NOTE: Line 18. The COURT requests for comment on the second issue never arrives. At Lines 8, 9, 10 I point at the reason there is no immunity. No immunity because the act of the mental health technician was not "discretionary".
MS. KOELSCH said something pertaining to the issue of immunity. When the judge said, "comment" he opened the door for her. The attorney didn't have to address the critical issue with legal foundation and couldn't so she "commented". Thinly veiled collusion and theater.