Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Dali clock icon.   Carolyn Selections (3)   Dali clock icon.

Book Group Books     |     Book Comments    
Adelia | Alex | Ann | Burch | Carolyn | Darcy | Judy | Karen | Lane |
Lindsey | Mary | Nancy | Jeanne | Friends
Home Page     |     Members' Page     |     Greatest Books     |     Famous Lists     |     Book Awards

Rating Index   Carolyn’s List

Wimsey-Vane mysteries - (Sayers) - Strong Poison, Have His Carcase, Gaudy Night and Busman's Honeymoon chronicle Lord Peter Wimsey and Harriet Vane's relationship through a series of mysteries written in England between the World Wars.  Dorothy L. Sayers is the author of novels, short stories, poetry collections, essays, reviews and translations. Although she was a noted Christian scholar, she is most known for her detective fiction. Born in 1893, she was one of the first women to be awarded a degree from Oxford University. Her first book featuring Lord Peter Wimsey, Whose Body?, was published in 1923 and over the next 20 years more novels and short stories about the aristocratic amateur sleuth appeared. Dorothy L. Sayers is recognized as one of the greatest mystery writers of the 20th century.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – (A third or forth reading of the Wimsey-Vane mysteries, this, in the aftermath of September 11, was for comfort.)   Sayers was a strong, intelligent, independent woman, born before the turn of the 20th century.  She was over 35 when she created Harriet Vane in her own image as the perfect counterpoint to her aristocratic detective-hero, Lord Peter Wimsey.  Harriet is a 29-year old mystery-writer on trial for the murder of her ex-lover.  Slight, 40-ish, bon-vivant Lord Peter finally falls in love as he watches Harriet in the dock.  Harriet has a plain face, tall, sturdy body, husky voice and direct manner.  She agreed to live with her lover because he wouldn't marry her - said he didn't believe in marriage.  When he finally wanted to get married, she left him.  She could respect a principle, but when it turned out to be just a trial run, it was over.   Peter talks his way into the case, and proposes to her during their first interview in prison.  Sick of relationships, she turns him down - a pattern they repeat through three of the four Wimsey-Vane mysteries.  
 
The books are vividly set in their times:  1930, Strong Poison glimpses the artist's life during the post-war roaring twenties.  Séances were big.  1932, Have His Carcase - a seaside ballroom resort.  The depression is noticeable around the edges, and the aftermath of the Russian Revolution is prominently featured.  1936, Gaudy Night, set in Oxford at Harriet's alma mater.  Harriet discovers that the foreign office sends Peter to smooth over ruffled feathers in hopes of avoiding war.  1937, Busman's Honeymoon - comedy and the perfect picture of British country life.  When war becomes too real, Sayers resorts to comfort, too.
 
The settings are wonderful and the romance perfect.  The mystery is good.  The dialogue is fast and intelligent, a bit on the snooty side at times.  But the best part is Sayers' exploration of women - who they are and how they fit in.  The most interesting women are near middle-age and not married.  She explores the damping effect of marriage on women's lives, and in the end her only real solution is economic independence.  This is the 1930's and everything is modern, but it's also less than a generation from women getting the franchise.  The characters and their motivations are fascinating to me.  In seventy years not much has really changed.  These days, however, Harriet Vane would be the star, not Lord Peter.  See other comments.
 

How To Be Good - (Hornby) - How to Be Good is a story for our times—a humorous but uncompromising look at what it takes, in this day and age, to have the courage of our convictions. In his third novel, Nick Hornby, whom The New Yorker named "the maestro of the male confessional," has reinvented himself as Katie—the consummate liberal, urban mom—a doctor from North London whose world is being turned on its ear by the outrageous spiritual transformation of her husband, David. Jump to the New York Times Review.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – In one day Katie's husband, David goes from professional malcontent to
extremist do-gooder, taking in his spiritualist guru, GoodNews.  Together,
they take on the world, giving away money, taking in street people, coercing
his kids to give away their toys and befriend the friendless.  For a time,
Katie and the kids try, but for David and GoodNews, there are no limits.
This is one of those books with a message, but you have to suspend your
belief in the probable.  Hornby writes men better than women.  If you take
it seriously (that is identify with any of the characters), it's annoying to
read, but compelling to get to the conclusion.  In the end, you must
compromise -  choices need to be made, otherwise you sacrifice your life.

Mark Twain and His World - (Kaplan) - Not in print.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – Justin Kaplan won the Pulitzer in 1967 for Mr. Clemens and Mark Twain.  Almost half of this luxurious book consists of photos and full - page color prints of art of the time depicting the places Twain inhabited.  

Magician of the Modern - (Gaddis) - Eugene Gaddis  (Non-fiction, 2000). Transcending the usual dusty confines of museum curatorships with unusual artistic range, grasp, ambition and flair, Austin (1900-1957) shone as director of Hartford's Wadsworth Athaneum and Florida's Ringling Museum. Born to a rich family, Austin married for social position, despite a flamboyant bisexual life (apparently reported matter-of-factly to his wife). By his late 20s he was already running the Athaneum, burning old paintings he disliked in the museum furnace and going on buying binges in Europe, usually snagging rare masterworks at bargain basement prices. In a typical case, he facilitated the world premiere of the Virgil Thomson-Gertrude Stein opera Four Saints in Three Acts (recently thrice-revived) at the Athaneum, and helped arrange George Balanchine's arrival in America to found what became the New York City Ballet. (The choreographer took one look at Hartford in the 1930s and fled to Manhattan.) Gaddis (Austin Memorial: The First Modern Museum), who currently curates the Austin House museum at the Athaneum, points out that many of Austin's artistic friends, from architect Philip Johnson to historian H. Russell Hitchcock, were gay, but fails to detail whether Austin's work and sexuality were related. A pioneer in the appreciation of film as art, baroque painting and the links between 19th-century kitsch and modern art, Austin seems here an ever open-minded intelligence, unique in his time and even more valuable today, when his like would languish in the bureaucratic, hype-obsessed art world. (Nov.) Copyright 2000 Cahners Business Information.  Jump to the New York Times review.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – Chic Austin was the kind of high-energy person who strategically charmed people into buying into his whirlwind world of fun and art - quite against their own natures.  For 15 years  he got away with creating the avant-gard in conservative Hartford.  He saw art as all the arts in a simultaneous package.  An oil painting had to be in the context of dance, theater, architecture, music and entertainment, and he tried to do them all, with other people's money.  His period at the Athaneum placed Hartford at the center of firsts in this country, and left the city with a treasure-trove of pieces, bought a bargain-basement prices.  I recognized the whirlwind, being next to Jack Dollard in the 1970's.  It should be about time for Hartford's next whirlwind.

The Gold Bug Variations - (Powers) - In this novel, "the narration alternates between two time frames. In 1957 at the University of Illinois, a biologist, Stuart Ressler, is decoding the DNA molecule and falling in love with his (happily married) colleague Dr. Jeanette Koss. She gives him a Glenn Gould recording of Bach's 'Goldberg' Variations that changes his life. . . . Meanwhile, in the mid-1980's in Brooklyn, Mr. Powers's first-person narrator, Jan O'Deigh, is joining her . . . boyfriend, Franklin Todd, in solving the mystery of the same Stuart Ressler--who 25 years later has sunk to anonymity in a dead-end, graveyard-shift job as a computer programmer. Why, they ask, has Dr. Ressler forsaken scientific glory for obscurity?" (N Y Times Book Rev)

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – I cared about each of these characters, elegantly described through their short-hand dialogue connecting the mysteries of the universe in a single phrase.  You have to pay attention, this book can't be scanned, but it is rich and deep.

The Sixteen Pleasures - (Hellenga) - "I was twenty-nine years old when the Arno flooded its banks on Friday 4 November 1966. On Tuesday I decided to go to Italy, to offer my services as a humble book conservator, to save whatever could be saved, including myself." The Italians called them "Mud Angels," the young foreigners who came to Florence in 1966 to save the city's treasured art from the Arno's flooded banks. American volunteer Margot Harrington was one of them, finding her niche in the waterlogged library of a Carmelite convent. For within its walls she discovered a priceless Renaissance masterwork: a sensuous volume of sixteen erotic poems and drawings. Inspired to sample each of the ineffable sixteen pleasures, Margot embarks on the intrigue of a lifetime with a forbidden lover and the contraband volume—a sensual, life-altering journey of loss and rebirth in this exquisite novel of spiritual longing and earthly desire.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: –  Florence after the flood of '66, in the winter and without tourists, is very appealing.  You get a glimpse of the worlds of art restoration, bookbinding and church hierarchy.  However, Margot is another female character unconvincingly written my a male author.  (All the females are sort of noble, and most of the male characters are sort of creeps.)  The sequence of action isn't very believable.  However, Hellenga does draw you into another world which is satisfying.

 

Two Kinsey Millhones - (Grafton) - 

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – It's 1986 and Kinsey is 36.  The phone rings and a stranger offers to sell her a box of her own childhood memorabilia (yearbook, old report cards, etc.)  It seems her first ex husband has shown up in a coma, victim of a shooting.  Kinsey can't help but investigate, but it seems she's also the prime suspect.  Grafton doles out bits and pieces of her heroine to her readers.  But this one wasn't one of her best, guessed the culprit right off.

Enduring Love - (McEwan) - On a windy spring day in the Chilterns, the calm, organized life of science writer Joe Rose is shattered when he witnesses a tragic accident: a hot-air balloon with a boy trapped in its basket is being tossed by the wind, and in the attempt to save the child, a man is killed. A stranger named Jed Parry joins Rose in helping to bring the balloon to safety. But unknown to Rose, something passes between Parry and himself on that day—something that gives birth to an obsession in Parry so powerful that it will test the limits of Rose's beloved rationalism, threaten the love of his wife, Clarissa, and drive him to the brink of murder and madness. Brilliant and compassionate, this is a novel of love, faith, and suspense, and of how life can change in an instant.  Jump to the New York Times review.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – McEwan specializes in psychological thrillers centered on obsession.  The writing is good.  The characters are three-dimensional.  You get sucked in by the good writing and characters, and then, uh-oh, it's another creepy situation.  Seemingly normal people take a little turn around a scary corner.  It could be I'm just not his audience.

Ruby, Sapphire & Emerald Buying Guide - (Newman) - Registered gemologist Newman understands this. In her two new guides, Newman continues her tradition of user-friendly texts that are technical enough to help consumers make wise purchases. Like her other well-regarded guides (e.g., The Gold Jewelry Buying Guide), this book is profusely illustrated with color photographs most by Newman showing not only the beauty of finished jewelry but close-ups and magnifications of details such as finish, settings, cut, clarity, flaws, and fakes. Sections on testing and judging the real from the fake are sophisticated enough for professionals to use. All three books are enjoyable reading, but Newman s guides are the ones to take along when shopping. (Lib J).

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – A carat is 1/5 of a gram.  Different stones have different rates of specific gravity, which means a 1 carat emerald is smaller than a 1 carat ruby.  An oil-filled emerald is probably OK if disclosed (it can be re-oiled), but an epoxy-filled emerald may degrade without being able to repair it.  Many claim to be able to identify the country of origin for  emeralds based on the color.  Which colors, cuts and countries are most valuable.  How to tell a fake.  How to pick a jeweler.  Nice photos, good, basic info.

Conditions of Faith - (Miller) - When Alex Miller's mother died several years ago, she left him the fragmentary journal she'd kept while living briefly in Paris as a young woman in the 1920's. Inspired by this surprising entrée into his mother's emotional life and her conflicted passions of young womanhood, Miller has written Conditions of Faith. In spare, precise prose, Miller brings us into vivid 1920's Australia, France, and Tunisia and gives us a taste of feminism at the beginning of the century through the story of Emily Stanton. Like Henry James's Isabel Archer before her, Emily is beautiful and headstrong, restless, idealistic, and determined to live a fulfilling life despite smothering social conventions. It's 1923 and at age 25 Emily, an Australian, impulsively marries Georges Elder, a French-Scottish engineer ten years her senior. Suddenly she is propelled from Melbourne, where she is a promising scholar of classical civilizations, to Georges's small, conventional flat in Paris. Quickly dismayed at the traditional life she has married into, Emily resolves to look elsewhere for the exotic adventure and intellectual stimulation she believes to be her due. She will "live a Parisian fairy story," she determines, which suits her until it leads to an illicit liaison and unwanted pregnancy, altering her life irrevocably. At the center of the book is "the problem of a reason for living," a problem which society says should be solved, for women, by motherhood. For Emily, though, it's not sufficient. Her search for fulfillment will take her as far as the ruins of Carthage and ultimately challenge society's most deeply cherished beliefs about motherhood and family.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – A page-turner.  You care about the heroine.  Beautifully described settings.  Alex Miller got the idea based on some journal entries his mother made as a young woman in Paris.  Yet not satisfying.  Too simple.  Alex miller is a man writing a woman's voice, and it almost works, but fails.   The characters are too chiseled, and the solution too pat.  Makes me think he has an agenda about his own conclusion. 

I Could Do Anything If Only I Knew What It Was - (Sher) - I Could Do Anything If I Only Knew What It Was (the New York Times Bestseller) guides you, not to another unsatisfying job, but to a richly rewarding career rooted in your heart's desire.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – Comment pending.  

Gift from the Sea - (Lindbergh) - Gift from the Sea has enlightened and offered solace to readers on subjects from love and marriage to peace and contentment. It tells of light and life and love and the security that lies at the heart.  Jump to Lindbergh's obituary.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – You can read this small treasure in a sitting.  In middle-age, Lindbergh delivers  a simple life philosophy springing from two weeks alone at the beach - take time to contemplate life and renew yourself.  Each stage of life is described by a different shell.  Wonderful  insight.   Lindbergh was born in 1906, daughter to an ambassador, graduate of Smith, wife to Charles Lindbergh, accomplished pilot, writer and mother of 6.  A life of privilege, excitement and contemplation.  Written in 1955.  Contrast this richness with the fictional choices a woman makes in Conditions of Faith.

Girl with a Pearl Earring - (Chevalier) - In seventeenth-century Delft, there's a strict social order-rich and poor, Catholic and Protestant, master and servant-and all know their place. When Griet becomes a maid in the household of the painter Johannes Vermeer, she thinks she knows her role: housework, laundry, and the care of his six children. She even feels able to handle his shrewd mother-in-law; his restless, sensual wife; and their jealous servant. What no one expects is that Griet's quiet manner, quick perceptions, and fascination with her master's paintings will draw her inexorably into his world. Their growing intimacy sparks whispers; and when Vermeer paints her wearing his wife's pearl earrings, the gossip escalates into a full-blown scandal that irrevocably changes Griet's life.  NYT Bestseller.  Jump to the book's web site to see Verneer's paintings described in the book, and learn about his life.  Jump to the New York Times review.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – Quick read, cleaver idea, historically accurate.  A gift from a very old friend, along with the comment, "She reminded me of you".  

It's only too late If You Don't Start Now - (Sher) - Shattering the myth that turns midlife (or any age) into a crisis, this provocative guide is packed with sage advice. Career counselor Barbara Sher has appeared on a  PBS special.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – A jump start for your second life.  Let's see if it works.  

Northanger Abby - (Austen) - Issued posthumously in 1818, Northanger Abbey was the first novel that Jane Austin completed for publication. Written when she was twenty-four, the book anticipates several of the major themes and concerns of her later work. It is the story of seventeen-year-old Catherine Morland, a passionate and headstrong young woman with a fondness for Gothic novels. Away from home for the first time to guide her, Catherine finds herself suddenly thrown into the adult world---a world bristling with possible intrigue, romance, and suspense. Northanger Abbey can be enjoyed as a parody of the Gothic romance novels popular at the time it was written. Or it can be savored as a delightful comedy of manners and a cautionary tale. For in the education of Catherine Morland, the novel explores the mercurial relationship between appearance, and reality, literature and life---and in the process raises questions about its own fictionality.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – Austen spoofs gothic novels and herself as a novelist. She occasionally turns to the camera and speaks directly to her reader, commenting on her characters, her own plot and even her ability as a writer. This is biting writing, sarcastic and young. But it looses something important when Austen admits even she doesn't really admire her own heroine. Great writing requires the reader engage in the characters, this isn't on par with her later novels.  

Vinegar Hill - (Ansay) - In her remarkable debut novel...Manette Ansay writes with startling authority and quiet elegance of one woman's gradual realization that in order to reenvision her life she must break all the rules. It is 1972 and Ellen Grier finds herself back in the Midwestern hometown she thought she had escaped for good. Worse yet, she and her family have had to move in with her in-laws: narrow-minded, eccentric people who are as tough as the farm lives they have endured. Devout Catholics, they inhabit a world "as rigid, as precise as a church," and Ellen struggles to live by their motto: "A place for everything; everything in its place." But there is no place for Ellen -- fresh, funny, bright with passion -- in a house filled with the dust of routine and the ritual of prayer, the lingering bitterness of her in-laws' loveless marriage. She tries to be the model woman everyone expects her to be -- teaching at the Catholic school, coaxing her traveling-salesman husband through his increasingly irrational moods, caring for his aging parents -- but Ellen's hopes for her family's future collide with life in this bizarre household, and she worries over her wryly observant adolescent daughter and her timid young son. Encouraged by her friend Barb, a woman ostracized for being "modern" and "wild," Ellen begins to consider her own desires and dreams as well. Surrounded by the family's obsession with an exacting, angry God and the disquieting ghosts of the past, Ellen searches for a way to satisfy the demands of this rural community and its traditions until, at last, she discovers the family's darkest secret, one that frees her and changes her life forever.  Jump to the Oprah site.

Comment:3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – In-laws so mean they are caricatures, and a worthless husband.  I read this one backwards: last chapter first.  It was my step-father's funeral in LA, and emotions were at the surface.  It helped to get to the positive conclusion and work my way back.  

Genome - (Ridley) - A fascinating tour of the results of the most momentous scientific endeavor of our time--the Human Genome Project--cleverly told in 23 essays, one for each chromosome.  Jump to the New York Times review.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – An updated version of Bishop’s Genome, but without the history spin, how people began their search, and how they went about it.  Instead, Ridley’s genome spends more time exploring the implications of man’s latest discovery: it ends with a paradox:  either our actions are determined, in which case we’re not responsible for them, or they are random, in which case we are not responsible for them.  Psychologist of twins, Lyndon Eaves put it this way, “Would you rather be pushed around by your environment, which is not you, or your genes, which is in a sense who you are.  Ridley believes in genetic determinism.  He argues that humans need to believe they have choice, but don’t.  I believe that if we don’t have any choices, what’s the point?

Demian - (Hesse) - In Demian, one of the great writers of the twentieth century tells the dramatic story of young, docile Emil Sinclair's descent—led by precocious shoolmate Max Demian—into a secret and dangerous world of petty crime and revolt against convention and eventual awakening to selfhood.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – Hauntingly written struggle between choosing an exemplary life and: seeing the gray, the trade-offs, considering the range of possibilities, not accepting the norm out of hand, considering wrong as a viable possibility. A whole generation of post-WWI youth identified with the anti-nationalist sentiments. My son recommended it as a representation of his generation’s seeking for truth and compared it to the movie Fight Club. The choices of youth are often made on the edge - parents would be white-knuckled if they knew. Hesse wrote this as an autobiography under an assumed name. The writing was so distinctive, he was simultaneously exposed and revered. Simply genius.

Genome - (Bishop) - Told with the pacing of a great suspense novel, GENOME tells the very real story of what could be the most ambitious scientific research project ever undertaken: the attempt to identify all the genes in the human body.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – The history of searching for genetic codes has happened in the span of my adulthood memory – mid 1970’s to 2001. I always wanted to do this work. Like a frame in a slide show, I remember each picture of the public phase of this process, fascinating to glimpse the story behind the scenes:

1978, Sickle-cell Anemia – the sickle-cell gene identified. 1979 – an African-American friend of mine is outraged at picking sickle-cell anemia for widespread genetic testing.
1980, Riflips for surveying genes – A pivotal moment in the genetics revolution - David Botstein & Ray White discover the first riflip and propose its use as a benchmark for genetic surveys. 1982 – my doctor offers amniocentesis to test for Down’s and known genetic risks.
1983, Huntington’s Disease – Nancy Wexler, at risk for Huntington’s herself, begins mapping a large concentration of Huntington’s families in the isolated water villages of Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela in 1979. Late in the year, she hears Botstein and White present their riflip technique and knows this is what she needs. They decline, but discuss their technique with David Housman, Botstein’s lab neighbor at MIT. With Wexler Foundation funding, Housman convinces his protégé James Guesella to accept a position at Harvard to do the lab work. No one predicts speedy identification, but in 1983 Guesella identifies the dominant gene for Huntington’s. Nancy Wexler’s decision: to be tested or not. 1985 - a good friend at risk whispers her option to be tested for Huntington’s (her children are teenagers at the time).
1982, Heart Disease – At Children’s Hospital in Boston, Jan Breslow discovers the first of dozens of heart disease-related genes from studying the genes of two 20 year old sisters lacking any HDL and with advanced heart disease. 1973 - my mother-in-law calls to tell my husband the only thing she has ever said about his biological father – he just died of a heart attack at age 49 (My husband has a heart attack at 45 in 1994).
1987, Schizophrenia – Ann Bassett, a young psych resident in Vancouver sees a schizophrenic student brought in by his parents. They mention his strong physical resemblance to his uncle who is also schizophrenic. She finds that they both have an extra piece of chromosome 5 attached to chromosome 1. This is the first report of a compass for a schizophrenia-linked gene. It is clear there is more than one form of the disease. 1940’s – A family member of mine is diagnosed with a form of schizophrenia, but is able to live independently. 1970 – I become a psych major interested in the behavioral and genetic aspects. My gut tells me that emotional and addiction diseases are related.
1990, Cancer – the first of the cancer genes to be identified (colon cancer) requires a two-hit derangement of several genes. 1984 – my mother-in-law dies of pancreatic cancer at 57 (her mother died of cancer at 62). 1994 - bladder cancer removed from my husband. 1997 – My husband tested and doesn’t have the bladder cancer gene.
1990, Genome Project Begins –Completion by 2005 predicted.
2001, Genome Mapping announced –20-30,000 genes comprise our genetic make-up.

This book has been a personal revelation. As a child born with one blue eye and one brown, DNA has always piqued me in a special way. In the 50’sand 60’s I remember the discussions of environment versus heredity. In the 50’s, at a time when the general wisdom was that environment prevailed, my Mom KNEW that heredity told the tale. I believe that too, and in many respects this belief has kept me from breaking out of a box of my own making. The undesirable family traits have defined me and the notable ones get me by. My default is to walk in the world safe in the knowledge that resistance is futile – in a state of mild disappointment, but not surprise. This book is about the wondrous strength of our genes, but because I have always believed this, my revelation has been the opposite. Most of what has been discovered so far requires some environmental trigger to compound a genetic predisposition. By accepting your fate, you lose the chance to change your story. It’s not easy, but it is that simple.

As She Climbed Across the Table - (Lethem) - What if your lover left you for, well, nothing? Literally nothing. Particle physicist Alice Coombs and her colleagues are on the cusp of an extraordinary discovery. They have created a void, a hole in the universe, a true nothingness that they have named "Lack." Philip Engstrand, a professor who studies other professors, has made a breakthrough of his own - he now understands how deeply he loves Alice. Lack, though, is no ordinary black hole: It swallows certain things - a pomegranate, argyle socks, mirrored sunglasses - but displays no appetite for a bow tie, an ice ax, or scrambled duck eggs. This is a void that displays the outlines of a personality: a nothingness that, as Philip comes to realize, utterly obsesses his beloved. Alice, it becomes apparent, has fallen out of love with Philip and in love with Lack.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – An interesting book – the kind you find integrating with your dreams in a half waking state. What makes a couple? Are you ultimately looking to fall in love with yourself in seeking a perfect love? (from a male perspective). You get a couple of bonuses with this book – an amusing satire of the university community, each discipline offering a different theory on the nature of reality. Two of the minor characters are memorable: Evan and Garth, a blind version of Tweedle Dumb and Tweedle Dee exploring their own reality. Of course Alice climbs down the rabbit hole. How could she not? It is what is staring back at her that’s the surprise.

The Millstone - (Drabble) - At a time when sex is de rigueur -- this is the 60s, after all, in newly energized London -- and illegitimacy taboo, Rosamund Stacey finds herself pregnant after her only sexual encounter. Despite her fierce independence and academic brilliance, Rosamund is naive and unworldly and the choices before her are terrifying. But in the perfection and helplessness of her baby she finds an unconditional love she has never known before, and the realization that motherhood and independence are not mutually exclusive.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – The writing, beautiful, the message timeless. In hindsight, a very prophetic book.

The Orchid Thief - (Orlean) - The orchid thief in Susan Orlean's true story of beauty and obsession is John Laroche, a renegade plant dealer and sharply handsome guy, in spite of the fact that he is missing his front teeth and has the posture of al dente spaghetti. In 1994, Laroche and three Seminole Indians were arrested with rare orchids they had stolen from a wild swamp in south Florida that is filled with some of the world's most extraordinary plants and trees. Laroche had planned to clone the orchids and then sell them for a small fortune to impassioned collectors. After he was caught in the act, Laroche set off one of the oddest legal controversies in recent memory, which brought together environmentalists, Native American activists, and devoted orchid collectors.  Jump to the New York Times review.

Comment: 3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – Parts of this book (describing Larouche) are laugh-out-loud funny. Orlean has a punchy writing style and Larouche is a true character – the type I’m sure I’ve met, but I can’t quite put my finger on. He shares one characteristic with me – the habit of picking up a hobby obsessively, gaining expertise, then dropping it to start the next. Since Larouche is so clearly flawed, I find myself reevaluating the sane-ness of this behavior. Read the book just for the profile of Larouche, and you’ll get more on orchids, the Fakahatchee state preserve and Seminole Indians than you will probably need. The descriptions of anything-goes Florida are nicely apt in light of the 2000 presidential elections.

Galileo's Daughter - (Sobel) - The son of a musician, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) tried at first to enter a monastery before engaging the skills that made him the foremost scientist of his day. Though he never left Italy, his inventions and discoveries were heralded around the world. Most sensationally, his telescopes allowed him to reveal a new reality in the heavens and to reinforce the astounding argument that the Earth moves around the Sun. For this belief, he was brought before the Holy Office of the Inquisition, accused of heresy, and forced to spend his last years under house arrest. Of Galileo's three illegitimate children, the eldest best mirrored his own brilliance, industry, and sensibility, and by virtue of these qualities became his confidante. Born Virginia in 1600, she was thirteen when Galileo placed her in a convent near him in Florence, where she took the most appropriate name of Suor Maria Celeste. Her loving support, which Galileo repaid in kind, proved to be her father's greatest source of strength throughout his most productive and tumultuous years. Her presence, through letters which Sobel has translated from their original Italian and woven into the narrative, graces her father's life now as it did then. Galileo's Daughter dramatically recolors the personality and accomplishment of a mythic figure whose seventeenth-century clash with Catholic doctrine continues to define the schism between science and religion. Moving between Galileo's grand public life and Maria Celeste's sequestered world, Sobel illuminates the Florence of the Medicis and the papal court in Rome during the pivotal era when humanity's perception of its place in the cosmos was being overturned.  Jump to the New York Times review.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – It took about 200 pages to get into the rhythm of this book – a lot of pious filler to Sr. Maria Celeste’s letters. Sobel’s writing style seems to have been infected with the general speech patterns of the time, difficult to plow through. But it got better and better toward the end. Interesting to me the roles of women as caretakers of the men’s daily needs – Sr. Marie Celeste knits socks in her cell for Galileo’s house guests during his year away and she is trusted with running his household affairs from the cloister, keeping the precious key to his private papers which are in some peril. As his obviously most precious child, she is given a fraction of the support Galileo gives his annoying son, and dies at the age of 33, it seems as a result of the hard conditions in the convent. Everybody credits her with singular brilliance, but you can’t really tell that from the letters which are filled with exhortations to God for Galileo’s well-being and the minutia of his wine kegs and citrus plants. Good detail on the plague, which ravaged Florence during this period. You do get a good idea of life in 1600 Tuscany and the very all-encompassing way power was yielded. Everything based on who you know, who your supporters and patrons are – not just Galileo, everyone.

Galileo was very good at sucking up, but was unfortunate in the end to piss off the pope. His posture before the Inquisition was definitely one of a humbled 69 year old supplicant, prepared to say what was necessary to survive as best he could. They don’t seem to have tortured him, and while he only spent several days in the actual prison, his “house-arrest” lasted the rest of his life until his death at the age of 78. His reputation was stripped, he wasn’t to go anywhere or receive any visitors. None of his works could be published, nor could he publish any others. Of course, he did. He had contacts all over the world, and his students found ways to publish his complete works later. In fact, his greatest work of all was written after the Inquisition. A very touching tribute after Galileo’s death by his student who arranges for his own descendants to build a fitting monument to Galileo at the cathedral Santa Croce. 1564- Galileo and Shakespeare are born, Michelangelo dies. 1642- Galileo dies, Newton is born. This book is about a very human Galileo who’s real genius seems to have been in recognizing that science is understood by observation and measurement, checking and re-checking the facts.

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire - (Rowling)

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – Harry is fourteen, and so begin the years of the Dark Lord's ascent back to power. Rowling sets up the last three books in this middle volume in the series. I save my Harry Potters until my predictable mid-winter cold, then treat myself to fevered emersion in Harry's world for a day or two. It takes a full day to emerge again into my own.

Waiting - (Jin) - This is the story of Lin Kong, a man living in two worlds, struggling with the conflicting claims of two utterly different women as he moves through the political minefields of a society designed to regulate his every move and stifle the promptings of his innermost heart.. "For more than seventeen years this devoted and ambitious doctor has been in love with an educated, clever, modern woman, Manna Wu. But back in the traditional world of his home village lives the wife his family chose for him when he was young - a humble and touchingly loyal woman, whom he visits in order to ask, again and again, for a divorce. In a culture in which the ancient ties of tradition and family still hold sway and where adultery discovered by the Party can ruin lives forever, Lin's passionate love is stretched ever more taut by the passing years. Every summer, his compliant wife agrees to a divorce but then backs out. This time, Lin promises, will be different.. "Tracing these lives through their summer of decision and beyond, Ha Jin vividly conjures the texture of daily life in a place where the demands of human longing must contend with the weight of centuries of custom. National Book Award 1999.  Jump to the New York Times review.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – I find myself fascinated by Ha Jin’s life story, more than his book. Jin says Waiting is about the relationships, not about China. But it is his description of China and it’s effects on the relationships that hold my interest, not his stunted characters Lin, Manna and Shuyu. They seem wooden (like marionettes) and trapped in a world that has taught them there are no choices. By the end of the twenty-year span, the rules that molded each of their days all of a sudden fall away. The next generation will be molded by a different set of rules. Lin is never really content, even when he does have the choice to decide. It is as if he never learned that choosing is only the beginning, you also have to decide to do what it takes to make your choices work for you. According to Jin, the story is about “how the emotional life is affected by time and also by environment”. Waiting is based on a true story.

Ha Jin (really Xuefei Jin) was born in China in 1956, lied about his age to leave home and join the People’s Liberation Army at 14. He describes himself as basically illiterate at the time. A lot of privileges were available to those in the army in the right spot. He came to the US in 1985 at the age of 29 to study at Brandeis, but decided he couldn’t return after Tiananmen Square. He couldn’t find teaching jobs, so he turned to writing. He did odd jobs and wrote. Eventually, Emory agreed to hire him. Beginning in 1996 he won PEN/Hemingway prize, The Flannery O’Connor Award for fiction, National Book Award and the 2000 PEN/Faulkner Award for Fiction for Waiting. He cites Nabokov’s Pnin on the subject of what learning a new language means to an immigrant. When asked if he will continue to write, he says, “I think I've gone so far along this road that I can't just change. When I made the decision to write in English only, I was determined to travel all the way no matter how tough, how solitary it was. I have to go to the end, see what I can do.” This sounds so grim, not like an award-winning author - a little like Lin?

Nabokov's Pale Fire - (Boyd) - Brian Boyd, Nabokov's biographer and hitherto the foremost proponent of the idea that Pale Fire has one narrator, John Shade, now rejects this position and presents a new and startlingly different solution that will permanently shift the nature of critical debate on the novel. Boyd argues that the book does indeed have two narrators, Shade and Charles Kinbote, but reveals that Kinbote had some strange and highly surprising help in writing his sections. In light of this interpretation, Pale Fire now looks distinctly less postmodern--and more interesting than ever.

In presenting his arguments, Boyd shows how Nabokov designed Pale Fire for readers to make surprising discoveries on a first reading and even more surprising discoveries on subsequent readings by following carefully prepared clues within the novel. Boyd leads the reader step-by-step through the book, gradually revealing the profound relationship between Nabokov's ethics, aesthetics, epistemology, and metaphysics. If Nabokov has generously planned the novel to be accessible on a first reading and yet to incorporate successive vistas of surprise, Boyd argues, it is because he thinks a deep generosity lies behind the inexhaustibility, complexity, and mystery of the world. Boyd also shows how Nabokov's interest in discovery springs in part from his work as a scientist and scholar, and draws comparisons between the processes of readerly and scientific discovery. 
Jump to the New York Times review.

Comment:3 stars3 stars3 stars
Carolyn: – When you’ve done all the rereading of Pale Fire you’re going to do in order to discover its links and depths on your own, treat yourself to Nabokov’s Pale Fire, by Boyd. It’s like getting a key to a thousand-piece paint-spattered jig-saw puzzle, which you’ve only half completed. Don’t read any further if you don’t want to know Boyd’s ‘final’ analysis. The main theme Nabokov is exploring is the surprising, seemingly random interconnectedness of life which we occasionally glimpse, but can never know (nature, the afterlife, time and space). Nabokov expected people to have to re-read to keep discovering sweeping surprises hidden in his work. He said, “The unraveling of a riddle is the purest and most basic act of the human mind.” Vera Nabokov described “the beyond” as her husband’s main theme.

Level 1 - first reading: Shade and Kinbote are separate characters. Kinbote is really a crazy man (Prof. Botkin) running from trouble in Europe caused by his obsessions and guilt over homosexual pedophilia. In the US, he develops the fantasy he is king of Zembla as a form of escapism, and presses his story on Shade, a poet of note, expecting to influence him to reinforce his fantasy in epic rhyme. Shade instead writes an autobiographical poem which describes the suicide of his homely daughter and his efforts to seek some sign that she is somehow still there. Shade is mistakenly killed by Grey, a crazed ex-convict who was really gunning for Judge Goldsworth, the owner of Kinbote’s house. A first reading seems to refute everything Shade is seeking in “the beyond”.

Level 2 – second reading (although it took Boyd 30 years to come to this conclusion): After her death, Hazel begins to influence Kinbote, giving him the fantasy that he is really king of Zembla so he can escape the thoughts which devastate him (she pities him). Several of the vignettes explore a vindication of Hazel as a spurned woman. Through Kinbote’s life fantasy she can obliquely communicate and influence her father to write two poems and his opus – his life story. The total reversal of the initial conclusion – the ‘Beyond’ is there.

Level 3 – third reading: The forth voice is Shade himself after his death. He influences Kinbote to publish his work and refashion Grey as Gradus, “the blind force of advancing death”, and to add his own hints at interpretation within the commentary. Not only is there a ‘Beyond’, WE can influence the world from beyond our life.

Some of the clues that Boyd explains: References to Shakespeare, Browning, T.S. Elliot, Goethe, Nabokov’s other works and the ultimate chess problem (8) are rampant. Colors: red, green, azure, neon, gray all point to specific characters or issues. Names with the same first letters (A to Z). Rhyming patterns which represent the voice of various characters. (The ghost in the barn was Aunt Maude warning of Shade’s death.) Mirrors and reflection (Nabokov’s son, Dimitri was the mirror antithesis of Hazel, also born in 1934. He was a “daredevil and playboy, frequently at risk because of his adventurousness”.) The symbolism of tunnels and underground, nature references, plays on Russian words and nobility, flight and things with wings. These and more are referenced by Boyd to bolster his theories.

He reviews 30 years of other’s interpretations, yet he fully expects to keep discovering more. “Who else could write a novel in which four out of the five main characters die but which remains so funny…”. To paraphrase Shade, “It’s not about the text, but the texture.”

Back                                                                                                                                                                                More  

 


Rating (1-5)
5- Life changing book or reread it frequently.
4- Great book, speaks to me.
3- Liked reading this book, recommend it.
2- Just OK, could have skipped it.
1- Disliked it or couldn't finish it.

=Rating of 4 or 5

Unless otherwise attributed, all summaries are taken from the publisher's summary.  All linked comments are original material.

Return to the Top