Unedited in Translation
Small-numbered word and thought of " humanity " Next united to the period of approximately 5 days which display the collection of note and the ramblings. I tried in order to maintain the note of the entire origin. Being thought frequently it seems the way perhaps, that kind of ones Simultaneously with the jumbled, as for this everything which does not have these thoughts of difference because of fact came to my everything simultaneously. Occasionally, the concept where I conceive completely new concept to half of another ones, am old again afterwards Occasionally time it returned in order to visit. Perhaps these thoughts and several of declaration it requires correction. Feedback is recognized.
Haughtiness of human (PHA) principle: Human behavior and you think and as for everything you can be explained as example of confidence of itself predominance characteristic human. As a person on the eye to the existence where other things have lived the human The conviction that feature of human remains " is better " than those of other kind,; Namely intelligence namely reason namely adaptability It is good is or, the conviction that function of the human who changes the environment for bad state is our predominance characteristic evidence, Conviction of our functions which are predicted just with anything. Our influences of evolution of other kind namely prediction We " the excellence " can understand " the heart " of the thing which is or the conviction, elementary principle of character But that conviction has been based on the predominance characteristic our itself concept of the human, everything of these hypotheses by mistake always is always does not show the PHA. Many examples - with the conviction which is said... it cancels the damage which we do to the world, or decreases " it is good, ". When the human " is good, " there is no damage which it should cancel. That seems the way in this principle extending to the transaction of our interspecies: You can understand us or the conviction, our itself hearts. (Sociology and psychology) A certain anyone " the person on the eye " or other which " " is better, the conviction that is. Among this seeding " and it applies But that me technology / the ability to differ and uses those which I have owned has owned the function which differs, I being whoever, without being, excellent other things it means this. When other things there is no other human, completely only that kind of distinction of context of the human, this quality it exists, rather than not receiving, the human thought well. If the behavior where the other person is good is done you has not known, then behavior are good you who are not " are good " to only context this quality is applied Us " it is good, " to behavior the PHA of quality and us as for allotment you feel us concerning us ourselves, well it makes that possible. Therefore, oneself to which every person whom it believes good behavior is done, can give motive it is complete. Auxiliary hypothesis: Human everyone originally is selfish and selfish. As for disposal excluding disposal oneself which can give motive in the part of the destination of the behavior which is not taken in place of other things essentially is. Human Selfishness (PHS) principle Prospect (explosion sound) principle With 1 person it is good it is possible, with other which in the same way it is seen by behavior the sea urchin it is not necessary to be seen. In case of point: Spare to the homeless person - this behavior you can look at modification, as for someone already due to one people it gives, (other than the homeless person). It is the person where the Homeless person is bad, it is dense The other person believes, (the reason for this is not important); Therefore, spare - giving to this homeless person, modification is " bad " behavior. The contribution person perceives " good " behavior. The observer perceives bad behavior. However, both observed the same behavior If (we have known the other animal in accordance with the necessity which is felt well being attached to them themselves, with) motive cannot be given. Example of PHA: Application of our value systems to existence the other than us ourselves, those other humans, the other animal or is the existence which is imagined. The conviction, imbued with us our value systems " the excellence by being " Conviction " excellent being (S)" indicating our lives and / or the fact that influence is exerted was chosen. We are excellent than existence of other things and as for by mistake being to be, " every excellence " existence " being the times when it believes and believing by mistake it is? The human makes excellent existence their themselves contexts always: Namely the human is excellent competition of the a/the of the earth with the God " image, the person being drawn up, namely the excellent being (S) the space/large house which is given It shows space. Ex: The conviction that our itself it is good to us it destroys the existence other than for the sake of it is " the right ", (You refer to to the animal) When " you perceive) a little " being attached to us ourselves worry concerning excellent us being (as excellent existence " it is related to us ourselves in order to feel well, occasionally, form of the life which excludes our necessity Worry of don concerning " t why us. Hypothesis: Human everyone is the same 輩 which was drawn up. It does standard, with someone? with those of all humans who certainly are not. Human everyone was drawn up is equal, why no one who believes hypothesis " is answering?: PHA Hypothesis: Existence everything is equal The human believing this is not possible,; We occasionally us assign our itself classes which are ended and, the excellent being which our existence has known (S) with occasionally end. (You refer to to life of the microscope) Why, is this consciousness important? we did not possess the consciousness of the amoebas 500 years ago; Thing we whom we have not known their existence " the person on the eye " so to the amoebas Was. In order for we to be to an amoeba, our existence you have known, " the person on the eye " of existence why to us, but it is or answer in any reason which " worries our existence and have: PHA/PHS The Bible predicator: We the amoebas let us suppose that the method to transmit is found. The thing human where he is God makes of these amoebas be convinced. It meaning that that is work of God the ペニシ $$ln2 Way the phosphorus is created, as for him then you call to those. The amoeba follows. Primary declaration: If we have known, with, as for existence other than the human it is good to behavior is, or does not release the feature of bad state Originally there is a good human or by the answering to this question of good or bad state individually of the human recognition which is influenced by all humans who to be good are bad and believe you do not have to exist, being, bad state ". Everyone who is not depended on the human originally well it is bad, being how to agree, the human originally is not good, it is not bad That without one-way or acceptance of all other humans is the PHA which believes other things Paradox: Originally the bad human believes well. This is error, however human everyone or believes one, or is not error the other than that. If the individual believes human everyone one or other things exclusively The human originally is good, or is wrong bad state, believes according to the PHA. Yet, and that you are convinced are justified. However, it meaning that everyone who is not the human believes this the human originally is good or badness To be it is possible that it is state it believes, it is not justified; The human namely the human originally not being good believing or, whether someone existing and bad state originally be good as for A possibility of the bad human is destroyed. It is the PHA/PHS where that is correct and believes and either view which does not have the acceptance of all other humans is taken. Morality: Morality is the product of the PHA. Projection of moral conviction and is the result of the expectation PHA/PHS in other things. Moral quality of behavior and the observer is decided by the authorized personnel. It is good, if our ascription are removed, a state where is bad to behavior and removes our necessity for moral interpretation of that behavior of you. Logic (the function where we are supposed) is influenced completely by that our recognition which is perceived. Evidence of the deductive/logical which is not that kind of thing. As for those recognition of evidence human of induction and It is divided in the same way to び interpretation Just we draw up " the infallibility " of the math and logic. Some haughtiness, preposterous hypothesis those not to lie! So it is! To that one time indoctrinated those there is no extraction from the recognition which " is decided in advance ", first our recognition where are caught " we at unlimited period is established. As for human human of new life of can Those which breaking recognition their recognition and both thing limit where escaping those are assigned does not do are raised; Recognition of the れ which is from the society which their you recognize resides then to come, those announcement The infinitum you raise and are high. Although it does that everything starts " " It was inferior to us, entirely " being to be, unless us it became independent it is necessary to exist, it is the animal with our recognition " PHA where it exists, or are and drew up and do. As for us predominance characteristic it is Those are drawn up from our necessity of the め. When you let escape that, the ** this paragraph was meant as a ** of joke namely the hehe, The Sqrt (-1) what which " is answering: The I " that I meaning of what which is it is not the sqrt (-1) from separated. But 1 " some that is does not have the meaning our recognition becoming independent. " Language of Math outer space " is not; On the other hand that is the method of expressing our predominance characteristics. If and it does not possess the method of breaking " the period of this recognition ", the existence where we obstruct the reason does not have. On the other hand, to accept that, the frame of our human recognition If and it does not possess the method of breaking " the period of this recognition ", the existence where we obstruct the reason does not have. On the other hand, accept that, move among the frameworks of our human recognition. The absolute where There " S our recognition becomes independent the method of knowing. Until it is installed in that, as for us it cannot understand with necessarily outside the kingdom of our recognition. Science: Are those where something which is imitated is imitated as for the model, or agreeable to the model which is agreeable? Both happens. Is imitated something which imitates the part which is agreeable to the model, then until the model changes to conformity, to that first as for the model, follows the modelings which is agreeable are imitated in the model which those which You must be agreeable. The ** of reminiscence requires the ** of this topic mass explanation and expansion Why the terrestrial exoatmosphere truth seems in order to verify the 1+1=2 then the Dick which observes " at that it moves "? Why, does other anyone develop the concept of two roots? we developed only those, therefore we can use those. When never there is no use for two roots in other intelligence, those never development There is no れ. The ***** in this way, finishes the original collection of note and the ramblings. If you me do not agree with in anything, permit the fact that you know I was written. " Your simple prosecution be Being attached, (that kind of ones and that kind of ones)" it is ignored damage. Concerning me something when by mistake it is why call to me. (I obtain these thoughts to that) to be expanded, to be corrected, letter Being single, and it becomes clear, it decides. And the I being independent, must do, that everything of don " t I desire the fact that. In order this part makes feeling to you, you to believe you to that If it is possible to add what, I welcome your input. In order in me to become clear, the genuine attempt where you perhaps and you ignore those whether, or you ask, make feeling from those After making, in feeling being made absolutely to you, you do not divide that. If you ignore those, it is your selection, if you help me, it is your selection. You from my rambling When you obtain with anything, perhaps, this: Simply from their itself self interests; Being to have acted, that you by mistake are, any everyone says to you it is possible) the ***** of applause to be the good reason, 
