ATTITUDE CHECK?!

See the H.B. Credits pages.
WARNING: We make every effort to be Un-Fair AND/OR Un-Balanced with our Comments in this Blog!

Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
« July 2007 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
The Weekly Roomer: Current Events II
Tuesday, 24 July 2007
Just as stupid as when Cereal Cpompanies caved to suits over "misleading" commercials about toys that can fly.

Discovery's "Wild" man not so brave: report

By Andrew Wallenstein Tue Jul 24, 12:35 AM ET

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Discovery Channel is re-evaluating one of its most popular series, "Man vs. Wild," after allegations surfaced that its survival-expert host was bunking in motels when he was supposed to be braving the great outdoors.

The network issued a statement Monday in response to an investigation launched by British television network Channel 4, which carries the program under the title "Born Survivor: Bear Grylls." Channel 4 confirmed that host Bear Grylls had partaken of indoor accommodations on at least two occasions when his series had depicted him spending the night in the wild.

"Discovery Communications has learned that isolated elements of the 'Man vs. Wild' show in some episodes were not natural to the environment, and that for health and safety concerns the crew and host received some survival assistance while in the field," the network said in a statement.

The production company behind the series, Diverse Television, is cooperating with the Channel 4 investigation, which likely will address a range of allegations that called into question "Wild's" authenticity.

In each episode of the series, Grylls is airlifted into the wilderness with only a few tools to aid in his survival, such as a flint or water bottle. A former British special forces soldier, Grylls is typically depicted as subsisting for several days without intervention or interruption while cameramen follow him offscreen. He has been stranded all over the globe, including Utah's Moab desert and the Costa Rican rain forest.

But among the charges made against Grylls is that a raft he is depicted as having built himself actually was constructed and then disassembled by consultants to the show in order for the host to put it together. In another episode, Grylls happens upon what are referred to as wild horses that were said to be brought in from a trekking station.

The brouhaha could become a PR nightmare for the channel, which in recent years has abandoned contrived unscripted formats in favor of the scientific explorations that first made the Discovery brand famous. "Wild" in particular has emerged as one of its main attractions during the past two seasons.

But the company gave no indication about parting ways with the series, only making certain unspecified alterations.

"Moving forward, the program will be 100% transparent and all elements of the filming will be explained upfront to our viewers," Discovery said. "In addition, shows that are to be repeated will be edited appropriately. Bear Grylls is a world-class adventurer and a terrific talent."

A spokeswoman for Discovery declined to elaborate on what exact measures will be taken to address the concerns raised about "Wild."

Among the likely possibilities: a disclaimer that will precede each episode explaining that some of the events being depicted are dramatized.

On July 13, Grylls spoke at the Television Critics Assn. summer press tour in Los Angeles about production of the series but gave little hint of any shenanigans behind the scenes. At one point, he described what it was like to bed down in the wild.

"Often at nighttime, they will get helicoptered out, and they might have to recharge camera batteries and hand in footage, and then they leave me a little minicamera for the night stuff, and they come and rejoin me in the morning," he said.

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 4:48 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Americans hate Congress, but trust it more than they do the smirking chimp...!

Poll: Americans trust Congress over Bush on Iraq

Mon Jul 23, 11:42 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Most Americans see President George W. Bush as too inflexible on the war in Iraq and prefer that the Democratic-run Congress have the final word on when to withdraw U.S. forces, a Washington Post/ABC News poll showed on Monday.

Nearly 80 percent of those polled said Bush is not willing enough to change policies over the unpopular war that has taken a huge toll on his approval ratings, the Post reported.

The poll was conducted last week, after Senate Democrats failed to advance a plan that would force Bush to withdraw U.S. combat troops from Iraq by April 2008.

More than six in 10 Americans -- 62 percent -- said Congress should have the final say on when to pull out U.S. forces, compared with 31 percent who said the decision should rest with Bush, the poll showed.

A narrow majority, 55 percent, said they supported the proposed pullout plan, which the Senate may not consider again until after its August recess.

The percentage of Americans seeing Bush as too rigid on Iraq has climbed 12 percentage points since December, the Post said.

It said Bush's approval rating of 33 percent matched his all-time low, with 65 percent disapproving. In previous Post/ABC polls, Bush was also at the 33 percent mark in May 2006 and January 2007.

Congress did not rate much better with a 37 percent approval and 60 percent disapproval rating, which the Post said was equal to dissatisfaction late last year when Republicans controlled Congress.

Other recent polls have shown Bush's approval rating below 30 percent and Congress even lower.

But on the issue of Iraq, the Post/ABC poll showed that the public stands with Congress.

Fifty-five percent said they trusted congressional Democrats on the war, compared with 32 percent who said they trusted Bush, the Post said.

The poll of 1,125 adults was conducted on July 18-21 and had a three-point margin of error.


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 4:37 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Impeach the assholes now!

Rights Groups Dismiss Bush's Rules for Secret Prisons

Aaron Glantz, OneWorld US Mon Jul 23, 6:18 PM ET

SAN FRANCISCO, Jul 23 (OneWorld) - Human rights organizations are reacting coldly to President George W. Bush's executive order forbidding the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from torturing, humiliating, or abusing detainees in its once-secret interrogation program.

"It's incredibly vague to the point of being useless as a way to stop torture," said Shayana Kadidal, an attorney at the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights, who represents detainees held at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Bush's five page executive order issued Friday bars CIA agents from acts of violence serious enough to be comparable to murder, torture, mutilation, and cruel or inhumane treatment.

It also bars willful or outrageous acts that any reasonable person would deem "to be beyond the bounds of human decency, such as sexual or sexually indecent acts undertaken for the purpose of humiliation, forcing the individual to perform sexual acts or to pose sexually, [and] threatening the individual with sexual mutilation."

But the order does not explicitly forbid sleep deprivation or mock drowning (often called waterboarding), leaving Kadidal to believe it was written "intentionally to give leeway" to agents and "provide them with a legal defense if charged with torture."

"We're not pleased with it at all," added John Sifton, senior researcher at New York-based Human Rights Watch, which believes the CIA program should be scrapped.

"The bigger issue is that this order continues to formalize a detention system that is outside the rule of law," he told OneWorld.

Detainees held by the CIA, he noted, "have no access to a lawyer, no family visits, and no oversight by the International Committee of the Red Cross. They're held indefinitely. It's an enforced disappearance of a person: a person is thrown into a black hole and no one knows where they are."

It's not known how many people have been arrested by the CIA and secretly detained at so-called "black sites" around the world.

After published newspaper reports appeared on the program last September, Bush confirmed its existence but would not disclose how many individuals were secretly detained.

Human rights organizations have been able to document some of the cases, however.

Last month, six major human rights groups -- Amnesty International, Cageprisoners, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice at NYU School of Law, Human Rights Watch, and Reprieve -- published a report called "Off the Record" identifying 39 individuals believed to have been held at some point by the United States in secret sites.

All but one remain missing.

Among those in the report is Ali Abdul-Hamid al-Fakhiri, a Libyan national who allegedly ran a training camp in Afghanistan from 1995 to 2000. After being apprehended by Pakistani authorities in November 2001, al-Fakhiri was turned over to the CIA in January 2002.

According to Human Rights Watch, the U.S. government moved al-Fakhiri from a U.S. base in Afghanistan to the U.S.S. Bataan to Egypt and then back to a secret U.S. detention facility in Afghanistan in 2003. Al-Fakhiri was reportedly transferred out of Afghanistan in late 2003 to a secret U.S. detention facility and then transferred to Libya in late 2005 or early 2006. On December 5, 2005, ABC News reported that he had been held in a secret U.S. detention facility in Poland.

"Al-Fakhiri is now reportedly held in isolation in Tripoli," the six-group report reads, "and is said to be suffering from tuberculosis and to be in very poor health. At least one U.S. official has acknowledged U.S. involvement in elements of al-Fakhiri's treatment, including questioning al-Fakhiri and transferring al-Fakhiri to a third country for interrogation.

"On July 19, 2006 his name was included in the 'Terrorists No Longer a Threat' List," the report continues. "No other information about al-Fakhiri's fate has been released by the U.S. government, and his whereabouts remain officially unexplained."

Human Rights Watch's Sifton believes the complex system of secret prisons abroad is unnecessary.

"We have a federal criminal code that dealt with the KKK and the Italian mafia," he said. "The federal courts are also more than able to deal with any of these alleged terrorists just like we indicted the people who carried out the 1998 Embassy bombings or the 1993 World Trade Center bombings."

Discuss/Share/Permalink


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 4:31 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Monday, 23 July 2007
Texas never has/never will, done a positive thing for the US! Give it back to Mexico! They still think capitalism is GOOD...

Texas turtles ending up in China soup pots

By Anna DriverSun Jul 22, 7:59 PM ET

HOUSTON (Reuters) - Growing up in East Texas, Dian Avriett loved to watch the turtles sunning on the banks of local rivers and lakes. But now she says it's rare to see them on those same waterways, and the reason is clear -- China's taste for Texas turtle meat.

Hundreds of thousands have been sold to dealers who ship the animals to Asia where the meat is considered a delicacy with health benefits. Some also fetch high prices around the world as pets.

"In Texas, anyone with a $50 dollar non-game permit can take as many (turtles) as they want," said Avriett, who chairs the Piney Woods group of the Sierra Club.

Global turtle populations are at risk, but conservationists said the problem is growing acute in Texas where there are no limits on the collection of unprotected varieties.

An average of 94,442 turtles per year are taken by dealers, mostly for export from the state, according to figures from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD).

Data from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service obtained under a Freedom of Information Act request showed more than 267,000 wild turtles were exported to Hong Kong fromDallas from 2002 to 2005, said Chris Jones, an environmental attorney who has lobbied for turtle protections.

Although there are no state-wide statistics showing declines in Texas turtle population, Jones said abundant anecdotal evidence exists. For example in one section of the Rio Grande river that had been a trap site, an adult turtle has not been seen in 10 years.

"They are taking them so fast the scientists can't study them," Jones said.

Now some varieties including the Texas river cooter could have some protection because the TPWD commissioners on May 24 approved a measure to prohibit the collection of wild turtles on public land.

But under that regulation, which is not yet on the books as law, collectors may harvest three varieties of turtles on private land; the red-eared slider, the common snapping turtle and five types of soft-shell turtles.

SLOW GOING

Turtles need protection from overharvesting because they are slow to mature and their young have a high mortality rate, said Lee Fitzgerald, an associate professor of herpetology at Texas A&M University who has published research on the Texas turtle trade.

"Their population can't take the removal of adults," said Fitzgerald. "If it continues, the population will collapse."

For example he said it takes a female box turtle 15 years to reach sexual maturity. Once at that stage she lays four or five eggs, and most of the hatchlings will not survive.

But Bob Popplewell, the state's largest exporter of live turtles to Asia, disagrees. He said there are plenty of turtles in Texas. And many are a nuisance to ranchers who say the turtles eat fish eggs and birds, and overcrowd their lakes and ponds, he said.

"People tell me they don't want one nasty, stinking turtle in their lake," said Popplewell, who is known as "Bayou Bob." "I've seen a decent-sized snapper pull down a full-grown goose. They are trained, stealthy predators."

Popplewell, who said he has received threats from animal rights activists, works with a network of hundreds of trappers across Texas who can earn up to $20 an hour for their work.

Once snared in net traps, the turtles are shipped to Asia by plane, he said.

The parties are divided over whether the state's proposed limits will protect the turtle population. Popplewell said 99 percent of the turtles his people harvest come from private lakes, so the changes will have little effect on his business.

Texas A&M's Fitzgerald described the protection measure as a step in the right direction, while conservationists say there should be a total ban on commercial turtle collection.


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 5:49 AM CDT
Updated: Monday, 23 July 2007 5:51 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 20 July 2007
from RAW:
    
Old-line Republican warns 'something's in the works' to trigger a police state
Muriel Kane
Published: Thursday July 19, 2007    
    
Print This  Email This    

Enjoy this story? Get headlines instantly with RSS.

Thom Hartmann began his program on Thursday by reading from a new Executive Order which allows the government to seize the assets of anyone who interferes with its Iraq policies.

He then introduced old-line conservative Paul Craig Roberts -- a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Reagan who has recently become known for his strong opposition to the Bush administration and the Iraq War -- by quoting the "strong words" which open Roberts' latest column: "Unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the US could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran."

"I don't actually think they're very strong," said Roberts of his words. "I get a lot of flak that they're understated and the situation is worse than I say. ... When Bush exercises this authority [under the new Executive Order] ... there's no check to it. It doesn't have to be ratified by Congress. The people who bear the brunt of these dictatorial police state actions have no recourse to the judiciary. So it really is a form of total, absolute, one-man rule. ... The American people don't really understand the danger that they face."

Roberts said that because of Bush's unpopularity, the Republicans face a total wipeout in 2008, and this may be why "the Democrats have not brought a halt to Bush's follies or the war, because they expect his unpopular policies to provide them with a landslide victory in next year's election."

However, Roberts emphasized, "the problem with this reasoning is that it assumes that Cheney and Rove and the Republicans are ignorant of these facts, or it assumes that they are content for the Republican Party to be destroyed after Bush has his fling." Roberts believes instead that Cheney and Rove intend to use a renewal of the War on Terror to rally the American people around the Republican Party. "Something's in the works," he said, adding that the Executive Orders need to create a police state are already in place.

"The administration figures themselves and prominent Republican propagandists ... are preparing us for another 9/11 event or series of events," Roberts continued. "Chertoff has predicted them. ... The National Intelligence Estimate is saying that al Qaeda has regrouped. ... You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda's not going to do it, it's going to be orchestrated. ... The Republicans are praying for another 9/11."

Hartmann asked what we as the people can do if impeachment isn't about to happen. "If enough people were suspicious and alert, it would be harder for the administration to get away with it," Roberts replied. However, he added, "I don't think these wake-up calls are likely to be effective," pointing out the dominance of the mainstream media.

"Americans think their danger is terrorists," said Roberts. "They don't understand the terrorists cannot take away habeas corpus, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution. ... The terrorists are not anything like the threat that we face to the Bill of Rights and the Constitution from our own government in the name of fighting terrorism. Americans just aren't able to perceive that."

Roberts pointed out that it's old-line Republicans like himself, former Reagan associate deputy attorney general Bruce Fein, and Pat Buchanan who are the diehards in warning of the danger. "It's so obvious to people like us who have long been associated in the corridors of power," he said. "There's no belief in the people or anything like that. They have agendas. The people are in the way. The Constitution is in the way. ... Americans need to comprehend and look at how ruthless Cheney is. ... A person like that would do anything."

Roberts final suggestion was that, in the absence of a massive popular outcry, "the only constraints on what's going to happen will come from the federal bureaucracy and perhaps the military. They may have had enough. They may not go along with it."

The full audio of Thom Hartmann's interview with Paul Craig Roberts can be found here.

Posted by hotelbravo.org at 10:59 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, 18 July 2007
Supreme Court majority are stooges... sieg heil!

Obama, Clinton slam court on abortion ruling

By John Whitesides, Political Correspondent Tue Jul 17, 9:15 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama criticized recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions as hypocritical and inconsistent on Tuesday, saying a ruling upholding a late-term abortion ban was part of a concerted effort to roll back women's rights.

ADVERTISEMENT
<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"> document.write('<a href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12gg32f78/M=346472.11001037.11581244.1442997/D=news/S=7666459:LREC/_ylt=ApJMORcfw7lZLLXlti7ukLAb.3QA/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1184780846/A=2700580/R=1/SIG=1327fh48g/*http://clk.atdmt.com/NFX/go/yhxxxnfx0020000323nfx/direct;wi.300;hi.250/01/&time=1184773646454553" target="_blank"><img src="http://view.atdmt.com/NFX/view/yhxxxnfx0020000323nfx/direct;wi.300;hi.250/01/&time=1184773646454553"/></a>'); </script><noscript><a href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12gg32f78/M=346472.11001037.11581244.1442997/D=news/S=7666459:LREC/_ylt=ApJMORcfw7lZLLXlti7ukLAb.3QA/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1184780846/A=2700580/R=2/SIG=1327fh48g/*http://clk.atdmt.com/NFX/go/yhxxxnfx0020000323nfx/direct;wi.300;hi.250/01/&time=1184773646454553" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://view.atdmt.com/NFX/view/yhxxxnfx0020000323nfx/direct;wi.300;hi.250/01/&time=1184773646454553" /></a></noscript>

Obama and Democratic White House rival Hillary Clinton, making separate appearances at a conference of abortion rights activists, pointed with pride to their Senate votes against the confirmation of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito.

The two leading Democrats in the 2008 presidential race courted women activists at the conference and said President George W. Bush was taking direct aim at overturning the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion.

Obama said the court's 5-4 rulings to uphold the late-term abortion ban, make it harder for women to sue over pay discrimination and strike down race-based school assignment programs were part an effort "to steadily roll back the hard-won rights of American women."

"There is an inconsistency, and I believe a hypocrisy, in terms of how we see these decisions being issued," the Illinois senator said of the Supreme Court.

"When the science is inconvenient, when the facts don't match up with the ideology, they are cast aside," he said.

Analysts say the top U.S. federal court, led by Roberts and with its newest member Alito, shifted sharply to the right in the last session. Clinton accused Bush of pursuing a conservative political agenda through judicial nominations.

"At the top of the list was this effort to try to overturn Roe vs Wade or at least try to chip away at it," Clinton said, adding the Bush administration has waged war against contraception education and "set out from Day One to dismantle reproduction rights around the world."

Also appearing at the conference sponsored by the action fund of Planned Parenthood, a leading provider of reproductive services including abortion, was Elizabeth Edwards, wife of Democratic presidential contender John Edwards.

Clinton, a New York senator, leads Democratic White House contenders six months before the first votes in the nominating race and 16 months before the November 2008 election. Polls show her with large leads among Democratic women voters.

Both she and Obama said they would take a different approach in their Supreme Court appointments than Bush.

"I would appoint well-qualified judges who really respect the Constitution," Clinton said.

Obama said he would look into the heart of a potential Supreme Court nominee. "We need somebody who's got the empathy to recognize what it's like to be a young teen-aged mom," he said.


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 10:51 AM CDT
Updated: Wednesday, 18 July 2007 10:58 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Egocentric Bush (Cheney?) thinks he must solve all problems in way of controling all oil...

U.N. leader tells Bush Iraq is the world's problem

Tue Jul 17, 5:59 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon lent support on Tuesday to President George W. Bush on Iraq, saying violence there was a problem for all countries.

As Bush hosted Ban at the White House, the U.N. chief also welcomed the president's plan to hold a high-level meeting on the Middle East peace process in the autumn.

"As for the Iraqi situation, this is the problem of the whole world," Ban said, promising U.N help with rebuilding Iraq politically, economically and socially.

On Monday, Ban warned against an "abrupt withdrawal" by U.S. forces from Iraq and said the international community should not abandon the Iraqi people, shocking some U.N. officials for inserting himself into the U.S. debate on the war.

The show of support comes as Bush faces the American public's growing frustration with the Iraq war and rising pressure even from within his own Republican Party for a U.S. pullout.

The two discussed climate change, said Ban, who invited Bush to participate in a conference on the environment that he has called for September, on the sidelines of the annual U.N. General Assembly.

Bush looks forward to attending the September 24 event, a White House spokesman said later.

Climate change is a contentious issue in the Bush administration, which has fought mandatory caps on the greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming.

Ban said he was encouraged by Bush's initiatives on climate change at last month's G8 summit, where world leaders agreed to pursue substantial cuts in greenhouse gases.


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 10:32 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, 17 July 2007
Now fire the real criminals who cut the budgets and reduced care in result!

Veterans Affairs secretary to step down

By Kristin Roberts Tue Jul 17, 4:34 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Veterans Affairs Secretary James Nicholson said on Tuesday he would step down, leaving an agency criticized for the care provided to veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.


Nicholson, whose resignation is effective no later than October 1, said he wanted to return to the private sector.

"This coming February, I turn 70 years old, and I feel it is time for me to get back into business, while I still can," he said in a prepared statement.

Nicholson was sworn in on February 1, 2005. He has also served in the Bush administration as U.S. ambassador to the Vatican and was a former chairman of the Republican National Committee.

The Veterans Affairs Department (VA) and Pentagon have faced increasing criticism this year for the quality and level of care received by veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

Reports have shown that the rise in post-traumatic stress and traumatic brain injury among returning troops has not been met with more resources to deal with mental health problems.

Some critics also say the Veterans Affairs Department is still unprepared and lacks the budget to care for a coming wave of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who will draw on veterans care benefits when they leave the military.

Also, during Nicholson's tenure, personal information on 26.5 million U.S. veterans was stolen from an agency employee who took the data home without authorization. That laptop was later recovered.

"It is clear that Secretary Nicholson is leaving the VA worse off than he found it," said Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, a Democrat running for president.

"He oversaw one of the most tumultuous periods in recent VA history, including billion-dollar budget shortfalls, ongoing cuts in services to certain groups of veterans, and the continuation of a dysfunctional bureaucracy that keeps many veterans from getting the disability benefits they deserve."

White House spokesman Tony Snow said Nicholson could have served longer had he wanted to.

"He certainly could have served longer if he had so desired," Snow said.

"There's no back story here. He called up, said he wanted to leave and move on, and the president accepted his resignation."

(Additional reporting by Tabassum Zakaria)


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 6:46 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Arnold unfocused?

Schwarzenegger accused of being MIA

With the budget and other big issues unresolved, lawmakers cite 'wanderlust' in saying the governor isn't engaged. An aide denies the claim.
By Evan Halper, LA Times Staff Writer
July 15, 2007

SACRAMENTO — The state budget is overdue. California's crisis-plagued prison system is on the brink of a federal takeover. The agency charged with putting tough new global warming regulations into effect is in turmoil.

Nonetheless, last week closed with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's attention thousands of miles east as he ventured to Florida for a turn before the cameras and a $25,000-per-table Republican party fundraiser.

To Capitol insiders, the trip was the latest troubling evidence that despite the many big issues before him, the governor's interest in the nuts and bolts of governing has ebbed. Splashy announcements remain his trademark, but after the cameras pack up, Schwarzenegger has often not followed through. As a result, key parts of his agenda are foundering.

The difficulties are most pronounced with the state budget, which was supposed to be signed by July 1. In moves that raised eyebrows in the Capitol, Schwarzenegger has left the state twice since the budget stalemate began late last month.

Travel is not the only problem. The governor waited until July 9 to bring the four legislative leaders into his office for a "Big 5" budget meeting — the forum he and other governors have used to keep negotiations moving. The leaders from both parties emerged to announce that little got done. No more meetings have taken place.

"We're all starting to say, 'Mr. Governor, phone home,' " said state Senate Majority Leader Gloria Romero (D-Los Angeles). "We've got a budget impasse. We need you to engage."

Republicans too are warning Schwarzenegger that his legacy is at stake.

"He clearly has a case of wanderlust," said Bill Whalen, a Republican political consultant. "While it is good and swell to go around the world and talk about global warming, being governor of California is very much a pothole job. It is about dealing with matters both large and small."

In Schwarzenegger's political career, glitz has often superseded potholes. He announced his candidacy on "The Tonight Show" and his recall events were tailored to swooning fans of his blockbuster movie persona.

Early on, the Legislature reacted with starry eyes as well. But now, as he closes in on the fourth anniversary of the recall, the novelty appears to have worn off. For adulation, he has had to turn elsewhere.

The contrast on global warming has been striking. Schwarzenegger has been celebrated on magazine covers and in national and international appearances for his call for aggressive action to curb global warming. But at home, with the governor largely unengaged, his own aides derailed efforts by the state Air Resources Board to push through global warming regulations.

The recently departed chairman of the air board, Robert F. Sawyer, learned he had been fired when Schwarzenegger's chief of staff handed him a curt letter signed by the governor. In his 18 months on the job, Sawyer said, Schwarzenegger had not met with him once.

The air board leader, according to state law, is the governor's "principal advisor" on "major policy and program matters on environmental protection."

Administration officials say Schwarzenegger is as involved as ever in the finer points of crafting policy. The trips and photo opportunities, they say, are crucial to maintaining public support for his plans.

"The governor is very engaged with every detail of his administration," Schwarzenegger communications director Adam Mendelsohn said. "He is a unique individual who loves to be out campaigning and talking to people and selling his agenda, while at the same time spending hours focusing on the minutiae of governing."

Mendelsohn argues that the meltdown at the air board was the result of regulators failing to follow through on the governor's instructions — ones conveyed by his advisors. When Schwarzenegger aides warned the board to go easier on industry, Mendelsohn said, the governor had signed off on the moves.

Mendelsohn also disputed charges that the governor's inaction was contributing to the budget stalemate. He said the Florida trip, which included an appearance at a global warming event and a fundraiser for the Florida Republican Party, would keep him out of the state less than 24 hours. He also said the governor has been meeting one on one with legislative leaders on the budget.

Others, however, say there is a clear perception in the Capitol that the governor is unfocused.

"It used to be that he was a lot more into arm-twisting and cajoling and cutting deals over cigars," said Barbara O'Connor, director of the Institute for the Study of Politics and the Media at Cal State Sacramento. "Now he's more interested in doing the global rhetorical visioning thing, which is a lot more fun. But he has some critical issues that require his presence. Not the least of which is the budget."

Her advice: "I would cancel everything, stay in town and put my shoulder to the wheel."



Single page
 
  1   2   >>   

Posted by hotelbravo.org at 7:58 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Arnold seeks the love and adoration of the selfish and stupid!

Gov. seeks to cut mental services for homeless

Schwarzenegger says ending the acclaimed program would save $55 million annually toward $3-billion budget gap.
By Lee Romney and Scott Gold, LA Times Staff Writers
July 14, 2007

A nationally lauded program that has helped thousands of mentally ill homeless men and women break the cycle of psychiatric hospitalization, jail time and street life is now on Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's list of budget cuts.

The governor has proposed eliminating Integrated Services for Homeless Adults With Serious Mental Illness, which receives $55 million annually, as part of his attempt to close a budget gap estimated at more than $3 billion.

Mental health advocates, clients and concerned legislators are lobbying fiercely to save the program, which served as the blueprint for California's ongoing efforts to radically retool the state's mental health system.

They have pledged to sue the administration if they fail, contending that the cut would violate the 2004 voter-approved Proposition 63, which aimed to remake the state's mental health system in the image of the homeless program's "whatever it takes" style of treatment, and prohibits the state from reducing mental health funding below its commitment at the time the measure passed.

Proposition 63 channels funds from a 1% income tax on Californians earning more than $1 million a year to mental health care and will ultimately bring billions of dollars into a starved system. But advocates fear that the gains will be neutralized if successful existing programs are cut with the other hand.

"If we don't succeed" in stopping the cut, "it sends a signal to the state government and county governments that they can do similar things," said state Sen. Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento), an author of the legislation that created the homeless program and Proposition 63.

If the program is eliminated in the coming days or weeks, as many as 4,700 men and women could face a return to homelessness, advocates say.

The proposed cut comes three years after Schwarzenegger praised the program in his budget for creating "significant savings at the local level." In the eight years since it was instituted, it has substantially reduced costly hospitalization and jail time for participants, while increasing the number of days they are able to work.

Among them are people like Karen Balsamico. For most of a decade, Balsamico bounced around the streets, homeless shelters and hospitals of San Rafael and San Francisco, tormented by schizophrenia and weakened by heart disease and diabetes.

In 2001, a caseworker plucked the quiet woman from a psychiatric emergency room and enrolled her in a state-funded program that is so successful it has been held up as a national model.

Today, Balsamico, 57, rents her own apartment and works at a food pantry. She has a caseworker, peer counselors and a web of other medical and psychiatric workers available to her at any time for emotional support, medication adjustments — or just about anything else.

"This program has given me confidence and stability," Balsamico said recently. Without it, "I'm afraid I could get lost in the crowd again."

In a form letter response to those who have flooded Schwarzenegger's office with pleas to save the program, the governor justified his proposed cut, saying that the homeless mentally ill program "was one of the few voluntary or non-mandated programs available for consideration for reduction."

Department of Finance spokesman H.D. Palmer said the governor has not made a final decision on eliminating the funding.

But Steinberg said he is hopeful that Democrats will refuse to approve a budget unless the funding is restored.

Proposition 63 included language that prohibited the state from cutting existing "funding levels for mental health services below current levels" as the new money poured in. It also forbade counties to use millionaire tax funds for existing programs.

The governor's office argues that halting the money for the homeless mentally ill program would not violate Proposition 63 because the state's overall dollar commitment to mental health programs has not decreased from 2004 levels. The state was required by the federal government to increase funding for a children's mental health Medi-Cal program in response to growing caseloads.

State officials have suggested that counties could "cushion the blow" of the cut — not by illegally restoring funds to the homeless mentally ill program with Proposition 63 money, but by using it to create comparable programs.

But Proposition 63 money can only be spent after lengthy community input, and current funds are already committed elsewhere. Advocates fear that any new program would come too late.

"You're dis-enrolling some people while reaching out to others," said Marin County mental health Director Bruce Gurganus, whose county would lose $1.4 million if the state program ended, leaving Balsamico and others in limbo and nearly wiping out gains from the $1.8 million in Proposition 63 funds Marin County has received in the last year. "Does that make any sense?"



Single page
 
  1   2   >>   



Posted by hotelbravo.org at 7:46 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post

 
Single page   Print   E-mail story     Normal Text SizeNormal Text Size Larger Text SizeLarger Text Size Largest Text SizeLargest Text Size Change text size
Books & Ideas

Harry Potter and the diminished returns

Surprisingly, the boy wizard's wild popularity hasn't been a big moneymaker for booksellers.
By Josh Getlin and Martha Groves, Times Staff Writers
July 16, 2007

NEW YORK — The numbers are staggering: More than 12 million copies of the final Harry Potter book have been printed and are ready for shipment. Booksellers expect 7 million copies to be sold in the first 24 hours. Even more copies are being rushed into print, even though the hotly awaited title will not be released until midnight Friday.

It should be a great moment for the publishing industry, which for years has been limping along with flat sales. But amid this avalanche of commerce and pre-publication hype, the book business is ruefully taking note of a startling incongruity: Very few U.S. booksellers will be making big money from "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows."

Indeed, as the competition heats up this week to lure customers, a price war has slashed the retail cost of J.K. Rowling's final installment by 40% to 50% at chains, big-box stores, and online retailers such as Amazon.com. They're selling the books for little more than they paid the publisher.

Call it Harry Potter and the Vanishing Profits.

"Virtually none of these sellers stand to make big money on a book that is likely to be the biggest-selling hardcover title this year," said Albert Greco, a publishing industry analyst and business professor at Fordham University. "The larger retailers are selling the books at pennies above cost, mainly because they don't want to lose an edge to others offering the same deal."

When it comes to bestselling books, retailers typically get discounts of up to 50% off the list price from publishers. But Jeff Bezos, Amazon.com's boss, bluntly warned shareholders last month that his company didn't expect to make a profit on the final Potter book. At Barnes & Noble, Kim Brown, vice president of merchandising, said the chain had to cut the price to be competitive.

Boon for book world

During the last 10 years, the Harry Potter phenomenon has sparked major changes in the book world: The series transformed young-adult fantasy fiction into a hot genre for adult readers too. It brought Hollywood-type sales figures into the publishing business and set off a stampede among hungry publishers to find the next Harry Potter bonanza.

As the final book's official July 21 release nears, the fifth Potter film, "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," took in $44.8 million in its U.S. box office debut Wednesday alone. It's one of those rare moments when an impending book appears to have ignited the market for a movie. With 121 million copies of the novels in print in the U.S., and 325 million worldwide, the audience is ready and waiting for any Potter product.

But among booksellers, the seven-part series, along with other blockbuster books, has fueled a heated competition to keep or increase their market share at a time when sales are steadily decreasing in bookstores.

The basic strategy for chains such as Barnes & Noble and Borders as well as online sellers is simple: They hope to attract more customers with lower prices. The chains in particular want to build loyalty by holding elaborate release-night parties, just like independent stores do.

"Our everyday best-seller list is 30% off, so this lower price is not all that drastic," Brown said.

But will the strategy work? Some call it a dangerous gamble, because the so-called halo effect, in which customers come for one book but buy other similar titles as well, has rarely materialized. "Harry Potter is a remarkable phenomenon," Greco said. "But he's a one-hit wonder."

Indeed, at big retailers like Target, Costco and Wal-Mart, the wizard from Hogwarts is just one more loss leader — a heavily discounted brand name that brings in people who also buy toothpaste and beach chairs.

In a cruel irony, these giant retailers have become a supplier of Harry Potter books for smaller, independent book shops, which in some cases get better deals from big-box stores than from regular distributors.

These independent stores, in fact, may be the biggest losers of all, because they operate on smaller economic margins and cannot afford to offer such deep discounts. In Southern California and across the nation, many are offering the book at or close to its full $34.99 price, hoping that the elaborate Harry Potter parties they throw on the night the book is released will attract large crowds of loyal customers.

At Village Books in Pacific Palisades, the owners will throw a release party on Friday night and offer a 20% discount on the book. Still, the shop stands to break even at best when all the excitement dies down.

"I don't think [the Harry Potter series] has been the profit center it could have been if the publishing world had tried to keep this a book for booksellers," said Katie O'Laughlin, the shop's owner. "That's a sad thing. This was the one time you had a book that people really wanted."

Tina Jordan, vice president of the Assn. of American Publishers, said discounting worked, because sales were higher during a Harry Potter year.

Veteran agent Jane Dystel said, "The excitement over a new release gives the business an uptick for two to three weeks."



Single page
 
  1   2   3   >>   

Posted by hotelbravo.org at 1:43 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 13 July 2007
Tax funded child abuse by Government, therefore by We The People!

Jr. ROTC Forces Districts To Abandon Local Control Of Curriculum and Staff

High School ROTC is a military program run by the military in public and private high schools. The military retains control of the curriculum and must approve any and all instructors. This completely violates the principle of local control. Some local officials may say differently, but they have no power to change the national regulations.

Because women make up only 13% of officer ranks and a lower percentage of NCO ranks, this pool, even before screening by the certification board, is disproportionately male. To create the final list, the certification board then screens out any gay/lesbian/bi or disabled potential applicants. This pre-approved hiring is a flagrant violation of non-discrimination codes.

Additionally, none of these retired officers have to have any educational training or academic teaching certification. The NCOs are not even required to have a college degree.

The military career academies cede even more control to the military. The final section of the regulations for Army Career Academies, states: "DoD retains coordinating authority for the overall Junior ROTC Career Academy Program, including the direction and control of the individual academies."

The Military Dictates the Curriculum

"... the governing authorities of this school agree as follows: a. To provide a course of military instruction prescribed by the Army..."

  • from Application and Contract: Establishment of a Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps Unit

"The complete course of JROTC/NDCC instruction at any school participating in these programs will be prescribed by DA (ed. note: Department of the Army) (para 5-2c). JROTC/NDCC units will not be established or maintained at schools that do not administer the prescribed course of instruction."

  • from AR 145-2 Section 5-12.a

"The School must enter into an agreement with CNET per Appendix 2, and agree to: a. Provide a program of instruction prescribed by CNET of either a 3-year, or 4-year course at secondary schools (9th-12th grades)." (In article 502.a CNET mandates 48 hours of Military drill per year).

  • from CNET 1553, article 202

The Military Must Approve All Instructors

"Only instructors authorized by this regulation will conduct JROTC/NDCC programs. ... Only instructors whose qualifications and subsequent performance are approved by the region commander will be authorized. Application by the individual or by the school for this approval will be considered to constitute a de facto agreement to the conditions prescribed in this regulation. Continued association with the JROTC/NDCC program is contingent upon the individual meeting these conditions." from AR 145-2, Section 6-3

"To employ a minimum per unit of one retired officer as the Naval Science Instructor (NSI) and one retired officer or enlisted person as the Associate Naval Science Instructor (ANSI) whose qualifications are approved by the Chief of Naval Education and Training to administer and instruct the NJROTC program of instruction." from CNET 1553, Appendix 2, section 2.b.

Schools Are bound by the Contract and the Regulations

"A school that desires to establish a JROTC unit must agree to the terms of the contract in appendix A (DA Form 3126, Application and Agreement for Establishment of a Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps Unit) and conditions prescribed by this regulation." from AR 145-2 Section 2-5

"The JROTC and NDCC are national programs authorized by laws enacted by Congress and conducted by the Department of the Army in cooperation with educational institutions." from AR 145-2 Section 1-2.

Unless otherwise stated, all quotations are from Army Regulation AR 145-2, or Chief of Naval Education and Training (CNET) Instruction 1533.9H, the federal regulations governing Army and Navy High School ROTC programs.

Before You Enlist 
 Military Out of Our Schools
Who We Are 
Donations
GI Rights Hotline  The Draft Publications Home 

Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors
info@objector.org

405 14th Street #205
Oakland, CA 94612
510-465-1617
Fax 510 465-2459
1515 Cherry St
Philadelphia, PA 19102
215-563-8787
Fax 215-567-2096

http://www.objector.org


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 3:10 PM CDT
Updated: Friday, 13 July 2007 3:12 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post

Dog finally off Wash. state voter rolls

Thu Jul 12, 12:26 AM ET

SEATTLE - Duncan M. McDonald is finally off the voter rolls after the Australian shepherd-terrier mix was sent absentee ballots for three elections.

ADVERTISEMENT
<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"> document.write('<a href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12h1kqa9g/M=346472.11001037.11581244.1442997/D=news/S=89014318:LREC/_ylt=Ang6fKnYqjcwR_yOeO4u1t4uQE4F/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1184360927/A=2700580/R=1/SIG=13285570k/*http://clk.atdmt.com/NFX/go/yhxxxnfx0020000323nfx/direct;wi.300;hi.250/01/&time=1184353727965882" target="_blank"><img src="http://view.atdmt.com/NFX/view/yhxxxnfx0020000323nfx/direct;wi.300;hi.250/01/&time=1184353727965882"/></a>'); </script><noscript><a href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12h1kqa9g/M=346472.11001037.11581244.1442997/D=news/S=89014318:LREC/_ylt=Ang6fKnYqjcwR_yOeO4u1t4uQE4F/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1184360927/A=2700580/R=2/SIG=13285570k/*http://clk.atdmt.com/NFX/go/yhxxxnfx0020000323nfx/direct;wi.300;hi.250/01/&time=1184353727965882" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://view.atdmt.com/NFX/view/yhxxxnfx0020000323nfx/direct;wi.300;hi.250/01/&time=1184353727965882" /></a></noscript>

King County Elections Director Sherril Huff said she canceled the voter registration Tuesday for the dog owned by Jane K. Balogh, 66, who registered her pet to protest a change in the law that she said made it too easy for non-citizens to cast ballots.

Balogh put her phone bill in the dog's name, then used that as identification when she mailed in the registration form in April 2006. In November, she wrote "VOID" across Duncan's ballot and returned it with an image of a paw print on the signature line.

She admitted the ruse when an election official called, but the dog was still sent absentee ballots for school bond elections in February and May.

"Quite frankly, the process did take too long, and it should have been addressed after the November election," said Bobbie Egan, an elections office spokeswoman.

County election procedures are being reviewed to provide speedier action against voting fraud, Egan said.

The removal came three weeks after Balogh was charged in King County Superior Court with making a false or misleading statement to a public servant, a misdemeanor. She pleaded not guilty to the charge in June.

A sheriff's investigator wrote that she admitted registering the dog under false pretenses "to make a point that anyone could vote, even an animal."

A preliminary court hearing was pending.


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 2:13 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Embarrassed Lawyer blames Borders for his own inadequate CRITICAL ability to explain CONTEXT.

Borders stores in UK shelve Tintin book

By RAPHAEL G. SATTER, Associated Press Writer Thu Jul 12, 9:16 PM ET

LONDON - Borders is removing "Tintin in the Congo" from the children's section of its British stores, after a customer complained the comic work was racist, the company said Thursday.

ADVERTISEMENT
<SCRIPT language='JavaScript1.1' src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N4518.Yahoo/B2369109;abr=!ie;sz=300x250;dcopt=rcl;click=http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12gjb2r2k/M=603041.11029072.11615089.1414694/D=news/S=8903512:LREC/_ylt=Ah_dlDMtph2LJkPHgdYFGMlY24cA/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1184358086/A=4722274/R=1/*;ord=1184350886599992?"></SCRIPT><NOSCRIPT><A href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12gjb2r2k/M=603041.11029072.11615089.1414694/D=news/S=8903512:LREC/_ylt=Ah_dlDMtph2LJkPHgdYFGMlY24cA/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1184358086/A=4722274/R=2/SIG=1389cdv6g/*http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/N4518.Yahoo/B2369109;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;ord=1184350886599992?"><IMG src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/N4518.Yahoo/B2369109;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;ord=1184350886599992?" BORDER=0 WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=250 ALT="Click Here"></A></NOSCRIPT>

David Enright, a London-based human-rights lawyer, was shopping at Borders with his family when he came upon the book, first published in 1931, and opened it to find what he characterized as racist abuse.

"The material suggests to (children) that Africans are subhuman, that they are imbeciles, that they're half savage," Enright said in a telephone interview.

"My black wife, who actually comes from Africa originally, is sitting there with my boys and I'm about to hand this book to them.... What message am I sending to them? That my wife is a monkey, that they are monkeys?"

The book is the second in a series of 23 tracing the adventures of Tintin, an intrepid reporter, and his dog, Snowy. The series has sold 220 million copies worldwide and been translated in 77 languages.

But "Tintin in the Congo" has been widely criticized as racist by fans and critics alike.

In it, Belgian cartoonist Georges Remi depicts the white hero's adventures in the Congo against the backdrop of an idiotic, chimpanzee-like native population that eventually comes to worship Tintin — and his dog — as gods.

Remi later said he was embarrassed by the book, and some editions have had the more objectionable content removed. When an unexpurgated edition was brought out in Britain in 2005, it came wrapped with a warning and was written with a forward explaining the work's colonial context.

Enright, who said he first complained to Borders and Britain's Commission for Racial Equality about a month ago, argued such a warning was not enough.

"Whether it's got a piece of flimsy paper around it or not, it's irrelevant, it's in the children's section," he said, adding that he felt the book should be treated like pornography or anti-Semitic literature and not displayed in mainstream bookstores at all.

Borders agreed to move the book to its adult graphic novels section, but said in a statement it would continue to sell it.

The Commission for Racial Equality backed Enright, saying in a statement Thursday that the book was full of "hideous racial prejudice."

"The only place that it might be acceptable for this to be displayed would be in a museum, with a big sign saying `old fashioned, racist claptrap.'"

 


Posted by hotelbravo.org at 1:28 PM CDT
Updated: Friday, 13 July 2007 1:53 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
"Sicko"
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/-Mq_17BtUJ4"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/-Mq_17BtUJ4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

Posted by hotelbravo.org at 6:42 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post

Newer | Latest | Older