I don't get upset at to much......BUT THIS HAS GONE TO DAMN FAR AND HAS BEEN GOING ON TO DAMN LONG !
Since United States Inc government became the conqueror and all states in the Union were thus re-formed as Franchisees of the Federal Corporation.The existing form of Martial Law government has been in power & controlled by internalional interest against what was the Constitutional Republic.
If the United States Inc , President, Congress , Courts and Government bodies are foriegn to us.
If the President was a man worthy of his station, he would write and Excutive Order to put America back under the Constitutional Republic.
If not then congress and the Supreme court should or resign.
If not then the people should take back their power and the country as J.F. Kennedy & others have stated.
With the UNITED STATES INC bankrupt and the people in slavery, there are no other choices to be free. Only outside interest profit.
Our Status -
"When seven Southern states walked out of Congress March 27, 1861, the quorum to conduct business under the Constitution, was lost. The only votes Congress could lawfully take, under parliamentary law, were those to set the time to re-convene, take a vote to get a quorum, and vote to adjourn and set a date, time, and place to re-convene at a later time.
Instead, Congress adjourned sine die , i.e., ‘without day.’ “An adjournment sine die—that is, without day—closes the session, and if there is no provision for convening the assembly again, of course the adjournment dissolves the assembly.”
"Thus, when Congress adjourned sine die it ceased to exist as a lawful body. The only lawful constitutional power who could declare war on the South, was no longer lawful, or in session. "
"Congress did not reconvene until days later when it was re-convened under military authority of the Commander-in-Chief. To this day, Congress still sits by military authority of the Commander-in-Chief, and not as a lawful Constitutional body. More evidence for this is in any official set of U.S. Titles and Codes. In the Index of Titles in Volume One one finds either;
a. Title II, The Congress is marked with an asterisk and the note at the bottom of the page will indicate that the Congress exists by Resolution, not positive law, or;
b. All positive law titles are marked by asterisk and Title II, The Congress has none. In this case the footnote states that those marked with an asterisk exist by virtue of positive law."
For you that are STUPID; listen up -
``Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.'' -John F. Kennedy, 1962
“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non
the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”Edward Mandell House had this to say in a meeting with Wodrow Wilson (President) [1913-1921]
"THIS IS A CALL FOR ACTION & REDRESS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION:"
THOSE THAT REFUSE IN THEIR DUTY TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD BE THE FIRST TO BE INVESTIGATED.
As a fact - I'm not Anti-Government as the US Constitution
by our Founding Father put forth for this Once Great
NATION ! NOT saying that I've contracted to anything knowingly but
the Almighty God & His Laws; BUT I AM ANTI-TRAITORS,
ANTI-SOCALISTS, ANTI-COMMUNISTS and Against ALL
USURPERS of my "God Given Natural RIGHTS as a Free Born
Sovereign Man" ! And there is no doubt that Gods
Judgement will be hard.
``...all of us here at the policy-making level have had experience with directives... from the White House.... The substance of them is that we shall use our grant-making power so as to alter our life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.'' -H. Rowan Gaither, Jr., President, Ford Foundation, to Norman Dodd, Congressional Reese Commission, 1954
``Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And.. moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.'' -Barry Goldwater, Acceptance Speech at the Republican Convention;
1964
``The high office of
President has been used to
foment a plot to destroy
the American's freedom,
and before I leave office I
must inform the citizen of
his plight.''
-John F. Kennedy, at
Columbia University, 10
days before his
assassination. Several days
before this speech,
Kennedy ordered an initial
issue of Treasury
Department metal
certificates. Three days
after the speech, he
proposed to Nikita
Khrushchev that the United
States and Soviet Union
embark on a joint program
to land men on the moon -
Khrushchev received this
proposal favorably. Also
shortly before his
assassination, Kennedy
vowed to dismantle the
Central Intelligence Agency,
which he blamed for the
Bay of Pigs disaster.
Kennedy was SHOT !
``The drive of the
Rockefellers and their allies
is to create a one-world
government combining
supercapitalism and
Communism under the
same tent, all under their
control.... Do I mean
conspiracy? Yes I do. I am
convinced there is such a
plot, international in scope,
generations old in planning,
and incredibly evil in
intent.''
-Larry P. McDonald, US
Congressman, 1976, killed
in the Korean Airlines 747
that was shot down by the
Soviets
After reading the following FBI Flyer and the information posted on my page from other sites on the net.
THIS IS ALSO RETOACTIVE AS STATED IN THE BILL.
Furthermore, each and everyone SHOULD BE TRIED FOR TREASON - AND IF FOUND GUILTY CONVICTED - JAILED & DEPORTED UPON RELEASE.
Furthermore, upon arrest, ALL THEIR HOLDINGS, PROPERTY AND FUNDS SHOULD BE SEIZED AND FORFEITED THE SAME AS ANY OTHER TERRORIST OR DRUG DEALER. SAID SEIZERS THEN
TO BE TO DISTRIBUTED TO THEIR VICTIMS IN EQUAL SHARES.IT'S TIME TO RECALL ANY ELECTED, APPOINTED OR HIRED PUBLIC OFFICAL OR AGENT THEREOF:
HOLDING ANY GOVERNMENT OFFICE THAT HAS VIOLATED THEIR OATH OF OFFICE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! THIS ALSO INCLUDES ANY ORGANIZATION OR CORPORATION AND IT'S OFFICERS
THAT IN THEIR OPERATIONS HAS AS PER "THE PATRIOT BILL"- "IN WHICH THE TERM "DOMESTIC TERRORISM" MEANS ACTIVITIES
THAT APPEAR TO BE INTENDED TO INFLUENCE THE POLICY OF A GOVERNMENT BY INTIMIDATION OR COERCION".
"Public Servants" Going After "Constitutional Terrorists"? by Angel Shamaya
November 14, 2001
KeepAndBearArms.com -- The Phoenix Federal Bureau of Investigation created a flyer some time back during Clinton's Presidency, asking the recipients to help them fight domestic terrorism. I received one of these flyers this past weekend at the Arizona "Freedom in the 21st Century" gathering. The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (Greater Phoenix, Arizona) and the Maricopa County Attorney were placed on the flyer, as well -- before they saw the actual wording of the flyer -- in an effort by the FBI to "work jointly with local law enforcement."
Called the Joint Terrorism Task Force, the program was created, presumably, to help preserve the American way of life. This flyer was created -- by the feds -- to disseminate information about who the bad guys might be. However, it's wording made it look like a disinformation campaign to paint at least a few groups of Real Americans as domestic terrorists. Among other things, the FBI was asking people:
"If you encounter any of the following, Call the Joint Terrorism Task Force":
"defenders of the US Constitution against federal government and the UN"
[That describes many civil liberties groups and most gun rights and American Sovereignty groups in existence -- and, by extension, their members.]
"Groups of individuals engaging in para-military training"
[Such as, perhaps, shooting your semi-automatic "assault weapon" with some friends out in the desert?"]
Also being sought are "Common Law Movement Proponents" who
"Request authority for a stop"
[That's illegal now?]
"Make numerous references to the US Constitution"
[That's illegal now?]
"Attempt to 'police the police'"
[That's illegal now?]
And let's not forget the other potential "domestic terrorists" being sought. We really need to watch out for these people:
"Lone Individuals"
[Do you meet that description?]
"Rebels"
[Know any gun rights activist who doesn't have at least a touch of rebel pumping through the old bloodstream?]
Be sure and notice the following two things on the flyer, as well:
1) There is NOT ONE MENTION of "Islamic Fundamentalists" anywhere.
2) Defenders of the US Constitution and the common law from which it grew are being classified on the same level as the bottom-feeding Skinheads, Nazis and the KKK.
READ THE FLYER FOR YOURSELF
The flyer is a tri-fold, so you'll have to turn your head sideways to read one of the sections.
Front Page Back Page
NOTE: The far right side of the above "Front Page" is the actual front of the tri-fold flyer. The far left side of the above "Back Page" -- the part that mentions the 'defenders of the US Constitution' -- is the inside flap... the first thing you see when you open the flyer.
HISTORY OF THE FLYER
According to Terry Chapman of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office -- whose name is on the flyer as the MCSO contact -- the FBI created the flyer and printed the MCSO and Attorney's Office before the text was approved. He said it was created as a full color brochure to hand out to officers, not for the general public -- and that as soon as he saw it, he urged them not to use it, knowing it had some problems.
"The flyer never got off the ground," said Officer Chapman, "but it did manage to make it's way out -- and maybe it's right that it did." He genuinely didn't like this piece of junk, and he showed true concern about my issues with the flyer, too. "We were not happy with it. It was formulated, I think, for legitimate purposes, but it fell on stony ground because of the way it was worded -- the unfortunate profiles that were put in there outraged a number of people who received it."
"It's dead in the water as far as I know," said Chapman. "I just can't imagine the FBI putting it out there again. It wasn't for the public. The fact that it's circulating again has gotta be by unofficial sources."
Mr. Chapman couldn't name the FBI agent who created the flyer, saying the individual who created it was no longer with the FBI's Phoenix branch, which he described as having "revolving doors." Sheriff's officers didn't like the flyer, either. Said Chapman, "I had a Lieutenant from our own office call me and ask 'Am I on your list?' Am I a threat?' for supporting the constitution?'" Chapman was embarrassed by the seeming targeting of "decent, honorable segments of the community" by the flyer -- he hoped it would never be handed out or go anywhere at all.
According to Chapman, the FBI approached the Sheriff's Office saying they wanted to put a flyer together to help local law enforcement raise officer awareness about who to watch out for. They asked for a local contact name and number for use of a flyer they wanted to produce, and because Terry Chapman heads up MCSO Intelligence, he was the likely candidate. Possible lesson for Chapman: don't let yourself get used by misguided federal agents again.
The big question: Why the hell does the FBI have someone running around promoting that Defenders of the Constitution (and the common law from which the Constitution was born) are domestic terrorists?
The FBI has not returned phone calls on this matter. But suffice it to say that there has been at least one unAmerican weasel running around their camp urging people to turn against We The Real American People. We'd sure like to know this fool's name and location within the Bureau. If you track that information down, please contact me personally; we've got a bone to pick with him and his boss, U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft.
CONTACT THE AGENCIES MENTIONED ON THE FLYER
FBI Phoenix Office Website:
SAC - Gonzalez Email: phoenix@fbi.gov Special Agent in Charge - Guadalupe Gonzalez
FBI's "Civil Rights" Website:
FBI's "Counterterrorism" Website:
FBI Arizona Regional Offices:
The Maricopa Sheriff's Office Website:
Feedback form for Sheriff Joe Arpaio: Via Website:
Public Via Email: complaints@mcso.maricopa.gov, information@mcso.maricopa.gov
Maricopa County Attorney Richard M. Romley
same group socialists that wrote this as the fbi flyer wrote
Project Megiddo
Just a note to the person or persons who wrote the FBI FLYER and all elected officials and other law enforcement officers on all levels :
The COURTS have RULED on the Right to Travel ! (SEE BELOW). If you did your job you'd know that. For those who knowingly write and pass unconstitutional laws
you'll be investigated once the commissions & committees are formed.
``If two or more persons
conspire to injure, oppress,
threaten, or intimidate any
person in any State,
Territory, Commonwealth,
Possession, or District in
the free exercise or
enjoyment of any right or
privilege secured to him by
the Constitution or laws of
the United States, or
because of his having so
exercised the same [...]
They shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not
more than ten years, or
both; and if death results
from the acts committed in
violation of this section [...]
they shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned for
any term of years or for
life, or both, or may be
sentenced to death.''
-The US Code, Title 18, §241,
"Conspiracy against rights"
IT'S TIME TO REENSTATE THE FOLLOWING!
``It shall be unlawful for
any person knowingly to
combine, conspire, or agree
with any other person to
perform any act which
would substantially
contribute to the
establishment within the
United States of a
totalitarian dictatorship, as
defined in paragraph (15)
of section 782 of this title,
the direction and control of
which is to be vested in, or
exercised by or under the
domination or control of,
any foreign government,
foreign organization, or
foreign individual: Provided,
however, That this
subsection shall not apply
to the proposal of a
constitutional amendment.''
-US Code, Title 50 (War and
National Defense), Chapter
23 (Internal Security),
Subchapter I (Control of
Subversive Activities), §783
(Offenses), former
subsection a, stricken in
1993 by Public Law
103-199, Sec. 803(2) (also
stricken were restrictions
on access to classified
information by members of
Communist organizations)
There is no dissent among various authorities as to this position. (See Am.Jur. [1st] Const. Law, 329 and corresponding Am. Jur. [2nd].)
"Personal liberty -- or the right to enjoyment of life and liberty -- is one of the fundamental or natural rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from nor dependent on the U.S. Constitution... It is one of the most sacred and valuable rights [remember the words of Justice Tolman, supra.] as sacred as the right to private property...and is regarded as inalienable." 16 C.J.S. Const. Law, Sect.202, p.987.
As we can see, the distinction between a "Right" to use the public roads and a "privilege" to use the public roads is drawn upon the line of "using the road as a place of business" and the various state courts have held so. But what have the U.S. courts held on this point?
"First, it is well established law that the highways of the state are public property, and their primary and preferred use is for private purposes, and that their use for purposes of gain is special and extraordinary which, generally at least, the legislature may prohibit or condition as it sees fit." Stephenson vs. Rinford, 287 US 251; Pachard vs Banton, 264 US 140, and cases cited; Frost and F. Trucking Co. vs. Railroad Commission, 271 US 592; Railroad commission vs. Inter-City Forwarding Co., 57 SW.2d 290; Parlett Cooperative vs. Tidewater Lines, 164 A. 313.
So what is a privilege to use the roads? By now it should be apparent even to the "learned" that an attempt to use the road as a place of business is a privilege. The distinction must be drawn between...
1.Travelling upon and transporting one's property upon the public roads, which is our Right; and...
2.Using the public roads as a place of business or a main instrumentality of business, which is a privilege.
"[The roads]...are constructed and maintained at public expense, and no person therefore, can insist that he has, or may acquire, a vested right to their use in carrying on a commercial business." Ex Parte Sterling, 53 SW.2d 294; Barney vs. Railroad Commissioners, 17 P.2d 82; Stephenson vs. Binford, supra.
Also see - travel
``If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same [...] They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section [...] they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.'' -The US Code, Title 18, §241, "Conspiracy against rights"
"It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error."- U.S. Supreme Court -339 U.S. 382, 447
"We [public servants] have no more right to decline the jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. - Chief Justice John Marshall stated in Cohens v Virginia, 6 wheat (19 U.S.) 264, 404:
Abraham Lincoln once said, "We the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution". We must stand together now in this, our national hour of need".
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are constitutional rights secure." Albert Einstein
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction." Ronald Reagan
``Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.'' -John F. Kennedy, 1962
``Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And.. moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.'' -Barry Goldwater, Acceptance Speech at the Republican Convention; 1964
`Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no Constitution, no Law, no Court can save it...Where do you stand Citizen?''-Judge Learned Hand (1961)
Quote From The Declaration Of Independence
"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, It is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, Laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
In a contest between the Constitution and treaties, the Constitution prevails. As the Supreme Court explained in Reid vs.Covert (1957), in an opinion joined by civil-libertarian icons Chief Justice Earl Warren and Associate Justices Hugo Black,William O. Douglas and William Brennan:
"No agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on Congress, or on any other branch of government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution. . . .It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights, let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition to construe Article VI as permitting the United States to exercise power under an international agreement without observing constitutional prohibitions."
``As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there's a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged, and it is in such twilight that we must be aware of change in the air, however slight, lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.'' - Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas
``Liberty has never come from Government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of it. The history of Liberty is a history of resistance. The history of Liberty is a history of limitations of Governmental power, not the increase of it.'' -Woodrow Wilson
``Experience teaches us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficent.'' -Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, in a 1928 decision
``As the most participatory form of mass speech yet developed, the Internet deserves the highest protection from government intrusion'' -the three-judge panel that issued a preliminary injuction blocking as unconstitutional the Communications Decency Act
``A popular government
without popular
information, or the means
of acquiring it, is but a
prologue to a farce or a
tragedy, or perhaps both.
Knowledge will forever
govern ignorance, and a
people who mean to be
their own governors must
arm themselves with the
power which knowledge
gives.''
-President James Madison,
"Notes on Virginia"
Just a starting point.
By the way is this Treason?
Public Law 471 Sec. 109, pg. 472 (83rd Congress, 1954)
"None of the funds appropriated in this title shall be used:
(1) to pay the United States contribution to any international organization which engages in the direct or indirect promotion of the principle or doctrine of one-world government or one-world citizenship;
(2) for the promotion, direct or indirect, of the principle
or doctrine of one-world government or one -world
citizenship."
The Council on Foreign Relations are in violation of Title-50 War and National Defense subsection 783.
The Council on Foreign Relations is a branch of an international group of co-conspirators called the Round Table Group. Other branches include; Britain's Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Canadian Institute of International Affairs, the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, the Australian Institute of International Affairs, the South African Institute of International Affairs, the Indian Institute of International Affairs, the Netherlands Institute of International Affairs, the Japanese Institute of Pacific Relations, the Chinese Institute of Pacific Relations, and the Russian Institute of Pacific Relations.
The Secretary of the Treasury is the public official responsible for keeping an eye on domestic and international monetary and financial policy. The following Secretaries of the Treasury are members of the Council on Foreign Relations; Robert B. Anderson(Eisenhower), Douglas C. Dillion (Kennedy/Johnson), Henry Hamill Fowler (Johnson), David M. Kennedy (Nixon), William Edward Simon (Nixon/Ford), W. Michael Blumenthal (Carter), G. William Miller (Carter) James A. Baker 3rd (Reagan), Nicholas F. Brady (Reagan/Bush).
The National Security Council provides intelligence support to the Secretary of the Treasury. The nature of the support, is classified. The support insures the Department of the Treasury acts in accord with recommended national security policy and makes its full contribution to the attainment of national security objectives and to the particular climate of opinion the United States is seeking to achieve in the world.
This opinion is formulated by Council on Foreign Relations members working in an ad hoc committee called the "Special Group" and through a vast intragovernmental undercover infrastructure called the "Secret Team". The "Special Group" and "Secret Team" insure that a well coordinated economic warfare campaign weakens non-Round Table Member controlled companies and benefits Round Table Member controlled companies in the United States and in other nations.
Even the most knowledgeable Treasury officials don't understand the role of the National Security Council in international monetary and financial policy. The "Special Group" and the "Secret Team" hide so-called national security objectives behind a veil of secrecy. This is because these objectives are in the best interest of the Round Table Group members, not in the best interest of the American public.
In 1969 Paul Volcker became Undersecretary for Monetary Affairs in the Nixon administration. Volcker's boss was Secretary of the Treasury David Kennedy. In his book Changing Fortunes, Volcker writes;
"On inauguration day I sat down in my new office in the Treasury...A memorandum arrived from the White House with, as I recall it, the title of "National Security Study Memorandum Number Two." I clearly had not been on the list for Number One but, after all, Number Two was not bad. I didn't really know what a National Security Study Memorandum was in those days, but since it was signed by Henry Kissinger on behalf of the president, it was obviously something to be taken seriously.
The memorandum described administrative and other arrangements for the conduct of international monetary affairs by the new administration. It designated the Undersecretary for Monetary Affairs - the position to which I would be nominated - to chair an inter-agency committee on the subject. The previous administration had such a group, so that was no striking new initiative, but it was nice for me to have my bureaucratic position confirmed. The memo also said that in that capacity I should report to Henry Kissinger at the National Security Council. That was unusual news to me, being in the Treasury Department. I went running to Secretary Kennedy's office and said, "You'd better take care of this quick, because it seems to cut you out of the loop." He was not very close to Mr. Nixon at the time, and I sensed his hesitation about what to do. I always suspected he just ignored that part of the directive, because that's certainly what I did. Henry Kissinger had other things to worry about during those days. Besides, one of his stable of assistants, Fred Bergsten, was a member of the inter-agency group, and I knew he was fully capable of keeping Henry informed.
I never heard another word about it, and I suspect papers on the intricacies of international monetary affairs ended up at the bottom of Kissinger's in-tray, assuming they ever got that far. But it was to me an interesting lesson in bureaucratic one-upmanship. Kissinger had been designated to his position many weeks earlier, had a staff in place, access to the president, and an instinct to make good use of his head start...."
David M. Kennedy, Paul A. Volcker, Henry A. Kissinger, and Fred C. Bergsten are all Council on Foreign Relations members.
On 21 of September 1964, a congressional Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, Committee on Banking and Currency, Chaired by Wright Patman, issued a report entitled Money Facts - 169 Questions and Answers on Money - A Supplement to A primer on Money. One fact is "Congress has never given authority for determining money policy to the Federal Reserve System - and certainly not to a committee within the system containing members who owe their selection to private bank interest." Yet, this is exactly what has happened. The Federal Reserve System, the banks that own it, and the governmental agencies involved with the monetary policy have something in common -- many of their executives are members of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Alan Greenspan, Paul Volcker, G. William Miller, and William McChesney Martin have all chaired the Federal Reserve board. All are members of the Council on Foreign Relations. As of September 1993, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that handling losses in failed savings and loan institutions would cost $120 billion from 1990 through 1998 (this figure does not include $60 billion spent before 1989). The Congressional Budget Offices underestimated. To date (1996) losses in failed savings and loan institutions have cost American citizens $500 billion dollars. Very few of the individuals responsible for the "losses" have been punished including sons of Council on Foreign Relations members George Bush and Lloyd Benson.
In 1987 leaders of America's major banks went to Tokyo. They met with our finance minister and governor of the central bank. They urged more positive cooperation by Japanese banks. The big American banks were caught in the dilemma of their Latin American Debt. On the one hand, they had to suffer the losses caused in part by their own overlending, which meant they could not continue being exposed to new loans to Latin America. On the other hand, they were unable to jettison Latin America, which for them was an important market. The leaders of the banks attending the meeting were John Reed of Citibank, Willard Butcher of Chase, Lewis Preston of Morgan, and Tom Clausen of the Bank of America. Reed, Butcher and Preston are all members of the Council on Foreign Relations.
The United States Code contains the general and permanent laws of the United States. The United States Code is prepared and published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the House of Representatives. The laws have been classified into fifty categories. A category is called a Title. For example, laws pertaining to the President are found in Title 3 The President. Title 12 is called Banks and Banking. A reading of laws contained in Title 12 back up the statement that Congress has not given authority for determining money policy to the Federal Reserve System.
Title 50 War and National Defense clearly spells out such a role for the Federal Reserve. Title 50 Section 101 is the National Security Emergency Preparedness Policy. In this policy in Part 15 - Department of the Treasury in Section 1501 Lead Responsibilities we find that "the Secretary of the Treasury shall: (1) Develop plans to maintain stable economic conditions and a market economy during national security emergencies; emphasize measures to minimize inflation and disruptions; and minimize reliance on direct controls of the monetary, credit, and financial systems. These plans will include provisions for: (a) Increasing capabilities to minimize economic dislocations by carrying out appropriate fiscal, monetary, and regulatory polices and reducing susceptibility to manipulated economic pressures; (b) Providing the Federal Government with efficient and equitable financing sources and payment mechanisms."
Has the Federal Reserve been acting as if we have been in a perpetual National Security Emergency? Has the federal reserve been fine tuning the economy of the United States and advertising that it had the legal powers to do so when it really does not? If the Federal Reserve bank had these responsibilities spelled out in Title 12 Banks and Banking wouldn't Title 50 merely reference those sections that state these responsibilities? Allen Greenspan, head of the Federal Reserve, Clinton's Economic Advisor Laura Dandrea Tyson, Clinton's International Security Advisor Lynn Etheridge Davis (who is also a Vice President of Chase Bank) and, you, President Bill Clinton, are all Council on Foreign Relations members.
Is the destiny of the American people being controlled by a group who have and hold the power to direct the credit policy of our nation. A group that has circumvented the check and balance safe-guards built into the system to prevent any one group from having this kind of power over the American citizen. A group whose self-proclaimed drive is for personal profit and who lack the honesty and integrity to make decisions based on public good.
Are Council on Foreign Relations members furthering a plan for a world order based on an economy of unrest? Are Council on Foreign Relations members subtle fascists intently interested in private ownership of property, under their control? Did the Council on Foreign Relations instigate and perpetuate the cold war? Did they do this to accumulate and protect Council holdings? Was this done by establishing and maintaining the most powerful U.S. military establishment in peacetime history? Is the next stage in the plan to co-opt and divide eastern Europe and the rest of the world? Is the next stage in the plan for powerful World-Wide military establishment of "volunteer" military forces under UN command in the role of Peacekeepers? Was detonation of the first nuclear bomb, in Alamogordo New Mexico, on July 16, 1945, in a field test code-named Trinity, the Council's subtle way of sounding the deathbell for Jefferson's Trinity of inalienable rights?
The Joint Chiefs of Staff have defined psychological operations (PSYOPS) as those that: "include psychological warfare and, in addition, encompass those political, military, economic and ideological actions planned and conducted to create in neutral or friendly foreign groups the emotions, attitudes, or behavior to support achievement of national objectives." Another proposal "develops the concept of 'strategic psychological operations' as aimed at influencing and shaping decision-makers' power to govern or control their followers." Wake up America, we the American people, are among the groups being targeted and controlled.
Council on Foreign Relations members in the State Department, The National Security Council, the Central Intelligence Agency, and in the Department of Defense continue to control the lives of the American people through well planed psycho-political operations. These psychological operations rob American citizens of the present, by creating false reality worlds. These false reality worlds are created to trick the American public into acting not in their own best interest but in the best interest of a group of subtle fascists intent on creating one world order under their control.
Title-50 War and National Defense subsection 783 states - "It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to combine, conspire, or agree with any other person to perform any act which would substantially contribute to the establishment within the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship, the direction and control of which is to be vested in, or exercised by or under the domination of control of, any foreign government."
The Council on Foreign Relations are in violation of Title-50 War and
National Defense subsection 783. The Council on Foreign Relations
has unlawfully and knowingly combined, conspired, and agreed to
substantially contribute to the establishment of one world order
under the totalitarian dictatorship, the direction and the control of
members of Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of
International Affairs, and members of Round Table branch
organizations in various nations throughout the world.
Convicted by THEIR OWN WORDS
"The Constitution is a radical document...it is the job of the government to rein in people's rights." - President W.J.Clinton on MTV - 1992 (self-proclaimed - "Citizzen of the World")
"When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans. And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make people safer in their communities."
- President William Jefferson Clinton - March 22, 1994
Presidential Canidate George W. Bush said, in front of several tv cameras, ''There ought to be limits to freedom.'"
"Gun registration is not enough." Attorney General Janet Reno, December 10, 1993 (Associated Press)
"What good does it do to ban some guns. All guns should be banned." Sen. Howard Metzanbaum
"Our task of creating a SOCIALIST AMERICA can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed." Sara Brady, Chairman, Handgun Control Inc.
``...all of us here at the policy-making level have had experience with directives... from the White House.... The substance of them is that we shall use our grant-making power so as to alter our life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.'' -H. Rowan Gaither, Jr., President, Ford Foundation, to Norman Dodd, Congressional Reese Commission, 1954
``We must sacrifice our civil liberties.''-Brent Scowcroft, in the immediate aftermath of the 2001-Sep-11 terrorist campaign
The Council on Foreign Relations, another member of the international complex, financed by the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations, overwhelmingly propagandizes the globalist concept. This organization became virtually an agency of the government when World War II broke out. The Rockefeller Foundation had started and financed certain studies known as The War and Peace Studies, manned largely by associates of the Council; the State Department, in due course, took these Studies over, retaining the major personnel which the Council on Foreign Relations had supplied." --Rene A. Wormser, Chief Counsel to the Reece Committee
"The Council on Foreign Relations is the American branch of a society which originated in England ... [and] ... believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established." --Dr. Carroll Quigley, CFR member, college mentor of President Clinton, author of Tragedy and Hope
"... the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." --Dr. Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966
"I know of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years in the early 1960s to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies ... but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known." --Dr. Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope
"As a teenager, I heard John Kennedy's summons to citizenship. And then, as a student, I heard that call clarified by a professor I had named Carroll Quigley." --President Clinton, in his acceptance speech for the Democratic Party's nomination for president, 16 July 1992
"In the economic-technological field, some international cooperation has already been achieved, but further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position." --Zbigniew Brzezinski, CFR member and founding member of the Trilateral Commission, and National Security Advisor to five presidents
"The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities." --Zbigniew Brzezinski
"[There must be] some dilution of sovereignty, to the immediate disadvantage of those nations which now possess the preponderance of power ... the establishment of a common money, might be vested in a body created by and responsible to the principal trading and investing people. This would deprive our government of exclusive control over a national money." --John Foster Dulles, CFR founder, former Secretary of State, 1939
"There must be a thoroughgoing reform of the world
monetary system ... For its part, I can assure you,
the United States will continue to rise to its world
responsibilities, joining with other nations to create
and participate in a modern world economic order."
--President Richard Nixon, CFR member, 1972
Just a few WITNESSES
A DEAD MAN as a witness - THE DEAD DON'T LIE !
``The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.'' -Larry P. McDonald, US Congressman, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets
``I took an oath. And the thing that I find totally abhorrent and disgusting is these higher-level people took that same oath and they violate the basic principles and tenets of the Constitution and the laws and simple ethics and morality.'' -Lou Tomasello, ATF agent, to Mike Wallace, on 60 Minutes, 1993-Jan
``a jack-booted group of fascists who are perhaps as large a danger to American society as I could pick today.'' -Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) in 1983, describing the ATF
``The very word 'secrecy' is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.'' -John F. Kennedy, address to newspaper publishers, 1961-Apr-27
``The high office of
President has been used to
foment a plot to destroy
the American's freedom,
and before I leave office I
must inform the citizen of
his plight.''
-John F. Kennedy, at
Columbia University, 10
days before his
assassination. Several days
before this speech,
Kennedy ordered an initial
issue of Treasury
Department metal
certificates. Three days
after the speech, he
proposed to Nikita
Khrushchev that the United
States and Soviet Union
embark on a joint program
to land men on the moon -
Khrushchev received this
proposal favorably. Also
shortly before his
assassination, Kennedy
vowed to dismantle the
Central Intelligence Agency,
which he blamed for the
Bay of Pigs disaster.
Thursday November 8 2:28 PM ET
Sedition Law Used to Hold Suspects
By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Prosecutors seeking to hold people they suspect were in the early stages of terrorist plots may turn anew to a very old weapon - the Civil War-era law on sedition.
Last week, prosecutors cited the rarely invoked law in the case of a student being detained in New York, and hinted they might make fuller use of it in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks.
With roots in laws that date back more than 200 years, the statute gives the government great flexibility in assembling prosecutions against people who plan but don't carry out criminal acts against the United States.
Federal prosecutors ``appear to be right on the money'' in using the sedition law to address possible terrorist collaborators, George Washington University law professor Stephen Saltzburg said.
``To the extent a jihad'' or holy war ``is invoked against the United States, it's like an announcement that `I'm putting myself under this statute,''' Saltzburg said.
The government suggested its approach in a perjury indictment last week. The federal grand jury that brought the case against an associate of two of the hijackers is investigating ``seditious conspiracy to levy war against the United States,'' the indictment stated.
Law enforcement officials, speaking only on condition of anonymity, said prosecutors are examining other cases in which they might use the sedition law against people who did not carry out attacks but had been in various stages of planning.
The law imposes up to 20-year prison terms when two or more people ``conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy war against them.''
While the law is seldom invoked, prosecutors used it to win convictions in two high-profile cases against four Puerto Rican nationalists and against a Muslim cleric and co-defendants who plotted to blow up the United Nations (news - web sites).
In neither case were the violent acts carried out.
The U.S. law on sedition dates back to the 1790s when the Alien and Sedition acts of the John Adams administration targeted people who criticized the government. The acts expired and were not renewed amid a storm of criticism.
A new law passed during the Civil War served as the basis for the current statute.
There were Confederate sympathizers in the North and the law was passed to make it easier to punish people who conspired against the union, said University of Michigan law professor Richard Friedman.
The government used the sedition law after World War I to convict anarchists. In the 1950s, the Supreme Court upheld convictions of communists on sedition charges for teaching doctrines that were held to be subversive.
``These weren't people blowing things up; they were basically basement seminars where people would read Marx,'' said constitutional law professor Richard Primus of the University of Michigan.
``Teaching people that the government is bad in the abstract is a constitutional right, but once you go beyond to an agreement to commit crimes, that becomes clearly punishable,'' said UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh.
Chicago attorney Jeremy Margolis successfully prosecuted four Puerto Rican nationalists for seditious conspiracy in the 1980s for planning to bomb a Marine training center and an Army Reserve facility.
The object of the conspiracy was to change the policies of the U.S. government
``as opposed to doing a particular criminal act - blow that up, take that down,
shoot that person,'' Margolis recalled.
LET THE INVESTIGATIONS BEGIN !
USE YOUR BACK BUTTON
