina Quinones is seeking $10 million, claiming the city of
Chula Vista was negligent because it failed to install sidewalk ramps. |
CHULA
VISTA The widow of a disabled man is suing the city of Chula Vista, saying
her husband was fatally hit by a car because he couldn't get his wheelchair on
the sidewalk.
Josefina Quinones
is demanding $10 million, claiming the city was negligent because it failed to
install sidewalk ramps.
James A. Quinones,
51, used an electric wheelchair after damaging his right leg in a fall. The
morning of May 31, 2006, he was heading home on Industrial Boulevard, alongside
the curb, when the driver of a stolen Honda hit his wheelchair, throwing him
onto the pavement.
He died the next
day.
I told the police
if the ramp had been there, my husband would not have died, said Josefina
Quinones, 53, who spoke in Spanish through an interpreter.
Quinones filed her
lawsuit in December in San Diego Superior Court. She and the city will enter
mediation today to reach a settlement.
Quinones is seeking
compensation for the loss of her husband's income, pain and emotional
suffering, medical bills and funeral expenses, and attorney's fees.
State
law cited
Her
attorney, Domingo Quintero, said people with disabilities have a statutory
right of access to public streets and sidewalks. He cited California Government
Code 4450. Since 1968, that law has set accessibility standards for public
buildings and facilities.
Quintero said that
fresh pavement and concrete indicates city crews recently did work on Industrial
Boulevard.
The
law states that when cities repair the street and the sidewalks they must
comply and bring it up to code, Quintero said. The city did not.
The city did not
address that allegation in its response to the lawsuit. Acting Assistant City
Manager Scott Tulloch, the city engineer, refused to answer questions or supply
documents about maintenance on Industrial Boulevard.
Chula Vista Mayor
Cheryl Cox also declined to comment on pending litigation.
In
the city's response, assistant city attorney Bart Miesfeld denied the city is
liable for Quinones' death. In a document filed with the court on March 8,
Miesfeld said Quinones shouldn't have been in the road.
Miesfeld
said James Quinones had full knowledge of the conditions existing and appreciated
the danger thereof.
PEGGY PEATTIE /
Union-Tribune In happier times, this photo shows Josefina Quinones and her
late husband, James A. Quinones.
|
James Quinones was struck just a few blocks
from the couple's home on Belvia Lane. That morning, he met his wife at the
Palomar trolley stop as she returned from an appointment in San Diego, so she
wouldn't have to walk home alone. The couple walked from Palomar and took a
right on Industrial Boulevard.
When they crossed
Ada Street, he couldn't get on the sidewalk because there was no ramp. He rode
on the street and his wife walked next to him on the sidewalk.
Shortly after 11:15
a.m., a red Honda Civic hit his wheelchair.
I heard a loud
noise. He was in the air when I turned to look, his wife said. I threw my bag
and tried to catch him and the car ran over my bag.
The driver kept
going, then abandoned the car.
Her husband landed
in the road and soon lost consciousness, Quinones said.
He suffered major
head injuries and two broken legs and was airlifted to UCSD Medical Center. His
life support was disconnected the next day.
What
makes me sad is that my husband did everything he could to be able to walk
again, Quinones said, her eyes filling with tears. I saw him doing exercises.
He would say, 'In a few months I'll be driving again.'
During the past
year, Quinones has supported herself by cleaning houses. She has moved in with
a neighbor.
I miss his
companionship most of all, she said.
Police asked for
the public's help to find the driver of the car. On June 12, 2006, they
arrested an 18-year-old suspect, on suspicion of felony hit-and-run, vehicular
manslaughter and possession of a stolen vehicle, said Chula Vista Police
Officer Ken Hicks.
The district
attorney declined to prosecute the case, saying further investigation was
needed. Hicks declined to describe what information was needed, saying it could
jeopardize an ongoing investigation.