Ossenfuse, pilot, Nicaragua
We are having difficulty locating any information about this subject. Why?

The Dems JUST DISCOVERED the WAR is worse than a Dead End! Gosh! Who Knew?
Congress' Iraq struggle evokes Vietnam years

By Susan Cornwell Sat Mar 3, 8:39 AM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A large portrait of Mike Mansfield, dogged Democratic foe of the Vietnam war, hangs near the Senate chamber where a new generation of Democrats is trying to stop another unpopular conflict -- in
Iraq.

But Democrats who look back at Mansfield's experience may not be encouraged. As Senate majority leader from 1961-1977, he tried many times publicly and privately to end U.S. involvement in Vietnam.

Congress spent years debating a slew of resolutions and funding limits on the Indochina war but failed to stop it or cut off funding for all combat operations until after the United States pulled its ground troops out of Vietnam in 1973.

"I think Mansfield's experience shows that political persuasion can only go so far if a president refuses to be persuaded," said Don Oberdorfer, who wrote a biography of the Montana lawmaker who died in 2001.

"Mansfield considered the war in Vietnam to be the greatest tragedy of his times and his inability to head it off, his greatest failure," said Oberdorfer, a journalist and professor at Johns Hopkins University's Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.

Decades later, Congress again is skirmishing over how to bring Americans home from a war the public largely opposes but that the president insists is a noble mission and many lawmakers say cannot be abandoned.

The four-year-old war in Iraq has revived constitutional arguments about the limits of congressional and presidential powers. Congress declares war and controls funding, but
President George W. Bush is commander-in-chief of the U.S. armed forces.

The Democratic-controlled House voted last month to denounce Bush's Iraq troop buildup. The Senate, despite having a 51-49 Democratic majority, bogged down on procedural rules and failed to follow suit.

Some House Democrats now want to attach conditions to the nearly $100 billion spending bill for military operations in Iraq, to be debated later this month. But others do not want to do anything that could be construed as undermining support for U.S. troops abroad.

'KICKS OF THE CAT'

"There were 31 kicks of the cat with Vietnam. We're on kick number three here," Democrat David Obey (news, bio, voting record) of Wisconsin, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee that oversees spending, said on Wednesday as he and his colleagues sought consensus on their next move on Iraq.

During the Indochina conflict, Congress considered 21 proposals to restrict funding for military operations between 1970 and 1973, but only five were enacted, according to a report by the Congressional Research Service (CRS).

A 1971 provision, for example, prohibited using any appropriated funds to reintroduce U.S. ground troops into Cambodia.

There were also proposals that urged the president to withdraw forces, terminate military operations, seek congressional authorization for military operations and set a date for U.S. troop withdrawals.

President
Richard Nixon was drawing down U.S. troops from 1969 onwards but set no goal for total withdrawal. Only after U.S. ground forces withdrew following 1973 peace accords did Congress cut off combat funds, to keep Nixon from reintroducing U.S. troops and to stop the bombing of Cambodia, the CRS said.

In 1975, after Congress refused to send more aid to South Vietnam, Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese.

"In a sense, the Vietnam experience just reiterates the obvious. Foreign and national security policy are nearly impossible to make from Capitol Hill," said Bradford Berenson, who was a White House associate counsel in Bush's first term.

Some see it differently.

"Vietnam did come to an end because of an act of Congress," when it refused to send more aid to South Vietnam, said Walter Dellinger, who was acting solicitor general, the government's chief advocate before the Supreme Court, under then-President
Bill Clinton. "It could have ended a lot earlier."

One senator said current congressional pressure may have produced some results by helping goad the Bush administration into agreeing to attend a regional conference on Iraq to which
Iran and
Syria are also invited.

Bush has resisted dialogue with the two countries, which the administration accuses of fueling violence in Iraq.

"There's something going on here," said Sen. Jack Reed (news, bio, voting record), a Rhode Island Democrat who opposes the Iraq war. "Maybe we're not the catalyst but we're certainly part of it."

SUPPORT VA WATCH-DOG, BECAUSE SOMBODY HAS TO!
The Nation's #1 Independent Veterans Web Site
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

VA NEWS FLASH from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 03-03-2007 #5

VA Medical Malpractice Lawyer - Malpractice Cases for Veterans Against the VA - The Law Offices of W. Robb Graham, L.L.C. - Former Navy Judge Advocate

VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site

Bookmark this page:

Printer Friendly Page

MILWAUKEE OFFICIALS DROP PLANS FOR VA CENTER --

Say veterans' groups opposed their proposals.

Background here... http://www.vawatchdog.org/old%
20newsflashes%20JUL%2006/newsflash07-29-2006-4.htm

Story here... http://www.jsonline.com/
story/index.aspx?id=571325

Story below:

---------------

City officials drop plans for Zablocki VA center

Veterans groups opposed proposals

By TOM DAYKIN
tdaykin@journalsentinel.com



Mayor Tom Barrett's administration is dropping plans to create a high-tech business park and veterans housing at Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, with city officials saying Tuesday that opposition from veterans groups killed the proposal.

Barrett's proposal called for preservation of five historic buildings on the VA grounds that are either vacant or largely unused. The restored buildings would include Old Main, the original Soldiers Home that opened in 1869 atop a hill that now overlooks Miller Park. The Soldiers Home grounds, which include several 19th-century buildings, are adjacent to the modern medical center complex.

Under the city's plan, Old Main would be converted into apartments for elderly veterans. CommonBond Communities, a St. Paul, Minn., housing developer, would have created 57 assisted-living units, along with 17 apartments set aside for veterans with spinal cord injuries.

CommonBond planned to renovate another building into 62 apartments for veterans. A 14,000-square-foot building would have been used as offices for veterans groups. The chapel would have been restored for its original use, and the former Ward Memorial Theater would have housed America's Freedom Center Museum.

Barrett also wanted to develop an office park on 27.5 acres of vacant land east of the medical center, near Miller Park Way and W. National Ave. The office park would have targeted biomedical firms and other high-tech companies.

Some veterans, however, said the office park would interfere with efforts to expand Wood National Cemetery, a burial ground for veterans that borders the medical center and the Soldiers Home grounds.

Wood National Cemetery should be expanded on to that vacant land to provide more burial plots, said Joe Campbell, vice president of the Allied Veterans Council of Milwaukee County. Campbell said the city's plan for a columbarium, a building for interment of ashes of cremated vets, amounted to a "token" gesture.

Campbell said commercial development of the vacant land would intrude on the tranquility of the cemetery and Soldiers Home grounds.

Also, both Campbell and Terry Troutman, state adjutant of the Wisconsin American Legion, said the city's plan would have allowed non-veterans to live in the CommonBond apartments if there were open units and no veterans to fill them.

"This should be for veterans only," Campbell said.

The apartments, working with veterans groups, would have maintained an active waiting list of veterans, said Andrea Rowe Richards, Department of City Development spokeswoman.

Barrett said the city's proposal respected the cemetery, complemented the Zablocki center's mission and sought to create job opportunities at the business park.

But the opposition was too strong, Barrett said. Even when city officials changed plans to accommodate the concerns of veterans, including the housing plan, those efforts were "met with derision," he said.

The city plan, including the development of vacant land, became "a very, very emotional issue" for some veterans, said Rocky Marcoux, Barrett's development secretary.
Funds for improvements

The city wanted to lease the land and buildings from the Department of Veterans Affairs and spend $21 million on the improvements. That money would have been repaid through property taxes generated by some of the new developments. Additional funding would have come from CommonBond and private fund-raising efforts.

City and federal officials also said the development would have created new revenue for the Department of Veterans Affairs, allowing it to plow more money back into maintaining and preserving the 19th-century buildings.

Campbell said local, state and federal officials should work with veterans groups to create an alternate plan to preserve the buildings. He said possible uses could include a recreation center for Zablocki patients, housing for families of veterans receiving long-term care at the medical center, and a facility to help homeless veterans.

---------------

Larry Scott --

Don't forget to read all of today's VA News Flashes (click here)

Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

So, you've survived combat, now comes the hard part, surviving the VA!
The Nation's #1 Independent Veterans Web Site
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

VA NEWS FLASH from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 02-26-2007 #8




VA Medical Malpractice Lawyer - Malpractice Cases for Veterans Against the VA - The Law Offices of W. Robb Graham, L.L.C. - Former Navy Judge Advocate

VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site

PANEL SAYS MILITARY MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM FAILS --

American Psychological Association finds Iraq War

veterans and families are not getting needed help.




American Psychological Association



APA Press Release here...
http://www.apa.org/releases/military_health.html

Full APA report here...
http://www.apa.org/releases/MilitaryDeploymentTaskForceReport.pdf

Story here... http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/
2007/02/25/iraq/main2511948.shtml

Story below:

---------------

Panel: Military Mental Health System Fails

American Psychological Assoc. Finds Iraq War Veterans, Families Not Getting Needed Help



(AP) Many Iraq war soldiers, veterans and their families are not getting needed psychological help because a stressed military's mental health system is overwhelmed and understaffed, a task force of psychologists found.

The panel's 67-page report calls for the immediate strengthening of the military mental health system. It cites a 40 percent vacancy rate in active duty psychologists in the Army and Navy, resources diverted from family counselors and a weak transition for veterans leaving the military.

The findings were released Sunday by the American Psychological Association.

More than three out of 10 soldiers met the criteria for a "mental disorder," but far less than half of those in need sought help, the report found. Sometimes that is because of the stigma of having mental health problems, other times the help simply was not available, according to the task force. And there are special difficulties in getting help to National Guard and Reserve troops, who have been used heavily in Iraq, the report said.

The special task force found no evidence of a "well-coordinated or well-disseminated approach to providing behavioral health care to service members and their families."

The psychology task force, chaired by an active military psychologist and comprised of psychologists working for the military or Veterans Administration, said "relatively few high-quality" mental health programs exist in the military now.

"There are tremendous needs; the system is stressed by these needs," said pediatric psychologist Jeanne Hoffman, a task force member and a civilian pediatric psychologist at Tripler Army Medical Center in Honolulu.

The Defense Department's mental health experts had not read the report. Pentagon spokeswoman Cynthia Smith said the military is proud of its mental health services record, including a new program this year that checks up on service members after they return home to their families.

"For the past four years, DOD has been aggressively reaching out to support our military personnel before and after deployments. This is unprecedented," Smith said in an e-mail to The Associated Press. "We have assessed the health, including the mental health of more than 1 million service members before and after deployments. We have worked with their families and others to address mental health concerns associated with deployments and with war."

One of the major problems is that four out of 10 "active duty licensed clinical psychologist" slots in the Army and Navy are not filled, a problem worsened by the dire need to send mental health experts into war zones, the report said.

That high vacancy rate has several side effects. One is that the psychologists left are overwhelmed, the report said. It found that one-third of Army mental health personnel reported "high burn out" and 27 percent reported "low motivation for their work."

Because of the shortage, there are even fewer stateside therapists to help families of those deployed and to help returning soldiers readjust, the report found.

Hoffman, the pediatric psychologist, said she's seen children regress on toilet training, have severe headaches, stomach pains, and suffer in school because of the stress of having a parent deployed.

And for soldiers and veterans returning home, only 10 to 20 percent of the military's mental health experts are trained to help those with post-traumatic stress disorder, the report found.

"I know guys that are waiting for appointments," said Russell Terry, chief executive officer of the Iraq War Veterans Organization. "I know guys who are dealing with doctors who have no concept of PTSD."

Terry was on the phone with an Iraq war veteran last year when the vet killed himself.

Report co-chair Michelle Sherman, a psychologist at the Veterans Administration Medical Center in Oklahoma City, said the military and VA are "working very hard to meet the needs" of those returning from Iraq.

At VA headquarters, Antonette Zeiss, deputy chief consultant in the agency's office of mental health services, said the report "misses the mark by quite a way." She said her agency didn't have "an opportunity to present data (to the panel) about what the VA is really doing."

Sherman said the panel did seek data from the VA, but when asked if the agency provided information to the psychologists' panel, she said: "I'm not supposed to answer that question."

Zeiss said the VA has been increasing spending on mental health services yearly, opening new centers and hiring more psychological professionals.

"We have the strongest mental health system in the country and we are making it stronger," she said.

But veterans groups disagree.

"The system as it exists today ignores the readjustment needs specific to Iraq and Afghanistan service members," Veterans for America President Bobby Muller said in a statement. "We have to stop throwing money at a problem that requires a complete overhaul. The system is broken."

---------------

Larry Scott --

Don't forget to read all of today's VA News Flashes (click here)

Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

Scape-Goating is a clear indication of malfeasance! Make no mistake!
Army secretary quits in veterans scandal

By Steve Holland and Kristin Roberts 32 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Army Secretary Francis Harvey has resigned after reports that troops wounded in
Iraq and
Afghanistan were being poorly treated at the Army's top hospital, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Friday.

The resignation of Harvey, the top civilian at the
Pentagon overseeing the army, was announced a day after the head of the Walter Reed Medical Center hospital was fired. Gates said problems at the Washington hospital were due to leadership.

"I am disappointed that some in the Army have not adequately appreciated the seriousness of the situation pertaining to outpatient care at Walter Reed," Gates said.

"Some have shown too much defensiveness and have not shown enough focus on digging into and addressing the problems."

Gates said a new permanent chief of the medical center would be announced later on Friday.

The Bush administration has put Army surgeon-general Lt. Gen. Kevin Kiley, a former commander of Walter Reed, in temporary charge but that decision was criticized by some who noted Kiley had been accused of ignoring earlier complaints about outpatient care.

Problems at an adjunct building of Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington were brought to light by a Washington Post investigation published last month. It found that recuperating soldiers were living in a dilapidated building infested with mice, mold and cockroaches.

The Washington Post reports were particularly embarrassing because
President George W. Bush and defense officials have repeatedly visited the wounded in the hospital to show their concern for those who served in battle.

Bush, scrambling to respond to the outcry over shoddy health care and the complex bureaucracy facing U.S. soldiers, said he would name a bipartisan panel to review medical care for military veterans.

"This is unacceptable to me, it is unacceptable to our country and it's not going to continue," Bush said in his weekly radio address, taped on Friday and released ahead of its usual Saturday morning delivery.

Bush, who learned of the problems by reading the newspaper, said he was deeply troubled by the reports. He said while most of the people working at the hospital are dedicated professionals, "some of our troops at Walter Reed have experienced bureaucratic delays and living conditions that are less than they deserve."

Members of the presidential commission are to be announced in coming days and will be given a deadline to report back. They will conduct a comprehensive review of the care that the U.S. government is providing the wounded.

The White House said the bipartisan panel's review would be separate from a similar investigation ordered by the Pentagon.

More than 10,000 U.S. troops in the Iraq war and more than 600 involved in the Afghan conflict have been wounded so seriously they were unable to return to duty within 72 hours, according to Pentagon statistics.

(Additional reporting by Andrew Gray)

Even "Attempted Kidnapping" does not adaquately apply. Comprehension of her mental state is being disregarded as relevant!
Lovelorn astronaut won't face murder charge

By Barbara Liston 1 hour, 46 minutes ago

ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - Astronaut Lisa Nowak, who stunned colleagues by driving from Houston to Orlando in a diaper to confront a woman she thought was a love rival, was charged with attempted kidnapping but not with attempted murder on Friday, prosecutors said.

The former space shuttle crew member also was formally charged on Friday with battery and using a weapon to attempt a car break-in. She is accused of pepper spraying the girlfriend of fellow astronaut Bill Oefelien, the prosecutors in Orlando said in a news release.

Shortly after Nowak was arrested on February 6, police said she was trying to kill U.S. Air Force Capt. Colleen Shipman. The police then charged Nowak, 43, with attempted first-degree murder, which carried a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

But the murder accusation was dropped without explanation when prosecutors brought the formal charges almost a month later. The prosecutors declined to comment.

In February, Nowak's lawyer, Donald Lykkebak furiously accused police of adding the attempted murder charge at the last minute in order to delay Nowak's release on bail. Orlando Police Sgt. Barbara Jones denied that police tried to manipulate the system.

"The charges we brought forward, we believed the elements were there," Jones said. "We do the probable cause and they (prosecutors) have to decide the formal charges and what can they prove beyond a reasonable doubt and these are the charges."

Nowak, who has three children and recently separated from her husband, was freed on bail and allowed to return to her home in Houston. She was ordered to stay away from the Florida county where Shipman lives and was fitted with a global positioning device so authorities can track her movements.

Police said Nowak, a flight engineer who made her first trip into space in July to the
International Space Station aboard shuttle Discovery, sped the 950 miles from Houston to Orlando wearing diapers so she would not have to stop at a bathroom.

She disguised herself in a dark wig, glasses and trench coat to confront Shipman at Orlando International Airport but told police she "only wanted to scare" the woman into talking to her.

Nowak waited for Shipman's flight from Houston to arrive and then followed her to the parking garage armed with pepper spray, a steel mallet and a pellet gun, police said.

She also carried black gloves, a folding knife, rubber tubing and trash bags, they said.

Nowak tried to get into Shipman's car and sprayed the pepper spray through the window when Shipman refused to open the door, police said. Shipman alleged afterward in a court document that Nowak had been stalking her for nearly two months.

NASA placed Nowak on a 30-day leave of absence, which ends next week.

"There's no speculation beyond that," said James Hartsfield, a spokesman at the Johnson Space Center in Houston.

Nowak, who grew up in Rockville, Maryland, and attended the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, became an astronaut in 1996 and waited 10 years for her first space flight.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sounds a lot like Bush. It takes more brains than Bush has to do that!
U.S. Religious Leaders Urge Bush to Talk to Iran

Aaron Glantz, OneWorld US Thu Mar 1, 3:11 PM ET

SAN FRANCISCO, Mar 1 (OneWorld) - A delegation of U.S. religious leaders called Monday for Washington to negotiate with Tehran, following the delegation's landmark two-and-a-half-hour meeting with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The 13-person religious delegation was the first to meet with an Iranian President since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

''It was a very cordial meeting,'' said Reverend Shanta Premawardhana of the National Council of Churches, an ecumenical coalition that includes more than 100,000 local congregations and 45 million people in the United States.

''It was late in the evening. It started at 8:00 PM and lasted until about 10:30,'' he told OneWorld. ''[Ahmadinejad] seemed a little tired. He had been traveling a lot, but we were grateful that he gave us a full two and a half hours.''

Premawardhana said the Iranian president told the group of United Methodist, Episcopal, Baptist, Catholic, Evangelical, Quaker, and Mennonite leaders that
Iran has no intention to acquire or use nuclear weapons. Ahmadinejad also said the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can only be solved through political--not military--means.

Upon their return to the United States, the religious leaders called for direct face-to-face talks between the U.S. and Iranian governments and more people-to-people exchanges, including among religious leaders and members of the Iranian Parliament and U.S. Congress.

''The Iranian government has already built a bridge toward the American people by inviting our delegation to come to Iran,'' the religious leaders said in a statement. ''We ask the U.S. government to welcome a similar delegation of Iranian religious leaders to the United States.''

Joe Volk of the Quaker Friends Committee on National Legislation told OneWorld he found Ahmadinejad to be ''compelling'' in the argument that Iran's nuclear program was being developed for energy production rather than weaponry.

''He said 'Look at it practically,''' Volk quoted the Iranian president. '''Nuclear weapons didn't save the apartheid regime in South Africa, didn't save the Soviet Union, and why would it save us? Secondly, if we had nuclear weapons we'd be in a deterrence situation. It's not something we could use and if we did use them there'd be overwhelming force in the other direction. We really are not crazy. '''

On Sunday, while the religious delegation was on a plane back to the United States, Ahmadinejad gave a speech about his country's nuclear program.

"Enemies have no concern about enrichment in Iran,'' Ahmadinejad said, according to his country's state news agency. ''They are worried that they might yield to determination of the Islamic Revolution and lose their dignity through Iran's access to nuclear technology."

He added, "By the grace of God, enemies will be obliged to succumb to the Iranian nation's will. Enemies have pinned hope on certain individuals inside the country who chant for disdain and surrender.''

Reflecting on the speech, Joe Volk of the Quaker Friends Committee on National Legislation said, ''If you listen to the public rhetoric of the government of Iran and if you listen to the public rhetoric of the government of the United States you would say the gap between these two governments is so great that it simply cannot be overcome. But when you look at the national interests that the U.S. has stated and the national interests that Iran has stated, they're much closer together than the rhetoric would indicate. The differences are relatively small.''

Volk cited a proposal the Iranian government allegedly made to Washington through a Swiss ambassador in 2003. The proposal, according to former U.S. Congressional aid Trita Parsi, contained promises to disarm the Lebanese political and paramilitary organization Hezbollah and end support to other groups the Bush administration has put on its terrorist watch list including Hamas and Islamic Jihad. The Iranian proposal also supposedly agreed to recognize a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and promote peace in
Iraq.

The Bush administration did not respond to the proposal.

As predicted, a comitee will be appointed to investigate so the RIGHT assessment will come out?
Bush to form panel to review wounded soldiers' care

By Steve Holland 2 hours, 37 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Scrambling to answer an outcry over shoddy health care for U.S. soldiers wounded in
Iraq, the White House announced on Friday that
President George W. Bush will appoint a bipartisan commission to review health care for military veterans.

The announcement comes a day after the head of the U.S. Army's top hospital was fired after troops wounded in Iraq and
Afghanistan were found to be living in substandard conditions and struggling with a complex bureaucracy.

Problems at an adjunct building of Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington were brought to light by a Washington Post investigation published last month. It found that recuperating soldiers were living in a dilapidated building infested with mice, mold and cockroaches.

The administration also faces questions over a decision to put Army surgeon-general Lt. Gen. Kevin Kiley in temporary charge at Walter Reed. An ex-commander of the hospital, Kiley has been accused of ignoring complaints about outpatient care.

The Washington Post reports were particularly embarrassing because Bush has repeatedly visited the wounded in the hospital to show his concern for those who served in battle in Iraq and Afghanistan.

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said Bush would announce formation of the commission in his weekly radio address on Saturday. Members of the group will be named in coming days.

They will conduct a comprehensive review of the care that the U.S. government is providing the wounded.

"The review will examine their treatment from the time they leave the battlefield to their return to civilian life as veterans, so that we can assure that we're meeting their physical and mental health needs," Perino said.

WHY KILEY?

An Army statement on Thursday said Maj. Gen. George Weightman was removed from his job in charge of Walter Reed and that top
Pentagon officials had lost confidence in his ability to address solutions for soldier outpatient care.

But the Washington Post reported that Kiley, appointed to take temporary charge, heard years ago from a veterans advocate and a member of Congress that outpatient care at Walter Reed was squalid and disorganized but did little about it.

"Why is Gen. Kiley back in charge at Walter Reed?" the paper asked in an editorial on Friday.

Army spokesman Col. Dan Baggio noted Kiley's appointment was an interim measure and said he had extensive experience with the Army medical system, including running Walter Reed.

"From a very pragmatic standpoint, he's probably the most qualified person for the job," Baggio said.

The White House said the bipartisan panel's review would be separate from a similar investigation ordered by the Pentagon. The Pentagon is looking solely at Walter Reed while the White House panel will look at all veterans' hospitals.

More than 10,000 U.S. troops in the Iraq war and more than 600 involved in the Afghan conflict have been wounded so seriously they were not able to return to duty within 72 hours, according to Pentagon statistics.

(Additional reporting by Andrew Gray)

Was she or wasn't she...?
Fayed wins Diana legal challenge

By Paul Majendie 1 hour, 52 minutes ago

LONDON (Reuters) - The father of Princess Diana's lover won a significant legal battle on Friday when the High Court decided that the inquest into their deaths in a Paris car crash 10 years ago should be heard by a jury.

Mohamed al Fayed, who is convinced his son and Diana were murdered, had sought to overturn a ruling by Britain's former top woman judge Elizabeth Butler-Sloss to handle the official inquiries on her own.

Three senior judges ordered that the coroner hearing the inquest "shall do so sitting with a jury."

Speaking to reporters outside the court, Fayed said: "We want to be sure that the jury are an independent jury."

He said he hoped Diana's ex-husband Britain's
Prince Charles and ex-father-in-law the Duke of Edinburgh would be called as witnesses.

Appeal court judge Janet Smith, handing out the High Court ruling, said: "Mr Al Fayed has alleged that the Duke of Edinburgh and the Security Services conspired to kill the Princess and Dodi Al Fayed.

"The allegation must be inquired into," she said.

Diana, 36, Fayed's son Dodi, 42, and their chauffeur Henri Paul were killed when their Mercedes limousine smashed at high speed into a pillar in a Paris road tunnel as they sped away from the Ritz Hotel, pursued by paparazzi on motorbikes.

A three-year British police investigation ruled at the end of last year that the crash was an accident and not part of an elaborate murder plot as Fayed claims.

The British inquiry backed a French probe which concluded that the driver was to blame because he was drunk, under the influence of anti-depressants and driving too fast.

Diana's children, Princes William and Harry had expressed the hope that the long-awaited inquest would be "open, fair and transparent" and completed as fast as possible.

Hello Magazine's royal correspondent Judy Wade told Reuters: "This just prolongs the agony for William and Harry but Mohamed al Fayed is a grieving father who wants a small triumph like this which would help give him some closure."

Evening Standard royal reporter Robert Jobson said: "The princes wanted it to be cleared up as quickly as possible which it clearly won't be. But everybody wants it to be a transparent and fair hearing."

Under British law an inquest is needed to formally determine the cause of death when someone dies unnaturally.

"Let them die and be quick about it!" - Scrooge (paraphrase) in Dickens' "A Christmas Carrol"
Cairo Journal
In Mighty Arab Hub, the Poor Are Left to Their Fate
Shawn Baldwin for The New York Times

On a busy street in Cairo recently, three men discussed the sheep they had for sale. The city is a collection of poor villages often cut off from the law.

By MICHAEL SLACKMAN
Published: March 1, 2007

CAIRO, Feb. 23 — Ali Mezar has spent his life fishing a narrow, muddy patch of the Nile in this, one of the most crowded cities in the world. But Mr. Mezar has little contact with urban civilization. He sleeps in his boat, makes tea from the dirty Nile water and on good days earns a few dollars.

Shawn Baldwin for The New York Times

A fisherman at work on the Nile in Cairo. Men like him live by their wits and earn a few dollars on a good day. More Photos >

Not far away, on the shoulder of a busy avenue, Karim Sayed, 21, herds sheep and goats matted with urban filth. He spends his days staring into oncoming traffic, hoping to make a sale before the police move him or confiscate a sheep.

At the city’s edge, in a packed neighborhood built entirely by its residents, Mina Fathy and his neighbors fix sewerage, water and electricity problems on their own because they say the government offers them virtually no service in such functions.

Cairo is home to 15 million and often described as the center of the Arab world, an incubator of culture and ideas. But it is also a collection of villages, a ruralized metropolis where people live by their wits and devices, cut off from the authorities, the law and often each other.

That social reality does not just speak to the quality and style of life for millions of Egyptians. It also plays a role in the nation’s style of governance.

The fisherman on the Nile, the shepherd in the road and residents of so-called informal communities say their experiences navigating city life have taught them the same lessons: the government is not there to better their lives; advancement is based on connections and bribes; the central authority is at best a benign force to be avoided.

“Everything is from God,” said Mr. Mezar, the fisherman, who was speaking practically, not theologically. “There is no such thing as government. The government is one thing, and we are something else. What am I going to get from the government?”
Video
More Video >

Cairo has been the capital of Egypt for more than 1,000 years, and sits where the dry sands of the desert lead to the fertile Nile Delta. Egyptian officials like to say that this is where modern bureaucracy was invented, where the mechanics of governance first took shape.

While the Egyptian government is the country’s largest employer, it is by all accounts an utterly unreliable source of help for the average citizen. That combination, social scientists say, helps create a system that has stifled political opposition and allowed a small group to remain in power for decades.

One brick in the foundation of single-party rule has been public resignation. There is no widespread expectation that the authorities will give the common man a voice, and so there is rarely any outrage when they do not. The fisherman, the shepherd and Mr. Fathy all said that the most they could hope for from the government was that it stay out of their lives.

“We hope God keeps the municipality away from us,” Mr. Sayed said as he sat in a wooden chair, surveying his fetid flock of goats and sheep with headlights streaming by.

Such a feeling of separation is one reason that the leadership has been able to clamp down on opposition political activities without incurring widespread public wrath, political analysts say.

“People see the government as something quite foreign or removed from their lives,” said Diane Singerman, a professor in government at American University in Washington who has written extensively about Cairo. “Commuters to the city, or poor peddlers and working people, do not see the government as particularly interested in their lives, and they also see politics as quite elite and risky and something to stay away from.”

Officials say part of the disillusionment comes from unrealistic expectations, a holdover from the heady days of Gamal Abdel Nasser, Egypt’s leader from 1954 to 1970, when government jobs were deemed a right and cradle-to-grave care a promise.

Mr. Mezar and his cousin Muhammad Hassan fish the Nile just as their parents and their grandparents did, living in the bottom of their small wooden boats. Dark from the sun, hands callused from their oars, they are the image of Egypt, and they often smile and wave dutifully as tour boats motor up the river, with tourists snapping their pictures.

They dock their boats beneath a busy overpass, waking each morning at 6, filling their glasses with tea made from water scooped directly from the Nile. They worry that despite their fishing licenses, the police will demand their fish or write a ticket for some invented infraction.

* 1
* 2

Next Page >

Mona El-Naggar contributed reporting.

Besides the usual suspects, in whose interest is such a deal?
Bogus medicines flood developing world

By Mark Heinrich Wed Feb 28, 7:23 PM ET

VIENNA (Reuters) - Counterfeit medicines, some of them sold over the Internet, are swamping unregulated markets in developing nations with sometimes fatal results, the U.N. drug control watchdog said on Thursday.

Some 25 to 50 percent of the medicines used in developing countries were now believed to be fake, the International Narcotics Control Board said in its 2006 report, quoting
World Health Organization (WHO) findings. Providers ranged from makeshift village markets to Web sites.

"This market is believed to be increasing rapidly. (It) exposes patients to serious health risks by providing access to poorly or incorrectly labeled medicines that are ineffective, substandard and, in some cases, even lethal," it said.

The board spotlighted dangers inherent in graft-ridden, weakly-regulated markets, where bogus medicines had proliferated, and the widespread and growing misuse of prescription and weight-loss drugs.

The annual report also said Iranians had become the world's highest per capita abusers of opiates as they straddled export corridors from lawless
Afghanistan, source of more than 90 percent of the opium produced globally.

The Vienna-based board is an independent judicial body elected by
United Nations members to monitor the implementation of world drug control conventions.

Separately, the board denied accusations from rights groups that it was hampering efforts to prevent the spread of
AIDS. It said it supported exchanges of sterile syringes for drug addicts but not what it called poorly supervised "drug injection rooms" because these only encouraged trade in illegal narcotics.

INTERNET TRAFFICKING

In order to meet the growing demand for cheap medicines, drug traffickers have increasingly turned to the Internet, postal and courier services to distribute their ersatz wares.

"The abuse and trafficking of prescription drugs is set to exceed abuse of illicit drugs. Demand for these products is so high that it has given rise to a new problem -- counterfeit products ... Progress made over the last 40 years in the control of illicit drugs is now being undermined," the report said.

Board president Philip Emafo said governments needed to enforce existing laws and rethink how to tackle Web crime.

The report said the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime and WHO should help member states that have little financial means and are overwhelmed by traffickers able to evade or buy off poorly-paid and equipped police forces.

Emafo, a Nigerian, said
Iran had developed the highest rate of opiate abuse because it was the "unfortunate" first conduit point for opium pouring out of Afghanistan toward Europe.

"In the process of being trans-shipped, drugs are deposited along the route," he said. "It is possible that because of the Iranian government's enforcement activity, the drugs come in, but (some) are not able to go out."

Human rights groups have accused the board of promoting policies that ignore AIDS prevention and other public health issues, for example by discrediting programs such as the use of methadone for treating addicts.

"Safe-injection facilities ... around the world ... reduce practices leading to
HIV and hepatitis transmission, steer people to treatment for their addictions, and prevent death from drug overdose," said Joanne Csete, the director of Canada's HIV/AIDS Legal Network on Thursday.

Emafo said the criticism was "misplaced and wrong."

Kirk and Spock, the early years...
BBC News


Last Updated: Thursday, 1 March 2007, 09:29 GMT

Star Trek film gets release date.

JJ Abrams said. "The new film would "chart its own course"
The 11th Star Trek film, to be directed by Lost creator JJ Abrams, will be released in the US on Christmas Day 2008, Paramount Pictures has announced.

The film, which will focus on the early lives of Captain James T Kirk and Mr Spock, will begin shooting this autumn.

No further details have been announced and the movie has yet to be cast.

But Abrams - who directed the third Mission: Impossible film last year - said he wanted "to make a picture for life-long fans and the uninitiated".

"Needless to say I am honoured and excited to be part of this next chapter of Star Trek," he added.

'Brilliance and optimism'

The original Star Trek TV series, created by Gene Roddenberry, ran from 1966 to 1969.

It went on to spawn 10 feature films, numerous spin-offs and a billion-dollar industry of books, computer games and consumer products.


PREVIOUS TREK FILMS
The Motion Picture (1979)
The Wrath of Khan (1982)
The Search for Spock (1984)
The Voyage Home (1986)
The Final Frontier (1989)
The Undiscovered Country (1991)
Generations (1994)
First Contact (1996)
Insurrection (1998)
Nemesis (2002)

The last Trek film, Star Trek: Nemesis, was released in 2002 and featured the stars of the Next Generation TV series.

The most recent TV spin-off, Star Trek: Enterprise, came to an end in 2005.

The latest feature, which has yet to be named, will tell of Kirk and Spock's first meeting at Starfleet Academy and their first outer space mission.

Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci, who worked with Abrams on Mission: Impossible III, have written the screenplay.

"If there's something I'm dying to see, it's the brilliance and optimism of Roddenberry's world brought back to the big screen," said Abrams.

"Alex and Bob wrote an amazing script that embraces and respects Trek canon but charts its own course."

Paramount Pictures chairman and CEO Brad Grey said he "could not be more thrilled to be back in business with JJ Abrams".

As well as directing the film, Abrams will co-produce with Lost co-creator Damon Lindelof.

Watch! Labor is targeted for continuing disembowelment from the Right, yet they dote on O'Reily and Limbagh!
White House threatens to veto 9/11 bill

By Thomas Ferraro Wed Feb 28, 3:48 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate began debating legislation to bolster America's security on Wednesday with the White House threatening a veto because one part would extend union protection to 45,000 airport workers.

President George W. Bush's administration charged that the Democratic-backed provision to provide workers limited collective bargaining rights would curb needed flexibility at the U.S. Transportation Security Administration and diminish traveler safety.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman (news, bio, voting record), a Connecticut independent and a chief sponsor of the overall bill, disagreed. He said he would urge Bush to support the provision as a way to bolster spirits among a largely demoralized workforce.

Noting there has been a high rate of turnover and injuries among the U.S. agency's baggage screeners, Lieberman said: "When you give employees a right to join an employee organization you are likely to improve their morale."

Lieberman pointed out that most federal workers already have such rights. He also said the proposal would not allow screeners to strike and would still permit
TSA to assign them as needed in an emergency.

"We are going to make the case," Lieberman said.

The provision is an another effort by new Democratic-led Congress to advance a number of causes favored by the U.S. labor movement, such as raising the minimum wage and making it easier to unionize.

The overall bill would implement many of the stalled recommendations of the bipartisan commission created after the September 11 attacks.

The measure refines other recommendations and imposes new ones, such as the labor provision, and would let state and local governments share information with federal authorities, build better communication systems and provide grants to help high-risk areas prepare for disasters.

But White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said if the labor provision remains in the legislation, "the president's senior advisers would recommend he veto the bill."

Thirty-six Republican senators sent a letter to Bush on Tuesday saying they would provide the needed votes to sustain a veto in the 100-member Senate.

Taxes can support religious programs when Religious instituions can be taxed (both property and income)!
Bush's faith-based program debated in court

By James Vicini Wed Feb 28, 4:41 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The
U.S. Supreme Court debated on Wednesday whether taxpayers can contest the use of government funds for church-related activities, with examples about presidential travel to address religious groups and bagels served at prayer breakfasts.

The theoretical discussion came in a high-profile case related to the perennial issue of keeping faith out of state matters as mandated by the U.S. Constitution.

The administration was urging the top court to limit the right of taxpayers to sue over government funding of religious activities as a way to derail another larger question over whether
President George W. Bush's federal program to funnel federal dollars to religious groups is unconstitutional.

In considering the question, Justice
Antonin Scalia asked if a taxpayer could sue over a hypothetical trip by the president on Air Force One to speak to a religious group, with the U.S. government picking up the whole tab, including the cost of fuel and security guards.

"The whole trip is about religion," Scalia said during arguments in the case brought by a Wisconsin group called the Freedom from Religion Foundation and three of its members.

Chief Justice John Roberts made up his own example in questioning the attorney for a group that wants to proceed with its constitutional challenge to Bush's program to help religious groups get federal funds.

"I don't understand under your theory why any taxpayer couldn't sue our marshal for standing up and saying 'God save the United States and this honorable court.' Her salary comes from Congress," Roberts said.

Attorney Andrew Pincus replied that taxpayers could not sue in either example. He said the money must be essential or central to the violation of the separation of church and state.

He responded with his own example.

"If there's a prayer breakfast and the only (government) money that's spent is on the bagels, we don't believe the bagels are the basis for a taxpayer challenge to the prayer breakfast," he said.

In January 2001, soon after he became president, Bush issued an executive order creating the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives and similar centers in various federal agencies.

One of the goals Bush set was to help religious and community groups better compete for federal funds to fight poverty, substance abuse and other social problems.

The lawsuit said administration officials violated the Constitution by organizing national and regional conferences at which religious groups received favored treatment over secular groups.

The Supreme Court at this time will rule on when taxpayers can bring such challenges, not on whether the program itself violates church-state separation.

Bush administration lawyer Paul Clement argued that a 1968 Supreme Court precedent allows taxpayer challenges to congressional spending, but not to executive branch actions.

Justice
Anthony Kennedy, who often casts the decisive vote on the nine-member court closely divided between conservative and liberal factions, appeared sympathetic to the administration arguments.

"It seems to me unduly intrusive for the court to tell the president that (he) cannot talk to specific groups to see if they have certain talents that the government may use," Kennedy said. "We would be supervising the White House and what it can say, who it can talk to."

A decision in the case is expected by the end of June.

Whatever...one essential person Not present was Gerry Geen!
Crypt Held Bodies of Jesus and Family, Film Says
Ruby Washington/The New York Times

Boxes said to contain residue of the remains of Jesus and Mary Magdelene yesterday at a news conference in New York promoting a documentary.

By LAURIE GOODSTEIN
Published: February 27, 2007

A documentary by the Discovery Channel claims to provide evidence that a crypt unearthed 27 years ago in Jerusalem contained the bones of Jesus of Nazareth.
Skip to next paragraph
Related
"The Lost Tomb of Jesus" at the Discovery Channel
The Lede: Jesus Burial Site Claim Stirs Passions
Enlarge This Image
Discovery Channel

The ossuary filmmakers say is inscribed with "Jesus son of Joseph."

Moreover, it asserts that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene, that the couple had a son, named Judah, and that all three were buried together.

The claims were met with skepticism by several archaeologists and New Testament scholars, as well as outrage by some Christian leaders. The contention that Jesus was married, had a child and left behind his bones — suggesting he was not bodily resurrected — contradicts core Christian doctrine.

Two limestone boxes said to contain residue from the remains of Jesus and Mary Magdalene were unveiled yesterday at a news conference at the New York Public Library by the documentary’s producer, James Cameron, who made “Titanic” and “The Terminator.” His collaborators onstage included a journalist, a self-taught antiquities investigator, New Testament scholars, a statistician and an archaeologist. Several of them said they were excited by the findings but uncertain.

“I would like more information. I remain skeptical,” said the archaeologist, Shimon Gibson, a senior fellow at the W. F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in Jerusalem, in an interview after the news conference.

In recent years, audiences have demonstrated a voracious appetite for books, movies and magazines that reassess the life and times of Jesus, and there is already a book timed to coincide with this documentary, which will be on the air next Sunday.

“This is exploiting the whole trend that caught on with ‘The Da Vinci Code,’ ” said Lawrence E. Stager, the Dorot professor of archaeology of Israel at Harvard, in a telephone interview. “One of the problems is there are so many biblically illiterate people around the world that they don’t know what is real judicious assessment and what is what some of us in the field call ‘fantastic archaeology.’ ”

Professor Stager said he had not seen the film but was skeptical.

Mr. Cameron said he had been “trepidatious” about becoming involved in the project but got engaged out of “great passion for a good detective story,” not to offend and not to cash in.

“I think this is the biggest archaeological story of the century,” he said. “It’s absolutely not a publicity stunt. It’s part of a very well-considered plan to reveal this information to the world in a way that makes sense, with proper documentation.”

The documentary, “The Lost Tomb of Jesus,” revisits a site discovered by archaeologists from the Israel Antiquities Authority in the East Talpiyot neighborhood of Jerusalem in 1980, when the area was being excavated for a building.

Ten burial boxes, or ossuaries, were found in the tomb, and six of them had inscriptions. The Discovery Channel filmmakers say, and archaeologists interviewed concur, there is no possibility the inscriptions were forged, because they were catalogued at the time by archaeologists and kept in storage in the Israel Antiquities Authority.

The documentary’s case rests in large part on the interpretation of the inscriptions, which they say are Jesus, Mary, Mary Magdalene, Matthew, Joseph and Judah.

In the first century, these names were as common as Tom, Dick and Harry. But the filmmakers commissioned a statistician, Andrey Feuerverger, a professor at the University of Toronto, who calculated that the odds that all six names would appear together in one tomb are one in 600, calculated conservatively — or as much as one in one million.

One box is said to be inscribed “Yeshua bar Yosef,” in Aramaic, an ancient dialect of Hebrew that is translated as “Jesus son of Joseph.” The second box is inscribed “Maria,” in Hebrew. Maria is the Latin version of “Miriam” — a name so common in first century ancient Israel that it was given to about 25 percent of all Jewish women. But the mother of Jesus has always been known as “Maria” (which in English is “Mary”). The documentary says that while thousands of ossuaries have been discovered, only eight have had the inscription “Maria” spelled phonetically in Hebrew letters.

The third box is labeled “Matia,” Hebrew for Matthew, and the filmmakers cite a reference in the New Testament to buttress their claim that Mary had many Matthews in her family and it would make sense to find one in the family tomb.

* 1
* 2

Next Page >

Isabel Kershner contributed reporting from Jerusalem.
More Articles in National >
Need to know more? 50% off home delivery of The Times.

CHECK OUT THE NY TIMES WEBSITE FOR MORE!