In response, her good pal, Pam A, [ not sure if this Pam is the same Pam Allen, who purveyed herself to me as "Back Talk" Board Administrater ] wrote a follow up, veritably snorting in derisive laughter, heaping on her own abuse, and urging Shannie to go ahead, and call him, lure him into a relationship, then gull him into believing that she really cared for him--and THEN drop the bomb, insulting him to his face! Her suggestion was for Shannie to pretend not to know that he was THE Rick Rockwell, commiserating with him over how cruel Darva had been: "start talking about what a slut good ole' Darva was, and a golddigger to boot. This will lull him into thinking you're a fan of his, THEN start in on how Rockwell was/is such a slimeball!"
Snort, snort, snort. Heeyuck!
This was followed up by Bambie, who'd asked which dating site Rick was posted on, as she'd just gotten out of a relationship where she'd "felt thoroughly used," that it would feel good to "turn the tables," and wanted to see if she could "get the cheapskate to part with some of his pennies, while I'm still young, single, and able to come and go as I please."
As I'd observed, this is the usual juvenile crap of which the foul "Back Talk" is comprised. Evil Shannie's backlog of posts reveals several like such derisive exchanges. What a sad fate is in store for the dupe she finally snares as husband! He will serve as fodder for Shannie to impress her Board-buddies. Pam A will serve as her snorting audience.
From having perused through Back Talk's archives, I deduced that the Board Administrator, "Becca"/Pam Allen, is in Shannie's hip pocket. Anytime Shannie says "jump!" "Becca"/Pam says "Glad to; which bridge?" Shannie's attitude is that of a spoiled-brat juvenile bitch, who spews ridicule and insults all over the hapless websurfer who might occasionally drop by. "Becca" would like more traffic to her board--but because Shannie had a tantrum due to too many "outsiders" posting messages, and had demanded a removal of Back Talk from the directory, "Becca"/Pam Allen readily complied.
Arf! Arf! Good Doggie!
"Becca"/Pam, should you really be taking your marching orders from such a demanding bitch as Shannie? You have a right to be listed widely in any damn search engine you want to. Who do owe your loyalty to? Your site, which you want to draw people to? Or that spoiled-rotten Bitch, Shannie? She's NOT as good a friend to you, as you may think--nor is she a good human being, in my opinion. Anyone with such cruel remarks about so many people has to be hideous. Any man who's unfortunate enough not to discover this before she snares him in marriage will suffer, horribly.
Considering Shannie's consistantly juvenile attitude and puerile writing, one wonders how she ever managed to get posted onto an ADULT dating site? My guess is that Shannie routinely passes around "funny" messages she gets from unwitting males, who were drawn to her, because she posts hot photos. One wonders if they are her own, or pilfered?
O, Man, How Foolish Art Thou!
To fall for a foul bitch such as this, whilst kinder women languish in solitude!
It's a sad trap for Rick Rockwell, especially, because he's a sucker for a hot blond. He searches dating sites for blonds who correspond to his criteria for a wife. In the course of his quest, he's found some sour poison-types. THIS is one of them. One would hope that Poor Rick will take more care in the future, to whom he writes. Finding someone in his OWN age bracket would be a help. Finding someone with the I.Q. and acumen of an adult would help, too. Shannie seems to be stuck at the mental age of about 14. ( though I, myself, was a much more mature, intelligent, and thoughtful 14! As I'm sure are MOST others! )
I had, previously, reprinted the entire, original message board commentary. It spoke for itself. But Foul Evil Shannie wrote to me, with threats for reprinting the message-posts. "Becca"/Pam, ever the faithful--and misguided--"doggie," wrote in with her 2˘ ( though it was worth only a farthing ), to claim copywrite infringment.
Being quite conscientious, I, of course, decided to work within my legal rights, restructuring this article, by quoting and describing as is my right as a reporter. If Shannie doesn't like THIS, there's nothing she can do about it. I will state here, that this article is MY OPINION, and in that reguard, I can express my feelings, per my observations. I am also reporting, as is my right as a gossip columnist, the dating attempt of my chosen subject, Rick Rockwell; thus it is a valid point of discussion. [ chew on THAT, Shannie! ]
You, the readers of the Rick and Darva Gossip/News site, will likely be unable to read the original posts, due to Foul Evil Shannie suddenly having removed them from the "Back Talk" site, upon realization that they were being viewed by "outsiders" such as myself. Upon my observation to this, she lied directly to me, claiming: "As for WHY those posts had been removed on that other board, how the hell would I know? I don't own/manage that board. I imagine they were removed because the board owner goes through and removes old posts that aren't getting any more replies. I had nothing to do with the removal."
Bull.
"Back Talk's" archives go back quite a way. I found posts as far back as February 2000. Likely could go back further, but I was too tired.
And considering how swiftly "Becca"/Pam Allen had jumped to remove "Back Talk" listing upon Shannie's tantrum-demand, I KNOW she lied! The original postings disappeared within 2 days of my second letter.
And the "old messages" had received a reply: mine, which was posted following Pam's, albeit ever-so-briefly; for Foul Shannie had sent an e-mail ( to my ISP address! )inquiring of me:
The Foul and Stinking Shannie had replied to my initial inquiry/posted letter with an e-mail dripping with derision for the "evil outsider," who dared to read "her" board. Rather, I'd caught the derisive tone of it, despite Foul Shannie's efforts at what she likely deemed a "friendly" reply. I will say that I probably erred in attempting to communicate with Foul Shannie on her own juvenile level. I had two choices: write a letter as an author, openly requesting an interview; OR attempt to establish a chat-pal relationship, as apparently had Foul Pam A, to whom Shannie had gladly shared Rick's private e-mails, chortling over them together. I'd hoped that she might extend to me the same "courtesy."
This was not the voyeuristic thing it might seem: I'd felt, that in Rick's own best interests, that if women were deriding his e-mails, posting tripe like that on message boards, that an author such as myself had better review them, as Poor Rick has gotten a bad rap as a poor sort of boyfriend. Had he really asked anything that was out-of-line? Or was this just another cruel fem bum-rapping him? In the interests of fairness, I would see for myself! My mistake was in not thoroughly perusing Evil Shannie's backlog of messages, prior to writing. I would've realized that she could NOT be communicated with on ANY civilized level. Shannie is thoroughly immature, lacking in courtesy, as well as other vital social traits. I'm afraid that I couldn't help but fail in an attempt to purvey myself as one of the usual feeble-minded posters of "Back Talk." For one thing, I used too many multi-syllable words, and actually conveyed thoughts that were not of grade-school-level. Likely THAT is what feeble Shannie could not decipher.
As the author of a biography on Rick Rockwell, I'd wanted to interview his girlfriends, current and past. I have interviewed several, already. I want to state for the record, that what I was looking for was NOT a "cheap thrill," but a 3-dimensional picture of Rick the man, and Rick as a date: for the only women on record, so far, have been women who despise and deride him. This may be the case, because only the critical ones have been published and publicized. Those with kinder reguards for Rick are relegated to the cutting-room-floor. Those who have mixed feelings about him, were likely cut down, on TV and newspapers as simply complaining about him, with none of their tender feelings displayed. The result made them look like bitches, and Rick look like a creep. Nothing is black-and-white. Rick has faults, but good points, too, which is why so many women call/write/phone him--despite all that is said of him! These women are not dummies, though they are derided for being enamoured of him. My book will seek to rectify that. I've asked for, and received interviews from many of the women who've dated Rick, both prior to the show, and since. I've found there to be women willing to give me their complete story, and I've treated them, and Rick with respect.
This same courtesy would've been extended to Shannie, but since that fem turned out to be not quite of the human race [ in my opinion ], it is a futile effort. Shannie seems incapable of telling the truth, even lying directly about not having the messages removed. [
2 days after, Shannie! Try to recall: I'm NOT one of your usual feeble pals! ] It was actually this alarcrity to remove the incriminating postings, that gave me the suspicion that Stinking, Foul Shannie had done just as her pal, "Pam A" bade: suckered Rick with a phony relationship, leading him to a sour finalé, where she'd deride him; and in the meantime, was passing around his e-mails to the eager, slavering members of "Back Talk." My attempts to ascertain this, however, were in vain. Shannie is quite the hoot, though!: actually chiding ME for asking her to give me his Vancouver phone number: "I can't even believe you had the audacity to ask me to give you his phone number. As *IF* I'd give out someone's telephone number." [ OH! Boo Hoo! But I suppose It IS all right to pass around his e-mails? FYI, Shannie, i.e.,411: all I had to do was call information. I already had the number! I just wanted to see if you were giving everything away!
And most likely, to your "Back Talk" buddies, you were! Passing around a man's private lovesick loveletters, to the derision of your nasty group is somewhat worse that to give a phone number, you creepy bitch.]
The women that have shared their stories with me, know they can trust me. I only regret that my research had led me to the contaminated airspace of Shameless Shannie and her gang. Still, it gives one sympathy for the sort of garbage Rick Rockwell has had to contend with.
Still, I am NOT writing a whitewash of Rick, as such a tome would not be respected. I am portraying him, warts and all, but seeking a balanced and 3-dimensional view of him. People have valid complaints about him; I seek to explain the reasons for his behaviour, or how/why relationships/situations had exploded as they had. This entails going through details of his relationships, via people who've known him, both past and present. I invite Rick's friends, associates, etc. to please speak with me. I want the whole story, and will convey it in my book.
[ Note to Mr. Rockwell: Due to Shannie's unwarranted attack on me, I suspect she is currently gulling you with a phony relationship. Her panic at my printing this on my site indicates it. Be warned. ]
FIN
Susan Brown, copyright ©2001
Disclaimer in advance: If the REAL "Back Talk" administrator, ostensibly "Becca 141," as listed, is NOT the one who'd rudely contacted me, be aware that stinking Pam A is impersonating you. I received a letter from Pam Allen, claiming to also be "Becca 141" "the forum owner." This may or may not be the case. I would wonder why there have been ongoing posts, throughout the months, for BOTH "Becca141", and "PamA"!! In which case, Pam Allen is the one guilty of "criminal" intent, not ME. I AM a professional writer, and will continue to be so. The filthy, insufferably FOUL letter Shannie wrote to me attacked me for my usage of messages posted on a "private" message board. There are certain allowances of Freedom of Speech, and reprinting of Internet postings within legality. If Filthy Shannie and Pam don't like it, then they can found a message board that is unable to be seen by "outsiders." Such a thing CAN be accomplished. They are both severely out of line for what they've done, and for what they've written, both privately and publicly.
I apologize to my readers for my vitriol, but it was caused by Foul Shannie's rotten attack upon me. I want to assure my readers that I am a legitimate writer, despite the slip of professionalism displayed in this diatribe. Shannie's evil nastiness was way too much for me to take. Reading that tramp Shannie's hideous attacking letter made me feel as if an elephant was sitting on my chest, suffocating me. If I get a heart attack, I will sue that bitch! The only thing that calmed my pains was writing this.
If anybody wants to "drop a penny" on Shannie, please feel free to do so. You know where you can contact me.
Rick's Favorite Things About Internet Dating
Links Back to Rick and Darva index, and more
UPDATE ON THIS PAGE
Link Back to Rick and Darva index
Rick and Darva Message Board
Celebrity Message Boards
This space reserved for future article
This space reserved for future article
SURVIVORS OF ABUSE, SEXUAL, BATTERY, ETC.
MAIN SITE PAGE