IN THE SUPERIOR COUR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO¹

____________ TERM

No. ____________________

(Sup. Ct. No. CM 010607 et als.)

No. C 037374 (3^rd Appellate)

Robert Lindsay; Cheney Jr.

Accused and Aggrieved Party

Petitioner/Appellant

Against

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

Respondent

_________________________________________________/

COMPLAINT OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CALIFORNIA PENAL CODES § 270 (“Willful failure to Provide) and § 166(a)(4) (“Contempt) [AND OTHER LAWS THERETO]

[WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS]

Appeal from the Judgment of the COUNTY OF BUTTE

Butte County Consolidated Courts (“Superior Court”)

Mr. Gerald Hermansen, Disqualified Judge

and

the Denial of Substantive Due Process and Constitutional Rights from

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

Robert Lindsay; Cheney Jr.

In Propria Persona, Sui Juris

Fifteenth Judicial District

6190 Skyway

Paradise, California

TOPICAL INDEX

Page

COMPLAINT OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE 1

I- Nature and Character of the Parties 3

Petitioner 3

II- Respondent’s 7

III- Questions Presented 9

IV- Constitutional Provisions Involved at Law 15

V- Habeas Corpus 20

VI- Habeas Corpus Proper Remedy to Secure Constitutional Rights 34

VII- An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States 38

(Judiciary Act of 1789)

An Act Concerning Writ of Habeas Corpus

(April 20, 1850)

COMPLAINT OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY 43

[Verified Petition for Habeas Corpus]

VIII- Verified Petition for Habeas Corpus 44

IX- Statement of Jurisdiction 44

X- Count I—First Cause of Action 47

THAT THE COUNTY OF BUTTE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MICHAEL L. RAMSEY, ET ALS IN OPEN AND OVERT COLLUSION WITH RESPONDENT’S THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, THE BUTTE COUNTY FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION, THE BUTTE COUNTY FAMILY COURT TRUST FUND, THE COUNTY OF BUTTE CONSOLIDATED COURT SYSTEM; THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (ET ALS) AND THE UNITED STATES (ET ALS) IN CONSPIRACY WITH JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 500 HAVE AND ARE ABUSIVELY USING CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE §§ 270 AND 166(a)(4) FOR A PURPOSE NOT INTENDED AT LAW[1]—TO DIRECTLY DISENFRANCHISE APPELLANT FROM HIS NATURAL BORN, CONSTITUTIONAL AND CIVIL RIGHT SECURED RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES IN ORDER TO UNLAWFULLY KIDNAP AND/OR ABDUCT HIS OWN CHILD FROM HIM AND THEREBY TO OBTAIN DIRECT AND/OR INDIRECT REMUNERATIOIN FOR RESPONDENTS BY AND FROM THOSE UNLAWFUL ACTS AND/OR OMISSIONS.

XI- Count II—Second Cause of Action 51

IT IS A FACT, THAT FATHERS HAVE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS[2] THAT SUPERCEDE[3] AND ARE SUPERIOR[4] TO THE RESPONDENT’S RIGHTS[5] UNDER LAW; IN WHICH RESPONDENT’S UNLAWFULLY SUPERCEDE APPELLANTS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WILLFULLY FOR AN ULTERIOR PURPOSE UNDER COLOR OF LAW.

XII- Count III—Third Cause of Action 60

RESPONDENT’S HAVE IN FACT, CONSPIRED AND ACTED IN OVERT COLLUSION AND HAVE IN FACT COMMITTED AN OVERT FELONY OF ABDUCTION AND/OR KIDNAPPING OF MY SON IN ORDER TO GET HIM INTO THE “CUSTODY” OF MS. SUSAN SLOAN; AND REPEATED LAWFUL ATTEMPTS OF YOUR APPELLANT/PETITIONER TO ACCESS THE LAWFUL FORMS OF TRIAL HAVE BEEN THWARTED BY RESPONDENTS ACTING AS GATE KEEPERS TO THE COURT SYSTEMS TO DENY ME PALPABLE AND CORRECT REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES AT LAW, IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF LAW:

XIII- Count IV—Fourth Cause of Action 62

RESPONDENT’S IN THIS MATTER HAVE A COGENT STATE PROGRAM TO ATTACK YOUR PETITIONER AS A FATHER AND USE A PRE-EMPTIVE ATTACK ON YOUR PETITONIER AND/OR APPELLANT AS WELL AS FATHERS GENERALLY, USING PENAL CODE §§ 270 AND 166(a)(4) AS A FRAUD TO OBLITERATE ANY RIGHT OR SECURED LIBERTY SECURED TO APPELLANT UNDER LAW; TO DENY HIM ALL HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO HIS OWN CHILD BY ATTACKING HIM BOTH FINANCIALLY AND BY RESPONDENT’S SURROGATE COURT SYSTEM(S) ALONG WITH CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AS WELL AS FEDERAL HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS (AND OTHER “PROGRAMS,” “GRANTS,” “FOUNDATIONAL PROGRAMS AND/OR MONIES” AND/OR OTHER FUNDINGS) USING COLOR OF LAW, AND UNDER COLOR OF AUTHORITY OF THE STATE TO OBTAIN TITLE IV-D “WELFARE” FUNDING(S) FOR RESPONDENT’S AND THEIR ASSIGNS BY FRAUDULENTLY USING “BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD” [PARENS PATRIAE] DOCTRINE AGAINST YOUR APPELLANT IN OVERT VIOLATION OF LAW.

XIV- Count V—Fifth Cause of Action 73

RESPONDENT’S KNOWINGLY ARE INSOLENT TO THE CONSTITUTION AND OUR LAWS AND IMPLEMENT A COMPLETE HATRED AGAINST OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT AND DID OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND ARE IN FACT, INFLICTING A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST YOUR PETITIONER IN OVERT VIOLATION OF LAW, HAVING FULL CONFIDENCE IN THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO UPHOLD THEIR CRIMES AND UNLAWFUL ACTS AS THEY HAVE BEEN INFORMED THAT SAID COURTS WILL UPHOLD THEIR HATRED, VIOLENCE AND UNLAWFUL ACTS AND/OR OMISSION AGAINST YOUR PETITIONER AND APPELLANT AND WILL PROTECT RESPONDENT’S UNLAWFUL ACTS AND/OR OMISSIONS, AND WILL IGNORE NOR AFFORD PETITIONER WITH NO RIGHTS AT LAW, AND WILL VIOLATE ALL LAWS AND CONSTITUTIONS[6] IN WHICH TO KEEP YOUR PETITIONER UNLAWFULLY AND/OR ILLEGALLY IN CIVIL DEATH AND IN EXTREME HARDSHIP IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE CONCISE RULE OF LAW, AND THE CONSTITUTION OF CALIFORNIA, THE CONSTITUTION OF NEW YORK, AND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

XV- Count VI—Sixth Cause of Action 77

RESPONDENT’S AND THEIR SURROGATE COURTS ARE IN FACT, USING THE “BEST INTEREST” OF THE CHILD DOCTRINE TO ESTABLISH AND SUPPORT PUBLISHED CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE §§ 270 AND 166 (a)(4) VIOLATIONS: TO DIRECTLY DISENFRANCHISE HIM; AND PLACE YOUR APPELLEANT INTO A NEEDLESS DEBT AND TO GIVE RESPONDENT’S SUPER RIGHTS NOT GUARRANTEED AT LAW IN DIRECT VIOLATION THEREOF.[7]

XVI- Count VII—Seventh Cause of Action 80

RESPONDENT’S ARE VIOLATING NOT ONLY THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF YOUR APPELLANT/PETITIONER, AND PRO-ACTIVELY DESTROYING THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND OF THE UNITED STATES, IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH DEBTORS PRISONS, AND TO OVERTHROW THIS NATION FROM WITHIN USING THE PRECEPTS OF SOCIALISM, AND/OR COMMUNISM AND/OR FEMINISM AS THE “NEW” RULE OF LAW[8] WITHIN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA UNDER COLOR OF LAW, UNDER COLOR OF AUTHORITY.

XVII- Count VIII—Eighth Cause of Action 87

RESPONDENT’S HAVE FACTUALLY ESTABLISHED A SYSTEM OF SLAVERY USING PUBLISHED CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE(S) SECTION §§ 270 AND 166(a)(4) [AND OTHER RELATED “LAWS”

XVIII- Count IX—Ninth Cause of Action 90

LIES AND PERJURIES OF RESPONDENT’S TO ESTABLISH CLAIM—PAINT THEM WITH UNCLEAN HANDS—AS LYING AND PERJURIES ARE THE STANDARD PRACTICE OF RESPONDENT’S[9] IN WHICH TO ABROGATE THE RIGHTS AND SECURED LIBERTIES OF YOUR APPELLANT/PETITIONER USING COLOR OF LAW AND UNDER COLOR OF AUTHORITY

XIX- Count X—Tenth Cause of Action 92

VIOLATION OF ARTICLE I SECTION 10 OBLIGATION OF CONTRACTS BETWEEN APPELLANT AND HIS SON WHICH RESPONDENT’S ARE UNLAWFULLY ABROGATING THE UNALIENABLE RIGHT OF THE CONTRACT BETWEEN MY SON AND MYSELF (APPELLANT)

XX- Count XI—Eleventh Cause of Action 95

RESPONDENT’S ARE IN FACT USING PUBLISHED CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE §§ 270 AND 166 (a)(4) FOR A PURPOSE NOT INTENDED AT LAW, AND ARE NOT ADHERING TO THE CONCISE RULE OF LAW, AND ARE IN DIRECT CONTRAVENTION AND CONTRADISTINCTION TO THE CONSTITUTION OF CALIFORNIA (1849) AND THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES (1787-1791) FULLY KNOWING THEIR SURROGATE COURTS WILL PROTECT THEIR INSOLENCE TO THE RULE OF LAW

XXI- Count XII—Twelfth Cause of Action 97

XXII- Count XIII—Thirteenth Cause of Action 100

XXIII- Count XIV—Fourteenth Cause of Action 102

RESPONDENT’S ARE WILLFULLY INFLICTING CRUEL AND INHUMAN PUNISHMENTS AGAINST YOUR APPELLANT/PETITIONER

XXIV- Count XV—Fifteenth Cause of Action 103 #

YOUR APPELLANT HAS SUFFERED MULTIPLE DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATIONS IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE LAW:

XXV- Count XVI—Sixteenth Cause of Action 105

RESPONDENT’S HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW, AND FULLY UNDERSTAND THAT THE ALLEGED “DEBT” THEY DEMAND TO STEAL FROM ME, IS IN FACT, RESPONDENT’S HAVE A SCAM WHERE THEY REDEFINE OBLIGATION [AND/OR DEBT] INTO SOMETHING ELSE IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF LAW, AND THE NORMAL USE AND REASONABLE UNDERSTANDING OF WORDS.

XXVI- Count XVII—Seventeenth Cause of Action 109

RESPONDENT’S HAD KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW AS WELL AS THE FACTS AND FACTUALLY KNEW I HAD NO ABILITY TO PAY; BUT VINDICTIVELY KEPT PROSECUTING APPELLANT ANYWAY

XXVII- Count XVIII—Eighteenth Cause of Action 112

FACTUAL INTENT OF SYSTEM IS TO DRAIN AND TRANSFER WEALTH[10]—TO KEEP PEOPLE NEEDLESSLY IMPRISONED INTO MODERN CALIFORNIA GULAG PRISON SYSTEMS, CONTACTED WITH THE COURTS, TO CONTROL A FREE SOCIETY—TO PLACE INNOCENT AND POOR MEN IN JAIL SO THAT RESPONDENT’S VIA THEIR SURROGATE COURT SYSTEMS CAN OVERTHROW THIS FREE NATION FROM THE INSIDE VIA ‘OFFICERS OF THE COURT” USING COLOR OF LAW UNDER COLOR OF AUTHORITY TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE UNITED STATES

XXVIII- Count XIX—Nineteenth Cause of Action 113

ALL JUDGES[11] ARE NOT IMPARTIAL—ALL HAVE THEIR INTERESTS ATTACHED TO THE COLLECTION OF CHILD SUPPORT, FILLING PRISONS, AND FINDING GUILT AGAINST YOUR APPELLANT.

XXIX- Count XX—Twentieth Cause of Action 118

PUBLISHED CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE § 270 “WILLFULL FAILURE TO PROVIDE” AND PENAL CODE § 166(a)(4) ARE FACTUALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL:

XXX- Count XXI—Twenty-First Cause of Action 121

RESPONDENT’S HAVE WILLFULLY DISCRIMINATED[12] AGAINST YOUR APPELLANT FOR BEING A FATHER, WHO HAS ONLY DEMANDED HIS RIGHTS: WHO WOULD NOT PAY “CHILD SUPPORT” WHICH HE WAS FACTUALLY WAS NOT OBLIGATED TO PAY RESPONDENT’S WHO IN FACT KIDNAPPED HIS SON FROM HIM, APPELLANT REFUSED EXTORTION ATTEMPTS BY MAIL BY RESPNDENT’S, AND AT ALL TIMES ATTEMPTED TO MAINTAIN HIS RIGHTS IN AN IMPOSSIBLE SITUATION WHERE RESPONDENT’S AND THEIR SURROGATE COURTS FACTUALLY DESTROYED APPELLANT AND ANY DUE PROCESS OF LAW RIGHTS OF APPELLANT AND PROVIDE NO EQUAL RIGHTS[13] UNDER THE LAW

XXXI- Count XXII—Twenty-Second Cause of Action 127

SIMPLE CORROLLARY—IS PRIMA FACIA: IF THERE IS A CONSTITUTION; THEN I AS APPELLANT HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS[14]. HOWEVER; IT IS A FACT, THAT I HAVE NONE, AND THAT THIS CONDITION FACTUALLY DOES NOT EXTEND FROM ANY ACT OR OMISSION I HAVE DONE—NOR ANY LAWFUL CONTRACT I AM OBLIGATED TO—BUT RATHER; ONLY FROM THE WILFULL AND UNLAWFUL ACTS AND OMISSIONS COMMITTED BY RESPONDENTS AGAINST YOUR APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

XXXII- Count XXIII—Twenty-Third Cause of Action 130

STEVEN R. MCNELIS WAS NOT A JUDGE[15] IN MY MATTER, HE WAS NOT STIPULATED[16] TO; HE WAS NOT ACCEPTED AT ANY TIME IN MY MATTER; AND HE WAS FACTUALLY DISQUALIFIED UNDER LAW

XXXIII- Count XXIV—Twenty-Fourth Cause of Action 133

RESPONDENT’S DID COGENTLY VIOLATE AND WILFULLY ABROGATE EXTRADITION LAWS AND TREATIES

XXXIV- Count XXV—Twenty-Fifth Cause of Action 139

THE CALIFORNIA CODES ARE NOT LAW

XXV- CONCLUSION 142

XXXVI—PRAYER FOR RELIEF 152

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF 155

CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE(S) SECTION 270 AND 166(a)(4)

VERIFICATION 191

SUBSCRIPTION 191

PROOF OF SERVICE 192

EXHIBITS 193 et seq.

Memorandum of Points and Authorities

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED

Cases

Page

1 Watts 67 33

Abeel v. Clark, 84 Cal. 230, [24 Pac. 383] 145

Albrecht v. United States, 273 U.S. 1, 5 (1927) 137

Allen v. City of Portland, 73 F.3d 232 (9th Cir. 1995) 83

Anonymous, Moore K.B. 242, 72 Reprint 555 75

Amos v. Mosley, 74 Fla. 555; 77 So. 619 120

Armstrong v. Stone and Wife, 9 Gratt. 102 31, 53

Au Yi Lau v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, 144 U.S. App. D.C. 147, 445 F.2d 217 136

Ayyash v. Ayyash, 700 So. 2d 752, 754 n.3 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). 126

Balzac v. Puerto Rico, 258 U.S. 298, 312-13, 66 L. Ed. 627, 42 S. Ct. 343 (1922) 136

Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27, [5 Sup. Ct. 357] 145

Barry v. Mercein, 46 U.S. 103 (1847) 32, 55

Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516, 523 57

Bell v. Hood, 71 F.Supp. 813, 816 (1947) U.S.D.C.-So.Dist.Calif. 128

Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. at 684 137

Bemis Bros. Bag Co. v. United States, 289 U.S. 28, 36 (1933) 137

Bennac v. People, 4 Barb. (N.Y.) 31 29

Bennett Estate (1901) 134 C. 320, 66 P. 370 55

Bennet v. O'Fallon, 2 Missouri 69 79

Best v. United States, 184 F.2d 131, 138 (1st Cir.) 136

Bonham's Case (1610), Common Pleas, 8 Rep. 118a 122

Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 , 6 S. Ct. 524, 535 (29 L. Ed. 746) 125

Bracey v. Warden, U.S. Supreme Court No. 96-6133 (June 1997) 116

Breckinridge & wife v. Faulkner, 8 Bush (Ky.) 527 3

Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F.Supp. 94 68

Brookins & Williams v. Tolbert, (App.Div. June 7, 2000) Before: Hon. Gerald Council, JSC (Mercer County) 85

Brown v. State, No. 186, N.Y.Ct. of Appeals, 89 N.Y.2d 172, 674 N.E.2d 1129, 652 N.Y.S.2d 223 (1996) 76

Bernal v. Fainter, 467 U.S. 216 (1984) 36

Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455, 461-462 (1942) 46

Billings v. Hall (1857), 7 C. 1 51, 54

Boca Mill Co. v Curry (1908) 154 C 326, 97 P 1117 140

Booth v. Booth, (1945) 69 Cal. App. 2d 496, 159 P.2d 93 (Cal.App.Dist.1 06/08/1945) 48

Borton v. Borton, 230 Ala. 630, 162 So. 529, 101 A.L.R. 320 63

Bowen v. Johnston (01/30/39) 306 U.S. 19, 59 S. Ct. 442, 83 L. Ed. 455 3

Bowles v. Dixon, 32 Ark. 92; 33

Boyd, 55 F.3d at 242 125

Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 , 6 S. Ct. 524, 535 (29 L. Ed. 746) 46, 47

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) 125

Brandt v. Krogh (1910) 14 CA 39, 111 P. 275 91

Bronson v. Kinzie, 1 How. 311, 315-318 (1843 95

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia State Bar, 37 U.S. (1964) 127

Brown v. Johnson, 51 Id. 118 75

Bryant v. U.S. 257 US 386, 387 73

Brown v. State, No. 186, N.Y.Ct. of Appeals, 89 N.Y.2d 172, 674 N.E.2d 1129, 652 N.Y.S.2d 223 (1996) 76

Brunch v Colombet (1894) 104 C 347, 38 P 45 141

Buliox v. Buliox, (1962) 185 N.E. 2d 802 61

Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985) 116

Byars v. U.S., 273 US 28, 32 46, 125

California Statutes of 1975 Ch1244 Section 1 78

Cannon v. Stewart, 3 Houst. 223 32

Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 304 57

Cartwright v. Bate 1 Allen 514 57

Chrisholm v. Georgia, 4 Dall 419, 471 118

City of Tucson v. C.I.R., 820 F.2d 1283 (D.C.Cir. 1987) 77

Clark v. Bayer, 32 Ohio St. 299; 312, 32, 60

Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821) 116

Colorado Common Cause v. Bledsoe, 810 P.2d 201 (Colo. 04/15/1991) 57

Comarpe Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U.S. 74, 78-79 (1937) 106

Com. v. Reed, 59 Pa. St. 425 33

Commercial Mutual Accident Co. v. Davis, 213 U.S. 245, 53 L. Ed. 782, 29 S. Ct. 445 (1909)

136

Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Schor (1986) 478 U.S. 833, 847-848 [92 L.#d.2d 675, 690-691, 106 S.Ct. 3245] 132, 133

Commonwealth v. Briggs, 33 Mass. (16 Pick.) 203 31, 52, 53

Commonwealth v. Horregan, 127 Mass. 450 55

Cooke v. United States, (1925) 267 U.S. 517, 45 S.Ct. 390, 69 L. Ed. 767] 97, 139

Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976) 144, 145

Cruz v. Cruz, (App.Div. March 19, 2001) Before: Hon. Rosalie B. Cooper, JSC (Ocean County)

Cummings v. Cummins, (1839) 8 Watts 366 79

Curry v. Superior Court (1970) 2 C3d 707, 87 CR 361 36

Daniels v. Towers, 79 Ga. 785, 7 S.E. 120 29

DeMannevill v. DeManneville (1804) [SEE: Rex v. Demanneville, 102 Eng Rep 1054 (KB 1804).] 101

Denman v Broderick (1896) 111 C 96, 43 P 516 140

Doby v. DeCrescenzo, 171 F.3d 858 (3rd Cir. 1999) 83

Dowling v. Todd, 26 Mo. 267 32

Dred Scott v. Sanford (1856), 19 How. 393, 599-600, 624-25, 88, 89

Drumb v. Keen, 47 Iowa 435 63

Dunn v. Simmons, 877 F.2d 1275, 1278 (6th Cir. 1989) 151

Dutton v. Poole, 2 Lev. 210, 83 reprint 523 75

Dyers Case, Y.B. 2 Hen. V p. 4 pl. 26 75

Edlebaum on Behalf of Miller v. Cuomo 472 N.Y.S. 302, 122 Misc. 2d 1029 137

Ellis v. Jesup, 11 Bush, 403 32

E.N.W. v. Michael W. (1983) 149 Cal.App.3d 896, 899-900 [198 Cal.Rptr. 355] 132

Estate of Colton, 164 Cal. 1, 5 [127 P. 643] 74

Estate of Lacey (1975) 54 Cal.App.3d 172, 182 [126 Cal.Rptr. 432] 132

Estate of Soforenko (1968) 260 Cal.App.2d 765, 766 [67 Cal.Rptr. 563] 132

Ex parte Bennett, 2 Cra. (C.C.) 612 Fed. Case. No. 1,311 30

Ex parte Bollman, 4 Cra. (U.S.) 75, 2 L.Ed. 554 28, 73

Ex parte Bollman, 8 U.S. (4 Cranch) 75 (1807) 42

Ex parte Burford. 3 Cra (U.S.) 448, 2 L.Ed. 495 28

Ex parte Chin King, 35 Fed. 354; (1892) App. Cas. 326 30

Ex parte Crow Dog, 109 U.S. 556, 572 3

Ex parte Earl of Westmeath, 1 Jacob 251 53

Ex parte Farley, 40 Fed 66 27

Ex Parte Grossman, 267 U.S. 87, 108 108

Ex parte Kitchen, 19 Nev. 178, 18 Pac. 886 29

Ex parte Lange, 18 Wall. 163, 178, 21 L.Ed. 717 3, 28

Ex parte Millburn, 9 Pet (U.S.) 701, 9 L.Ed.280 31

Ex parte Miller, 109 Cal. 648, 42 Pac. 428 68

Ex parte Miraude, 73 Cal. 365, 14 Pac. 888 29

Ex parte Randolph, 2 Brock, 447, Fed. Cas. No. 11,558 28

Ex parte Ryan 17 Nev. 139, 28 Pac. 1040 30

Ex parte Robinson, 19 Wall. 505 97

Ex Parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 37, 371; 25 L. Ed. 717 50

Ex Parte Spears (1891), 88 Cal. 640, 642, 26 P. 608 134

Ex parte Smith, 3 McLean 121, Fed. Cas. No. 12, 968 29

Ex parte Terry, 128 U.S. 289, 9 Sup. Ct. 77, 33 L.Ed. 405 29

Ex parte Ulrich, 43 Fed. 661 27

Ex parte Watkins, 28 U.S. (3 Pet.) 201 31

Ex parte Watkins, 7 Pet. (U.S.) 568, 8 L.Ed. 780 28

Fanning v. Fanning, 2 Misc.N.Y. 94 58

Fisher v. Baker, 203 U.S. 174 25

Ferguson v. Ferguson, (1865) 36 Mo. 197 33

Fiocconi v. Attorney General of United States, 339 F. Supp. 1242, 1244 (S.D.N.Y. 1972) 135

Fonte v. Collins, 898 F.2d 284 (1st Cir. 1990) 68

Forman v Clatsop County, 297 Or 129, 133; 681 p2d 786 (1984) 125

Francis v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459 (1947) 102

Franks v. Delaware, (1978) 438 U.S. 154; 98 S. Ct. 2674; 57 L. Ed. 2d 667 115

Freedman v. United States, (1977) 437 F.Supp. 1252, 1259 (D.C.N.D.Ga. 1977) 138

French v. Davidson, 143 Cal. 662, [77Pac. 663] 145

Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972) 86

Galpin v. Page, 18 Wall. 350; In re Holt, 55 N. J. L. 384 97

Garner v. Gordon, 41 Ind. 92. 33

Gayle v. Scully, 779 F.2d 802, 806 (2d Cir. 1985) 117

Gedulig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484, 497 (1974) 144

Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 95 S.Ct. 854 (1975) 136

Gillaspie v. Wesson, 31 Am.Dec. 715 75

Glucksman v. Henkel, 221 U.S. 508, 512, 31 S. Ct. 704, 705, 55 L. Ed. 830 (1911) 138

Gomez v. Toledo, (1980) 446 U.S. 635 118

Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U.S. 418 97

Goodloe v. Godley, Id. 159 75

Goodrich v. Goodrich, 44 Ala. 670 78

Gouled v. United States, 255 U. S. 304, 41 S. Ct. 261, 46, 125

Government of Virgin Islands v. Ortiz, 427 F.2d 1043, 1045 n. 2 135

Green v. Biddle, 8 Wheat. 1, 75-76, 84-85 (1823) 95

Green v. Campbell, 35 W. Va. 698, 14 S.E. 212, 29 Am. St. Rep. 813 30

Gregoire v. Biddle, 177 F.2d 579, 581 (CA2 1949) 119

Griffith v. Gibson, 73 Cal.App.3d 465; 142 Cal.Rptr. 176 79

Grinberger v. Brotherton, 1933, 173 Wash. 292, 22 p.2D 983 56

Guion v. Guion Admin., 16 MO 48 78, 79

Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295, 306, 90 S.Ct. 506 (1970) 77

Hans Nielsen, Petitioner, 131 U.S. 176, 182 3

Hale v. United States Department of Justice, 973 F.2d 894 (10th Cir. 08/31/1992) 50

Harris v. McRae, 448 US 297 (1980) (USSC+) 51

Herrick v. Richardson 40 N.H. 272, 275 32, 53

Hibberd v. Smith (1885) 67 C 547, 561 4 P 473, 8 P 46, 56 Am.Rep. 726 6

Holmes v. Jennison, 14 U.S. 540, 570-1 108

House v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District (1944), 25 C.2d 384, 153 P.2d 950 119

Hull v. Connolly, 15 Am. Dec. 612 79

Huntoon v. Hazelton, 20 N. H. 389 52

Hunt v. Thompson 3 Scammon 179 79

Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 94

Illinois v. Pease, 207 U.S. 100, 28 Sup. Ct. 58, 52 L.Ed. 121 26

Indiana ex rel. Anderson v. Brand, 303 U.S. 95, 104-105 (1938) 106

Inglis v. Trustees Sail. Snug Harb., 3 Pet., 99 , 99; 7 Anne, cap. 5; 4 Geo. 3, cap. 21 32

In re Agar-Ellis, L.R. 10 Ch.D. 49 57

In re Antazo (1970) 3 C3d 100, 89 ?CR 255 36

In re Application of Gille (1924) 65 CA 617, 224 P 784 32

In re Application of James Rose, 6 A.2d 388, 122 N.J.L. 507 (N.J. 05/22/1939) 151

In re Ayala (1957) 155 CA2d 807, 318 P.2d 698 35

In re Ayers, 123 U.S. 443, 8 Sup.Ct. 164, 31 L.Ed. 216 28

In re Berry, (1968) 68 C2d 137, 145, 65 CR 273, 279 36

In re Campbell, 130 Cal. 380 [62 P. 613] 48

In re Cooper (1960) 53 C2d 772, 3 CR 140 36

In re Coy, 127 U.S. 731, 8 Sup. Ct. 1263, 32 L.Ed. 274 29

In re Cuddy, 131 U.S. 280, 9 Sup.Ct. 703, 33 L.Ed. 154 28

In re Cross, 43 Fed. 517 27

In re Davenport, 102 Fed. 540 27

In re Dewing (1977) 19 C3d 54, 136 CR 708 (ex post facto) 35, 36

In re Demillo (1975) 14 C3d 598, 121 CR 725 35

In re Dick (1966) 64 C2d 272, 49 CR 673 35

In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219 82

In re Dykes, 13 Okl. 339, 74 Pac. 506 26

In re Farez, 7 Blatchf. 345, Fed. Cas. No. 4,645 28

In re Ferguson (1971) 5 C3d 525, 96 CR 594 35

In re Fitton, 45 Fed. 471 27

In re Foss (1974) 10 C3d 910, 930, 112 CR 649, 662 36

In re Feiock, supra, 215 Cal.App.3d at p. 148 113

In re Frye (1983) 150 Cal.App.3d 407, 409-410 [197 Cal.Rptr. 755] 132

In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 27-28 (1967) 59

In re George Cooper on Habeas Corpus states [(1960) 3 Cal. Rptr. 140, 53 Cal.2d 772] 133

In re Glenn, 54 Md. 572, 595 32

In Re Gribben, 5 Okl. 379, 47 Pac. 1074 28

In re Hart, 229 C.A.2d 455; 40 Cal.Rptr. 4201 137

In re Haygood (1975) 14 C3d 802, 122 CR 760 35

In re Hendricks, (1970) 5 Cal.App.3d 793, 85 Cal.Rptr 220 105

In re Hochberg (1970) 2 Cal.3d 870, 875 34

In re Horton, (1991) 54 Cal.3d 82 133

In re Jacinto (1935) 8 CA2d 275, 47 P2d 300 45

In re Jessup, (1889) 81 C 408, 21 P. 972, 22 P.742, 1028, 6 LRA 594 55

In re Johnson (1970) 24 C3d 769, 157 CR 674 35

In re Joiner (1959) 180 CA2d 250, 4 CR 667 36

In Re J.P., document no 17386, S.Ct. UT (1982) pp. 13-17 84

In re Kapperman (1974) 11 C3d 542, 114 CR 97 36

In re Keddy, (1951) 105 Cal. App. 2d 215, 233 P.2d 159 71

In re Keeler, Fed. Cas. No. 7,637 [1 Hemp. 306] 31

In re Kowalsky, (1887) 73 Cal. 120, 14 Pac. 399 29, 117

In re Lee (1980) 103 CA3d 615, 163 CR 204 35

In re Lewis, 114 Fed., 963 27

In re Lynch (1972) 8 C3d 410, 105 CR 217 37

In re MARK BETTENCOURT on Habeas Corpus. Cite as 93 C.D.O.S. 4460 110

In re Mark L. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 171, 178-179 [193 Cal.Rptr. 165, 666 P.2d 22 132

In re McCandless, 17 Cal.App. 222 [119 Pac. 199]) 110

In re McDonald, (1861) Fed. Cas. No. 8,751 16 Fed. Cas. 17, 30 34, 42

In re Mazoros (1977) 76 CA3d 50, 142 CR 609 35

In re Moon, (1996) 201 B.R. 79, 87-88 (Bktrcy. S.D.N.Y. 1996) 81

In re Moyer, 36 Colo. 159, 85 Pac. 190, 12 L.R.A. (N.S.) 979 26

In re O’Shea, (1909) 11 CA 568, 105 P. 776 102

In re Neagle, 135, U.S. 1, 10 Sup.Ct. 658, 34 L.Ed. 55 27, 29

In re Newbert (1959) 175 CA2d 862, 1 CR 80 36

In Re Newman (1858), 9 C. 502 54, 60, 71

In re Nielson, 131 U.S. 176, ( Sup. Ct. 672, 33 L.Ed. 118 29

In re Ouimette, 115 R.I. 169, 175, 342 A.2d 250, 253 (1975) 123

In re Poole, 2 MacArthur (D.C.) 583 33

In re Rauch, 103 Cal. App. 2d 690, 230 P.2d 115 (Cal.App.Dist.2 04/23/1951) 74

In re Reese, 167 Fed 942, 47 C.C.A. 87 28

In re Reinitz, 39 Fed. 204, 4 L.R.A. 286 29

In re Rosoto (1974) 10 C.3d 939, 112 CR 641 123

In re Rinegold (1970) 13 Cal.App.3d 723, 725, 92 CR 18 34, 35

In re Rodriguez (9175) 14 C3d 639, 122 CR 552 37

In re Sawyer, (1888) 124 U.S. 200, 8 Sup.Ct. 482, 31 L.Ed.402 28, 116

In re Shaner, 39 Fed. 869 26

In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274, 285 3

In re Stidger, 37 Colo. 407, 86 Pac. 219 28

In re Stone, 120 Fed. 101 27

In re Swan, 150 U.S. 637, 14 Sup.Ct. 225, 37 L.Ed. 1207 28

In re Turner, 115 Fed. 231 25

In re Turner, 94 Kan. 115 [145 P. 871, 872 71

In re Tyler, 149 U.S. 164, 13 Sup.Ct. 785, 37 L.Ed. 689 28

In re Village of Willowbrook, 37 Ill.App.2d 393 (1962) 116

In Re Winship (1970) 90 S.Ct 1068 141

Ipswich Taylors Case, 11 Coke 53a. 77 reprint 1218 75

Jenness v. Emerson, 15 N. H. 486 52

John Doe v Jane Doe & Another 314 N.E.2d 128, 365 Mass. 556 54

Johnson v. MacCoy 278 F2d 37, 40 52

Johnson v. Terry, 34 Conn. 259 57

Johnson v. Zerbst (1938) 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461 3, 76

Jones v. Cleyborn, 54 Ga. 9, 13 60

Jones v. Jones, 156 Fla. 524, 527, 23 So. 2d 623, 625 (1945) 126

Jordah v. Hayda (1905) 1 Cal.App. 696, 82 P. 1079 80

J.T. v. O'Rourke, 651 P.2d 407, 413 (Colo. 1982) 121

Kahn v. Shevin, 416 U.S. 351, 356 (1974) 144

Katz v. United States, supra at 353 136

Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Superior Court (E. & J. Gallo Winery) (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 970

Keizo v. Henry, 211 U.S. 146 25

Kennedy v. Los Angeles Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 702, 709 (9th Cir. 1989) 116

Kenyon v. Chicopee, 320 Mass. 528, 536 [1946] 54

Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214, 216 (1944) 144

Lawson v. Lawson, (1910) 158 C. 446, 111 P. 354 55

Leeper v. Texas, 139 U. S. 467, [11 Sup. Ct. 577] 145

Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248, 257-61, 103 S.Ct. 2985, 2991-93, 77 L.Ed. 2d 614, 623-29 (1982).

Leonardini v. Shell Oil Co. (1989) 216 Cal.App.3d 547 83

Littleton v. Berbling, 468 F.2d 389, 412 (7th Cir. 1972) 115

Louisville RR v. Motley, 2111 US 149, 29 S.Ct. 42 76

Loyd v. Malone (1859) 23 Illinois, 43 78

Lubin v. Lubin, (1956) 144 C.A. 781; 302 P.2d 491 106, 107

Mackenzie v. Barrett, 144 Fed. 954, 76 C.C.A.8 27

Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 26 (1964) 46, 124

Mapp v. Ohio, in Mapp, 367 U.S., at 670 115

Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 163 (1803) 44

Mathews v. Wade, 2 W.Va. 464 33

Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 387 40 N.Y.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277 (1976) 72

Matter of Dickson v. Lascaris, 53 N.Y.2d 204, 440 N.Y.S.2d 884, 423 N.E.2d 361 (1981) 72

Matter of Gomez v. Lozado, 40 N.Y.2d 839, 387 N.Y.S.2d 834, 356 N.E.2d 287 (1976) 72

Matter of Heather Children, 50 Mich. 261 33

Matter of McMullin, 164 Cal. 504, 129 Pac. 773 68

Matter of Mitchell, R.M. Charlt. 489 32

Matter of Scurritt, 76 Mo. 565 57

Mayer v. Baldwin, 1 Halst. (N. J.) 454 31

Mayne v. Baldwin, 1 Halst. Ch. 454 52, 53

McBee v. Grant, 763 F.2d 811, 818 (6th Cir. 1985) 117

McCallen v. Massachusetts, 27 U.S. 620, 630 118

McCain v. Sierra County, Jan. t. 1857 17, 146

McClain v. Buck (1887) 73 C. 320, 14 P. 876 48

McCulloch v. Maryland, Wheat 316, 404, 405 118

McIntosh v. Dill, 86 Okla. 1 [205 P. 917, 925-6] 71

McKay v. McKay, 125 Cal. 65, 57 Pac. 677 68

McKim v. McKim, 12 R.I. 462; 34 Am. Rep. 694 78

McConologue’s Case, 107 Mass. 154 33

McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 87 L. Ed. 819, 63 S. Ct. 608 (1943) 135

Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County, 450 U.S. 464, 475 (1981) 144

Michaelson v. Beemer, 72 Neb. 761, 101 N.W. 1007, 9 Ann.Cas. 1191 28

Michigan v. Doran, 439 U.S. 282 (1978) 37

Miller v. Superior Court, (1937) 72 P.2d  868                                                                                          105, 106

Miller v. Wallace, 76 Ga. 479                                                                                                      63

Milwaukee Industrial School v. Supervisors, 49 Wis. 328; 22 Am.Rep. 702 55

Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627 82

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491 (1968) 120

Miskimmins v. Shaver, 8 Wyo., 392, 58 Pac. 411, 49 L.R.A. 831 26

Mitchell v. Treanor, 11 Geogia 324 79

Moers v. Gilbert, (1941) 175 Misc. 733, 25 N.Y.S.2d 114 114

Monaca Borough v. Monaca St. R. Co., 247 Pa. 242, 91 A. 344. 78

Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 685 (1978) 77

Monmouth County v. G.D.M., 705 A.2d 408, 308 N.J. Super. 83, 88 (1997) 72

Mookini v. United States (1938) 58 S.Ct. 543, 303 U.S. 201,82 L.Ed. 748 3

Moore v. Dempsey, 261 U.S. 86, 91 3

Moore v. Christian, 56 Miss. 408; 31 Am. Rep. 375 32

Monaca Borough v. Monaca St. R. Co., 247 Pa. 242, 91 A. 344 113

Morse v. Municipal Court (1974) 13 C3d 149, 155, 118 CR 14, 17 47

Murdock v. Penn, 319 U.S. 105, 113 105

Mugler v. Kansas,123 U.S. 623, 661 109

Murray v. Wilcox, 122 Iowa 188, 97 N.W. 1087 (1904) 138

NAACP v. Alabama 1964 .S.Ct..1052 , 377 U.S. 288, 84 S.Ct. 1302, 12 L. Ed. 2d 325 83

NAACP v. Button, 37 U.S. 415 127

National Life Insurance Company v. United States, 277 U.S. 508, 630 121

New Jersey v. Wilson, 7 Cranch 164 (1812) 107

Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. (1981) 458 U.S. 50, 57-60 [73 L.Ed.2d 598, 606, 608, 102 S.Ct. 2858] 132

O'Connell v. Judnich (1925), 71 C.A.386, 235 P. 664 72

O'Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 714-15, 107 S.Ct. 1492, 1496, 94 L.Ed.2d 714 (1987)

Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 9 Wheat (22 U.S.) 738, 866, 6 L.Ed 204 (1824) 115

Oyama v. California, 332 U.S. 633 83

Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America v. Instromedix (9th Cir.1984) 725 F.2d 537, 541

132

Paff v. Kaltenbach, 204 F.3d 425 (3rd Cir. 2000) 83

Painter v. Berglund (1939) 31 CA2d 63; 87 P.2d 360 95

Pamela P. v. Frank S., 443 N.Y.S.2d 343, 110 Misc.2d 978 (Fam.Ct.1981) 56, 72

Parham v. J.R., 442 U.S. 584, 602 (1979) 129

Parke v. Raley, 506 U.S. 20, 28 (1992) 128, 151

Parker v. Parker, 193 Cal. 478, 225 P. 447 63

Payne v. Payne, 39 Ga. 174 33

People ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. Gilmore, 345 Ill. 28, 177 N.E. 710 (1931) 116

People v. Anderson (1972) 6 C3d 628, 100 CR 152 37

People v. Applegate, 5 Cal. 295 45

People v. Bigler, 5 Cal. 23 115

People v. Coleman, 4 Cal. 46 115

People v. Davis, 55 Misc.2d 656, 659 286 N.Y.S.2d 396 111

People v. Forester, (1916) 29 Cal.App. 460 110

People v. Gillson, 109 New York, 389 122

People v. Hartman, 23 Cal. App. 72, 137 Pac. 611 68

People v. Haskett (1982) 30 Cal.3d 841 [180 Cal.Rptr. 640, 640 P.2d 776] 132

People v. Landers (1976) 59 CA3d 846, 131 CR 522 35

People v. Municipal Court (1972) 27 CA3d 193, 103 Cal Rptr 645 122

People ex Rel. Kropp v. Shepsky, 305 N.Y. 465, 113 N.E.2d 801 (1953) 72

People ex.rel. O'Connell v. Turner, 55 Ill. at 280-87 (1870) 72

People ex. rel. Nickerson, 19 Wend. 637 31

People ex rel. Portnoy v. Strasser, 303 N.Y. 539, 104 N.E.2d 895 (1952) 71

People v. Brisendine (1975) 13 C3d 528, 119 CR 315, 327 37

People v. Brisendine (1975) 13 C3d 528, 549 n17, 119 CR 315, 328 n17 36

People v. Cardenas (1981) 114 Cal.App.3d 643, 647-648, 170 Cal.Rptr. 763 76

People v. Charles W. Aubry, 53 C. 427, 428 99

People v. Chegaray, 18 Wend. 637 31

People v. Coleman, 145 Cal. 615, [79 Pac. 283] 145

People v. Currie, 1911, 16 Cal.App. 731, 117 P. 941 52

People v. Davenport (1937), 21 C.A. 292, 69 P.2d 396 54

People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 21, 23-24, 150 N.E. 585, 587, 588 (1926) 124

People v. De Leon 109 New York 226 521 U.S. at 936 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 5779(a) 52

People v. Dewy, 23 Misc. 267, 50 N.Y. Supp. 1013 26

People v. Disbrow (1976) 16 C3d 101, 114, 127 CR 360, 368 37

People v. Forester, (1916) 29 Cal.App. 460 94

People v. Forrester, 29 Cal.App. 462 [155 Pac. 1023] 101

People v. Hartman, 23 Cal.App. 72, 81-82 94

People v. Herman, 45 Cal. 689 93

People v. Hinton, 40 NY2d 348 112

People v. Hinton, 386 N.Y.S.2d 703 112

People v. Landers (1976) 59 CA3d 846, 131 CR 5222 36

People v. McDonald, (1957) 8 Misc.2d 50, 167 N.Y.S.2d 394 114

People v. Mercein, 25 Wend. 64 31

People v. Mercein, 8 Paige, 55 32

People v. Mercein, 3 Hill (N. Y.) 399 52, 53, 57

People v. Norwoods (1957) 67 C2d 589,316 P2d 1010 34

People v. Oaxaca (1974) 39 Cal.App.3d 153 [114 Cal.Rptr. 178 132

People v. Oliver (1975) 46 Cal.App.3d 747, 751 [120 Cal.Rptr. 368] 76

People v. Pena (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 414, 423 34

People v. Pope (1979) (9179) 23 Cal.3d 412, 426 34

People v. Ramirez (1979) 25 C3d 260, 158 CR 316 37

People v. Ramey (1976) 16 C.3d 263, 275-276, 127 Cal.Rptr. 629 634-637, 545 P.2d 1333, 140-141

37, 137

People v. Reid (1924) 195 C. 249, 232 P. 457, 36 ALR 1435 95

People v. Rickert, (1983) 450 N.Y.S.2d 734 111

People v. Scott (1976) 16 C3d 242, 128 CR 39 37

People v. Tate (1955) 136 CA2d 31, 288 P.2d 149 35, 123

People v. Thoi (1989 4th Dist) 213 Cal.App. 3d 689, 696, 261 Cal.Rptr. 789 75

People v. Tijerina, supra, 1 Cal.3d at p. 49; In re Frye (1983) 150 Cal.App.3d 407-40 [197 Cal.Rptr. 755] 130, 132

People v. Torres (1979) 96 CA3d 14, 157 CR 560 34

People v. Turner, 55 Ill. 280 55

People v. Wallach, (1923) 62 Cal.App. 385; [Crim. No. 1099: 1^st Appel. Distr., Div. 2, June 1923] 101

People v. War, (1862) 20 C. 117 98

Perry v. Pernet, 165 Ind., 67, 74 N.E. 609, 6 Ann. Cas. 533 28

Perry v. U.S. 294 U.S. 330, 353 (1935) 118

Pertize. v. United States (1991) 501 U.S. ____, _____ [115 L.Ed.2d 808, 822, 11 S.Ct. 2661, 2669]

Pillsbury v. Brown, 47 Cal. 480 98

Pitman v. Kintner, 33 Id. 469 75

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, 16 S.Ct. 1138, 41 L.Ed. 256 5

Price v. Price, 85 Cal.App.2d 732 [194 P.2d 101] 107

Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166, 88 L. Ed. 645, 652, 64 S.Ct. 438, 442 (1944) 51, 73, 129

Quilloin v. Walcott (1978) 434 US 246, 255 129

Quilloin v. Walcott, 99 S.Ct. 549, 434 U.S. 246, 255-56, (1978) 74

Queen v. Clark, 7 El. & Black. 186, 90 E. C. L. 185 52

Rainwater v. Durham, 10 Am. Dec. 637 79

Rea v. United States, 350 U.S. 214, 100 L. Ed. 233, 76 S. Ct. 292 (1955) 135

Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71, 75 (1971) 145

Re Estate of Stanford (1899) 126 C 112, 58 462 141

Regina v. Smith, 16 Eng. L. & Eq. 221 57

Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1148, 77 S. Ct. 1222 (1957) 136

Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292, 301-302 (1993) 46, 124

Rex v. Champion. 4 Mod. 37. Glies Case

Rex v. Chancellor, &ct. of Cambridge S.C. Fort 202. Pg. 1334 to 1342 117

Rex v. Delaval, 3 Burr. 1434 52

Rice v. Ames (1901) 180 U.S. 371, 374, 21 S.Ct. 406, 45 L.Ed. 577 133

Richman v. Back of Perris (1929) 102 CA 71, 782 P. 801 92

Rivers v. Mitchell, 57 Iowa 193 33

Roberts v. Higgins, 1222 Cal.App. 170, 9 P.(2d) 517 63

Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962) 102

Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp. (1973) 10 Cal.3d 351, 360, 361-362 [110 Cal.Rptr. 353, 515 P.2d 297] 130, 131

Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57, 83 (1981) 144

Rust v. Vanvacter, 9 W.Va. 600 33

Rzayeva. Foster, 134 F.Supp.2d 239 (D.Conn. 2001) 83

Sacramento v Swanston (1915) 29 CA 212, 155 P 101 140

Salas v. Cortez, supra, 24 Cal.3d at p. 27 63

San Antonio School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973) 46

San Francisco v. Scott, 4 Cal. 114 17, 146

Santosky v. Kramer, supra, 455 U.S. at pp. 766-767 [71 L.Ed.2d at p. 615 71

Savin, Petitioner, 131 U.S. 267 97

Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) 117

Schlesinger v. Ballard, 419 U.S. 498, 510 (1975) 144

Selfridge v. Paxton, 145 Cal. 713, 79 Pac. 425 68

Sharon v. Sharon (1880) 75 C 1, 10; 16 P. 345 106

Shelton vs. Tucker, 364 U.S. 4798, 488, 5 L. Ed. 2d 231, 81 S. Ct. 247 (1960) 73

Shields v. Martin, 706 P.2d 21 (Idaho 1985) 56

Simmons v. Coal Co., 117 Ga. 305, 43 S.E. 780, 61 L.R.A. 789 26

Slack v. McDaniel, (2000) 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 46

Smith v. Bank of America (1936) 14 CA 2d 78, 87; 57 P.2d 1363 80

Sona v. Aluminum Castings Co., supra; [Citations Omitted] 97

South Dakota v. Brown (1978) 20 C3d 765, 144 CR 758 37

Southern Pac. Co. v. Zehnle, (1947) 163 F2d 453 75

State ex. rel. Hodgdon v. Libbey, 44 New Hampshire 321 32

State v. Baldwin, 5 N.J. Eq. 454 33, 57

State v Bess, 44 Utah, 29 [137 Pac. 829] 94

State v. Bulzine, 4 Harr. (Del.) 575 29

State v. Clover, 16 N. J.L. 419 33

State v. Clover, 1 Harr. (N. J.) 419 53

State v. Green, supra, p. 902 71

State v. Huegin, 110 Wis., 189, 85 N.W. 1046, 62 L.R.A. 700 26

State v. Libbey, 44 N.H. 321 57

State v. Madewell, (1973) 63 N.J. 506 at 512 (N.J. Supreme Court) 82

State v. Ray, 63 N.H. 406; 55 Am. Rep. 458 55

State v. Scott, 30 N. H. 274, 276 31, 53

State v. Smith, 6 Mo. 462; 20 Am. Dec. 324 32

State v. Whitcher, 117 Wis. 665, 94 N.W. 787, 98 Am. St. Rep. 968 26

St. Regis Paper Col. V. United States, 368 U.S. 206, 299, 82 S.Ct. 289, 301, 7 L.Ed.2d 240 (1961) 91

Sturges v. Crowninshield, (1819) 4 Wheat. 122 93

Sumner v. Sumner, 117 Ga. 229. 43 S.E. 485 26

Sutro Estate (1907) 152 C. 249, 92 P. 486, 1027 88

Swart v. Kimball (1880), 43 Mich. 443, 451, 5 N.W. 635 134

Sweet v. Cupp (9^th Cir. 1981) 640 F.2d 233, 236 34

Takahashi v. Fish & Game Commission, 334 U.S. 410 83

Tarkington v. State, 1 Ind. 171, 173 32

The Western Maid, 257 U.S. 419, 433 (1922) 137

Tolen v. Tolen, 2 Blackford 407 79

Thomason v Ashworth (1887) 73 C 73, 14 P 615 140

Townsend v. Kendall, 4 Minn. 412 33

Trans Aero Inc. v. LaFuerga Area Boliviana, 24 F.3d 457 (2nd Cir. 1994) 116

Troxel v. Granville, 99-138 (2000) 129

Tulare v Hevren (1899) 126 C 226, 58 P 530 141

Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 523, 47 S.Ct. 437, 441, 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927) 130

Union Ice Co. v. Rose, 11 C.A. 357 98

United Mine Workers v. Illinois Bar Association, 38 U.S. 217 127

United States Trust Company v. New Jersey, 431 U.S. 1 93

United States v. Aguilar, 115 S. Ct. 2357, 2362 (1995) 125

United States v. Archer, supra at 677 135

United States v. Benitez, 34 F.3d 1489, 1497 n.6 (9th Cir. 1994) 90

United States v. Brand, 163 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 1998) 110

United States v. Brandon, 50 F.3d 464, 467 (7th Cir. 1995) 125

United States v Brown, 381, US 437,448-49,, 85 S Ct 1707, 1715, 14 L.Ed. 484;492 96

United States v. Edwards, 36 F.3d 639, 645 (7th Cir. 1994) 125

United States v. Faasse, 265 F.3d 475, 482, 490 (6th Cir. 2001) 112

United States v. Freeman, 357 F.2d 606 (2d Cir. 1967) 135

United States v. Harris, 501 F.2d 1, 10 (9th Cir. 1974) 116

United States v. Laurins, 857 F.2d 529, 537 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 906 (1989)

117

United States v. Lovato, 520 F.2d 1270 (9th Cir. 07/14/1975) 137

United States v Lovett, 328 US 303, 315, 66 S. Ct. 1073,1079,90 L Ed. 1252 96, 97

United States v. Mathes, 151 F.3d 251 (1998) 110

United States v. Maloney, 71 F.3d 645 (7th Cir. 11/29/1995)] 125

United States v. Pink, 315 U.S. 203, 228, 86 L. Ed. 796, 62 S. Ct. 552 (1942) 136

United States v. Russell (1973) 411 U.S. 423, 431-436, 36 L.Ed. 2d 366, 93 S.Ct. 1637 75, 135

United States v. Toscanino, 500 F.2d 267 (2nd Cir. 05/15/1974) 136

United States v. Virginia, 116 S. Ct. 2264 (1996) 51

U.S. v. Anderson, Cooke (Tenn.) 143 33

U.S. v. Bishop, 66 F.3d 569, 577 (1995) 107

U.S. v. Bongiorno, 106 F.3d 1027, 1032 (1997) 108

U.S. v. Fullhart, 47 Fed. 802 29

U.S. v. Hamilton, 3 Dall. (U.S.) 17, 1 L.Ed. 490 28

U.S. v. Lewko, 269 F.3d 64, 68 (2001) 107, 108

U.S. V. Mitchell, 2 Dall 348, 355,1 L.Ed. 410 73

U.S. v. Mussari, 95 F.3d 787, 790 (1996) 108

U.S. v. Parker, 108 F.3d 28, 31 (1997) 107, 108

U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir. 1970 67

U.S. v. Ronan, 33 Fed. 117 27

U.S. v. Sage, 92 F.3d 101 at 106 (1996) 108

U.S. v. Simpson, 927 F.2d 1088 (9th Cir. 1990) 115

U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61-71 (1878) 67, 124

U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299-300 67, 124

U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980) 116

Van Buren v. Pima Community College Dist. Bd., 546 P.2d 821, 113 Ariz. 85 (Ariz.1976) 124

Vaughan v. Rhodes, (1822) 2 McCord 227 58, 59

Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480, 491, 100 S.Ct. 1254 (1980) 83

Von Hoffman v. City of Quincy, 4 Wall., at 552-554 95

Wagenmann v. Adams, 829 F.2d 196 (1st Cir. 1987) 68

Ward v. Roper, 7 Humph. (Tenn.) 111 33

Warrender v. Warrender, 2 Cl. & F., 523; Story Confl. L., 30, 36, 43, 74, 160 32

Warren v. Graham, 1916, 174 Iowa 162, 156 N.W. 323 56

Washington Ins. Co. v. Price (1823) 1 Hopk. 1. 114

Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 719 (1997) 46, 124

Weinstein v. Weinstein (App.Div. April 7, 2000) Before: Hon. Louis Locascio, JSC (Monmouth County) 86

Western Surgical Supply Co. v. Affleck, 1952, 110 Cal.App.2d 388 52

Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773 4

Wilcox v. Wilcox, 14 N.Y. 575 33

Wilensky v. Fields, Fla, 267 So.2d 1,5. 59

Williams v. Thompson, Jan. T. 1856 115

Williamson v. United States, 311 F.2d 441 (5th Cir. 1962) 135

Windsor v. McVeigh, 93 U.S. 274 97

Winton v. Winton, 53 Hun 4; 5 NYS 537 104

Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205,232 (1972) 129

Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25, 42 (1949) 115

Wood v. Goodridge, 52 Id. 771 75

Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 488, 9 L. Ed. 2d 441, 83 S. Ct. 407 (1963) 135

Wright v. United States, 302 U.S. 583 (1938) 108

Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U. S., at 300 117

Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370, 373 (1886) 82, 87

Zummo v. Zummo, 574 A.2d 1130, 1138 (Pa. Super. 1990) 62

CONSTITUTIONS

Page

Constitution for the United States (1787-1791)

Preamble 15, 120

Article I, Section 8, Clause 2 45

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 15

Article I, Section 8, Clause 9 15

Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 9, 15

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 15

Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 15, 96

ARTICLE I, SECTION 10 16, 93, 96

Article III, Section 2, Clause 1 16, 32, 112

Article IV, Section 4 73

AMENDMENT THE FIRST 16, 94, 118

127

AMENDMENT THE THIRD 112,

AMENDMENT THE FOURTH: 6, 94, 112

AMENDMENT THE FIFTH: 16, 103

109, 112

118, 121, 127

130

AMENDMENT THE SIXTH: 17, 130

AMENDMENT THE SEVENTH: 17

AMENDMENT THE EIGHTH: 17, 37, 102

109

AMENDMENT THE NINTH: 17, 51, 97

112, 127

AMENDMENT THE TENTH: 17

Article IV, § 4 94, 120, 118

Article VI, § 2 94, 118, 127

139

Amendment the Fourteenth 53

Constitution for the state of California, (1849) 17

Preamble 17, 97, 118

Article I, Section 1 17, 47, 48

59, 73, 112

114, 118

Article I, Section 2 18, 47, 48

Article I, Section 3 74, 130

Article I, Section 4 97

Article I, Section 5 18

Article I, Section 6 18, 105

Article I, Section 8 18, 62, 74

81, 103

109, 112

130

Article I, Section 9 74

Article I, Section 10 77, 81, 86

90, 92, 94

99, 102

105, 109

113,

Article I, Section 11 18, 51, 62

74, 81, 139

Article I, Section 12 51, 74

Article I, Section 13 51

Article I, Section 15 18, 36, 105

109

74, 86, 92

Article I, Section 16 97, 105

Article I, Section 18 109

Article I, Section 19 19, 51, 74

Article I, Section 21 19

Article II 77, 86, 90

92, 99, 102

103, 109

Article III 74, 139

Article VI, et seq. 114

Article VI, § 1 130

Article VI, § 3 130

Article VI, § 5 130

Article VI, Section 13 63

Article VI, Section 17 19

Constitution for the State of California (1998)

Article I, § 15 130

Article I, § 24 19, 37, 60

Article VI, § 15 130

Article VI, § 17 130

Article VI, §18 130

Article XX, Sec. 3 20, 77, 130

Constitution for the state of New York (1777) 20

PUBLISHED CALIFORNIA CODES

CC § 3523 95

CC § 3531 103

CC § 3539 91

CCP § 170.1(a)(6)(c) 130

CCP § 780.180 et seq. 92, 93

CCP § 1203.4 47

CCP § 1866 92

CRC Rule 244 130

GC 1027.5 47, 73, 81

112

GC 11120 and 54950 82

PC § 7 47

PC § 8 94

PC § 14 90

PC § 13 118

PC § 17 98, 99

PC § 17(a)(4) 97

PC § 20 118

PC § 21 118

PC § 38 47, 73, 112

PC § 72 105

PC § 96 113

PC § 98 113

PC § 115.3 77, 81

PC § 118.1 90

PC § 118(a) 90

PC § 120 77

PC § 121 77

PC § 127 90

PC § 128 90

PC § 129 77, 90

PC § 146 62

PC § 148.5 47

PC § 156 60

PC § 158 60

PC § 166(a)(4) 47, 48

PC § 168 62

PC § 170 62

PC § 181 86

PC § 182 114

PC § 182(a)(2), and (4) 47

PC § 184 47

PC § 186 62

PC § 186.9 114

PC § 186.10 114

PC § 186.11 99

PC § 207 47, 51, 60

PC § 209 47, 51

PC § 210.5 47, 51

PC § 273f 77

PC § 273h 81

PC § 277 47

PC § 278 47

PC § 270 47, 48

PC § 518 47

PC § 519 94

PC § 522 81

PC § 531 60

PC § 531(a) 99

PC § 532 60, 62

PC § 532(a) 99

PC § 654 103

PC § 655 103

PC § 688 81

PC § 693 81

PC § 694 81

PC § 784.5 60, 86

PC § 793 81

PC § 794 81

PC § 830 60

PC § 871 97

PC § 991 (e) 133

PC § 1387 133

PC § 1447 109

PC § 1448 109

PC § 1549.2 133

PC § 1552 133

PC § 1555 133

PC § 1555.2 133

STATUTES

4 U.S.C.S. section 110(d) 3

4 U.S.C.S. section 110(e). 3

8 C.F.R. § 208.18(a)(2), (3) 102

30 Am. Rep. 593 60

37 Cal.3d at p. 74 58

39 CJS §427 21

43 Am. Rep. 768 57

45 Am. Dec. 399 57

92 Am. Dec. 223 57

An Act Concerning the Writ of Habeas Corpus--[Passed April 20th, 1850]

Article 2549, § 1 38

Article 2550, § 2 38

Article 2550, § 3 38

Article 2550, § 4 38

Article 2551, § 5 39

Article 2551, § 6 39

Article 2552, § 9 39

Article 2555, § 16 40

Article 2556, § 18 40

Article 2557, § 20 40

Article 2559, § 26 40

Article 2559, § 28 2, 20, 40

Article 2562, § 36 41

Article 2562, § 37 41

Article 2563, § 38 41

Article 2563, § 39 41

Article 2563, § 40 41

Article 2563, § 41 41

Act of Congress at 9 Stat. 452 6

The Act of 31 Car. II 30

Clayton Act; 38 Stat. 731, 15 U.S.C. Sect. 17, 15 U.S.C.A. Sect. 17 89

Divisions 12 and 82 of the Department of Social Services “Manual of Policies and Procedures

F.R.Civ.P. 15(c) 121

INDEX TO THE LAWS OF CALIFORNIA, 1805-1893, (1894), p. 696 140

Statute of California passed February 28, 1850 7

California Statutes of 1975 Ch1244 Section 1 78

An Act Concerning the Writ of Habeas Corpus 38

Judiciary Act, 1789, 11 32

Sec 14 39

Judiciary Act, Sept. 24, 1789, Ch. 20, §14, 1 Stat. 81-82 39

Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) 65

Rev. Stat. § 5278 134

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1 116, 114

Title 18 U.S.C. § 2 60, 73

Title 18 U.S.C. § 3 60, 73

Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 73, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 35 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 111 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 153 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 228 65

Title 18 U.S.C. § 241 77, 81, 114

Title 18 U.S.C. § 242 77, 81, 114

Title 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(1)(B) 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 246 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 371 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 662 134

Title 18 U.S.C. § 912 113

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1001 66, 90

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1002 90

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1341 77, 81, 121

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1343 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1503 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1505 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513(b) 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1515(a) 77, 81

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1621 90

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1623 90

Title 18 U.S.C. § 2340 121

Title 18 U.S.C. § 2384 77

Title 18 U.S.C. § 3182 133

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1738 47

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1746 90

Title 42 USCA §§ 651-666 56, 62, 63

65, 75

Title 42 U.S.C. § 1982 73

Title 42 U.S.C. § 1994 86, 88

Title 42 U.S.C. § 5779(a) 52

Title 45 U.S.C. Parts 200-449 65

TEXT AND OTHERS

1 Bl. Com. 453 52

1 Bouv. Inst. n. 167, 502 89

1 Craig. & Phil. 317 56

1 Ld. Ray. 699 56

2 AM JUR 2d Administrative Law §§ 332 (2d Ed. 1962) 75, 151

2 California Criminal Law Practice Chapter 27 (Cal. CEB 1969) 37

2 Cal. Proc. 3d Jurisdiction, § 61 134

2 Poll & Maitl. 551, 591 22

2 Story Eq., sec. 1340 31

2 Story's Eq., secs. 1343-1350 52

2 Kent's Com. 193 52

2 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) 132

3 Bla. Com. 135 24

3 Bl.Comm. 142 51

4 S. & R. 207; Bouv. Inst. Index, h. t. --Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 56

8 Am. Rep. 645 55

8 Watts, R. 366 56

9 C. & P. 497 56

9 Ed. 4, 14, G. 11 Ca. 99. Fa. Baggs Case I Sid. 14. 2 Sid. 97 117

18 Crim.L.Rptr. 2507 37

38 E. C. L. R. 195 56

Administrative Procedure Act 5 USC 'D' 76

American Bar Association Project on Standards for Criminal Justice, The Prosecutor Function 1.1, 3.4, 3.9 (1974); American College of Trial Lawyers, Code of Trial Conduct, Rule 4(c) (1963)

128

Ann.Cas. 1916E 1022 71

Bac. Abr. Hab. Corp. B. 10 151

Blackstone Commentaries on the Laws of England, edited by Wm. Hardcastle Browne, A.M., by L.K. Strouse & Co., Law Publishers, New York, 1892, p. 26 99

Bov. Law Dict. (1859), Vol., I, p. 573 45

Bouviers Law Dictionary (1914), “Maxim” p. 2140 78

Bouvier's Law Dictionary(1914), "Maxim," p, 2142 144

Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p. 2151. 80

Cannibals All! - Or Slaves Without Masters, by George Fitzhugh, Harvard Univ. Press, 1960, pg. 20 (Originally published in 1857) 88

Church, Hab. Corp 3 22

Church, Hab. Corp. 67 26

Church, Hab. Corp 37 24

3 Co. Litt. 22 70

Co. Inst. 233 70

Cleaning Up After Radical Feminism: Manhood Is A Terrible Thing To Waste, By Gerald L. Rowles, Ph.D. http://toogoodreports.com/column/general/rowles/20020408.htm; April 8, 2002,

119

Columbia University's Carpenter Lectures 1968 115

Congressional Globe, 39th Congress, 1st Session, at page 1757 (1866) 5

CONG. GLOBE, 39th Cong., 1st Sess. 2765 (May 23, 1866). 50, 76

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 524 (3rd ed. 1986) 145

Cowen, Domestic Relations; Action for Loss of Consortium, 1951, 25 Aust.L.J. 390, 1952, 26 Aust. L.J. 358 51

Dig 8, 2, 26; 17 Mass. 443 78

Dig 50, 17, 29. 91

Elliot's Debates 1836 ed. pages 500-519 129

Gerstein v. Pugh, (1975) 420 U.S. 103 (1975) 128

GAO/HEHS-99-105 69

Habeas Corpus Act of 31 Car. 11 24

Habeas Corpus Issues, Hearings before the Subcommittee on Crime, House Judiciary Committee, May 22, June 27, and July 17, 1991, 102d Cong., 1st Sess., Serial No. 39, p. 386 128, 150

Harling v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1961) supra, 295 F.2d 161, 314 70

Hechtman, 1972 Practice Commentary 112

Horner’s Stat. Ind. (1896) § 1107 33

House Ways and Means Committee, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Human Resources

(1997); Thursday, March 20, 1997; pg 93 69

Yahoo Group - Ex-Husband_is_now_my_Slave http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ex-husband_is_now_my_slave/ [April 11, 2002 reviewed] 90

Hurd Hab. Corp. 93 24

Hurd, Hab. Corp. 109 25

Hurd, Hab. Corp. 145 22

Hurd on Habeas Corpus, pp. 213, 214 31, 46

Hurd Hab. Corp. 450 30

In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection, 86 HARV. L. REV. 1, 24 (1972) 145

MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, GENDER BIAS STUDY OF THE COURT SYSTEM IN MASSACHUSETTS (1989), reprinted in 24 NEW. ENG. L. REV. 745, 745 (1990)

126

Maxim’s of Lord Coke, Section 152b 61

McKinney’s Cons.Laws of N.Y., Book 39, Penal Law § 260.05 [1975—1976 Supp.]) 112

Mondale Act 75

Our Sacred Honor, Words of Advice from the Founders in Stories, Letters, Poems and Speeches, by William J. Bennet ©1997, Simon and Schuster, Rockefeller Center, 1230 Avenue of the America’s, New York, NY 10020, ISBN 0-684-84138-X p. 322 85

Parental Kidnapping and Enforcement Act (PKPA), a.k.a. 28 USC Sec. 1738A 47

Reid v. Covert, (1956) 354 U.S. 1, at p. 17 129

Rethinking Habeas Corpus 34 K. Scheidegger, (1989) 150

Ridley's View, part 1, ch. 3, sect. 9 92

Sex-Based Discrimination, Herma Hill-Kay, 26-27 (2d ed. 1981) 145

Speech in the House of Commons 1763, p. 312 80

Studies to the Civil Law 54 22

Sturges v. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat. 122 1819 86

Super.R.Crim.P. 59 123

The ABA and Criminal Justice Issues: An Informational Report of the Criminal Law and Procedure Practice Group of the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies, August 1997 128

ABA code of Professional Responsibility, DR 7-103 (a) (Final Draft 1969) 128

The Catholic World Report, August/September 2001, pp. 54-58 119

By Dr. Stephen Baskerville

The Child Welfare Reform Act of 1994: Is the Cure Worse than the Problem? By Judge Arthur G. Christean; June 1997 edition of the Utah Bar Journal Vol. 10 No. 5, pg 30-42 61

The Communist Manifesto. A Modern Edition, by Karl Marx and Frederick Engles, ã 1998 Verso, Verso, UK: 6 Meard Street, London WIV 3HR ISBN 1085984-898-2, pp. 60-61 147

The Constitutional Rights of Unwed Fathers Before and After. (Lehr v. Robertson (1984) 45 Ohio State L.J. 313, 351 58

The Institutes of Justinian (533AD); Lib. I, Tit. III, Gai. I. 9 87

The McNabb-Mallory Rule: Its Rise, Rationale and Rescue, 47 Geo. L.J. 29, 32 (1952) 135

The State Constitution: A more Than “Adequate” Nonfederal Ground, 61 Calf. L.Rev. 273 (1973) 37

The Story of the Habeas Corpus” by Edward Jenks in 13 L. Q. Rev. 64 (2 Sel. Essays in Anglo-Amer. L. II. 531 31

The Supreme Court, 1971 Term-Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection, 86 HARV. L. REV. 1, 24 (1972 145

The Theory of the Common Law by James M. Walker, Charleston, S.C., Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1852; p. iii 91

The Theory of the Common Law, by James M. Walker, Charleston, S.C., Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1852; p. 34 86

U.N. Charter, art. 2; O.A.S. Charter, art. 17 135

Webster’s 1828 Dictionary 98

West's Ann. Const. art. 1 § 7(a) 53

What is the State to Do? Juvenile Justice in Historical Perspective, presented at the Chicago Council on Urban Affairs annual luncheon, July 17, 1997 72

Year Book 48 Ed. III 22 22

ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS

NO. DESCRIPTION Pg

1. CERTIFICATE OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE A1

2. Second

3. THIRD

4. F

5. F

6. F

7. F

8. F

9. FF

10. F

11. F

12. F

13. F

14. F

15. F

16. F

17. F

18. F

19. F

20. F

21. F

22. F

23. F

24. F

25. F

26. F

27. F

28. F

29. F

30. F

31. F

32. F

33. F

34. F

35. F

36. F

37. F

38. F

39. F

40. F

41. F

42. F

43. F

44. F

45. F

46. F

47. F

48. F

49. F

50. F