Is Gold Confiscation Possible in the future?
There are many views out there, here's mind with back ground.
Dear Sir : Is this your DARK VISION about the confiscation of your gold bullion or coins by the U.S. government under the still valid 1933 Executive Order or future orders by the government?
If so I'll be glade to by all you have at the "OFFICAL US TREASURY PRICE" of $42.22 per ounce or face value.
To me one ounce of gold equals one ounce of gold.
Nothing but Property for "Life, Liberty & Happiness"? or "Right" not a "privilege." or is that "The Bankers Right" over the "privilege of the people" for control.
Dear SIR - before you worry about the government confiscation of your gold, you may want to read the complete "BILL OF RIGHTS" & THE CONSTITUTION, then read the EXECUTIVE ORDERS that were passed by Clinton and Bush.
``Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no Constitution, no Law, no Court can save it...Where do you stand Citizen?'' -Judge Learned Hand ( 1961 )
The government is of the People & By the People, yet todays socialists government will do ANYTHING to protect their power over the people to transfer the power and wealth of the people into their hands.
My grandparents and parents, went through the depression. They were STRONG AMERICANS of this Republic under it's Constitution compared to the weak Socialist Americans of today.
Did they turn in their gold under the 1933 confiscation? NOPE ! They were to poor to have much.
Would I turn in my gold under future confiscation? NOPE! It's my property and I have a right under god to protect it and myself and family.
``Liberty has never come from Government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of it. The history of Liberty is a history of resistance. The history of Liberty is a history of limitations of Governmental power, not the increase of it.'' -Woodrow Wilson
What may happen? No one knows!
Seeing that the government works their police power under the "Act or Law of Necessity" to maintain power. Power is a "Necessity" of & from the People, which is the true power of this nation not government. Does the government have the right to confiscate (STEAL) your gold, food or property? NOPE! Does the government have the right to confiscate your ARMS under the 2nd Amendment ? NOPE!
Does the government have authority under the Bill of Rights or Constitution in a national emergency to confiscate anything? NOPE!
Does that matter? NOPE, they'll do what ever the People let them do, same as in the past as fits their needs.
First, they came for the terrorists, and I didn't speak up, because I wasn't a terrorist.
Then they came for the foreigners, and I didn't speak up, because I wasn't a foreigner.
Then they came for the Arab-Americans, and I didn't speak up,
because I wasn't Arab-American.
Then they came for the radical dissenters, and I didn't speak up,
because I was just an ordinary troubled citizen.
Then they came for the guns of the people, and I didn't speak up,
because I was just an ordinary troubled citizen.
Then they came for the gold and silver because it was unprotected, and I didn't speak up, because I was sheepish mouse wanting government to protect me
Then they came for my food, my property, my faimly and my Liberty, and I didn't speak up, because I had no rights left.
Then they came for me, and by that time there was no one left to speak up for me.
(Adapted from Pastor Niemoller's 1945 quote about the Nazis*)
When and if, todays Americans wake up and protect theirselves, their faimly, their property, their gold, their Bill of Rights and their Constitution; then and only then can they protect their nation from terrorists at home or overseas.
Here's alittle history from the past. See if the present government is following the same foreign laws of the "UNITED STATES INC." or the Constitution?
In Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (2 Cranch) 137 (1803), former
Chief Justice John Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court stated the
obvious, asapplicable not only to the Constitution of the United
States, but the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma: "All laws
which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void."
To those digging in the bone piles of history, it is clearer each day that the Republic that was the united States of America, died at the hands of A. Lincoln, who seized power—without any lawful,
constitutional authority whatsoever—and set forces in motion that
drove the South into a war it did not want, and could not win.
When seven Southern states walked out of Congress March 27,
1861, the quorum to conduct business under the Constitution, was
lost. The only votes Congress could lawfully take, under
parliamentary law, were those to set the time to re-convene, take
a vote to get a quorum, and vote to adjourn and set a date, time,
and place to re-convene at a later time.
Instead, Congress adjourned sine die (pronounced see-na dee-a),
i.e., ‘without day.’ “An adjournment sine die—that is, without
day—closes the session, and if there is no provision for convening
the assembly again, of course the adjournment dissolves the
assembly.”
Thus, when Congress adjourned sine die it ceased to exist as a
lawful body. The only lawful constitutional power who could declare war on the South, was no longer lawful, or in session.
Congress did not reconvene until days later when it was
re-convened under military authority of the Commander-in-Chief.
To this day, Congress still sits by military authority of the
Commander-in-Chief, and not as a lawful Constitutional body. More
evidence for this is in any official set of U.S. Titles and Codes. In the
Index of Titles in Volume One one finds either;
a. Title II, The Congress is marked with an asterisk and the note at the bottom of the page will indicate that the Congress exists by
Resolution, not positive law, or;
b. All positive law titles are marked by asterisk and Title II, The
Congress has none. In this case the footnote states that those
marked with an asterisk exist by virtue of positive law.
The point here is, Congress knew the rules of parliamentary law
and knew that it could have adjourned lawfully, but instead, chose
a method that the Congress knew would destroy the law making
power of Congress. In other words, the campaigns of the
commercial speculators, banks, and others in Congress had been
successful. The Constitution for the United States of America had
ceased to be the law of the land, and the President, Congress, and
the Courts were now free to re-make the nation in its own image.
The Southern states, by virtue of their secession from the union,
also ceased to exist sine die. And, those state legislatures in the
Northern bloc also adjourned sine die as, for example, occurred in
California in April 27, 1863.
Thus, all the states who were parties to creating the Constitution
ceased to exist and new states were created in their place as
Franchisees of the Federal corporation, so that a new Union of the
United States could be created.
From that time on, all Presidents have ruled by Executive Order.
Lincoln wrote only a handful of E.O.’s during his tenure. Executive
Order No. 1, the first ever signed by a President was executed April
21st, 1861, and called up 75,000 militia. other E.O.’s are issued under the authority of the Commander-in-Chief by the Adjutant General, the Treasury, and others.
The point is, Lincoln had no authority to issue Executive Orders and he knew it. Thus, he commissioned a special code to ‘govern’ his
acts under martial law. In fact, the Code merely justified his
seizure of power. “The Lieber Instructions,” extended The Laws of
War and International law beyond the borders of Washington, D.C.,
and for the first time brought foreign law onto American soil.
The United States government became the conqueror and all states in the Union were thus re-formed as Franchisees of the Federal Corporation. The key to when the states became Federal
Franchisees is related to the date when such states enacted the
Field Code in law. The Field Code was a codification of the common
law that was adopted first, by New York and by California in 1872.
Later, the Lieber Code put the U.S. into the 1874 Brussels
Conference (two years after Washington, D.C., became a
corporation), and the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.
The Lieber Code explicitly stated in Section I, Article 1., that:
“A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in
consequence of the occupation, under the Martial law of the
invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring
Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been
issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and
consequence of occupation or conquest.” (emphasis added)
Lincoln imposed Martial Law on America without public notice.
Americans could thus be arrested (falsely mustered), hauled into
military tribunals, tried, convicted, sentenced, put in jail, have all
their property seized, and put to death, without ever knowing the
trials were in fact, military proceedings in court martial against
civilians.
In such military courts no defendant has any Constitutional rights.
The Code goes on to say in the same Section, Article 10. that:
“Martial Law affects chiefly the police and collection of public
revenue and taxes whether imposed by the expelled government or
by the invader, and refers mainly to the support and efficiency of
the army, its safety, and the safety of its operations.” (Emphasis
added)
Is it mere ‘coincidence’ that the I.R.S. was born during this period, in 1863? It collected war reparations from the conquered peoples in the South. Later, F.D. Roosevelt went Lincoln one better when he
extended the same unconstitutional acts to all the states.
The Lieber Code then states in Section II, Article 31., that:
“A victorious army appropriates all public money, seizes all public movable property until further direction by its government, and sequesters for its own benefit or that of its government all
revenues of real property belonging to the hostile government or
nation. The title to such real property remains in abeyance during
military occupation, and until the conquest is made complete.”
(emphasis supplied)
Under Martial Law, one’s title is a mere fiction, since all property
belongs to the military except for that property which the
Commander-in-Chief may, in his benevolence, exempt from
taxation and seizure and upon which he allows the enemy to
reside.
After Lincoln, a new type of government was born in America when the District of Columbia was incorporated in 1872. In the U.S. Titles and Codes, the District of Columbia can also be called, the “United States.” Why did the federal power need a corporation?
The answer is, first, martial law governments are—in law—styled as ‘fictional creations.’ Second, the doctrine of equal standing in law makes it clear that only parties of equal standing can communicate in law. The maxim of Law is; “Disparata non debent jungi—Dissimilar things ought not to be joined.” Third, since such governments are fictions, they can only deal with fictions and are thus, prohibited from re-creating lawful civil authority.
Only the people have the sole and exclusive right, power, and
authority to alter, abolish, or create a Lawful Civil government.
Therefore, since corporations are also fictions, they became the
logical means through which the new government carried on its
business. Notice however, the substance of the government is now
gone, and it retains only the outward form and appearance. After
Lincoln’s War ended and hostilities were declared at an end, the
Lieber Code justified keeping martial law a secret. Part of the
evidence for the continuation of martial law is seen in an address
given by Andrew Johnson, Lincoln’s successor, in which he gives his
reasons for vetoing the Reconstruction Acts.
“The veto of the original bill of the 2d of March was based on two
distinct grounds, the interference of Congress in matters strictly
appertaining to the reserved powers of the States, and the
establishment of military tribunals for the trial of citizens in time of peace.” July 19, 1867 (Emphasis supplied).
The nation was still under Martial Law and Congress knew it though the People have, from that day to this been ignorant of the fact. And, the U. S. is under no obligation to tell the People anything
regarding their true status, nor to promote reconstruction of the
Lawful civil authority.
Some may call this treason, sedition, or fraud, and these charges
are commonly seen in the patriot literature, but, in fact, it is mere
deceit, which is a stratagem of war, and under International Law is
legal. This is because under such law, commonly associated with the
Laws of War, it is proper for the enemy to deceive his opponent in
the field, until engagement is made. Thus, the importance of
Roosevelt’s change in The Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, and
the reclassification of all Americans as belligerents under an
emergency situation (actually a declaration of war).
If the following is FACT:
1) The seven Southern states walked out of Congress March 27,
1861. They knew would destroy the law making power of Congress.
2) The quorum to conduct business under the Constitution, by Congress was lost.
3) Congress adjourned "sine die", i.e., ‘without day.’ “An adjournment sine die—that is, without day—closes the session, and if there is no provision for convening the assembly again, of course the adjournment dissolves the assembly.”
4) Seeing that Congress adjourned "sine die" it ceased to exist as a lawful body. The only lawful constitutional power who could make the "Lawful" Constitutional Laws of the Land or declare war on the South, was no longer lawful, or in session.
5) This kept the Constitution in tack it did not abolish it for the people of the Republic, only stopped passage of "Lawful Constitutional Power" to make laws.
6) The Southern states, by virtue of their secession from the union, also ceased to exist sine die. And, those state legislatures in the Northern bloc also adjourned sine die.
7) Thus, all the states who were parties to creating the
Constitution ceased to exist as any "Lawful Constitutional Power".
8) Thus the delegated power to the Federal Government ceased to exist and the "Sovereign Power" of "We the People" returned to the people under "Gods Laws", Nature and the "Decoration of Independence".
9) A Congress did not reconvene until days later when it was
re-convened under military authority of the Commander-in-Chief.
(Martial Law) for the Union States. (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC) ?
10) Lincoln had no authority to issue Executive Orders
11) To this day, A Congress still sits by military authority of the
Commander-in-Chief (Martial Law), and not as a lawful Constitutional body. Which govverned the 10 square miles know as Washington,D.C. and its Federal Terrortories (Guam,etc). Hence, no laws from the Federal Government have effect on the anything but Washington,D.C. and the people that willing and with full knowledge, accept the Federal Military Goverment of the UNITED STATES INC. Therefore any and all laws made or passed after March 27, 1861 are null & void. ( See Notes: (a) & (b) below.)
NOTES: More evidence for this is in any official set of U.S. Titles and Codes. In the Index of Titles in Volume One one finds either;
a. Title II, The Congress is marked with an asterisk and the note at the bottom of the page will indicate that the Congress exists by
Resolution, not positive law, or;
b. All positive law titles are marked by asterisk and Title II, The Congress has none. In this case the footnote states that those
marked with an asterisk exist by virtue of positive law.
11) Only the people have the sole and exclusive right, power, and
authority to alter, abolish, or create a Lawful Civil government.
12)Therefore, since corporations are also fictions, they became the logical means through which the new government carried on its
business. Notice however, the substance of the government is
now gone, and it retains only the outward form and appearance.
Hence, there has been no "Lawful Constitutional Power".to make any "Lawful Constitutional Laws" that effect the "Sovereign People of the land".
Thus logic brings the "Sovereign People" free choice as to the "Natural rules of God" or to a foreign "UNITED STATES INC."
Therefore, no Sovereign can be changed into a citized of the UNITED STATES INC without full knowledge and willingness by any contract, act or treaty, seen or unseen, without full disclosure.
Ref: http://www.destiny-worldwide.net/rcg/america1.htm
Does any of this matter? Is the "Future of America" at stake?
ONLY IF THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA LET IT HAPPEN AS IN THE PAST!
