ATTITUDE CHECK?!

See the H.B. Credits pages.
WARNING: We make every effort to be Un-Fair AND/OR Un-Balanced with our Comments in this Blog!

Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
« August 2007 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
The Weekly Roomer: Current Events II
Saturday, 11 August 2007
Richard "Blackwell" Seltzer only in the play and was NOT "Whitey," played by Billy Benedict.
Home > Library > Reference > Wikipedia
Dead End Kids

The Dead End Kids was a group of young actors from New York who appeared in Sidney Kingsley's Broadway playDead End in 1935. In 1937 producer Samuel Goldwyn brought all of them to Hollywood and turned the play into a film. They proved to be so popular that they continued to make movies under various monikers, including The East Side Kids, The Little Tough Guys, and The Bowery Boys, until 1958.

History

In 1934, Sidney Kingsley wrote a play about a group of children growing up on the streets on New York City. A total of fourteen children were hired to play various roles in the play, including Billy Halop (Tommy), Bobby Jordan (Angel), Huntz Hall (Dippy), Charles Duncan (Spit), Bernard Punsly (Milty), Gabriel Dell (T.B.), and Leoand David Gorcey (Second Avenue Boys). Duncan left for a role in another play before opening night and was replaced by Leo, his understudy. Leo had been a plumber's assistant and was originally recruited by his brother David to audition for the play.

The play opened at the Belasco Theatre on October 28, 1935 and ran for two years, totalling 684 performances. Samuel Goldwyn and director William Wyler saw the play and decided to turn it into a film. They paid $165,000 for the rights to the film and began auditioning actors in Los Angeles.[1] Failing to find actors that could convey the emotions they saw in the play, Goldwyn and Wyler had six of the original Kids (Halop, Jordan, Hall, Punsly, Dell, and Leo Gorcey) brought from New York to Hollywood for the film. The Kids were all signed to two-year contracts, allowing for possible future films, and began working on the 1937 United Artists' film, Dead End.

During production, the boys ran wild around the studio, destroying property, including a truck that they crashed into a sound stage. Goldwyn choose not to use them again and sold their contract to Warner Brothers.[2]

At Warner Brothers, the Dead End Kids made six films with some of the top actors in Hollywood, includingHumphrey Bogart, James Cagney, John Garfield, and Pat O'Brien. The last one was in 1939, when they were released from their contracts due to more antics on the studio lot.

Little Tough Guys

Main article: Little Tough Guys

Shortly after they made their first film at Warner Brothers in 1938, Universal borrowed all of the Dead End Kids except for Bobby Jordan and Leo Gorcey and made twelve films and three 12-chapter serials under the team names of "The Dead End Kids and Little Tough Guys" and "Little Tough Guys." Universal also contracted Leo's brother David and Hally Chester to join the team. After Universal released Jordan from his contract, Warner Brothers quickly signed him to join the rest of gang.

Because the original Dead End Kids were now working for several studios, their Universal films were made at roughly the same time as the Warner Brothers' 'Dead End Kids' series, and later, Monogram Picture's "The East Side Kids" series. The final Universal film was Keep 'Em Slugging, released in 1943.

The East Side Kids

Main article: East Side Kids

After Warner Brothers released the remaining Dead End Kids from their contracts in 1939, producer Sam Katzman at Monogram acted quickly and hired several of them, including Jordan and the Gorcey brothers, as well as Chester and some of the other Little Tough Guys to star in a new series using the name "The East Side Kids." This series introduced 'Sunshine' Sammy Morrison, one of the original members of the Our Gang comedy team, to the group.

A total of 22 East Side Kids films were made, ending with Come Out Fighting in 1945.

The Bowery Boys

Main article: The Bowery Boys

In 1946, with only Mongoram making films using any of the original Dead End Kids, Huntz Hall, Leo Grocey, and Grocey's agent, Jan Grippo, revamped the The East Side Kids, rechristening them "The Bowery Boys." These films followed a more established formula than the earlier films. Gorcey left after the forty-first film and was replaced by Stanley Clements for the remaining films. In all, a total of 48 Bowery Boys films were made, ending with 1958's In the Money.

Epilogue

The Dead End Kids' star on Hollywood's Walk of Fame
Enlarge
The Dead End Kids' star on Hollywood's Walk of Fame

In total the various teams that began life as 'The Dead End Kids' made 89 films and three serials for four different studios during their 21 year long film career. The team was awarded a star on Hollywood's Walk of Fame, which can be found at the corner of La Brea and Hollywood.

The original play has had two revivals. A 1978 adaption played at the Quigh Theatre in New York and another in 2005 at the Ahmanson Theatre in Los Angeles, where the family of the original Dead End Kids (Leo Gorcey Jr., Bobby Jordan Jr., Gabe Dell Jr., and the nieces and nephews of Billy Halop) attended a performace together.[3]


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 10:20 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Dishonorable discharge, loss of bennefits, and prison would help weed out Homophobes!

Attitudes on gays in military shifting

The Pentagon and Congress have begun to soften their rhetoric on the controversial policy known as "don't ask, don't tell."
By Peter Spiegel and Joel Rubin
August 9, 2007

When Bill Clinton proposed dropping the ban on gays and lesbians serving openly in the military, Army Gen. Colin L. Powell, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was vehement in his opposition.

"The presence of homosexuals in the force would be detrimental to good order and discipline for a variety of reasons, principally relating around the issue of privacy," Powell said in a January 1993 speech at the U.S. Naval Academy, just days before Clinton took the oath of office.

Last month, the incoming Joint Chiefs chairman had a much more nuanced response when asked about the ban during his confirmation hearing. Navy Adm. Michael G. Mullen said that though he supported the current policy, he was open to having Congress debate whether it was still appropriate. "I'd love to have Congress make its own decision with respect to that," Mullen said.

Subtly but unmistakably, rhetoric from the military and Congress has begun to soften on the controversial policy known as "don't ask, don't tell." Powell himself has changed his tune, acknowledging that attitudes have shifted. A House bill that would lift the ban on gays serving openly has gained support from military veterans in that chamber. And the pressures of the Iraq war and the 2008 presidential campaign have focused more attention on the merits of a repeal.

At a forum tonight for Democratic presidential candidates, the ban is expected to get its most thorough examination since 1993. The event, cosponsored by the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights organization, will be held in front of about 200 invited guests at a Hollywood video production facility.

In a previous debate, the eight Democratic hopefuls all raised their hands to acknowledge they would work toward lifting the ban. Tonight, they will probably get an opportunity to expand on that.

In surveys filled out ahead of tonight's forum, the leading candidates showed a depth of commitment to the repeal that could push the issue back into the limelight.

"Courage, honor, patriotism and sacrifice -- the traits that define our men and women in uniform -- have nothing to do with sexual orientation. This is a matter of national security, and I will fix it, " wrote Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, the Democratic front-runner. Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina wrote similar statements.

Activists and veterans said the attitude shift among policymakers was partly because of high-profile incidents during the Iraq war in which service members holding key jobs, particularly Arabic translators, were dismissed because of their sexual orientation. Activist groups said at least 59 such cases had been documented.

In addition, recent comments by the outgoing Joint Chiefs chairman, Marine Gen. Peter Pace, that allowing gays to serve openly in the military would be condoning "immoral behavior," set off a firestorm that has convinced even some centrist Republicans that the issue should be reevaluated.

"Gen. Pace's comments were fortunate in that they caused people to think about the current policy," Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said in an interview, adding that she would support a reexamination of the ban.

Perhaps most significant, recent polling data have shown that a new generation of service members, raised in an era in which homosexuality was more accepted, is more willing to serve with openly gay recruits.

"Just like in the general population, there is a generational shift within the military," said Paul Rieckhoff, a former Army platoon commander in Iraq who is now executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, a group largely composed of younger retired soldiers. "The average 18-year-old has been around gay people, has seen gay people in popular culture, and they're not this boogeyman in the same way they were to Pete Pace's generation."

In a Zogby International survey conducted in October of 545 service members who served in Iraq or Afghanistan, 37% said they were opposed to allowing gays to serve openly in the military. Nineteen percent said they were uncomfortable in the presence of gays and lesbians.

Steve Ralls, communications director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, a nonprofit that provides legal assistance to military personnel affected by the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, said the organization knew of at least 500 active-duty military personnel who were serving openly, without retribution from their comrades.

Even Powell has had a change of heart. In June, he told NBC's "Meet the Press" that his attitudes had shifted significantly since 1993 -- though he stopped short of calling for a repeal of the ban, a position recently taken by his immediate successor, Army Gen. John M. Shalikashvili.

Despite the change in attitudes, ending the ban will probably be more difficult than creating it was in 1993. As part of the compromise reached by the Clinton administration, the ban on gays and lesbians serving openly -- once just a Pentagon rule -- was encoded in U.S. law, meaning that unless a court strikes it down, legislation would have to be passed to repeal it.

Even with a Democratic president, such a proposal may have a difficult road -- particularly in the Senate, where advocates of repeal would probably need a filibuster-proof supermajority to pass a new law.

Ralls said he believed there was an increasing number of moderate Republican senators such as Collins and John W. Warner of Virginia -- a leading GOP voice on military issues who strongly rebuked Pace's remarks on gays in the military -- who support revisiting the issue.

"There are moderate Republicans in Congress who are beginning to understand that 'don't ask, don't tell' is very much a national security issue," Ralls said. "Many of those same Republicans are beginning to question the wisdom of dismissing and turning away perfectly well-qualified gays and lesbians who want to serve."







Posted by hotelbravo.org at 4:15 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 10 August 2007
Christian spelled P-H-A-R-I-S-E-E! And they passed by on the other side of the road!

Church cancels memorial for gay Navy vet

By ANGELA K. BROWN, Associated Press Writer56 minutes ago

ARLINGTON, Texas - A megachurch canceled a memorial service for a Navy veteran 24 hours before it was to start because the deceased was gay.

Officials at the nondenominational High Point Church knew that Cecil Howard Sinclair was gay when they offered to host his service, said his sister, Kathleen Wright. But after his obituary listed his life partner as one of his survivors, she said, it was called off.

"It's a slap in the face. It's like, 'Oh, we're sorry he died, but he's gay so we can't help you,'" she said Friday.

Wright said High Point offered to hold the service for Sinclair because their brother is a janitor there. Sinclair, who served in the first Gulf War, died Monday at age 46 from an infection after surgery to prepare him for a heart transplant.

The church's pastor, the Rev. Gary Simons, said no one knew Sinclair, who was not a church member, was gay until the day before the Thursday service, when staff members putting together his video tribute saw pictures of men "engaging in clear affection, kissing and embracing."

Simons said the church believes homosexuality is a sin, and it would have appeared to endorse that lifestyle if the service had been held there.

"We did decline to host the service — not based on hatred, not based on discrimination, but based on principle," Simons told The Associated Press. "Had we known it on the day they first spoke about it — yes, we would have declined then. It's not that we didn't love the family."

Simons said the decision had nothing to do with the obituary. He said the church offered to pay for another site for the service, made the video and provided food for more than 100 relatives and friends.

"Even though we could not condone that lifestyle, we went above and beyond for the family through many acts of love and kindness," Simons said.

Wright called the church's claim about the pictures "a bold-faced lie." She said she provided numerous family pictures of Sinclair, including some with his partner, but said none showed men kissing or hugging.

The 5,000-member High Point Church was founded in 2000 by Simons and his wife, April, whose brother is Joel Osteen, well-known pastor of the 38,000-member Lakewood Church in Houston. Now High Point meets in a 432,000-square-foot facility in Arlington, near Dallas.

Wright said relatives declined the church's offer to hold the service at a community center because they felt it was an inappropriate venue. It ultimately was held at a funeral home, but the cancellation still lingered in some minds, she said.

___

On the Net:

High Point Church: http://www.churchunusual.com

 


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 11:15 PM CDT
Updated: Friday, 10 August 2007 11:23 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Rep. Charles Rangel has called for reinstating the draft as a way to end the Iraq war.

Bush war adviser says draft worth a look

By RICHARD LARDNERFri Aug 10, 7:06 PM ET

WASHINGTON - Frequent tours for U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan have stressed the all-volunteer force and made it worth considering a return to a military draft, President Bush's new war adviser said Friday.

"I think it makes sense to certainly consider it," Army Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute said in an interview with National Public Radio's "All Things Considered."

"And I can tell you, this has always been an option on the table. But ultimately, this is a policy matter between meeting the demands for the nation's security by one means or another," Lute added in his first interview since he was confirmed by the Senate in June.

President Nixon abolished the draft in 1973. Restoring it, Lute said, would be a "major policy shift" and Bush has made it clear that he doesn't think it's necessary.

"The president's position is that the all volunteer military meets the needs of the country and there is no discussion of a draft. General Lute made that point as well," National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe said.

In the interview, Lute also said that "Today, the current means of the all-volunteer force is serving us exceptionally well."

Still, he said the repeated deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan affect not only the troops but their families, who can influence whether a service member decides to stay in the military.

"There's both a personal dimension of this, where this kind of stress plays out across dinner tables and in living room conversations within these families," he said. "And ultimately, the health of the all-volunteer force is going to rest on those sorts of personal family decisions."

The military conducted a draft during the Civil War and both world wars and between 1948 and 1973. The Selective Service System, re-established in 1980, maintains a registry of 18-year-old men.

Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., has called for reinstating the draft as a way to end the Iraq war.

Bush picked Lute in mid-May as a deputy national security adviser with responsibility for ensuring efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan are coordinated with policymakers in Washington. Lute, an active-duty general, was chosen after several retired generals turned down the job.

 


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 10:58 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post

Fly me to the moon: space hotel sees 2012 opening

By Pascale Harter1 hour, 59 minutes ago

BARCELONA (Reuters) - "Galactic Suite," the first hotel planned in space, expects to open for business in 2012 and would allow guests to travel around the world in 80 minutes.

Its Barcelona-based architects say the space hotel will be the most expensive in the galaxy, costing $4 million for a three-day stay.

During that time guests would see the sun rise 15 times a day and use Velcro suits to crawl around their pod rooms by sticking themselves to the walls like Spiderman.

Company director Xavier Claramunt says the three-bedroom boutique hotel's joined up pod structure, which makes it look like a model of molecules, was dictated by the fact that each pod room had to fit inside a rocket to be taken into space.

"It's the bathrooms in zero gravity that are the biggest challenge," says Claramunt. "How to accommodate the more intimate activities of the guests is not easy."

But they may have solved the issue of how to take a shower in weightlessness -- the guests will enter a spa room in which bubbles of water will float around.

When guests are not admiring the view from their portholes they will take part in scientific experiments on space travel.

Galactic Suite began as a hobby for former aerospace engineer Claramunt, until a space enthusiast decided to make the science fiction fantasy a reality by fronting most of the $3 billion needed to build the hotel.

An American company intent on colonizing Mars, which sees Galaxy Suite as a first step, has since come on board, and private investors from Japan, the United States and the United Arab Emirates are in talks.

PLENTY RICH ENOUGH

If Claramunt is secretive about the identity of his generous backer, he is more forthcoming about the custom he can expect.

"We have calculated that there are 40,000 people in the world who could afford to stay at the hotel. Whether they will want to spend money on going into space, we just don't know."

Four million dollars might be a lot to spend on a holiday, but those in the nascent space tourism industry say hoteliers have been slow on the uptake because no one thought the cost of space travel would come down as quickly as it has.

Galactic Suite said the price included not only three nights in space. Guests also get eight weeks of intensive training at a James Bond-style space camp on a tropical island.

"There is fear associated with going into space," said Claramunt. "That's why the shuttle rocket will remain fixed to the space hotel for the duration of the guests' stay, so they know they can get home again."

In an era of concern over climate change, Galaxy Suite have no plans so far to offset the pollution implications of sending a rocket to carry just six guests at a time into space.

"But," says Claramunt, "I'm hopeful that the impact of seeing the earth from a distance will stimulate the guests' urge to value and protect our planet."

 


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 2:23 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Bush behind more unnecessary deaths...more than likely!
 
Site Search: 



The New York Times Store
MODERN LOVE
MODERN LOVE


Friends in the White House Come to Coal's Aid

By CHRISTOPHER DREW and RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr.

Published: August 9, 2004

Enlarge This Image

Susan F. Lapis/Southwings
A mountaintop mining operation in West Virginia. Debris is deposited in valleys.

ARTICLE TOOLS
Email This ArticleE-Mail This Article
Printer Friendly FormatPrinter-Friendly Format
Most E-mailed ArticlesMost E-Mailed Articles
Reprints & PermissionsReprints & Permissions
Single Page FormatSingle-Page Format


MULTIMEDIA

.Graphic: Mining Mountains

.Chart: Campaign Contributions

TIMES NEWS TRACKER

  Topics

Alerts
Bush, George W


Coal


Mines and Mining


Environment



 

WASHINGTON - In 1997, as a top executive of a Utah mining company, David Lauriski proposed a measure that could allow some operators to let coal-dust levels rise substantially in mines. The plan went nowhere in the government.

Last year, it found enthusiastic backing from one government official - Mr. Lauriski himself. Now head of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, he revived the proposal despite objections by union officials and health experts that it could put miners at greater risk of black-lung disease.

The reintroduction of the coal dust measure came after the federal agency had abandoned a series of Clinton-era safety proposals favored by coal miners while embracing others favored by mine owners.

The agency's effort to rewrite coal regulations is part of a broader push by the Bush administration to help an industry that had been out of favor in Washington. As a candidate four years ago, Mr. Bush promised to expand energy supplies, in part by reviving coal's fortunes, particularly in Appalachia, where coal regions will also help decide how swing states like West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Ohio vote this year.

The president has also made good on a 2000 campaign pledge to ease environmental restrictions that industry officials said were threatening jobs in coal country. That promise led many West Virginia miners, who traditionally voted Democratic, to join coal operators in supporting Mr. Bush. It helped him win the state's five electoral votes, ultimately the margin of victory.

Safety and environmental regulations often shift with control of the White House, but the Bush administration's approach to coal mining has been a particularly potent example of the blend of politics and policy.

In addition to Mr. Lauriski, who spent 30 years in the coal industry, Mr. Bush tapped a handful of other industry executives and lobbyists to help oversee safety and environmental regulations.

In all, the mine safety agency has rescinded more than a half-dozen proposals intended to make coal miners' jobs safer, including steps to limit miners' exposure to toxic chemicals. One rule pushed by the agency would make it easier for companies to use diesel generators underground, which miners say could increase the risk of fire.

In an interview, Mr. Lauriski said that the proposals that were canceled were unnecessary. He said the agency had instead concentrated on other measures "we believed were important to pursue."

He cited a revamping of evacuation procedures after an explosion killed 13 miners in Alabama in 2001, and requirements that workers be told about the presence and dangers of hazardous chemicals.

Mr. Lauriski said the coal dust measure would improve miners' health by encouraging the use of equipment to limit how much dust miners breathe.

The Bush administration's efforts to change the rules have led to battles with labor unions and environmentalists. Congress and the courts have stepped in to temporarily block some of the initiatives, including the coal dust measure.

"They generally want to do whatever the industry wants," said Representative Frank Pallone Jr., a New Jersey Democrat and member of the House Resources Committee who has been a critic of the administration's regulation of the industry. "You don't even have to change the law. You can change the regulations and don't do enforcement."

How any of these changes may affect the number of coal mining injuries and deaths is unclear. The rate of injuries has declined over the last 15 years. And a coal miner's odds of dying on the job are about the same as they were in the last years of the Clinton administration, government statistics show. The death tally, though, does not include black-lung disease, which still kills hundreds of miners every year.

But union leaders and some former agency officials see a direct link between the death rate and one specific proposal that was shelved. Before leaving office, the Clinton administration proposed updating technology to better protect workers from the two-story-high trucks that haul coal. Since that proposal was withdrawn in 2001, 16 miners have been killed in hauling accidents above ground.

The administration has also tried to make surface mining more economical by making it easier for coal companies to blast off the tops of mountains and dispose of rubble in valleys and streams.

 

 Continued
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next>>




RELATED ARTICLES
.Study Ranks Bush Plan to Cut Air Pollution as Weakest of 3  (June 10, 2004) $
.White House Minimized the Risks of Mercury in Proposed Rules, Scientists Say  (April 7, 2004) $
.E.P.A. May Tighten Its Proposal on Mercury  (March 16, 2004) $
.Most States Expect Pollution To Rise if Regulations Change  (February 6, 2004) $
 Find more results for Bush, George W and Coal


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 1:53 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Sinse when do a father's hurt feelings hold sway over a son's incompetent waste of life?

Tough Times on Sidelines for Bush Sr.

By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG,
The New York Times
Posted: 2007-08-09 21:55:17
Filed Under: Politics News
WASHINGTON (Aug. 9) - There are times in the life of George Herbert Walker Bush, the 41st president of the United States and father of the 43rd, that people, perfect strangers, come up to him and say the harshest things — words intended to comfort but words that wind up only causing pain.

Photo Gallery: Father and Son

Ron Sachs / Getty Images

President Bush and his father speak about the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina at the White House in 2005. Chance encounters with ordinary Americans who criticize the president are taking a toll on his father, one adviser says.

  1 of 12
“I love you, sir, but your son’s way off base here,” they might say, according to Ron Kaufman, a longtime adviser to Mr. Bush, who has witnessed any number of such encounters — perhaps at a political fund-raiser, or a restaurant dinner, a chance meeting on the streets of Houston or Kennebunkport, Me. They are, he says, just one way the presidency of the son has taken a toll on the father.

“It wears on his heart,” Mr. Kaufman said, “and his soul.”

These are distressing days for the Bush family patriarch, only the second former president in American history, after John Adams, to see his son take the White House. At 83, he finds it tough to watch his son get criticized from the sidelines; often, he likens himself to a Little League father whose kid is having a rough game. And like the proud and angry Little League dad who cannot help but yell at the umpire, sometimes he just cannot help getting involved.

The official line from the White House is that 41, as he is known in Bush circles, gives advice to 43 only when asked. But interviews with a broad range of people close to both presidents — including family members like the elder Mr. Bush’s daughter, Doro Bush Koch, and aides who have worked for both men, like Andrew H. Card Jr. — suggest a far more complicated father-son dynamic, in which the former president is not nearly so distant as the White House would have people believe.

They talk almost every morning by phone, and Mr. Bush studiously avoids saying anything critical of his son, close associates say. But he has privately expressed irritation with some of his son’s aides. At times, he has urged White House officials to seek outside advice, and he has passed on his own foreign policy wisdom to the president, even as he makes a point of saying his son’s administration is not his.

He views himself, in Mrs. Koch’s words, as “a loving father, first and foremost,” but as he himself suggested to a group of insurance agents at a recent dinner in Minneapolis, loving fathers find it tough to stay away.

Story Telling Kit

Which president do you favor most?

  • GEORGE W. BUSH
  • BILL CLINTON
  • GEORGE H.W. BUSH
  • RONALD REAGAN
“Any parent in this audience knows exactly how I feel,” Mr. Bush said in response to a question about what it was like to have a son as president. “It’s no different. You’ve got to look at it strictly as family — not that anyone is a big shot, even though he’s president of the United States. It’s family. It’s the pride of a father in his son.”

This weekend, the elder Mr. Bush will preside over his clan’s annual summer gathering at Walker’s Point, their grand seaside spread in Kennebunkport. There will be the usual horseshoe games, fishing trips and speedboat rides, plus a visit from the president of France, Nicolas Sarkozy — a classic Bush family tableau, but one that does not capture the delicate course the elder Mr. Bush has charted in playing the roles of father and former president at the same time.

It is a balancing act. The former president keeps up his contacts with world leaders — last year, for instance, he invited President Hamid Karzai of
Afghanistan  to spend a night at Kennebunkport — but is discreet. Once, during an intimate dinner with the king of Morocco, he called the White House and got the president on the phone.

“He put the king on, just like that,” one startled guest recalled. “No national security advisers, no nothing, just the president talking with the king of Morocco.”

He is a frequent visitor to the White House. He still loves eating at the White House mess and has breakfast or coffee with
Karl Rove , the president’s chief political strategist, whenever he comes, mostly to chew over political gossip. From time to time, he picks up the phone to talk policy with Joshua B. Bolten, the White House chief of staff. He called Mr. Bolten’s predecessor, Mr. Card, about every other week.

Mostly, said Mr. Card, who was transportation secretary to the elder Mr. Bush and views himself as “a bridge” between the generations, the father was simply checking on his son. But sometimes the ex-president would raise a foreign policy question, or suggest the White House reach out to those “in his circle,” like James A. Baker, the former secretary of state, or Brent Scowcroft, the former national security adviser, who has been openly critical of the war in
Iraq .

“He made sure that I knew there were experts around that we should be reaching out to or listening to,” Mr. Card said, adding: “I never felt that the former president was trying to meddle in the responsibilities that the president had. But he cares deeply about his son.”

Recently, the White House has cast the elder Mr. Bush in a new role as foreign policy facilitator. In addition to the coming Sarkozy visit, the former president was host to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia at Kennebunkport for a White House summit meeting in June. It was the current president’s idea, but the father was happy to return Mr. Putin’s hospitality; a few years ago, when he and his wife, Barbara, were traveling in Russia, the Putins met them at the airport and invited them to their country retreat.

In a sense, the elder Mr. Bush is traversing uncharted territory. The first President Adams died 18 months after John Quincy Adams was inaugurated, and 28 years separated their administrations. By contrast, just eight years separate the Bush administrations, and the men themselves are only 22 years apart in age.

Their relationship is undoubtedly the most scrutinized father-son bond in Washington, especially given the well-publicized foreign policy rifts between their two camps.

Tensions between aides to 41 and 43 ran especially high when Mr. Baker was co-chairman of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group. When
President Bush  rejected the group’s recommendations, some in the 41 camp viewed it as an outright rejection of the father. When Mr. Scowcroft spoke out against the war, some thought the father was sending a message to the son.

Some authors have asserted that there is rivalry between the two; the journalist Bob Woodward, for instance, reported in his book “Plan of Attack” that when asked if he sought his father’s advice before going to war, the president said: “You know he is the wrong father to appeal to in terms of strength. There is a higher father that I appeal to.”

The rivalry theory flared up again last year, at the christening of the Navy’s newest Nimitz aircraft carrier, the George H. W. Bush. The president joked that given the ship’s qualities — “she is unrelenting, she is unshakeable, she is unyielding” — it should have been named for his mother. The line brought a laugh, but some close to the elder Mr. Bush winced at what seemed a subtle dig.

Despite the armchair psychologists who speculate about Oedipal complexes and prodigal sons, father and son are described as extremely close. When the clan is in Kennebunkport, all the Bush children, the president included, stream into their parents’ bedroom at the crack of dawn for coffee. When the president is not there, the other Bushes call.

Bob Strauss, the onetime chairman of the Democratic National Committee and close friend of the elder Mr. Bush from their days in Texas, was recently invited to dinner with both men at the White House. He says he worried in advance that there might be tension, or that they might talk politics, creating discomfort for a
Democrat  like himself.

But, he said, there was none of that. “They talked about West Texas, they talked about family,” he said. “It couldn’t have been more relaxed.”

As to what is said in private conversations between father and son, no one can be certain. When phone calls come in from Houston or Kennebunkport, White House aides make themselves scarce. But Mr. Card says it is clear to him that family talks were not always confined to family matters.

“It was relatively easy for me to read the sitting president’s body language after he had talked to his mother or father,” Mr. Card said. “Sometimes he’d ask me a probing question. And I’d think, Hmm, I don’t think that question came from him.”

The former president is often asked how he steers clear of second-guessing his son, and his answer is always the same: that he is not qualified to second-guess because only the occupant of the Oval Office has complete access to the kind of intelligence reports that inform presidential decisions.

Even so, those close to the former president say it is clear that the father has been dissatisfied with the performance of some of his son’s aides, notably
Donald H. Rumsfeld , the former secretary of defense.

“I think it is accurate to say that there’s a feeling that a lot of the aides around him have not served the president well — Rumsfeld is one,” said one person close to the elder Mr. Bush who, like all interviewed on this topic, spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Nearly 15 years have passed since the first President Bush left the White House, and though he remains vigorous — he jumped out of an airplane on his 80th birthday and is promising another jump when he turns 85 — he has also slowed down. After two hip replacements, his gait is a little unsteady. He does not wade in streams anymore, and in Kennebunkport, he now uses a ramp to get on his boat.

His children worry about him. Last December, at an event honoring his son Jeb in his last days as Florida’s governor, the elder Mr. Bush broke down crying at the memory of Jeb’s bitter defeat in 1994. Mrs. Koch says her father is growing more emotional as he ages — “he has a tender heart that is getting tenderer” — which makes criticism of his eldest son that much harder to take.

Late last year, at the aircraft carrier christening, he grew emotional again, this time with President Bush in his presence. Before a crowd that included political luminaries from both administrations, as well as dozens of family members and friends, the father made a point of saying he supports his son “in every single way with every fiber of my body.”

The words were intentional, said his longtime speechwriter, Jim McGrath, who wrote them.

“I think he understood he was going to have a national audience, and I think he wanted to send an unmistakable signal,” Mr. McGrath said. “There had been a couple of these kind of pop psychology pieces — you know, the father, is he trying to send a message? I think he wanted to say none of that malarkey matters. I just want to support my son.”

2007-08-09 09:23:15

Posted by hotelbravo.org at 1:45 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Thursday, 9 August 2007
Thanks to the over compensating Coward in the White House!

Russian bomber jets resume Cold War sorties

By Dmitry SolovyovThu Aug 9, 11:45 AM ET

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia's strategic bombers have resumed Cold War-style long-haul missions to areas patrolled by NATO and the United States, top generals said on Thursday.

A Russian bomber flew over a U.S. naval base on the Pacific island of Guam on Wednesday and "exchanged smiles" with U.S. pilots who had scrambled to track it, said Major-General Pavel Androsov, head of long-range aviation in the Russian air force.

"It has always been the tradition of our long-range aviation to fly far into the ocean, to meet (U.S.) aircraft carriers and greet (U.S. pilots) visually," Androsov told a news conference.

"Yesterday we revived this tradition, and two of our young crews paid a visit to the area of the (U.S. Pacific Naval Activities) base of Guam," he said.

President Vladimir Putin has sought to make Russia more assertive in the world. Putin has boosted defense spending and sought to raise morale in the armed forces, which were starved of funding following the fall of the Soviet Union.

Androsov said the sortie by the two turboprop Tu-95MS bombers, from a base near Blagoveshchenskin the Far East, had lasted for 13 hours. The Tu-95, codenamed "Bear" by NATO, is Russia's Cold War icon and may stay in service until 2040.

"I think the result was good. We met our colleagues -- fighter jet pilots from (U.S.) aircraft carriers. We exchanged smiles and returned home," Androsov said.

Ivan Safranchuk, Moscow office director of the Washington-based World Security Institute, said he saw nothing extraordinary in Moscow sending its bombers around the globe.

"This practice as such never stopped, it was only scaled down because there was less cash available for that," he said.

"It doesn't cost much to flex your muscles ... You can burn fuel flying over your own land or you can do it flying somewhere like Guam, in which case political dividends will be higher."

COLD WAR CAT-AND-MOUSE

The bombers give Russia the capability of launching a devastating nuclear strike even if the nuclear arsenals on its own territory are wiped out.

During the Cold War, they played elaborate airborne games of cat-and-mouse with Western air forces.

Lieutenant-General Igor Khvorov, air forces chief of staff, said the West would have to come to terms with Russia asserting its geopolitical presence. "But I don't see anything unusual, this is business as usual," he said.

The generals said under Putin long-range aviation was no longer in need of fuel, enjoyed better maintenance and much higher wages, a far cry from the 1990s when many pilots were practically grounded because there was no money to buy fuel.

The generals quipped that part of the funding boost was thanks to a five-hour sortie Putin once flew as part of a crew on a supersonic Tupolev Tu-160 strategic bomber, known as the "White Swan" in Russia and codenamed "Blackjack" by NATO.

The current state of Russia's economy, which is booming for the eighth year in a row, has allowed Russia to finance such flights, said Safranchuk from the World Security Institute.

"Maintenance and training are not the most expensive budget items of modern armies. Purchases of new weapons really are."


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 2:12 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, 8 August 2007
Colombian coutryside being redistricted...!

Colombian crime gangs cut off tribes from food

By Hugh BronsteinWed Aug 8, 2:55 PM ET

BOGOTA (Reuters) - Colombia's indigenous tribes are being surrounded and cut off from food supplies by criminal gangs made up of right-wing paramilitaries that disbanded under a government peace plan, rights experts said on Wednesday.

To control lucrative cocaine-smuggling routes, new gangs with names like the Black Eagles are blocking access to and from indigenous communities around the country, tribal leaders told a United Nationsforum.

More than 31,000 paramilitaries have turned in their guns over the last three years, but the government admits that thousands of former militia fighters have regrouped into drug and extortion gangs.

"The Black Eagles are a paramilitary army that is refining itself as an organized crime group," said Luis Andrade, president of the National Indigenous Organization of Colombia.

He said that about 12,000 tribe members throughout the country have been hemmed into their villages by new and old paramilitary groups as well as soldiers enforcing President Alvaro Uribe's hard-line security policies.

"They can't leave to fish or hunt, which has caused hundreds to starve," Andrade said. "This confinement is causing more victims than direct actions such as assassinations."

Indigenous people who do try to leave their villages risk being shot as rebel collaborators, he said.

Urban violence associated with Colombia's four-decade-old guerrilla war has declined under Uribe, who was re-elected last year. But wide swathes of countryside are still controlled by left-wing rebels, paramilitaries and other criminal bands.

The government has never controlled all of the Andean country, which is the world's biggest producer of cocaine. The "paras" were formed in the 1980s to help cattle ranchers, drug lords and other rich Colombians beat back the rebels.

'WILDER, YOUNGER'

The United Nations says the new crime gangs are less disciplined and more dangerous than their paramilitary predecessors.

"They are wilder, younger and not as well organized as they were before. They do not have a political agenda at all. It is pure narco-trafficking," said Roberto Meier, Colombia's representative for the United Nations refugee agency UNHCR.

"They run over everything in front of them," Meier said.

Uribe's international standing has been damaged by a scandal in which some of his closest allies in Congress have been jailed while awaiting trial on charges of colluding with paramilitary drug gangs.

Human rights groups say the demobilization has not forced paramilitary chiefs to get out of the cocaine business.

The northern Sierra Nevada region remains filled with coca crops used to make cocaine as well as laboratories for processing the drug, said indigenous leader Leonor Zalabata.

"That illicit economic structure is not being dismantled," she said.


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 5:36 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Citizen Murdoch

Media tycoon Murdoch now owns Wall Street Journal

TimePublished on Thursday , August 02, 2007 at 15:11 in Business section

New Delhi: Rupert Murdoch's News Corp agreed to buy Dow Jones & Co. for $5.2 billion, gaining control of the Wall Street Journal and ending the Bancroft family's 105 years of stewardship.

Dow Jones investors will receive $60 a share, the companies said Wednesday in a statement. The offer is 4.6 per cent higher than the closing stock price Tuesday and a 65 per cent premium over April 30, the day before Murdoch's bid was announced.

The purchase of the Journal, the second-biggest US newspaper by circulation, Dow Jones Newswires and Barron's satisfies Murdoch's long-expressed desire to own New York-based Dow Jones. The assets will be added to News Corp.'s more than 110 newspapers, film and TV studios and the Fox News cable network.

"News Corp. will be able to extract value from the brand," Michael Morris, an analyst at UBS AG in New York, said Tuesday. A divided Bancroft family accepted the offer after debate over Murdoch's impact on news coverage at the Journal, which has a daily circulation of 2.06 million. Murdoch, 76, pledged to maintain the editorial independence of Dow Jones, winning enough support when Bancroft family members controlling at least 37% of the company OK'd the deal.

Murdoch offered a price that other potential bidders, including CNBC owner General Electric Co, could not match.

"The Bancrofts were staunchly opposed, but there's no other alternative," said Richard Dorfman, managing director at Richard Alan Inc., an investment company in New York. "Once nobody else became available as a buyer, the deal became a fait accompli."

Rupert Murdoch Profile
 
Rupert Murdoch Executive Info in Portfolio's Executive Database.
 
Ads by Google

LANDMARK DEAL: News Corp will be able to extract value from the world-famous Wall Street Journal.

LANDMARK DEAL: News Corp will be able to extract value from the world-famous Wall Street Journal.

Save & Share Article

DiggDeliciousNewsvineReditFarkYahoo

Read Comment | Post Comment

Copyright ? IBNLive.com. All rights reserved. Reproduction of news articles, photos, videos or any other content in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of IBNLive.com is prohibited.



Posted by hotelbravo.org at 12:17 PM CDT
Updated: Wednesday, 8 August 2007 12:25 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
The Aging Family Truckster, and other assorted problems...

Space shuttle Endeavour in first mission in 4 years

By Irene KlotzWed Aug 8, 2:21 AM ET

CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida (Reuters) - The U.S. space shuttle Endeavour was due to blast off fromFlorida on Wednesday on its first mission in nearly five years, carrying a former teacher who trained with the ill-fated Challenger crew and gear for the International Space Station.

The mission will be the second of four that the U.S. space agency plans this year as it presses to finish construction of the $100 billion space station before the three remaining U.S. shuttles are retired in 2010.

Florida's weather, often marked by afternoon thunderstorms during the state's steamy summer, was expected to cooperate, with an 80 percent chance of clear skies for the 6:36 p.m. EDT launch,NASA said.

Endeavour has not flown since before the February 1, 2003, Columbia disaster, in which seven astronauts were killed when their spacecraft disintegrated on re-entry into the atmosphere.

NASA and Columbia's crew had not been aware that a falling chunk of insulation foam had knocked a hole in the ship's protective heat shield during launch. The agency now monitors liftoffs with dozens of cameras and shuttle crews scrutinize their ship's heat-resistant tiles when they reach space.

Endeavour has undergone an extensive overhaul since its last flight in 2002 and NASA managers say the spacecraft is virtually new. It has a new piece of equipment that can tap into the power grid of the space station and could allow the shuttle to extend its 11-day mission to 14 days.

The primary purpose of Endeavour's flight, which is the 119th in the shuttle program, is to deliver and install a new beam for the station's main support structure, replace a faulty gyroscope needed to keep the outpost positioned properly in orbit, and deliver supplies.

CIVILIANS WERE BANNED

But it is the crew that has fallen under the spotlight, partly because the five-man, two-woman team includes former elementary school teacher Barbara Morgan.

Morgan trained 22 years ago as the backup to Challenger crew member Christa McAuliffe, a New Hampshire social studies teacher who died along with six astronauts seconds after Challenger's liftoff on January 28, 1986, when a booster rocket blew up.

Civilian fliers were banned from shuttles after Challenger and Morgan joined the astronaut corps in 1998.

The astronaut corps itself is also under some scrutiny after allegations last month that a drunken astronaut was allowed to fly on a Russian spacecraft and another almost flew on a shuttle.

"To imply that my crew or I would ever consider launching on our mission in anything but the best possible condition is utterly ridiculous," Endeavour Commander Scott Kelly wrote in a letter to journalists, denouncing the panel that reported the allegations for posting unsubstantiated opinions.

NASA managers have launched an investigation and vowed to reinforce a 12-hour ban on alcohol before spaceflights.

Endeavour's mission was also clouded by the revelation that a component it is taking to the space station had been sabotaged by a worker at one of NASA's subcontractors. The computer has been fixed and an investigation is under way.


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 6:13 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, 7 August 2007
Official: Iran producing fighter jet

Official: Iran producing fighter jet

Mon Aug 6, 10:44 PM ET

TEHRAN, Iran - Iran has started industrial-scale production of its first domestically manufactured fighter jet, state television reported Monday, part of the country's effort to be militarily self-sufficient.

The plane was first tested in 2006 and derived from re-engineered components of U.S. combat aircraft.

"The airplane, Azarakhsh, was made by Iranian experts, and it has already reached the industrial production stage," state TV quoted Iran's defense minister, Mostafa Mohammad Najjar, as saying.

According to previous reports, the Azarakhsh, or Lightning, was designed for close air support.

After decades of relying on foreign weapons purchases, Iran has said it is increasingly self-sufficient, claiming annual military exports of more than $100 million to more than 50 countries.


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 7:25 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Anniversary of Hiroshima bombing..."Administators" are rarely "Leaders"!

62 Years After Hiroshima

Nicole Olsen, OneWorld USMon Aug 6, 12:35 PM ET

WASHINGTON, Aug 6 (OneWorld) - In the history of warfare, nuclear weapons have been used twice, and though it has been 62 years since an atomic bomb has been employed in a conflict, the threat of a nuclear attack remains as present as ever, say arms control advocates.

Both nuclear attacks targeted Japan during the closing days of World War II. On August 6, 1945 Hiroshima was destroyed by a single atomic bomb. Three days later, on August 9th, a second atomic weapon was dropped over Nagasaki.

This week marks the anniversary of these bombings.

Currently there are nine nuclear-weapons-wielding countries: the United States,Russia, UK, France, China, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea. According to reports from the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, these countries maintain approximately 27,000 nuclear weapons, 12,000 of which are currently deployed.

Although most of the world's nations are party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), an international agreement forged in 1968 to limit the spread of nuclear weapons, four key states that have since developed nuclear arsenals are not: Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea.

The NPT obligates the nuclear weapons states that are parties to the treaty to engage in good-faith negotiations for nuclear disarmament. The International Court of Justice has interpreted this to mean that negotiations must be concluded ''leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects.''

However, in a deal finalized last week, the United States government agreed to transfer nuclear technology to India. Although India has assured the world community that the imported technology would be used only for non-military purposes, critics fear the agreement could result in the escalation of a nuclear arms race in a politically volatile region of the world.

Critics have described the U.S. acceptance of India's nuclear weapons program as amounting to ''a major concession'' for a country that has refused to join the NPT.

''As the world's only remaining superpower, the United States can lead the way" in promoting nuclear disarmament, David Krieger of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation said last week. ''[But] it has failed to do so.''

''It is perhaps the least talked about and most worrying irony of our time. The United States has a massive defense budget, but spends relatively little addressing the most immediate danger to humanity,'' Krieger said, referring nuclear weapons.

''U.S. nuclear policy undermines the security of its people,'' Krieger added. ''The more the U.S. relies on nuclear weapons, the more other countries will do so.''

The non-profit group Citizens for Global Solutions agrees. "We've told the world that we will reduce our stockpiles of nuclear weapons and not develop new ones. Doing our part will help us convince others to do theirs," the group said in a message to its 35,000 members and supporters last week, adding that U.S. leaders should work with other governments to "revitalize and strengthen" the NPT, which it called "outdated."

But as U.S. voters prepare to choose a new president next year, there are indications that George W. Bush's successor may stay the course set by the current U.S. president on nuclear weapons. Indeed, four Republican presidential candidates have so far been unwilling to take the nuclear weapons option off the table against Iran.

And Democratic presidential hopeful Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton recently objected to Senator Barack Obama's statement that the use of nuclear weapons in Afghanistan or Pakistan would be a "profound mistake."

"Presidents should be careful at all times in discussing the use and nonuse of nuclear weapons,"Senator Clinton remarked.

Leonor Tomero from the Washington, DC-based Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation called Clinton's approach ''reckless.''

"The United States should not recklessly threaten to use nuclear weapons, particularly against states that do not have these weapons....There is currently no justification for lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons," Tomero said.

The blast, heat, fire and radiation from the first atomic bomb to hit Hiroshima killed an estimated 90,000 people immediately and 145,000 by the end of 1945. In Nagasaki, some 40,000 were killed immediately, with another 30,000 dying by the end of the year. In each instance the majority of those killed were civilians.

Sixty-two years later the effects of these nuclear explosions are still felt.

In Hiroshima in 1955, Sadako Sasaki, a 12-year-old girl, was diagnosed with leukemia 10 years after being exposed to radiation from the nuclear attack. Sadako's intimate knowledge of the cost of war and nuclear attack motivated her to try and spread peace, say those who remember her efforts today.

Sadako began folding origami paper cranes after a friend reminded her of a legend: if one folds 1,000 cranes, one will live to be very old.

Sadako was only able to fold 644 cranes before succumbing to her illness, each one crafted with the words: "I will write peace on your wings and you will fly all over the world."

Inspired by the young girl's message of hope, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and La Casa de Maria dedicated a peace garden in Santa Barbara, California to Sadako in 1995.

This year, on August 9, these organizations will celebrate their thirteenth annual Sadako Peace Day, and they have invited individuals to submit their own messages for peace to be sent to the White House.

In a statement commemorating the world's only nuclear attacks to date, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation's David Krieger said: "The anniversaries of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are reminders of the continued peril that humanity faces. This peril is far too serious to be left only in the hands of government leaders."

"Citizens must demand more of their governments," he added. "Their very lives and those of their children could depend upon ending the delusions that nuclear weapons protect us and that nuclear double standards will hold indefinitely."

Discuss/Share/Permalink


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 12:56 AM CDT
Updated: Tuesday, 7 August 2007 12:59 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Sunday, 5 August 2007
Congress yields to pass Bush spying bill

Congress yields to pass Bush spying bill

By Thomas FerraroSat Aug 4, 11:27 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Congress yielded to President George W. Bush on Saturday and approved legislation to temporarily expand the government's power to conduct electronic surveillance without a court order in tracking foreign suspects.

Civil liberties groups charged the measure would create a broad net that would sweep up law-abiding U.S. citizens. But the House of Representatives gave its concurrence to the bill, 227-183, a day after it won Senate approval, 60-28.

"After months of prodding by House Republicans, Congress has finally closed the terrorist loophole in our surveillance law -- and America will be the safer for it," declared House Minority Leader John Boehner, an Ohio Republican.

"We think it is not the bill that ought to pass," said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. But Hoyer conceded he and fellow Democrats were unable to stop the measure after a showdown with the White House amid warnings of possible attacks on the United States.

With lawmakers set to begin a month-long recess this weekend, Bush had called on them to stay until they passed the legislation.

"Protecting America is our most solemn obligation," Bush said earlier in the day in urging Congress to send him the bill so he could sign it into law.

The measure would authorize the National Security Agency to intercept without a court order communications between people in the United States and foreign targets overseas.

The administration would have to submit to a secret court a description of the procedures they used to determine that warrantless surveillance only targeted people outside the United States.

The court, created by the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), would review the procedures and order changes, if needed. The administration could appeal.

MEASURE EXPIRES IN SIX MONTHS

FISA now requires the government to obtain orders from its court to conduct surveillance of suspected terrorists in the United States.

But after the September 11 attacks, Bush authorized warrantless interception of communications between people in the United States and others overseas if one had suspected terrorist ties. Critics charged that program violated the law, but Bush argued he had wartime powers to do so.

In January, Bush put the program under the supervision of the FISA court, but the terms have not been made public. Congress has subpoenaed documents in an effort to determine Bush's legal justification for the warrantless surveillance.

The new bill was needed in part, aides said, because of restrictions recently imposed by the secret court on the ability of spy agencies to intercept communications.

Final passage of the bill came a day after Republicans rejected Democratic alternatives that would have provided greater court supervision.

The measure is to expire in six months. Lawmakers are to come up with permanent legislation in the meantime.

Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell said he needed the measure "in order to protect the nation from attacks that are being planned today to inflict mass casualties on the United States."

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, opposed the bill, saying, "Sadly, Congress has been stampeded by fear-mongering and deception into signing away our rights."

"With the President set to sign this bill into law, I do not believe we will soon be able to undo this damage," Nadler said. "Rights given away are not easily regained."

Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, who broke ranks with many fellow Democrats to vote for the measure, said: "We are living in a period of heightened vulnerability and must give the intelligence community the tools they need."


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 12:58 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Sunday, 29 July 2007
...another WWII Buzz Bomb found...scares Brits...
WWII Flying Bomb Unearthed in London
Reuters
Posted: 2007-07-29 16:26:49
Filed Under: World News
LONDON (July 28) - Police closed streets near London's Canary Wharf financial district on Saturday after an unexploded German flying bomb from World War Two was found on a construction site.

Bomb disposal experts were called in to make the V1 missile safe after it was unearthed close to the east London complex that houses 80,000 office workers during the working week, police said. At weekends the area is busy with shoppers and visitors.

Police closed several roads around the site in Millharbour, a road in the former docklands.

"Ambulance, fire and police are there and the building site has been evacuated," a London police spokesman said. The area was cordoned off, he said.

Thousands of V1s, nicknamed "Doodlebugs," were fired at the capital during the war, with the docks a prime target.

Hundreds of unexploded bombs from the war are buried across the country, according to government figures. They are unearthed from time to time, often during building excavations.

Canary Wharf's tenants include Bank of America, Barclays, Citigroup, HSBC, the Independent newspaper group and Reuters.

Copyright 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
2007-07-29 16:06:04

Posted by hotelbravo.org at 8:32 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post

Newer | Latest | Older