By: Jennifer Schultz
Per 1
5/09/04
Wal-Mart and its unique style of retail sales is arguably the
innovation that has had the greatest impact on the American Economy. Wal-Mart has created an innovative system in
which consumers can buy goods at incredibly low prices (a box of a certain
cereal at Wal-Mart costs only 56% of what it would cost at one of Wal-Mart’s
competitors). Wal-Mart displays its
impact on the economy with the mind-boggling amount of business it actually
does, and by the various positive and negative influences that economists have
studies that have been caused by Wal-Mart.
To begin with, Wal-Mart is the world’s largest retailer and
largest private employer with global workforce of 1.3 million people, doing
more than business than most of its competitors combined. Not only does it do more actual business,
Wal-Mart makes more money, earning more through sales ($245 billion) than the
entire GDP of the country of Switzerland.
To show just how much business this actually is, consider this: Wal-Mart earns more in three months than the
number two retailer (Home Depot) sells in an entire year. Not only that, Wal-Mart associates with over
21,000 suppliers who have come to depend on Wal-Mart’s valuable business, since
every week approximately 138 million shoppers visit Wal-Mart. These impressive figures can only hint at
the sheer amount of business that Wal-Mart conducts every single day.
It is safe to assume that any corporation that does the amount
of business that Wal-Mart does would have a tremendous positive impact on the
economy of America. In fact,
economists believe that Wal-Mart is at least partly responsible for the low
inflation rate and “a McKinsey & Co. study concluded that about 12% of
the economy's productivity gains in the second half of the 1990s could be
traced to Wal-Mart alone.” In its never ending search for savings to pass on to
the consumer, Wal-Mart is also
responsible for 10% of the nation’s ($12 billion) imports from China. Many supporters of Wal-Mart even advocate
Wal-Mart’s harsh treatment on inferior suppliers, citing that such tough
treatment results in more efficient suppliers that have increased their
competency to levels that had previously been unimaginable. Most of all, Wal-Mart allows consumers to
get more for their money and allows them to worry less about possible economic
recessions.
Of course, low prices can be a double-edged sword that can cause
serious negative effects to the American Economy. Wal-Mart’s quest for “everyday low prices” cause them to take
competitive pricing to a whole new level.
Many of their suppliers are forced to lay off thousands of workers in
order to make ends meet and out-source to places with cheap labor, such as
China. The irony of it is that the
suppliers’ own workers who were laid off could very well have been the cause of
their unemployment simply by showing their support of Wal-Mart’s methods of
obtaining low prices by shopping there to get “bargains”. Wal-Mart has the power to squeeze suppliers
until they are making only a cent or two of profit for each individual profit
sold, which is a real blow to suppliers.
Nor will this trend cease, since each year Wal-Mart strives to lower
prices to cater to consumer demands.
Since Wal-Mart has such a vast quantity of suppliers from which to
choose, if one supplier fails to meet demands, it would be child’s play for
Wal-Mart to find one who would.
According to Fast Company, “Wal-Mart is legendary for forcing its
suppliers to redesign everything from their packaging to their computer
systems. It is also legendary for quite straightforwardly telling them what it
will pay for their goods.” Not only can
Wal-Mart be (albeit indirectly) blaimed for unemployment, it refuses to be
unionized, a fact which many economists and buisness reporters often focus
on. The average Wal-Mart employee
recieves a scant $8.23 an hour (below the federal poverty line for a family of
three) while unionized employees of similar stores receive about $10.35. Such wages may be done deliberatly by
Wal-Mart, with such low wages, the employees can ONLY
afford to shop at Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart
squeezes profit from every single area it is able, particularly employee
benefits. Wal-Mart spends 30% less than
its competitors on health care of its employees. Of course, since many people consider a position at Wal-Mart as
temporary rather than a career, perhaps it would be only fair to add that one
can hardly expect such perks for being a bagger or other such position.
Wal-Mart
has affected the economy more than any single other innovation ever. Although the effects can be construed as
both negatively and positively, no one can argue the sheer impact Wal-Mart has
had on America, and the entire world.
Whether you love them, or hate them you cannot dispute their entirely
new way of doing business that has affected the economy more than any other
innovation. Although some people tend
to blame Wal-Mart for everything from the demise of K-Mart to the growing trend
to out-source American manufacturing, it is important to realize that Wal-Mart
is only responding to the demands of consumers, who clamor for “more for
less”. We, the consumers, made Wal-Mart
what it is today, and we must take responsibility for our actions.
References
Fishman, Charles. Fast Company. May
2003
<http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/77/walmart.html>.
Gross, Daniel. Don't Blame Wal-Mart for the
Wal-Mart Economy. MSN. 08 Oct. 2003
<http://slate.msn.com/id/2089532/>.
Moyers, Bill. NOW with Bill Moyers. 19 Dec.
2003.
<http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/walmart.html>.