Wimsey-Vane mysteries
- (Sayers) - Strong Poison, Have His Carcase, Gaudy
Night and Busman's Honeymoon chronicle Lord Peter Wimsey
and Harriet Vane's relationship through a series of mysteries written
in England between the World Wars. Dorothy L. Sayers is the
author of novels, short stories, poetry collections, essays, reviews
and translations. Although she was a noted Christian scholar, she is
most known for her detective fiction. Born in 1893, she was one of the
first women to be awarded a degree from Oxford University. Her first
book featuring Lord Peter Wimsey, Whose Body?, was published in 1923
and over the next 20 years more novels and short stories about the
aristocratic amateur sleuth appeared. Dorothy L. Sayers is recognized
as one of the greatest mystery writers of the 20th century.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – (A third or forth reading of the Wimsey-Vane
mysteries, this, in the aftermath of September 11, was for
comfort.) Sayers was a strong, intelligent, independent
woman, born before the turn of the 20th century. She was
over 35 when she created Harriet Vane in her own image as the
perfect counterpoint to her aristocratic detective-hero, Lord
Peter Wimsey. Harriet is a 29-year old mystery-writer on
trial for the murder of her ex-lover. Slight, 40-ish,
bon-vivant Lord Peter finally falls in love as he watches Harriet
in the dock. Harriet has a plain face, tall, sturdy body,
husky voice and direct manner. She agreed to live with her
lover because he wouldn't marry her - said he didn't believe in
marriage. When he finally wanted to get married, she left
him. She could respect a principle, but when it turned out
to be just a trial run, it was over. Peter talks his
way into the case, and proposes to her during their first
interview in prison. Sick of relationships, she turns him
down - a pattern they repeat through three of the four Wimsey-Vane
mysteries.
-
- The books are vividly set in their times: 1930, Strong
Poison glimpses the artist's life during the post-war roaring
twenties. Séances were big. 1932, Have His Carcase -
a seaside ballroom resort. The depression is noticeable
around the edges, and the aftermath of the Russian Revolution is
prominently featured. 1936, Gaudy Night, set in Oxford at
Harriet's alma mater. Harriet discovers that the foreign
office sends Peter to smooth over ruffled feathers in hopes of
avoiding war. 1937, Busman's Honeymoon - comedy and the perfect picture of
British country life. When war becomes too real, Sayers
resorts to comfort, too.
-
- The settings are wonderful and the romance perfect. The
mystery is good. The dialogue is fast and intelligent, a bit
on the snooty side at times. But the best part is Sayers'
exploration of women - who they are and how they fit in. The
most interesting women are near middle-age and not married.
She explores the damping effect of marriage on women's lives, and
in the end her only real solution is economic independence. This is the 1930's and everything is modern, but it's also less
than a generation from women getting the franchise. The
characters and their motivations are fascinating to me. In
seventy years not much has really changed. These days,
however, Harriet Vane would be the star, not Lord Peter. See
other comments.
-
How To Be Good
- (Hornby) - How to Be Good is a story for our times—a
humorous but uncompromising look at what it takes, in this day and
age, to have the courage of our convictions. In his third novel, Nick
Hornby, whom The New Yorker named "the maestro of the male
confessional," has reinvented himself as Katie—the consummate
liberal, urban mom—a doctor from North London whose world is being
turned on its ear by the outrageous spiritual transformation of her
husband, David.
Jump
to the New York Times Review.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – In one day Katie's husband, David goes from
professional malcontent to
extremist do-gooder, taking in his spiritualist guru, GoodNews.
Together,
they take on the world, giving away money, taking in street
people, coercing
his kids to give away their toys and befriend the friendless.
For a time,
Katie and the kids try, but for David and GoodNews, there are no
limits.
This is one of those books with a message, but you have to suspend
your
belief in the probable. Hornby writes men better than women.
If you take
it seriously (that is identify with any of the characters), it's
annoying to
read, but compelling to get to the conclusion. In the end,
you must
compromise - choices need to be made, otherwise you
sacrifice your life.
Mark Twain and His World
- (Kaplan) - Not in print.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – Justin Kaplan won the Pulitzer in 1967 for Mr.
Clemens and Mark Twain. Almost half of this luxurious
book consists of photos and full - page color prints of art of the
time depicting the places Twain inhabited.
Magician of the Modern
- (Gaddis) - Eugene Gaddis
(Non-fiction, 2000). Transcending the usual dusty confines of
museum curatorships with unusual artistic range, grasp, ambition and
flair, Austin (1900-1957) shone as director of Hartford's Wadsworth
Athaneum and Florida's Ringling Museum. Born to a rich family, Austin
married for social position, despite a flamboyant bisexual life
(apparently reported matter-of-factly to his wife). By his late 20s he
was already running the Athaneum, burning old paintings he disliked in
the museum furnace and going on buying binges in Europe, usually
snagging rare masterworks at bargain basement prices. In a typical
case, he facilitated the world premiere of the Virgil Thomson-Gertrude
Stein opera Four Saints in Three Acts (recently thrice-revived) at the
Athaneum, and helped arrange George Balanchine's arrival in America to
found what became the New York City Ballet. (The choreographer took
one look at Hartford in the 1930s and fled to Manhattan.) Gaddis
(Austin Memorial: The First Modern Museum), who currently curates the
Austin House museum at the Athaneum, points out that many of Austin's
artistic friends, from architect Philip Johnson to historian H.
Russell Hitchcock, were gay, but fails to detail whether Austin's work
and sexuality were related. A pioneer in the appreciation of film as
art, baroque painting and the links between 19th-century kitsch and
modern art, Austin seems here an ever open-minded intelligence, unique
in his time and even more valuable today, when his like would languish
in the bureaucratic, hype-obsessed art world. (Nov.) Copyright 2000
Cahners Business Information. Jump
to the New York Times review.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – Chic Austin was the kind of high-energy person
who strategically charmed people into buying into his whirlwind
world of fun and art - quite against their own natures. For
15 years he got away with creating the avant-gard in
conservative Hartford. He saw art as all the arts in a
simultaneous package. An oil painting had to be in the
context of dance, theater, architecture, music and entertainment,
and he tried to do them all, with other people's money. His
period at the Athaneum placed Hartford at the center of firsts in
this country, and left the city with a treasure-trove of pieces,
bought a bargain-basement prices. I recognized the
whirlwind, being next to Jack Dollard in the 1970's. It
should be about time for Hartford's next whirlwind.
The
Gold Bug Variations - (Powers) - In this novel,
"the narration alternates between two time frames. In 1957 at the
University of Illinois, a biologist, Stuart Ressler, is decoding the
DNA molecule and falling in love with his (happily married) colleague
Dr. Jeanette Koss. She gives him a Glenn Gould recording of Bach's
'Goldberg' Variations that changes his life. . . . Meanwhile, in the
mid-1980's in Brooklyn, Mr. Powers's first-person narrator, Jan
O'Deigh, is joining her . . . boyfriend, Franklin Todd, in solving the
mystery of the same Stuart Ressler--who 25 years later has sunk to
anonymity in a dead-end, graveyard-shift job as a computer programmer.
Why, they ask, has Dr. Ressler forsaken scientific glory for
obscurity?" (N Y Times Book Rev)
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – I cared about each of these characters,
elegantly described through their short-hand dialogue connecting
the mysteries of the universe in a single phrase. You have
to pay attention, this book can't be scanned, but it is rich and
deep.
The
Sixteen Pleasures - (Hellenga) - "I was
twenty-nine years old when the Arno flooded its banks on Friday 4
November 1966. On Tuesday I decided to go to Italy, to offer my
services as a humble book conservator, to save whatever could be
saved, including myself." The Italians called them "Mud
Angels," the young foreigners who came to Florence in 1966 to
save the city's treasured art from the Arno's flooded banks. American
volunteer Margot Harrington was one of them, finding her niche in the
waterlogged library of a Carmelite convent. For within its walls she
discovered a priceless Renaissance masterwork: a sensuous volume of
sixteen erotic poems and drawings. Inspired to sample each of the
ineffable sixteen pleasures, Margot embarks on the intrigue of a
lifetime with a forbidden lover and the contraband volume—a sensual,
life-altering journey of loss and rebirth in this exquisite novel of
spiritual longing and earthly desire.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – Florence after the flood of '66, in the
winter and without tourists, is very appealing. You get a
glimpse of the worlds of art restoration, bookbinding and church hierarchy.
However, Margot is another female character unconvincingly written
my a male author. (All the females are sort of noble, and
most of the male characters are sort of creeps.) The
sequence of action isn't very believable. However, Hellenga
does draw you into another world which is satisfying.
Two Kinsey Millhones
- (Grafton) -
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – It's 1986 and Kinsey is 36. The phone
rings and a stranger offers to sell her a box of her own childhood
memorabilia (yearbook, old report cards, etc.) It seems her
first ex husband has shown up in a coma, victim of a
shooting. Kinsey can't help but investigate, but it seems
she's also the prime suspect. Grafton doles out bits and
pieces of her heroine to her readers. But this one wasn't
one of her best, guessed the culprit right off.
Enduring Love
- (McEwan) - On a windy spring day in the Chilterns, the calm,
organized life of science writer Joe Rose is shattered when he
witnesses a tragic accident: a hot-air balloon with a boy trapped in
its basket is being tossed by the wind, and in the attempt to save the
child, a man is killed. A stranger named Jed Parry joins Rose in
helping to bring the balloon to safety. But unknown to Rose, something
passes between Parry and himself on that day—something that gives
birth to an obsession in Parry so powerful that it will test the
limits of Rose's beloved rationalism, threaten the love of his wife,
Clarissa, and drive him to the brink of murder and madness. Brilliant
and compassionate, this is a novel of love, faith, and suspense, and
of how life can change in an instant. Jump
to the New York Times review.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – McEwan specializes in psychological thrillers
centered on obsession. The writing is good. The
characters are three-dimensional. You get sucked in by the
good writing and characters, and then, uh-oh, it's another creepy
situation. Seemingly normal people take a little turn around
a scary corner. It could be I'm just not his audience.
Ruby, Sapphire &
Emerald Buying Guide - (Newman) - Registered gemologist
Newman understands this. In her two new guides, Newman continues her
tradition of user-friendly texts that are technical enough to help
consumers make wise purchases. Like her other well-regarded guides
(e.g., The Gold Jewelry Buying Guide), this book is profusely
illustrated with color photographs most by Newman showing not only the
beauty of finished jewelry but close-ups and magnifications of details
such as finish, settings, cut, clarity, flaws, and fakes. Sections on
testing and judging the real from the fake are sophisticated enough
for professionals to use. All three books are enjoyable reading, but
Newman s guides are the ones to take along when shopping. (Lib J).
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – A carat is 1/5 of a gram. Different stones
have different rates of specific gravity, which means a 1 carat
emerald is smaller than a 1 carat ruby. An oil-filled
emerald is probably OK if disclosed (it can be re-oiled), but an
epoxy-filled emerald may degrade without being able to repair
it. Many claim to be able to identify the country of origin
for emeralds based on the color. Which colors, cuts
and countries are most valuable. How to tell a fake.
How to pick a jeweler. Nice photos, good, basic info.
Conditions of Faith
- (Miller) - When Alex Miller's mother died several years ago, she
left him the fragmentary journal she'd kept while living briefly in
Paris as a young woman in the 1920's. Inspired by this surprising
entrée into his mother's emotional life and her conflicted passions
of young womanhood, Miller has written Conditions of Faith. In spare,
precise prose, Miller brings us into vivid 1920's Australia, France,
and Tunisia and gives us a taste of feminism at the beginning of the
century through the story of Emily Stanton. Like Henry James's Isabel
Archer before her, Emily is beautiful and headstrong, restless,
idealistic, and determined to live a fulfilling life despite
smothering social conventions. It's 1923 and at age 25 Emily, an
Australian, impulsively marries Georges Elder, a French-Scottish
engineer ten years her senior. Suddenly she is propelled from
Melbourne, where she is a promising scholar of classical
civilizations, to Georges's small, conventional flat in Paris. Quickly
dismayed at the traditional life she has married into, Emily resolves
to look elsewhere for the exotic adventure and intellectual
stimulation she believes to be her due. She will "live a Parisian
fairy story," she determines, which suits her until it leads to
an illicit liaison and unwanted pregnancy, altering her life
irrevocably. At the center of the book is "the problem of a
reason for living," a problem which society says should be
solved, for women, by motherhood. For Emily, though, it's not
sufficient. Her search for fulfillment will take her as far as the
ruins of Carthage and ultimately challenge society's most deeply
cherished beliefs about motherhood and family.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – A page-turner. You care about the
heroine. Beautifully described settings. Alex Miller
got the idea based on some journal entries his mother made as a
young woman in Paris. Yet not satisfying. Too
simple. Alex miller is a man writing a woman's voice, and it
almost works, but fails. The characters are too
chiseled, and the solution too pat. Makes me think he has an
agenda about his own conclusion.
I Could Do Anything If Only I
Knew What It Was - (Sher) - I Could
Do Anything If I Only Knew What It Was (the New York Times
Bestseller) guides you, not to another unsatisfying job, but to a
richly rewarding career rooted in your heart's desire.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – Comment pending.
Gift from the Sea
- (Lindbergh) - Gift from the Sea has enlightened and offered solace
to readers on subjects from love and marriage to peace and
contentment. It tells of light and life and love and the security that
lies at the heart. Jump
to Lindbergh's obituary.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – You can read this small treasure in a sitting.
In middle-age, Lindbergh delivers a simple life philosophy
springing from two weeks alone at the beach - take time to
contemplate life and renew yourself. Each stage of life is
described by a different shell. Wonderful
insight. Lindbergh was born in 1906, daughter to an
ambassador, graduate of Smith, wife to Charles Lindbergh,
accomplished pilot, writer and mother of 6. A life of privilege,
excitement and contemplation. Written in 1955. Contrast
this richness with the fictional choices a woman makes in
Conditions of Faith.
Girl with a Pearl Earring
- (Chevalier) - In seventeenth-century Delft, there's a strict social
order-rich and poor, Catholic and Protestant, master and servant-and
all know their place. When Griet becomes a maid in the household of
the painter Johannes Vermeer, she thinks she knows her role:
housework, laundry, and the care of his six children. She even feels
able to handle his shrewd mother-in-law; his restless, sensual wife;
and their jealous servant. What no one expects is that Griet's quiet
manner, quick perceptions, and fascination with her master's paintings
will draw her inexorably into his world. Their growing intimacy sparks
whispers; and when Vermeer paints her wearing his wife's pearl
earrings, the gossip escalates into a full-blown scandal that
irrevocably changes Griet's life. NYT Bestseller. Jump to the book's web
site to see Verneer's paintings described in the book, and learn
about his life. Jump
to the New York Times review.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – Quick read, cleaver idea, historically
accurate. A gift from a very old friend, along with the
comment, "She reminded me of you".
It's only too late If You
Don't Start Now - (Sher) -
Shattering the myth that turns midlife (or any age) into a crisis,
this provocative guide is packed with sage advice. Career counselor
Barbara Sher has appeared on a PBS special.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – A jump start for your second life. Let's
see if it works.
Northanger Abby
- (Austen) - Issued posthumously in 1818, Northanger Abbey was the
first novel that Jane Austin completed for publication. Written when
she was twenty-four, the book anticipates several of the major
themes and concerns of her later work. It is the story of
seventeen-year-old Catherine Morland, a passionate and headstrong
young woman with a fondness for Gothic novels. Away from home for
the first time to guide her, Catherine finds herself suddenly thrown
into the adult world---a world bristling with possible intrigue,
romance, and suspense. Northanger Abbey can be enjoyed as a parody
of the Gothic romance novels popular at the time it was written. Or
it can be savored as a delightful comedy of manners and a cautionary
tale. For in the education of Catherine Morland, the novel explores
the mercurial relationship between appearance, and reality,
literature and life---and in the process raises questions about its
own fictionality.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – Austen spoofs gothic novels and herself as a
novelist. She occasionally turns to the camera and speaks directly
to her reader, commenting on her characters, her own plot and even
her ability as a writer. This is biting writing, sarcastic and
young. But it looses something important when Austen admits even
she doesn't really admire her own heroine. Great writing requires
the reader engage in the characters, this isn't on par with her
later novels.
Vinegar Hill
- (Ansay) - In her remarkable debut novel...Manette Ansay writes with
startling authority and quiet elegance of one woman's gradual
realization that in order to reenvision her life she must break all
the rules. It is 1972 and Ellen Grier finds herself back in the
Midwestern hometown she thought she had escaped for good. Worse yet,
she and her family have had to move in with her in-laws:
narrow-minded, eccentric people who are as tough as the farm lives
they have endured. Devout Catholics, they inhabit a world "as
rigid, as precise as a church," and Ellen struggles to live by
their motto: "A place for everything; everything in its
place." But there is no place for Ellen -- fresh, funny, bright
with passion -- in a house filled with the dust of routine and the
ritual of prayer, the lingering bitterness of her in-laws' loveless
marriage. She tries to be the model woman everyone expects her to be
-- teaching at the Catholic school, coaxing her traveling-salesman
husband through his increasingly irrational moods, caring for his
aging parents -- but Ellen's hopes for her family's future collide
with life in this bizarre household, and she worries over her wryly
observant adolescent daughter and her timid young son. Encouraged by
her friend Barb, a woman ostracized for being "modern" and
"wild," Ellen begins to consider her own desires and dreams
as well. Surrounded by the family's obsession with an exacting, angry
God and the disquieting ghosts of the past, Ellen searches for a way
to satisfy the demands of this rural community and its traditions
until, at last, she discovers the family's darkest secret, one that
frees her and changes her life forever. Jump
to the Oprah site.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – In-laws so mean they are caricatures, and a
worthless husband. I read this one backwards: last chapter
first. It was my step-father's funeral in LA, and emotions
were at the surface. It helped to get to the positive
conclusion and work my way back.
Genome -
(Ridley) - A fascinating tour of the results of the most momentous
scientific endeavor of our time--the Human Genome Project--cleverly
told in 23 essays, one for each chromosome. Jump
to the New York Times review.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – An updated version of Bishop’s
Genome, but
without the history spin, how people began their search, and how
they went about it. Instead, Ridley’s genome spends more
time exploring the implications of man’s latest discovery: it
ends with a paradox: either our actions are determined, in
which case we’re not responsible for them, or they are random,
in which case we are not responsible for them. Psychologist
of twins, Lyndon Eaves put it this way, “Would you rather be
pushed around by your environment, which is not you, or your
genes, which is in a sense who you are. Ridley believes in
genetic determinism. He argues that humans need to believe
they have choice, but don’t. I believe that if we don’t
have any choices, what’s the point?
|
The Orchid Thief
- (Orlean) - The orchid thief in Susan Orlean's true story of beauty
and obsession is John Laroche, a renegade plant dealer and sharply
handsome guy, in spite of the fact that he is missing his front teeth
and has the posture of al dente spaghetti. In 1994, Laroche and three
Seminole Indians were arrested with rare orchids they had stolen from
a wild swamp in south Florida that is filled with some of the world's
most extraordinary plants and trees. Laroche had planned to clone the
orchids and then sell them for a small fortune to impassioned
collectors. After he was caught in the act, Laroche set off one of the
oddest legal controversies in recent memory, which brought together
environmentalists, Native American activists, and devoted orchid
collectors. Jump
to the New York Times review.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – Parts of this book (describing Larouche) are
laugh-out-loud funny. Orlean has a punchy writing style and
Larouche is a true character – the type I’m sure I’ve met,
but I can’t quite put my finger on. He shares one characteristic
with me – the habit of picking up a hobby obsessively, gaining
expertise, then dropping it to start the next. Since Larouche is
so clearly flawed, I find myself reevaluating the sane-ness of
this behavior. Read the book just for the profile of Larouche, and
you’ll get more on orchids, the Fakahatchee state preserve and
Seminole Indians than you will probably need. The descriptions of
anything-goes Florida are nicely apt in light of the 2000
presidential elections.
Galileo's Daughter - (Sobel)
- The son of a musician, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) tried at first to
enter a monastery before engaging the skills that made him the
foremost scientist of his day. Though he never left Italy, his
inventions and discoveries were heralded around the world. Most
sensationally, his telescopes allowed him to reveal a new reality in
the heavens and to reinforce the astounding argument that the Earth
moves around the Sun. For this belief, he was brought before the Holy
Office of the Inquisition, accused of heresy, and forced to spend his
last years under house arrest. Of Galileo's three illegitimate
children, the eldest best mirrored his own brilliance, industry, and
sensibility, and by virtue of these qualities became his confidante.
Born Virginia in 1600, she was thirteen when Galileo placed her in a
convent near him in Florence, where she took the most appropriate name
of Suor Maria Celeste. Her loving support, which Galileo repaid in
kind, proved to be her father's greatest source of strength throughout
his most productive and tumultuous years. Her presence, through
letters which Sobel has translated from their original Italian and
woven into the narrative, graces her father's life now as it did then.
Galileo's Daughter dramatically recolors the personality and
accomplishment of a mythic figure whose seventeenth-century clash with
Catholic doctrine continues to define the schism between science and
religion. Moving between Galileo's grand public life and Maria
Celeste's sequestered world, Sobel illuminates the Florence of the
Medicis and the papal court in Rome during the pivotal era when
humanity's perception of its place in the cosmos was being overturned.
Jump
to the New York Times review.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – It took about 200 pages to get into the rhythm
of this book – a lot of pious filler to Sr. Maria Celeste’s
letters. Sobel’s writing style seems to have been infected with
the general speech patterns of the time, difficult to plow
through. But it got better and better toward the end. Interesting
to me the roles of women as caretakers of the men’s daily needs
– Sr. Marie Celeste knits socks in her cell for Galileo’s
house guests during his year away and she is trusted with running
his household affairs from the cloister, keeping the precious key
to his private papers which are in some peril. As his obviously
most precious child, she is given a fraction of the support
Galileo gives his annoying son, and dies at the age of 33, it
seems as a result of the hard conditions in the convent. Everybody
credits her with singular brilliance, but you can’t really tell
that from the letters which are filled with exhortations to God
for Galileo’s well-being and the minutia of his wine kegs and
citrus plants. Good detail on the plague, which ravaged Florence
during this period. You do get a good idea of life in 1600 Tuscany
and the very all-encompassing way power was yielded. Everything
based on who you know, who your supporters and patrons are – not
just Galileo, everyone.
Galileo was very good at sucking up, but was unfortunate in the
end to piss off the pope. His posture before the Inquisition was
definitely one of a humbled 69 year old supplicant, prepared to
say what was necessary to survive as best he could. They don’t
seem to have tortured him, and while he only spent several days in
the actual prison, his “house-arrest” lasted the rest of his
life until his death at the age of 78. His reputation was
stripped, he wasn’t to go anywhere or receive any visitors. None
of his works could be published, nor could he publish any others.
Of course, he did. He had contacts all over the world, and his
students found ways to publish his complete works later. In fact,
his greatest work of all was written after the Inquisition. A very
touching tribute after Galileo’s death by his student who
arranges for his own descendants to build a fitting monument to
Galileo at the cathedral Santa Croce. 1564- Galileo and
Shakespeare are born, Michelangelo dies. 1642- Galileo dies,
Newton is born. This book is about a very human Galileo who’s
real genius seems to have been in recognizing that science is
understood by observation and measurement, checking and
re-checking the facts.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
- (Rowling)
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – Harry is fourteen, and so begin the years of the
Dark Lord's ascent back to power. Rowling sets up the last three
books in this middle volume in the series. I save my Harry Potters
until my predictable mid-winter cold, then treat myself to fevered
emersion in Harry's world for a day or two. It takes a full day to
emerge again into my own.
Waiting - (Jin) - This is
the story of Lin Kong, a man living in two worlds, struggling with the
conflicting claims of two utterly different women as he moves through
the political minefields of a society designed to regulate his every
move and stifle the promptings of his innermost heart.. "For more
than seventeen years this devoted and ambitious doctor has been in
love with an educated, clever, modern woman, Manna Wu. But back in the
traditional world of his home village lives the wife his family chose
for him when he was young - a humble and touchingly loyal woman, whom
he visits in order to ask, again and again, for a divorce. In a
culture in which the ancient ties of tradition and family still hold
sway and where adultery discovered by the Party can ruin lives
forever, Lin's passionate love is stretched ever more taut by the
passing years. Every summer, his compliant wife agrees to a divorce
but then backs out. This time, Lin promises, will be different..
"Tracing these lives through their summer of decision and beyond,
Ha Jin vividly conjures the texture of daily life in a place where the
demands of human longing must contend with the weight of centuries of
custom. National Book Award 1999. Jump
to the New York Times review.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – I find myself fascinated by Ha Jin’s life
story, more than his book. Jin says Waiting is about the
relationships, not about China. But it is his description of China
and it’s effects on the relationships that hold my interest, not
his stunted characters Lin, Manna and Shuyu. They seem wooden
(like marionettes) and trapped in a world that has taught them
there are no choices. By the end of the twenty-year span, the
rules that molded each of their days all of a sudden fall away.
The next generation will be molded by a different set of rules.
Lin is never really content, even when he does have the choice to
decide. It is as if he never learned that choosing is only the
beginning, you also have to decide to do what it takes to make
your choices work for you. According to Jin, the story is about
“how the emotional life is affected by time and also by
environment”. Waiting is based on a true story.
Ha Jin (really Xuefei Jin) was born in China in 1956, lied about
his age to leave home and join the People’s Liberation Army at
14. He describes himself as basically illiterate at the time. A
lot of privileges were available to those in the army in the right
spot. He came to the US in 1985 at the age of 29 to study at
Brandeis, but decided he couldn’t return after Tiananmen Square.
He couldn’t find teaching jobs, so he turned to writing. He did
odd jobs and wrote. Eventually, Emory agreed to hire him.
Beginning in 1996 he won PEN/Hemingway prize, The Flannery
O’Connor Award for fiction, National Book Award and the 2000
PEN/Faulkner Award for Fiction for Waiting. He cites Nabokov’s
Pnin on the subject of what learning a new language means to an
immigrant. When asked if he will continue to write, he says, “I
think I've gone so far along this road that I can't just change.
When I made the decision to write in English only, I was
determined to travel all the way no matter how tough, how solitary
it was. I have to go to the end, see what I can do.” This sounds
so grim, not like an award-winning author - a little like Lin?
Nabokov's Pale Fire -
(Boyd) - Brian Boyd, Nabokov's biographer and hitherto the foremost
proponent of the idea that Pale Fire has one narrator, John Shade, now
rejects this position and presents a new and startlingly different
solution that will permanently shift the nature of critical debate on
the novel. Boyd argues that the book does indeed have two narrators,
Shade and Charles Kinbote, but reveals that Kinbote had some strange
and highly surprising help in writing his sections. In light of this
interpretation, Pale Fire now looks distinctly less postmodern--and
more interesting than ever.
In presenting his arguments, Boyd shows how Nabokov designed Pale Fire
for readers to make surprising discoveries on a first reading and even
more surprising discoveries on subsequent readings by following
carefully prepared clues within the novel. Boyd leads the reader
step-by-step through the book, gradually revealing the profound
relationship between Nabokov's ethics, aesthetics, epistemology, and
metaphysics. If Nabokov has generously planned the novel to be
accessible on a first reading and yet to incorporate successive vistas
of surprise, Boyd argues, it is because he thinks a deep generosity
lies behind the inexhaustibility, complexity, and mystery of the
world. Boyd also shows how Nabokov's interest in discovery springs in
part from his work as a scientist and scholar, and draws comparisons
between the processes of readerly and scientific discovery. Jump
to the New York Times review.
- Comment:
![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif) ![3 stars](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/diamstar/star_bul.gif)
- Carolyn: – When you’ve done all the rereading of Pale
Fire you’re going to do in order to discover its links and
depths on your own, treat yourself to Nabokov’s Pale Fire, by
Boyd. It’s like getting a key to a thousand-piece
paint-spattered jig-saw puzzle, which you’ve only half
completed. Don’t read any further if you don’t want to know
Boyd’s ‘final’ analysis. The main theme Nabokov is exploring
is the surprising, seemingly random interconnectedness of life
which we occasionally glimpse, but can never know (nature, the
afterlife, time and space). Nabokov expected people to have to
re-read to keep discovering sweeping surprises hidden in his work.
He said, “The unraveling of a riddle is the purest and most
basic act of the human mind.” Vera Nabokov described “the
beyond” as her husband’s main theme.
Level 1 - first reading: Shade and Kinbote are separate
characters. Kinbote is really a crazy man (Prof. Botkin) running
from trouble in Europe caused by his obsessions and guilt over
homosexual pedophilia. In the US, he develops the fantasy he is
king of Zembla as a form of escapism, and presses his story on
Shade, a poet of note, expecting to influence him to reinforce his
fantasy in epic rhyme. Shade instead writes an autobiographical
poem which describes the suicide of his homely daughter and his
efforts to seek some sign that she is somehow still there. Shade
is mistakenly killed by Grey, a crazed ex-convict who was really
gunning for Judge Goldsworth, the owner of Kinbote’s house. A
first reading seems to refute everything Shade is seeking in
“the beyond”.
Level 2 – second reading (although it took Boyd 30 years to come
to this conclusion): After her death, Hazel begins to influence
Kinbote, giving him the fantasy that he is really king of Zembla
so he can escape the thoughts which devastate him (she pities
him). Several of the vignettes explore a vindication of Hazel as a
spurned woman. Through Kinbote’s life fantasy she can obliquely
communicate and influence her father to write two poems and his
opus – his life story. The total reversal of the initial
conclusion – the ‘Beyond’ is there.
Level 3 – third reading: The forth voice is Shade himself after
his death. He influences Kinbote to publish his work and refashion
Grey as Gradus, “the blind force of advancing death”, and to
add his own hints at interpretation within the commentary. Not
only is there a ‘Beyond’, WE can influence the world from
beyond our life.
Some of the clues that Boyd explains: References to Shakespeare,
Browning, T.S. Elliot, Goethe, Nabokov’s other works and the
ultimate chess problem (8) are rampant. Colors: red, green, azure,
neon, gray all point to specific characters or issues. Names with
the same first letters (A to Z). Rhyming patterns which represent
the voice of various characters. (The ghost in the barn was Aunt
Maude warning of Shade’s death.) Mirrors and reflection (Nabokov’s
son, Dimitri was the mirror antithesis of Hazel, also born in
1934. He was a “daredevil and playboy, frequently at risk
because of his adventurousness”.) The symbolism of tunnels and
underground, nature references, plays on Russian words and
nobility, flight and things with wings. These and more are
referenced by Boyd to bolster his theories.
He reviews 30 years of other’s interpretations, yet he fully
expects to keep discovering more. “Who else could write a novel
in which four out of the five main characters die but which
remains so funny…”. To paraphrase Shade, “It’s not about
the text, but the texture.”
Back
More
![](https://www.angelfire.lycos.com/images/icons/pr_ar.gif)
|