Hearst orchestrated a whole war that netted us several strategic naval bases, all with lies...
2/3/2007
Murdoch Confesses To Propaganda On Iraq
Filed under:

* General
* Propaganda

— Mark @ 5:46 pm

Last Friday, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Rupert Murdoch sat on a panel where he lamented what he described as a “loss of power” due to the ascension of the Internet and other new media. The notion that this captain of one of the most dominant media conglomerates in the world is trembling in the shadow of bloggers is simply absurd. Especially when you consider the fact that his company is also a dominant player on the Internet with an aggressive acquisitiveness that includes MySpace, the world’s largest online social networking site.

But there was a more shocking exchange that took place that ought to have caused more of a stir amongst professional journalists and all freedom loving people. It was an exchange that revealed something that most conscious beings knew, but which I have never seen explicitly articulated.

Murdoch was asked if News Corp. had managed to shape the agenda on the war in Iraq. His answer?

“No, I don’t think so. We tried.” Asked by Rose for further comment, he said: “We basically supported the Bush policy in the Middle East…but we have been very critical of his execution.”

Let me repeat this: “We Tried!”

Rupert Murdoch in DavosSetting aside the nonsense that they had ever been critical of Bush’s adventures in Baghdad, having confessed to being deliberatly deceitful raises some questions. For instance, how can anyone ever again take seriously Fox News or any of Murdoch’s other instruments of bias? How can News Corp. continue to pretend that they are “fair and balanced?” How can any other media company exhibit the slightest expression of respect or patronization?

And speaking of other media companies, where are they now? The Chairman and CEO of a media empire that includes the number one rated cable news network, and numerous newspapers around the world, has just admitted that he tried to use that empire to “shape the agenda” in support of a partisan political goal with consequences of life, death, and global destabilization. Why has the media, who you might think would have some interest in this subject, virtually ignored these remarks? We know they were there because, on the very same day, there was a media tempest over remarks by John Kerry on whether Bush had turned the U. S. into an international pariah. That trumped up commotion was led, of course, by Fox News. Even the Hollywood Reporter downplayed the most startling portion of Murdoch’s presentation by headlining their story: “Big media has less sway on Internet.” They apparently felt that that was a more weighty revelation than the attempted thought-control exposed by Murdoch.

Where is the outrage? Where are the calls to disband this mammoth and unlawful propaganda machine? Murdoch, who was made an American citizen by an act of Congress because, otherwise, he could not own an American television network, should have his citizenship revoked and be deported back to Australia. Think of the precedent this sets for any other wealthy and ambitious ideologue that seeks to manipulate public opinion. There are plenty of wealthy and ambitious ideologues in the Middle East and elsewhere who may view Murdoch as a role model.

At the very least, it needs to be broadcast far and wide that News Corp. and Fox News are nothing but a tool of the neo-con operatives in government. You might say we already knew that, but this is different. We are not merely accusing them of this stance, they have now admitted it. And it can not be tolerated! Not by any standard of journalistic ethics. Not by a nation that values a free press so much that it incorporated that freedom into its Constitution.

Old Johnny Horton song...we're going to sink the "Crimson Assurance" to the bottom of the sea!
Ed:
...placement of ICBMs? Unless intent on remaking an old enemy, who the hell is there in the region? Neo-Cons seem to be revealed for the global conquest and domination/mongers (Businessmen) they truly are...which is NOT US AMERICAN! When we cut them out of the power circles, we might have a chance at becoming something of what we apparently thought we could become ideally in the beginning, but if the best we can accomplish is to strive to be just another self-destructive Empire, we are sunk!


Poland's defense minister resigns

By RYAN LUCAS, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 27 minutes ago

WARSAW, Poland - Polish Defense Minister Radek Sikorski, who has strong ties to the United States, has resigned after the country's prime minister expressed "reservations" about his work, a government spokesman said Monday.

Sikorski's departure deprives Prime Minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski's weak government of an internationally respected figure, just as Warsaw begins negotiations with Washington over whether to host a missile defense base.

Poland also is in the process of building up its contingent in
Afghanistan from 100 to about 1,000, and is a strong U.S. ally in
Iraq.

Government spokesman Jan Dziedziczak said that Sikorski had resigned after speaking with Kaczynski. The prime minister had "reservations" about Sikorski's work, Dziedziczak said. He did not elaborate.

The United States is hoping to set up missile defense sites in Poland and the Czech Republic. The system would combine long-range radar and ballistic rockets, with the aim of detecting and shooting down missiles fired from the Middle East.

Jacek Kucharczyk, the deputy head of a Warsaw think tank, the Institute of Public Affairs, said Sikorski's departure was unlikely to affect Warsaw's general stance on missile defense, or its support for U.S. missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Kaczynski and his twin brother, President Lech Kaczynski, support strong ties with Washington.

However, Kucharczyk said the resignation could hurt Warsaw as it opens talks with the U.S. on missile defense.

"Sikorski would have been well-placed to negotiate good conditions for Poland," he said. "I think his resignation may make it easier for the Americans to get what they want without giving so much in exchange."

There was no immediate word on who would succeed Sikorski.

His resignation highlights the weakness of the coalition government led by Kaczynski and his Law and Justice party.

Since taking power in October 2005, the Law and Justice-led government has had two premiers, five finance ministers, two treasury ministers and two foreign ministers.

The Oxford-educated Sikorski, 43, was a deputy defense and deputy foreign minister in previous conservative governments. He worked as a resident fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute in Washington immediately before becoming defense minister in October 2005.

Sikorski is married to Washington Post columnist and Pulitzer Prize-winning author Anne Applebaum.

Gosh, sorry if our Humanity screws up your plan to reclaim old dominance...Prick!
French official blasts repentence issue

Mon Feb 5, 3:44 AM ET

PARIS - France's foreign minister warned Monday against a "permanent repentance" for colonialism and said his country should invest more in oil-rich former colony Algeria.

Philippe Douste-Blazy spoke after Socialist presidential candidate Segolene Royal sent a message to Algeria's president over the weekend saying it was time for France to come to terms with its colonial history.

Douste-Blazy bristled at the message. "We should watch out for a bad conscience and permanent repentance," he said on Europe-1 radio. "We must turn the page, be able to look at Algeria as an equal partner."

Douste-Blazy is a member of the conservative ruling party UMP, whose candidate Nicolas Sarkozy slightly leads Royal in the polls ahead of the April-May presidential vote.

Long a thorny issue, France's colonial history came under the spotlight in 2005 after the UMP-led parliament passed a law citing the positive effects of colonialism. The contentious language was later removed, but many nations remain bitter.

Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika has long demanded that France apologize for colonial-era crimes.

Royal sent an envoy, Jack Lang, to visit Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika over the weekend with a message urging France to look its colonial history "in the face." Algeria was the jewel in France's colonial crown, and won its independence in 1962 after a brutal war.

Douste-Blazy appealed for France to boost investment in Algeria, whose economy is gaining ground after a crippling insurgency in the 1990s.

"There are $95 billion in privatization deals in the next three or four years. The Americans, the British, the Spanish and others are already there, while the French are still battling guilt," he said.

...placement of ICBMs? Unless intent on remaking an old enemy, who the hell is there in the region?
Poland's defense minister resigns

By RYAN LUCAS, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 27 minutes ago

WARSAW, Poland - Polish Defense Minister Radek Sikorski, who has strong ties to the United States, has resigned after the country's prime minister expressed "reservations" about his work, a government spokesman said Monday.

Sikorski's departure deprives Prime Minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski's weak government of an internationally respected figure, just as Warsaw begins negotiations with Washington over whether to host a missile defense base.

Poland also is in the process of building up its contingent in
Afghanistan from 100 to about 1,000, and is a strong U.S. ally in
Iraq.

Government spokesman Jan Dziedziczak said that Sikorski had resigned after speaking with Kaczynski. The prime minister had "reservations" about Sikorski's work, Dziedziczak said. He did not elaborate.

The United States is hoping to set up missile defense sites in Poland and the Czech Republic. The system would combine long-range radar and ballistic rockets, with the aim of detecting and shooting down missiles fired from the Middle East.

Jacek Kucharczyk, the deputy head of a Warsaw think tank, the Institute of Public Affairs, said Sikorski's departure was unlikely to affect Warsaw's general stance on missile defense, or its support for U.S. missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Kaczynski and his twin brother, President Lech Kaczynski, support strong ties with Washington.

However, Kucharczyk said the resignation could hurt Warsaw as it opens talks with the U.S. on missile defense.

"Sikorski would have been well-placed to negotiate good conditions for Poland," he said. "I think his resignation may make it easier for the Americans to get what they want without giving so much in exchange."

There was no immediate word on who would succeed Sikorski.

His resignation highlights the weakness of the coalition government led by Kaczynski and his Law and Justice party.

Since taking power in October 2005, the Law and Justice-led government has had two premiers, five finance ministers, two treasury ministers and two foreign ministers.

The Oxford-educated Sikorski, 43, was a deputy defense and deputy foreign minister in previous conservative governments. He worked as a resident fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute in Washington immediately before becoming defense minister in October 2005.

Sikorski is married to Washington Post columnist and Pulitzer Prize-winning author Anne Applebaum.

Happens all the time, but Officers like this don't really care unless caught!
U.S. military in Iraq admit airstrike error

Mon Feb 5, 7:14 AM ET

MAHMUDIYA, Iraq (Reuters) - U.S. military officers offered their condolences on Monday to an Iraqi family south of Baghdad in a rare admission of error after killing two innocent Iraqis in an airstrike last Tuesday.

A U.S. military statement released on January 31 said two "insurgents" out of a four-man team were killed as they were trying to plant a roadside bomb in the town of Mahmudiya.

Calling the incident a "tragic accident," the officers on Monday handed out $2,500 to the family for each man killed.

A small group of U.S. officers, accompanied by an Iraqi officer and Mahmudiya's mayor, entered a tent with their weapons where mourners gathered to pay respect to the victims, shaking hands with tribesman and drinking hot coffee.

After one of the tribesmen lectured the Americans on their "many mistakes," Lieutenant-Colonel Robert Morschauser apologized to the gathering.

"I wish I could roll the clock back five or six days and start again," he said.

U.S. military admissions of error are rare in
Iraq.

Many Iraqis believe wrongful killings of Iraqis at the hands of Americans are frequent and generally go unnoticed.

Hyper-sensitive local authorities be damned! Give her the Nobel!
AIDS activist stopped from visiting U.S.

By ALEXA OLESEN, Associated Press Writer Sun Feb 4, 11:30 PM ET

BEIJING - A retired Chinese doctor who helped expose blood-buying schemes that infected thousands with
HIV has been put under house arrest to stop her from traveling to Washington to be honored by a charity backed by Sen.
Hillary Clinton, a friend said Monday.

Gao Yaojie is among China's most prominent and tenacious
AIDS activists. She has received numerous awards for her efforts a decade ago to alert people in her home province of Henan in eastern China to an AIDS epidemic that was being spread by tainted blood transfusions. Operators often used dirty needles, and people selling plasma — the liquid in blood — received replenishment from a pooled blood supply.

Gao, who is in her 80s, was warned by Henan authorities not to attend the Vital Voices Global Partnership awards ceremony next month but she refused to comply, said Hu Jia, a Beijing-based AIDS activist and friend of Gao's.

Zhengzhou city authorities put her under house arrest Thursday ahead of a planned trip to Beijing Sunday to apply for a U.S. visa, Hu said.

Friends and family who tried to see Gao at home were being blocked or interrogated before being allowed to visit, he said. Her daughter was under constant police surveillance, he said.

Gao was refused a passport in 2001 to go to Washington to accept an award from a U.N. group.

A man who answered the phone at the Zhengzhou Public Security Bureau refused to answer questions about Gao. Like many Chinese officials, he refused to give his name and referred calls to the provincial government.

A duty officer with the Henan government who would give only his surname, Wu, said he was unclear about the case.

Gao's and her daughter's phone numbers both rang unanswered Monday.

Hu said Gao was to be honored for her work promoting women's legal rights in China at a Vital Voices annual awards dinner in Washington on March 14. Clinton, a New York Democrat, is one of the group's honorary chairwomen. Vital Voices could not be immediately reached for comment.

In the late 1990s, when the government was tightlipped about its AIDS problem, Gao spoke openly to the press and distributed brochures about the spread of AIDS among poor farmers because of the blood-buying industry. Health officials then accused her of helping "anti-China forces."

Chinese leaders have since confronted the disease more openly, promising anonymous testing and free treatment for the poor. The government has banned blood sales and discrimination against people with the virus.

But AIDS workers still face frequent harassment by local authorities who fear their activism will reflect badly on them.

Gao has also distributed medicine, cared for AIDS orphans, written a book about China's AIDS epidemic and hosted AIDS sufferers in her modest apartment. Funding comes from her own earnings and occasional donations.

___

On the Net:

Vital Voices http://www.vitalvoices.org

Only a Dumbass sees such uniformity in a positive light. A Fascist dumbass!
States challenge nat'l driver's license

By LESLIE MILLER, Associated Press Writer Sun Feb 4, 10:36 PM ET

WASHINGTON - A revolt against a national driver's license, begun in Maine last month, is quickly spreading to other states.

The Maine Legislature on Jan. 26 overwhelmingly passed a resolution objecting to the Real ID Act of 2005. The federal law sets a national standard for driver's licenses and requires states to link their record-keeping systems to national databases.

Within a week of Maine's action, lawmakers in Georgia, Wyoming, Montana, New Mexico, Vermont and Washington state also balked at Real ID. They are expected soon to pass laws or adopt resolutions declining to participate in the federal identification network.

"It's the whole privacy thing," said Matt Sundeen, a transportation analyst for the National Conference of State Legislatures. "A lot of legislators are concerned about privacy issues and the cost. It's an estimated $11 billion implementation cost."

The law's supporters say it is needed to prevent terrorists and illegal immigrants from getting fake identification cards.

States will have to comply by May 2008. If they do not, driver's licenses that fall short of Real ID's standards cannot be used to board an airplane or enter a federal building or open some bank accounts.

About a dozen states have active legislation against Real ID, including Arizona, Georgia, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming.

Missouri state Rep. James Guest, a Republican, formed a coalition of lawmakers from 34 states to file bills that oppose or protest Real ID.

"This is almost a frontal assault on the freedoms of America when they require us to carry a national ID to monitor where we are," Guest said in an interview Saturday. "That's going too far."

Guest filed a resolution last week opposing Real ID and said he expects it quickly to pass the Legislature. "This does nothing to stop terrorism," he said. "Don't burden the American people with this requirement to carry this ID."

Though most states oppose the law, some such as Indiana and Maryland are looking to comply with Real ID, Sundeen said.

The issue may be moot for states if Congress takes action.

Republican Sen. John Sununu (news, bio, voting record) of New Hampshire, along with Democratic Sen. Daniel Akaka (news, bio, voting record) of Hawaii, filed a bill last year to repeal the law. Sununu expects similar legislation will be introduced soon.

"The federal government should not be in charge of defining and issuing drivers' licenses," Sununu said in a statement.

Privacy advocates say a national driver's license will promote identity theft.

Barry Steinhardt, a lawyer with the
American Civil Liberties Union, said the Real ID ordered by Congress would require a digital photo and probably a fingerprint on each driver's license or state-issued ID card. That, he said, will make it more valuable to identity thieves because the ID card will be accepted as much more than a driving credential.

"It's going to be a honey pot out there that's going to be irresistible to identity thieves," Steinhardt said.

An identity thief, he said, could buy a Real ID from a rogue motor vehicle department employee with is own photo and fingerprint on it.

"The victim is never going to be able to undo this," Steinhardt said.

Other criticisms include:

_Some states will have to invest millions in new computer systems that can communicate with federal databases. That is something they probably will not accomplish by the deadline.

_It will be difficult to comply with the requirement that license applicants prove they are in the country legally. There are more than 100 different immigration statutes, Steinhardt said, which will pose problems for motor vehicle clerks unfamiliar with immigration law.

_It does not solve the problem of terrorism. Oklahoma City bomber
Timothy McVeigh and some of the hijackers from the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, had legitimate driver's licenses.

_Even the requirement that applicants' full legal names appear on licenses will pose problems because some states limit the number of characters on the face of the card.

___

On the Net:

Background on Real ID Act: http://www.ncsl.org/standcomm/sctran/realidsummary05.htm

Maybe if our Peresident wasn't an eleven year old, the World would be more at ease and enabled to do business together...!
Report: Russian calls U.S. 'difficult'

By STEVE GUTTERMAN, Associated Press Writer Sun Feb 4, 7:16 PM ET

MOSCOW - Russia's foreign minister said the United States was perhaps Moscow's "most difficult" partner and urged Washington to learn from its mistakes on the world stage, according to a news report on Sunday.

Sergey Lavrov also blamed Washington for impasses in the Middle East, suggesting the U.S. approach there was too confrontational, Interfax news agency reported.

"Like any other country, we are interested in having good, smooth, clear relations with the United States" but it is "not easy," Interfax quoted Lavrov as saying in an interview on state-run television.

While Moscow and Washington have been able to "achieve mutually acceptable results" on many issues, the United States "is not an easy partner at all — probably the most difficult partner," he said.

The remarks reflected the troubled ties between the former Cold War foes, despite avowals of common aims on matters such as terrorism and weapons proliferation. Relations have been strained by disagreements over an array of international issues as well as Russia's record on democracy under President
Vladimir Putin.

Russia sharply criticized the U.S. invasion of
Iraq and has sought to counter what it has suggested are Washington's uncompromising positions on the nuclear programs of
Iran and
North Korea.

Lavrov repeated criticism he made in Washington last week, when he rebuked the Bush administration for its resistance to diplomacy with certain Middle East governments. He suggested the U.S. was being shortsighted by not engaging countries that could help resolve problems in Iraq, Lebanon and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"The Middle East settlement has been suspended because, despite our position and the position of the
European Union, Washington has conducted policy based on the principle, 'He who is not with us is against us,'" Lavrov said.

He said the United States was isolating Iran,
Syria, Hamas and Hezbollah even though they were "key actors in solving the Middle East puzzle."

The U.S. State Department said it had not seen Lavrov's remarks and declined to comment.

Lavrov said Moscow has been frank with Washington when it questions U.S. foreign policy, and that the United States should learn from its experiences.

"Too much potential for crisis has built up in addition to Iraq and
Afghanistan," he said.

The foreign minister also said relations were far less positive at lower levels than between Putin and
President Bush.

"In spite of the mutual respect of the presidents and their readiness to accept the sovereign decisions of the other side, the situation looks entirely different at other levels of the executive branch," he said.

Call it anything you want, but don't call it Justice! Whose "Hero" he is, will be determined in the future!
Court-martial looms for war objector

By MELANTHIA MITCHELL, Associated Press Writer Sun Feb 4, 5:58 PM ET

SEATTLE - Denied a chance to debate the legality of the
Iraq war in court, an Army officer who refused to go to Iraq now goes to trial hoping to at least minimize the amount of time he could serve if convicted.

Anti-war activists consider 1st Lt. Ehren Watada a hero, but the Army accuses him of betraying his fellow soldiers.

The 28-year-old faces four years in prison if convicted on one count of missing movement and two counts of conduct unbecoming an officer for refusing to ship out with his unit, the 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division. His court-martial is set to begin Monday at Fort Lewis, south of Seattle.

Watada has spoken out against U.S. military involvement in Iraq, calling it morally wrong and a breach of American law.

"As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately unlawful as well, I must as an officer of honor and integrity refuse that order," Watada said in a video statement released at a June 7 news conference.

Despite having already been charged, he spoke out again in August, at a Veterans for Peace rally in Seattle.

"Though the American soldier wants to do right, the illegitimacy of the occupation itself, the policies of this administration, and the rules of engagement of desperate field commanders will ultimately force them to be party to war crime," Watada said then.

Watada and his Honolulu attorney, Eric Seitz, contend his comments are protected speech, but Army prosecutors argued his behavior was dangerous to the mission and morale of other soldiers.

"He betrayed his fellow soldiers who are now serving in Iraq," Capt. Dan Kuecker said at one hearing. Kuecker has not commented on the case outside of court.

Seitz unsuccessfully sought an opportunity to argue the legality of the war, saying it violated Army regulations that specify wars are to be waged in accordance with the
United Nations charter. His final attempt was quashed last month when the military judge, Lt. Col. John Head, ruled Watada cannot base his defense on the war's legality. Head also rejected claims that Watada's statements were protected by the First Amendment.

The Army had subpoenaed two journalists who interviewed Watada, drawing criticism from free-press advocates, but that fell by the wayside as prosecutors dropped two of the four counts of misconduct in exchange for Watada admitting he made statements to freelance journalist Sarah Olson and Greg Kakesako of the Honolulu Star-Bulletin.

"This should be seen as a victory for the rights of journalists in the U.S. to gather and disseminate news free from government intervention, and for the rights of individuals to express personal, political opinions to journalists without fear of retribution or censure," Olson said in an e-mail message.

Military law experts said that, by confining themselves to the missing movement charge, prosecutors might have saved themselves from arguing some of the legal issues relating to free speech.

"It's desirable that they're abandoning the path of using reporters as witnesses," said Eugene Fidell, president of the National Institute of Military Justice in Washington, D.C. "It's a very toxic strategy."

Fidell wasn't surprised, however, that the government rejected a deal offered by Seitz that would have had Watada serve only three months confinement with a dishonorable discharge.

"Why should they? He missed a movement of his unit," he said. "No army can tolerate officers refusing to move with their unit."

___

On the Net:

Watada supporters: http://www.thankyoult.com/

Pope Benedict is an out of touch, nineteenth century, dogmatic dork, interested mostly in holding power, screw God!
Pope says compassion no excuse for euthanasia

Sun Feb 4, 10:23 AM ET

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) -
Pope Benedict on Sunday renewed his appeal to Catholics to reject abortion and euthanasia, saying life was God-given and could not be cut short under "the guise of human compassion."

His appeal came days after an Italian doctor who switched off the life support of a paralyzed man at the center of a euthanasia battle was cleared of wrongdoing by a medical panel.

"Life, which is the work of God, cannot be negated by anyone, neither at the very young and indefensible unborn stage, nor when grave disabilities are present," he said in his weekly address to pilgrims and tourists in St. Peter's Square.

Speaking on the Italian Catholic Church's "Day for Life," he said humanity could not legitimize euthanasia or be "fooled" into justifying it "under the guise of human compassion."

Euthanasia is a deeply divisive issue in overwhelmingly Catholic Italy, where it is illegal and carries a jail term of up to 15 years.

The issue was back in the spotlight last month when Italian doctor Mario Riccio disconnected the life support of Piergiorgio Welby, who was paralyzed for many years by muscular dystrophy and had asked to die.

If you're buying this spin from the authors of ATROCITY, you're being White Hosed: Kettle is Black, said the Pot!
White House says Iraq bombing an "atrocity"

Sat Feb 3, 2:41 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House called the suicide bombing in Baghdad that killed 135 people an "atrocity" on Saturday and pledged to help the Iraqi government bring security to the capital.

"The United States stands with the people of
Iraq. We will support the freely elected Iraqi government and its security forces, to help bring those responsible for today's atrocity to justice, and to deliver greater security to the people of Baghdad," White House press secretary Tony Snow said in a statement.

The blast, caused by explosive-laden truck, was the deadliest single bombing in Iraq since the 2003 war and took place in a mainly Shi'ite area of Baghdad.

The White House said the attack "targeted the innocent people of Iraq."

"Free nations of the world must not stand by while terrorists commit mass murder in an attempt to derail democratic progress in Iraq and throughout the greater Middle East," the statement said.

Finally, from the honest man with no ego...
Nader leaves '08 door open, slams Hillary

Sun Feb 4, 5:30 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Former presidential candidate
Ralph Nader on Sunday left the door open for another possible White House bid in 2008 and criticized Democratic front-runner
Hillary Rodham Clinton as "a panderer and a flatterer."

Asked on CNN's Late Edition news program if he would run in 2008, the lawyer and consumer activist said, "It's really too early to say. ... I'll consider it later in the year."

Nader, 72, said he did not plan to vote for Clinton, a Democratic senator from New York and former first lady.

"I don't think she has the fortitude. Actually she's really a panderer and a flatterer. As she goes around the country, you'll see more of that," Nader said.

On whether he would be encouraged to run if Clinton gets the Democratic nomination, Nader said, "It would make it more important that that be the case."

He added that Clinton may face a challenge in her own state from wealthy Republican New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

"I think her main problem may well be right in New York City, Michael Bloomberg. They're talking in the Bloomberg camp of a possible run. I'm saying he'll give more diversity, for sure, and he'll focus on urban problems. But I might say, he's got the money to do it," Nader said.

Democratic candidates Nader likes include former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel and Ohio Rep.
Dennis Kucinich, he said.

"These people have records, not just rhetoric," he said.

He also criticized focusing on campaign fund-raising to judge candidates' prospects. "The press and the polls are gravitating on cash-register politics ... who's going to raise the $100 (million) or $200 million, McCain or Obama or Hillary. That's very unhealthy. That's rancid politics," he said.

Nader ran for president as an independent in 2004 and as the Green Party candidate in 2000, when some Democrats said he siphoned away votes from former Democratic Vice President
Al Gore, helping Republican George W. Bush to win.

Everyone's differences are one the same and that is our super strength!
Ed: Here's the premise for Edwards' position...: The Most Fundamental Necessity for Democracy to exist and function, is for Taxes to be levied so that everyone is enabled toward gaining an equal footing! This requires everyone to allow that someone elsewhere in the Democracy may not be of the same persuasion or ability to contribute, but that Democracy only works when we allow that everyone's not the same and that this allowance is our super strength! Imperialists will try to reverse this truth and force the poor to pay equally with themselves, as though they are already equal, ut this subterfuge is evil and the rich who support it seek to undermine Democracy! The alternative is Fascism!

Edwards: raise taxes for healthcare

Sun Feb 4, 12:19 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic U.S. presidential candidate
John Edwards on Sunday said that he would raise taxes, chiefly on the wealthy, to pay for expanded healthcare coverage under a plan costing $90 billion to $120 billion a year to be unveiled on Monday.

"We'll have to raise taxes. The only way you can pay for a healthcare plan that cost anywhere from $90 to $120 billion is there has to be a revenue source," Edwards said on NBC's Meet the Press news program.

The 2004 vice presidential nominee and former North Carolina senator said his plan would "get rid of
George Bush's tax cuts for people who make over $200,000 a year."

He said the plan would also reduce healthcare costs.

"Finally we need to do a much better job of collecting the taxes that are already owed," he said, specifically targeting what he said are large amounts of unpaid capital gains taxes.

"We should have brokerage houses report the capital gains that people are incurring because we're losing billions and billions of dollars in tax revenue," Edwards said.

Offering a preview of his plan, Edwards said it aims to bring healthcare coverage to 47 million uninsured Americans, lower costs for the middle class and foster competition.

It would expand Medicaid, the state-federal health insurance plan for the needy, and offer subsidies for the uninsured. He said, "We ask employers to play a bigger role, which means they either have to have coverage or they have to buy into what we're calling health markets."

Without providing details, Edwards said his plan would create "health markets" nationwide. One choice available in the markets would be "the government plan, so people who like the idea of a single-payer health insurance plan, that is actually one of the alternatives," he said.

Edwards declared his candidacy in December calling for fewer U.S. troops in
Iraq, a restoration of U.S. world leadership and an end to poverty.

Football
I don't watch football! Nam was enough football for me.
5:54 PM. A bunch of dumbasses tearing up the turf, growling and glaring at each other, running at each other hopping to destroy each other's desire to fight, and all for the sake of stealing territory that does no belong to them, in the name of "WINNING" a game played for fun to the tune of billions of dollars a year that do not end up in the pockets of the idiots buying chips and beer!
7:02 PMOkay, I realize it is a long time until time (in your world) to chat, but I certainly am not up stairs watching a bunch of idiots throw themselves at each other for millions of dollars and enough injuries to use up most of those millions that no reasonable insurance company would cover...unless it pushes the costs off onto us, ...some of whom are NOT FOOTBALL FANS and who should NOT BE PAYING FOR WHAT CRETIN FOOTBALL FANS THINK IS ENTERTAINMENT!!!!!!

The McCain Doctrine, a Thought Process only a stereotypical
(Ed: Playing the guilt card to gain support for a failed and ultimately myopic, self-destructive policy is really low; really, really very low, far beneath any potentially serious Presidential Candidate, except a Republican one, apparently! Though they know not how to rid themselves of this scourge, most US Americans are sick of having the dumb asses who fall for this shit in charge of their lives and the lives of their children...and this goes for you, too, Hillary, though you will probably use it to WIN!)

McCain condemns anti-surge resolution

By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer 26 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record) sought to weaken support for a resolution opposing
President Bush's
Iraq war strategy Sunday, saying proponents are intellectually dishonest.

On the eve of a possible congressional showdown on Iraq strategy, McCain contended the bipartisan proposal amounted to a demoralizing "vote of no confidence" in the U.S. military.

The measure criticizes Bush's plan to add 21,500 troops in Iraq yet offers no concrete alternatives, he said.

"I don't think it's appropriate to say that you disapprove of a mission and you don't want to fund it and you don't want it to go, but yet you don't take the action necessary to prevent it," said McCain, top Republican on the
Senate Armed Services Committee and a 2008 presidential candidate from Arizona.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., called GOP efforts to block a vote on the resolution "obstructionism." Neither a Senate majority nor voters, she said, will tolerate such a delaying tactic.

"If we can't get this done, you can be sure a month or so down the pike, there's going to be much stronger legislation," she said.

The Senate, where Democrats hold a 51-49 working majority, has tentatively set an early test vote for Monday on the nonbinding resolution by Sen. John Warner (news, bio, voting record), R-Va.

In a bid to attract more GOP support, Warner added a provision pledging to protect money for troops in combat.

That compromise drew the ire of some Democrats who said it leaned too far in endorsing the status quo. They want to see binding legislation to cap troop levels, force a new vote to authorize the war or begin bringing troops home.

McCain is sponsoring a resolution expressing support for a troop increase and setting benchmark goals for the Iraqi government. He sought to capitalize on some of the Democratic division.

"I do believe that if you really believe that this is doomed to failure and is going to cost American lives, then you should do what's necessary to prevent it from happening rather than a vote of 'disapproval,'" McCain said.

"This is a vote of no confidence in both the mission and the troops who are going over there," he said, noting the proposal does not seek to cut off money for troops.

A fellow Vietnam veteran, GOP Sen. Chuck Hagel (news, bio, voting record) of Nebraska, disagreed with McCain's assessment. Hagel said the resolution would make clear the Senate's belief that Bush's policy is misguided.

Hagel said the proposal also lays out alternatives such as moving troops away from the sectarian violence and closer to the Iraq border to provide "territorial integrity."

"We can't change the outcome of Iraq by putting American troops in the middle of a civil war," said Hagel, who is considering a run for the White House in 2008.

Republican leaders are working to block a vote on Warner's resolution. They insisted that at least two other GOP proposals also be considered — McCain's and one focused on maintaining money for troops in the field. Such a strategy could dilute support for Warner's measure and make it tougher for any measure to pass.

Democrats want to limit debate to just the Warner and McCain proposals.

Two Republicans who oppose Warner's proposal, Lindsey Graham (news, bio, voting record) of South Carolina and Richard Lugar (news, bio, voting record) of Indiana, said Sunday they were uncertain the Warner resolution would get the support of 60 senators.

"Even if there is, it's nonbinding, and has in my judgment no consequence," Lugar said.

Hagel said Warner's resolution strikes a careful balance for a majority of senators who oppose a troop buildup but differ on the appropriate response.

He called McCain's proposal meaningless because it offers benchmarks but does not spell out what the U.S. government will do if the Iraqi officials fail to meet them.

"What are the consequences? Are we then going to pull out?" Hagel asked. "Are we going to cut funding? Now, that falls more in the intellectually dishonest category."

The resolution debate comes as the White House and congressional Democrats prepared to square off over war spending.

Bush's new budget on Monday will ask for $100 billion more for military and diplomatic operations in Iraq and
Afghanistan this year — on top of $70 billion already approved by Congress for the current year. The budget will call for $145 billion in war spending for 2008.

The spending request covers Bush's new war strategy, including the increase in troops, White House budget director Rob Portman said Sunday.

"It's extremely important that we support our troops," Portman said. He described the requested money as the amount needed "to be sure our troops have the equipment they need, that they are taken care of well."

Hagel and McCain appeared on ABC's "This Week," Graham was on "Fox News Sunday," and Feinstein, Lugar and Portman spoke on "Late Edition" on CNN.