PART 15. COMMUNICATION ANTENNAS AND COMMUNICATION TOWERS
(b) To protect residential areas and land uses from potential adverse impacts of communication towers;
(c) To minimize adverse visual and aesthetic impacts of communication towers through careful design, siting, landscape screening, and innovative aesthetic mitigation;
(d) To accommodate the growing need for communication towers;
(e) To promote and encourage shared use/co-location of existing and new communication towers as the preferred option rather than construction of additional single-use towers;
(f) To consider the public health and safety of communication towers;
(g) To avoid or minimize potential damage to adjacent properties, from the perspective of public safety, from tower failure through engineering and careful siting of tower structures.
Communication antenna means an antenna, appurtenant to a structure, designed to transmit and/or receive communications authorized by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
Communication tower means a principal structure which is principally intended to support communication equipment for telephone, radio and similar communication purposes. The term "communication tower" shall not include towers utilized by amateur radio operators not licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Communication towers are generally described as either monopole (free standing), lattice (self-supporting), or guyed (anchored with guy wires or cables).
Tower site means a parcel of land smaller than the minimum lot size required in the zoning district completely contained within a lot meeting the requirements of the zoning district for the purposes of locating a communication tower.
History.—Ord. 96-305-296, s. 1.
(b) All communication towers existing on [June 27, 1996], (the effective date of this ordinance) shall be allowed to continue to be used as they presently exist. Routine maintenance (including its replacement with a new tower of like construction and height and modifications to accommodate the co-location of an additional user or users) shall be permitted on such existing towers. New construction, other than routine maintenance and modifications to accommodate co-location on an existing communication tower, shall comply with the requirements of this Part.
© For purposes of this Part, a communication tower that has received final approval in the form of either an exception or building permit, but has not yet been constructed, shall be considered an existing tower so long as such approval is valid and unexpired.
(d) No rezoning, zoning exception or variance shall be required to locate a communication antenna on an existing structure, provided however, that the communication antenna does not extend more than twenty feet above the existing structure. Such structures may include, but are not limited to, buildings, water towers, existing communications towers, recreational light fixtures and other essential public utility structures.
History.—Ord. 96-305-296, s. 1; Ord. 96-760-412, s. 1.
(b) Minimum distances shall be measured from the center of the base of the communication tower to the lot line of the applicable residential zoning district.
© Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Zoning Code, no communication tower other than a monopole (freestanding) tower shall be located in any residential zoning district including the AGR IV land use category.
History.—Ord. 96-305-296, s. 1; Ord. 96-810-482, s. 1; Ord. 96-810-482, s. 1.
(b) In all other zoning districts: Two hundred fifty feet.
History.—Ord. 96-305-296, s. 1.
for communication towers.
History.—Ord. 96-305-296, s. 1.
History.—Ord. 96-305-296, s. 1.
(i) A row of shade trees a minimum of eight feet tall and a maximum of ten feet apart shall be planted around the perimeter of the fence;
(ii) A continuous hedge at least thirty inches high at the time of planting, capable of growing to at least thirty-six inches in height within eighteen months, shall be planted in front of the tree line referenced above;
(iii) All required landscaping shall be of the evergreen variety;
(iv) All required landscaping shall be xeriscape tolerant or irrigated and properly maintained to ensure good health and vitality.
(b) Required landscaping shall be installed outside the fence or wall.
© The use of existing vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent practicable and may be credited as appropriate toward meeting landscaping requirements.
(d) These standards may be waived by the Chief for those sides of the proposed tower that are located adjacent to undevelopable lands and lands not in public view.
History.—Ord. 96-305-296, s. 1.
History.—Ord. 96-305-296, s. 1.
History.—Ord. 96-305-296, s. 1.
(FCC) NIER Standards. Prior to receiving final inspection, adequate proof shall be submitted to the Building and Zoning Inspection Division documenting that the communication tower complies with all current FCC regulations for non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIER) and that the radio frequency levels meet the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C95 guidelines for public safety.
History.—Ord. 96-305-296, s. 1.
(b) A current zoning or tax map or aerial, as maintained by the Duval County Property Appraisers Office, showing the location of the proposed tower;
(c) A legal description of the parent tract and tower site (if applicable);
(d) If the proposed tower site meets the required minimum distance from residentially-zoned lands, approximate distance between the proposed tower and the nearest residential dwelling, platted residentially zoned properties, or unplatted residentially zoned properties. If the proposed tower site does not meet the minimum distance requirements, then exact distances, locations and identifications of said properties shall be shown on an updated zoning or tax map;
(e) A landscape plan showing specific landscape materials;
(f) The method of fencing, finished color and, if applicable, the method of aesthetic mitigation and illumination.
(g) If the applicant is not co-locating (sharing space) on the proposed communication tower of another communications provider, evidence that it has made diligent but unsuccessful efforts to co-locate its antenna and associated equipment on an existing structure;
(h) The written consent by the applicant that any such exception or variance shall be conditioned upon requiring the applicant to (1) construct the proposed communication tower so as to provide sufficient excess capacity over the initial loading and (2) permit at least one other comparable communication provider to use the proposed tower where feasible and subject to reasonable terms. The term "where feasible" as it applies to co-location, means that utilization of a tower by another party would, at the time of such utilization, comply with sound engineering principles, would not materially degrade or impair the communication tower’s utilization by existing users, would not unduly burden the tower structurally, and would not otherwise materially and adversely impact existing users. Reasonable terms for use of a communication tower that may be imposed by the owner include a requirement for reasonable rent or fees, taking into consideration the capitalized cost of the communication tower and land, the incremental cost of designing and constructing the tower so as to accommodate additional users, increases in maintenance expenses relating to the tower and a fair return on investment, provided such amount is also consistent with rates paid by other co-locators at comparable tower sites; and
(i) With respect to variances only, certification by a Florida licensed engineer that the proposed communication tower is reasonably necessary to serve an adjacent or nearby residential area or areas.
(b) The communication tower will not have a significant detrimental impact on adjacent property values.
Notwithstanding any other variance criteria in the Zoning Code, with respect to action upon applications for zoning variances from the minimum distance required pursuant to s. 656.1505, the Commission shall grant a variance only if it finds from a preponderance of the evidence that the variance meets the following standards and criteria:
(a) The location of existing uses, structures or other features on or adjacent to the property create a need for the variance;
(b) The variance sought is the minimum necessary to address the need for the variance, subsequent to exploring all reasonable siting alternatives.
(c) The location of the proposed communication tower in relation to existing structures, trees, and other visual buffers shall minimize, to the greatest extent reasonably practicable under the circumstances, any impacts on affected residentially-zoned property;
(d) The location of the communication tower will not have a significant detrimental impact on adjacent property values.