Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
Mission Possible - Dr. Betty Martini Fights For Our Health!
Mission Possible - Dr. Betty Martini Fights For Our Health!
Dr. Betty Martini - BIO Mission Possible International... Betty Martini is the founder of the worldwide volunteer force, Mission Possible International, which is committed to removing the deadly chemical aspartame from our food. This poison has brought more complaints to the American Food and Drug Administration than any other additive and is responsible for 75% of such complaints to that agency. From 10,000 consumer complaints FDA compiled a list of 92 symptoms, including death. They used to mail this list out, but now you can't get the list without a congressman or Freedom of Information Act request. Betty had three children instead of a doctor's degree, but spent 22 years in the medical field. While working with a hematologist she supplied the CDC with reports on leukemia, which CDC said, were more than all the case histories submitted by the entire Emory University Hospital system combined, an indication of the low level of physician generated reports to the CDC. This reveals that only a small percentage of serious health threats are collected and statistically tabulated. In l970 Betty Martini established a model for the nation by creating Physicians on Call, a network of five Emergency Care clinics in Atlanta, Georgia, staffed with medical doctors 7 days/24 hours. Services were without cost to the indigent. With a deep interest in traumatology she worked to build a trauma center in her mother's name, Eve Geller, who lost her life to breast cancer, but this did not materialize. She ran for Mayor of Atlanta in l973. When she developed breast cancer she named the herbal formula that cured her for her mother. Now the FDA has started outlawing the healthful, life saving herbs. It is no wonder she calls the FDA the Fatal Drugs Allowed folks for approving deadly poisons and outlawing safe herbs needed for good health. She says when people send complaints to the FDA about aspartame shattering their life instead of concern they badmouth the safe herb Stevia. This herb could save the life of diabetics since it helps in the metabolism of sugar, and aspartame actually can precipitate diabetes, keeps blood sugar out of control, destroys the optic nerve, can cause diabetics to go into convulsions and interacts with insulin. Larry Hagman said of stevia: "I am a diabetic and alive today due to Stevia, diet and exercise. I no longer have to use insulin. I would never use aspartame knowing how dangerous it is and having been declared a world epidemic." At one time the FDA actually embargoed Stevia and the rumor is Monsanto wants to add a molecule so they can patent it, and sell it themselves. In l993 she began Mission Possible International when she investigated what was disabling a family friend and discovered his multiple neurological symptoms were Aspartame Disease. He constantly drank diet sodas, which is #1 on the FDA list of aspartame disease causes. Soon Betty learned how generalized the devastation is since most Americans consume it and many are addicted to a substance that breaks down into methyl alcohol, formaldehyde, formic acid (ant sting venom) and a long list of other poisons including diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent. Three congressional hearings were held on aspartame and books by renowned doctors have exposed its hazards, but the public is lulled to sleep by constant advertising and the FDA seal of approval, even though the FDA themselves originally asked for indictment of the manufacturer. Both U.S. Prosecutors, Sam Skinner and William Conlon, hired on with the defense team and the statute of limitations expired. Betty decided to wake up the world. Using the Internet to create an international audience and enlist an army of activists she has sustained a constant campaign of expose greedy corporate poisoners who destroy our minds, our health, kill our unborn, disable our children and eliminate our sexual capacity and pleasure with a chemical poison so toxic the National soft Drink Association protested against its approval. Their blast was published in the Congressional Record, May 7, l985, S5505. Betty speaks on nationwide radio hookups hundreds of times, sometimes on networks of 200 stations for hours on talk programs, answering all questions, forcing a fire hose of facts on corporate filth and corruption. A two week lecture tour in the UK received large articles in leading English and Scottish newspapers. The campaign has created a groundswell repudiation of NutraSweet/Equal/DietCoke/Diet Pepsi and other asparpoisoned products. Results include the dissolving of the NutraSweet Company into three parts which were sold off so its parent, Monsanto, could be absorbed by Pharmacia Upjohn. Five years ago Coca Cola was the most admired company in the world, now it wouldn't even make the list. Coke CEO Ivester resigned and his replacement Daft is in trouble as they constantly change top management. Her articles are constantly printed in newspapers and medical bulletins in many languages. Doctors from as far as Australia have pilgrimaged to Atlanta to be guests in her home and confer on a worldwide disaster that rivals nicotine. Recently H. J. Roberts, M.D. published a 1,000 page medical text: Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, www.aspartameispoison.com which is the most comprehensive study of this world plague. In l984 Dr. Roberts was recognized by the national medical publication Practice 84 as the best doctor in the United States. He dedicated this book to Betty Martini. She has collected thousands of case histories and is recognized as an international authority on this world plague. An award winning website called DORway.com by David Rietz offers a river of aspartame facts with much of Betty's work. Brain tumors, lupus, MS, seizures, horribly damaged infants and immeasurable damage to human dna desolating future generations, are the curses of aspartame. A July 2001 Canadian Conference on Mal- Mediated Developmental Toxicity attended by 130 scientists reported that 85% of human spermatazoa are damaged. The report gave us this comfort: "Fortunately for most couples it's the undamaged or least damaged sperm that tends to fertilize the egg." "Worst of all," Betty says, "It's not a diet product. Aspartame defeats the brain's ability to detect serotonin so you crave carbohydrates. It makes most people fat! This entire travesty, this horrible atrocity against our poor human race is driven only by greed! greed! greed! And because of the damage to the hypothalamus some consumers suddenly drop dead (see Dr. Blaylock's paper on Aspartame, MSG and Other Excitotoxins And the Hypothalamus). This may be associated with recent sudden death of athletes." Betty has a great interest in medical research and the consumer's right to know. She believes its despicable that the FDA, the manufacturers, and professional organizations it funds get away with lying to the public, not even acknowledging that aspartame is a drug that reacts with drugs they may be taking. She has three grown children, two sons and a daughter who is a missionary. Her husband, Don, is an ordained minister. They perform this work as an expression of the neighbor love the Bible teaches, and have nothing to sell and no financial motives. Her work is a pure charity which she explains with this quote: "Deliver those being taken away to death and those staggering to the slaughter. O may you hold them back. In case you should say 'Look! We did not know of this' will not He that is making an estimate of the hearts discern it and pay back to earthling man according to his activity?" Proverbs 24:11 ---------------- Mrs. Martini can be reached by several means: Betty Martini bettym19@mindspring.com 9270 9270 River Club Parkway Duluth, Ga. 30097 770 242-2599 Voice 770 242-2596 FAX
How our Goverment Cares from those who have financal ties and are VP's in companies which produce these drugs.....
How our Goverment Cares from those who have financal ties and are VP's in companies which produce these drugs..... "ARE THEY NOT IN CONFLICT OF INTEREST?  
 
Possible War Crime Charges Force Rumsfeld To Cancel Trip 01/21/05 “DPA”—US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld cancelled a planned visit to Germany after a US human rights organisation asked German authorities to prosecute him for war crimes, Deutsche Presse-Agentur (dpa) has learned. Rumsfeld has informed the German government via the US embassy that he will not take part in the Munich Security Conference in February, conference head Horst Teltschik told dpa on Thursday. The New York-based Centre for Constitutional Rights filed a complaint in December with the Federal German Prosecutor’s Office against Rumsfeld accusing him of war crimes and torture in connection with detainee abuses at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison. Rumsfeld made it known immediately after the complaint was filed that he would not attend the Munich conference unless Germany quashed the legal action German legislation violations The organisation alleges violations of German legislation, which outlaws war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide independent of the place of crime or origin of the accused. The prosecutor’s office in Karlsruhe reportedly is examining the roughly 170-page complaint to see whether an investigation is warranted. The Centre for Constitutional Rights said it and four Iraqis allegedly tortured in US custody filed a complaint with German authorities against Rumsfeld, former CIA director George Tenet and eight other senior military and civilian officials over abuses at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere in Iraq. The organisation said it had turned to German prosecutors “as a court of last resort” because the US government “is unwilling to open an independent investigation” and had “refused to join the International Criminal Court”. Post Modified: 01/22/05 08:31:43 IsraelForever2 R18578 01/22/05 09:04:29 Without knowing anything about this, I have to send out a red flag. It just doesn’t make sense. The whole story just doesn’t make sense. I shall wait to read about it the “mainstream” press and then figure it out. Perhaps it is a hoax. WTF R18580 01/22/05 09:21:18 Red Flag, my ass! DPA stands for Deutsche Presse-Agentur Which I think most normal people would agree is pretty mainstream Post Modified: 01/22/05 09:21:47 Butt R18590 01/22/05 10:05:52 So if’n it ain’t on MSNBC then it couldn’t possibly be true? Rumsfeld to Bypass Munich Conference Lawsuit Against Rumsfeld Threatens US-German Relations Rumsfeld scraps Munich visit over ‘war crimes’ probe kinda interesting that US networks are not carrying this. do you think it just slipped their minds? whateveryousay R18593 01/22/05 10:18:03 IF2, when was the last time you were outside the states? moondancer R18667 01/22/05 15:59:33 “mainstream” ....you really think you’ll hear bout this in the mainstream press?..no really,do you?Izzy you’re a funny guy..ha ha ha ha ha ha..mainsteam..ha ha ha ha IsraelForever2 R18672 01/22/05 16:26:22 Here it is loosers; The actual quote, get ready: Rumsfeld has excused himself from the high-profile talks on international defense policy claiming prior commitments. However, some have speculated that his decision not to attend the meeting was influenced by a complaint filed against him by a New York-based human rights group, the Center for Constitutional Rights. The crackerjack version uses this as input and comes up with this crackerjack prize: “01/21/05 “DPA”—US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld cancelled a planned visit to Germany after a US human rights organisation asked German authorities to prosecute him for war crimes, Deutsche Presse-Agentur (dpa) has learned. In future, stop lying and stop wasting my time. Post Modified: 01/22/05 16:26:54 Butt R18766 01/23/05 05:56:06 Now IF2, thats what I call ‘selective quoting’. Further down in the report that you quoted from it states: The defense secretary later sent a message to the German government through the US embassy in Berlin that he would not attend the Munich meeting if there is a chance a case will be launched against him in Germany. However, when he informed the German government he would not take part in the conference, he did not refer to the charges filed against him you’re not exactly being honest here, wingnut, are you? BTW it’s 24 hrs later and I just checked Google News and still not a sqeak from US ‘News’ organizations on this one Post Modified: 01/24/05 01:57:27 whateveryousay R18770 01/23/05 06:09:39 ...because outside the states, like in germany and stuff…americans are regarded as…well, um… is it true that only 10% of americans even have a passport? Butt R18889 01/24/05 02:26:06 spurious comment DocMaloc R18902 01/24/05 05:12:53 How many Americans own passports? ChuckUFarley R18910 01/24/05 06:14:10 “This so-called ill treatment and torture in detention centers, stories of which were spread everywhere…—were not, as some assumed, inflicted methodically, but were excesses committed by individual prison guards, their deputies, and men who laid violent hands on the detainees.” -IsraelForever2 Post Modified: 01/24/05 06:14:37 IsraelForever2 R18912 01/24/05 06:28:13 “This so-called ill treatment and torture in detention centers, stories of which were spread everywhere…—were not, as some assumed, inflicted methodically, but were excesses committed by individual prison guards, their deputies, and men who laid violent hands on the detainees.” -IsraelForever2” Thanks for quoting, those words are true, but I don’t get the point. Does this shatter your worldview so much, and its fallacy so self evident, and folly so grand, that you are shaming me by posting it? I really don’t get it. ChuckUFarley R18914 01/24/05 06:45:48 Oh sorry, I made a typo. That wasn’t your quote. It should have been attributed to Rudolf Hoess, the SS commandant at Auschwitz. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-horton20jan20,0,2436713.story Post Modified: 01/24/05 06:46:12 IsraelForever2 R18915 01/24/05 06:54:15 ” Oh sorry, I made a typo. That wasn’t your quote. It should have been attributed to Rudolf Hoess, the SS commandant at Auschwitz.” Your point being that any words said by Rudolf Hess, if applicable today in a different context are automatically a fallacy. So if Rudolf Hess said that “Shaupps goes well with fish” must implies that shaupps should not be served with fish. Chuck, your post may sound clever to people who are not very sharp, but it is, in its essence, flawed logic. zark R18916 01/24/05 07:00:13 your bravado is embarrassing IF2 ChuckUFarley R18917 01/24/05 07:01:02 Most people who hear this quote today assume it was uttered by a senior officer of the Bush administration. Instead, it comes from one of history’s greatest mass murderers, Rudolf Hoess, the SS commandant at Auschwitz. Such a confusion demonstrates the depth of the United States’ moral dilemma in its treatment of detainees in the war on terror. In past weeks, we have been treated to a show trial of sorts at Ft. Hood, Texas, starring Cpl. Charles Graner and other low-ranking military figures. The Graner court-martial and the upcoming trial of Pfc. Lynndie England are being hyped as proof of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s explanation for the Abu Ghraib prison tortures: A few “rotten apples” — not U.S. policy or those who created it — are to blame. Graner entered a “Nuremberg defense” — arguing that he was acting on orders of his superiors. This defense was rejected in Ft. Hood as it was in Nuremberg 60 years ago, when Nazi war criminals were found guilty of crimes against humanity. A misled American public can choose to see in the Graner verdict the proof of the “rotten apples” theory and of the notion that Graner and the others acted on their own initiative. But what it should see is a larger Nuremberg lesson: Those who craft immoral policy deserve the harshest punishment. Consider the memorandum written by Alberto Gonzales — then the president’s attorney, now his nominee for attorney general. He wrote that the Geneva Convention was “obsolete” when it came to the war on terror. Gonzales reasoned that our adversaries were not parties to the convention and that the Geneva concept was ill suited to anti-terrorist warfare. In 1941, General-Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel, the head of Hitler’s Wehrmacht, mustered identical arguments against recognizing the Geneva rights of Soviet soldiers fighting on the Eastern Front. Keitel even called Geneva “obsolete,” a remark noted by U.S. prosecutors at Nuremberg, who cited it as an aggravating circumstance in seeking, and obtaining, the death penalty. Keitel was executed in 1946. Keitel’s remarks were made in response to a valiant memorandum prepared by German military lawyers who argued that the interests of Germany’s soldiers, and the interests of morale and good order, would be served by adhering to the Geneva treaty. Secretary of State Colin Powell, echoing the opinions of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and U.S. military lawyers, sent Gonzales a letter that hit the same notes. Rumsfeld and the White House would have us believe that there is no connection between policy documents exploring torture and evasion of the Geneva Convention and the misconduct on the ground in Guantanamo Bay, Iraq and Afghanistan — misconduct that has produced at least 30 deaths in detention associated with “extreme” interrogation techniques. But the Nuremberg tradition contradicts such a contention. At Nuremberg, U.S. prosecutors held German officials accountable for the consequences of their policy decisions without offering proof that these decisions were implemented with the knowledge of the policymakers. The existence of the policies and evidence that the conduct contemplated in them occurred was taken as proof enough. There is no doubt that individuals like Graner and England should be held to account. But where is justice — and where are the principles the U.S. proudly advanced at Nuremberg — if those in the administration and the military who seem most culpable for the tragedy not only escape punishment but in some cases are slated for promotion? Next week, the world will commemorate the liberation of Auschwitz. A memorial prayer for the death camp victims will be read at the United Nations. German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer will attend to acknowledge that the depravities at Auschwitz were not the work of a few “rotten apples” but the responsibility of a nation. Such a courageous assumption of responsibility should provide a model for the United States, which can still act to salvage its tradition and its honor. IsraelForever2 R18924 01/24/05 07:36:27 “Most people who hear this quote today assume it was uttered by a senior officer of the Bush administration. Instead, it comes from one of history’s greatest mass murderers, Rudolf Hoess, the SS commandant at Auschwitz. Such a confusion demonstrates the depth of the United States’ moral dilemma in its treatment of detainees in the war on terror.” No it doesn’t. It shows what a vague and genaral statement it was. “This so-called ill treatment and torture in detention centers, stories of which were spread everywhere…—were not, as some assumed, inflicted methodically, but were excesses committed by individual prison guards, their deputies, and men who laid violent hands on the detainees.” This statement says, exactly what it says. It says that: There exists something called a “detention center” There esists some people who claim that atrocities are committed there. The statement claims that some abuse has taken place in the “detention center”. But that this abuse is committed by individual prison guards. All that has to happen to satisfy these words is; abuse of some kind by one individual has to take place at any prison and be discovered and prosecuted. And that some people have to claim there are systematic atrocities taking place. Well, the minute a prison worker is charged, you can be sure that some people will make sensational claims about widespread abuse. What does any of this have to do with the United States, or the Secretary of Defense? whateveryousay R18927 01/24/05 07:43:52 let’s maybe try to remember that while torture sucks, there is way worse shit going on… bombs taking kids arms off and stuff… the far worse crime of ‘aggression’ is what the u.s. top brass should be slapped with… everything else is pretty much assumed as being the natural and predictable consequences of armed aggression. IsraelForever2 R18930 01/24/05 07:49:28 “the far worse crime of ‘aggression’ is what the u.s. top brass should be slapped with… everything else is pretty much assumed as being the natural and predictable consequences of armed aggression.” If you put that stuff on the debit side, do you include on the credit side, the people who would have been tortured and killed by Saddam, his sons, and his other security apparataus, but weren’t because his sons are dead and he is in jail. And do you also include on the dredit side, the fact that Iraq is free and is having an election. And are including the end of sanctions. Or are you just looking for stuff that tends to show that you are right. ChuckUFarley R18933 01/24/05 07:55:38 What does any of this have to do with the United States, or the Secretary of Defense? Two words: Project Paperclip http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Personenregister/WeichsMFv.htm http://www.searchspaniel.com/index.php/Maximilian_von_Weichs Notice the following biographies, which for some reason make no mention of Rumsfeld’s activites prior to the death of the nazi in 1954: http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/rumsfeld.html http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/rumsfeld-bio.html http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=R000508 http://www.geocities.com/rummyfan/bio.html http://www.militaryfactory.com/generals/detail.asp?general_id=7 Forget The Manchurian Candidate or The Game: http://www.allmovie.com/cg/avg.dll?p=avg&sql=1:109252 Post Modified: 01/24/05 08:03:31 Butt R18938 01/24/05 08:27:24 IF2 said ” I don’t get the point” I noticed that a long time ago….on the day I first met you Post Modified: 01/24/05 08:27:50 Butt R18939 01/24/05 08:30:49 “if you put that stuff on the debit side, do you include on the credit side, the people who would have been tortured and killed by Saddam”....jesus, he’s doing accounting now? Butt R18940 01/24/05 08:33:43 123 Post Modified: 01/24/05 09:33:24 alpinestar R19018 01/24/05 12:46:55 please keep me posted on the probe, i will do my best to follow DW, which was my favorite source of information any time i was outside of north amerika, but now that i’m stuck in NY for a while it’s a bit harder to follow. i truly hope germany doesn’t fold as belgium did and change the law, i hope they continue to abide by the rule of law and force the US to take into account it’s own actions in light of national and international laws ALL of which were ratified by the congress at one point or another…. thanks. EGisJUICE R19021 01/24/05 12:59:53 Without knowing anything about this, I have to send out a red flag. Without knowing about it, all you have to do is shut the fuck up. whateveryousay R19032 01/24/05 13:36:30 hey look… Rumsfeld facing war crimes case in Germany Tue 30 November, 2004 05:33 BERLIN (Reuters) – Lawyers acting for a U.S. advocacy group will today file war crimes charges in Germany against senior U.S. administration officials for their alleged role in torture at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. “German law in this area is leading the world,” Peter Weiss, Vice President of the New York-based Centre for Constitutional Rights (CCR), a human rights group, was quoted as saying in Frankfurter Rundschau newspaper’s Tuesday edition. According to the group, German law allows war criminals to be investigated wherever they may be living. Those to be named in the case to be filed at Germany’s Federal Prosecutors Office include Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld, former Central Intelligence Agency chief George Tenet and eight other officials. The group is due to present details of its case at several news conferences on Tuesday, according to invitations faxed to media organisations. alpinestar R19035 01/24/05 13:48:49 how can you make this a headline,,, i hope it can get published soon because i think everyone should be made aware of this…. whateveryousay R19036 01/24/05 13:59:19 it’s from november 30th… i thought they already ran it here… i can’t remember where i picked it up… the reuters link i had is dead but it’s probably still around… if you can find it then just put it in the “yard” DocMaloc R19042 01/24/05 14:23:06 No need to get hyped up about this. Allthough the courts in Germany, according to law, actually have to allow for investigations such as this one (according to a new law since 2002), much fewer serious investigations than expected have been started with even fewer successful prosecutions. And although the media over here was all over this, political support is as little as can be expected. Defense minster Struck has already stated that he doubts the attorneys will even pursue the investigation based on “supposed” war crimes in Abu Ghraib against his US-”colleague”. In December Lawrence DiRita of the pentagon dropped the hint that, should the group of those “adventurous” attorneys be successful, it could serioulsy worsen the US-German relations (was that in the papers?). It’s the same old story folks…those who commit the greatest crimes against humanities are never held accountable. Our justice system and that of the international community is only good enough for “normal” people. Post Modified: 01/24/05 14:24:43 alpinestar R19071 01/24/05 15:45:38 thanks for the reality check doc… DocMaloc R19164 01/25/05 06:35:12 I looked into the law a little more, and what I came up with breaks my heart. The initiative, which was started by the Centre for Constitutional Rights has been joined by many other groups, such as the Republican Lawyers Association (crazy huh? Republican seems to mean different things in different countries), the International League for Human Rights as well as the NGO Lawyers against the War. Although the Federal Attorney General has the power to deny the investigation (which he has been putting off but will invariable do), certain legal options exist which could overturn the federal attorney’s decision. Sounds great, right? Well, since it’s inception, the law which allows for potential prosecution of war criminals around the globe has resulted in 26 filed complaints. Of these 26 complaints, not a single one has led to an investigation (often because of diplomatic immunity, for example). Even if Rumsfeld was formally charged, he retains diplomatic immunity until he is no longer secretary of defense, however diplomatic immunity does not apply for the others. It will be interesting to keep up with this because I don’t think any other case has been as strong as this one, evidence and support wise. At least it can get people’s attention and let the world know that others are willing to look into human rights investigations if the US isn’t. I guess we’ll have to settle for Lynndie England. Jump to Page: PAGE 1 Flip Thru Pages: prev | Displaying 1 thru 32 of 32next Create your own GNN profile/blog page.

Comments (0) | Add a Comment