A Review of Enzyme Reactions:
Allosteric: "other site"
Common Model:
It is commonly thought that most allosteric effects can be explained by either the concerted (MWC) model put forth by Monod, Wyman, and Changeux, or by the sequential model described by Koshland, Nemethy, and Filmer. Both postulate that enzyme subunits exist in one of two conformations, tensed (T) or relaxed (R), and that relaxed subunits bind substrate more readily than those in the tense state. The two models differ most in their assumptions about subunit interaction.
Concerted Model:
The concerted model of allostery postulates that enzyme subunits are connected in such a way that a conformational change in one subunit is necessarily conferred to all other subunits. Thus all subunits must exist in the same conformation. To summarize:
Sequential Model:
The sequential model of allostery holds that subunits are not connected in such a way that a conformational change in one induces a similar change in the others. Thus all enzyme subunits need not exist in the same conformation. To summarize:
Goal
Disprove the accuracy of the commonly accepted allosteric models.
Predictions
Concerted - inhibition is the same regardlesss of the position of the bonded sub-unit.
Experiment Phosphofructokinase
Adding PEP acts like an inhibitor in that Fru-6-P isn't allowed to bond as tightly.
A computer-generated image of phosphofructokinase.
This is the same picture as the previous image, but only the parts of the enzyme relative to Dr. Reinhart's experiment are shown. Yellow structures represent active sites on the enzyme. Red structures represent allosteric sites.
The purpose of the experiment is to determine if the individual allosteric sites (x-axis) have an effect on the bonding of a specific active site.
Through manipulation, all but one active site and one allosteric site were completely inhibited. The pattern of inhibition was rotated four times so that each allosteric site had a chance to opperate along with the chosen active site. At the same time, negative markers were added to the molecule so it could later be determined from other hybrids.
The negative markers were used to determine which of the samples were the 1:3 hybrid.
In the following four images, arrows are used to indicate (via a numerical representation as well as relative thickness of the arrow) the impact the bonding of each allosteric site has on the active site. First is the Common Model approach. Following that are Dr. Reinhart's results in varying pH solutions (indicated at the upper left corner of the image).
Conclusion
Multiple allosteric ligands contribute a corresponding number of couplings that are:
Sequential - inhibition is almost maximal in one position; minimal in the others.
Fru-6-P + MgATP --> MgADP + Fru-1,6-BP
From: E. Coli
Composition: homotetramer
Regulation: PEP inhibits / MgADP activates