Carey Campaign Chief Invokes
Fifth in Probe
Teamsters Investigators Win Ruling on Talks
By Frank Swoboda Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 13, 1997;
Page G01 The Washington Post
NEW YORK, June 12 -- The manager of Teamsters
President Ron Carey's reelection campaign has refused to cooperate with
federal authorities investigating charges of illegal campaign financing,
government prosecutors told a U.S. Court of Appeals today.
Under questioning from the bench, Assistant U.S.
Attorney Karen Konigsberg said Jere Nash, Carey's campaign manager, had
invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in what she
said was "an ongoing criminal investigation" of the Teamsters election.
However, the three-member appeals panel ruled
late today that attorneys for the Carey campaign may disclose what Nash
has told them about the financing of Carey's election campaign -- the same
conversations that Nash has refused to discuss with Justice Department
investigators.
Carey narrowly defeated James P. Hoffa, the son
of the former Teamsters president, last November by a vote of 226,593 to
209,896 in government-supervised elections. Hoffa has since filed protests
with federal elections officials alleging the Carey campaign used illegal
campaign funds to pay for a last-minute mailing and get-out-the-vote telephone
campaign to win the election.
Nash met last March with campaign attorneys from
the New York firm of Cohen, Weiss & Simon to discuss the allegations
against Carey. He contends that those conversations were privileged because
they involved a client-attorney relationship. A lower court said no, because
the attorneys represented the campaign, not Nash, and therefore there was
no privilege. The appeals court today agreed.
Nash's attorney, Christopher Mead, said he did
not know whether Nash would appeal the ruling.
Barbara Zack Quindell, the federal elections officer
appointed by the Justice Department to oversee the Teamsters elections,
had told the court that Nash's refusal to answer questions has impeded
her ability to certify the election results. If she does not certify them,
she will order a new election.
The ruling today will allow Quindell to proceed
with her investigation as well as aid federal prosecutors in the criminal
case.
The sudden swirl of allegations and court actions
is putting new pressure on Quindell to order a new election. The Hoffa
campaign already has called for new elections and demanded that Carey step
down. If new elections were ordered, they would most likely involve all
national officers in the union.
Teamster spokeswoman Nancy Stella said today that
Carey was fully cooperating with the election investigations and has instructed
all members of both the union and his election campaign, including Nash,
to cooperate.
The Carey campaign has paid back more than $200,000
in disputed campaign contributions.
Last week, federal authorities charged Martin
Davis, a Washington, D.C., political consultant, with mail fraud, alleging
that he diverted money from the Teamsters for use in the Carey reelection
campaign. Davis, who could receive a five-year prison sentence and a $250,000
fine, pleaded not guilty to the charges and was released on $100,000 bail.
The charges against Davis were originally contained in an election protest
filed by Hoffa.
Government sources said they expect other criminal
charges, possibly this month, against individuals connected with the Teamsters
elections.
The charge against Davis alleges that he used
a Massachusetts telemarketing firm owned by Michael Ansara to illegally
launder money for the Carey campaign. Davis allegedly solicited contributions
from Ansara's wife and then gave a Teamsters contract to Ansara's firm,
but allowed him to overcharge for the work performed as a way to repay
him for the donations, according to the government complaint. Ansara has
pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy and is cooperating with federal
authorities.
It is illegal under federal labor law for any
employer to contribute to a union election campaign. It is also illegal
for a union to contribute money or services to the election campaign of
another union, except under narrow special circumstances.
The government alleged that the campaign contributions
in the Davis case were made to a group called Teamsters for a Corruption
Free Union. Quindell, in a letter to Hoffa's attorneys, said the campaign
group produced and mailed 886,000 pro-Carey leaflets to Teamsters members
during the first week of last November, just as the government was sending
mail ballots to Teamsters members. Quindell said Carey's total direct mail
campaign in November was approximately 2 million pieces of mail including
those produced by the Teamsters for a Corruption Free Union.
Campaign finance reports filed May 8 by the Carey
campaign also show that the campaign owes the American Federation of State,
County and Municipal Employees union -- a strong supporter of Carey --
$129,735 for "phone calling" last November, according to new protest allegations
filed by the Hoffa campaign.
"It's an unpaid bill. We have treated them so
far as everyone else we sell services to. We expect to collect it all,"
said AFSCME attorney Bob Lenhard.
The Carey financial reports also show that Cohen,
Weiss & Simon contributed at least a $200,000 in "in kind" services
to the Carey campaign. Such contributions are legal under federal labor
law.
@CAPTION: RON CAREY
@CAPTION: JAMES P. HOFFA
© Copyright 1997 The Washington Post Company