Burbank, California; November 3, 2001; Joan Marques, MBA
(URL: https://www.angelfire.com/id/joanmarques/PR)
Introduction
There are many ways
to approach the subject of the influence of technology and communication on
leadership. Humphrey & Stokes (2000), for instance, state, that the 21st
century supervisor should be more acclimated to software programs and should
find new applications that can complete daily work routines faster and provide
more accurate information sooner (p.189). The variety of approaches toward
technology and communication as leadership tools becomes even broader given the
fact that leadership itself is not a fixed phenomenon but rather a dynamic
process that is dispersed throughout all segments of the society (Wren, 1995,
p.5). Leaders need to understand the connection between technology and
leadership; the capabilities of these technologies, and how they should be applied
to their organization (Kowalski & Campbell, 2000, p. 52).
In the past
twenty years the statement ?The World is becoming a global village? has gained
popularity through the increased effectiveness of technology and, as a partial
result of that, communication. A tremendous change in business philosophy has
manifested itself, due to the emergence of Information Technology. Myburg
(2000) states, ?IT has moved beyond data management within organizations and
now influences the way in which organizational communication takes place?
(p.4). In almost every organization, whether it is a Business Corporation,
educational institution, or non-profit foundation, email, newsgroups, the World
Wide Web and other technological facilities are part of the daily tools of
information exchange and networking. Myburg (2000) asserts, ?We are now
witnessing a profound change in the way in which organizations perceive,
understand, and manage their information. There is now clear recognition of the
value of information, the creation of new information, the retrieval of
existing information, the storage of important information, and the disposal of
redundant information. There is also greater awareness of the cost of not
getting the right information to the right person at the right time? (p.6).
Within companies
there are continuous technological developments focused on increasing
efficiency, profitability, and customer satisfaction. Management in these
companies mainly focuses on improving the communication within and outside the
organization through technological facilitation. Several companies experience
that ?by leveraging the power of the Internet, it has become possible to
realize the integration between the shop floor and supply chain?
(Abramic-Dilger, 2000, p.13). Quick responses seem to be the best way for these
companies to get ahead of competitors. The ones that can afford the investments
anticipate on every new technology that is introduced. One of these new gadgets
is called ?plant floor.com? (Abramic-Dilger, 2000) and was introduced by Sun
Microsystems Computer Co., who uses Java and Jini technologies to enhance
communication between the shop floor and the supply chain.
On a broader
scope, companies can interact more efficiently with suppliers and satellites in
other regions or even continents through aforementioned technological
communication tools like email, newsgroups and the Web. The now four-year-old
CU-SeeMe World software, for instance, enables people on different ends of the
globe to actually see each other while communicating. The main convenience with
this software is that ?through the cuseemeeworld.com Web site, people who have
paid $50 or $100 for a little camera to mount on top of their computer monitor
can set up video chat rooms ?on the
fly? ? (Howe, 2000, p.1). Even though it is understandable, like with every
other development, that there will be people who use this technology for less
noble reasons, CU-SeeMe World brings the great advantage of eradicating the
previous lack of visual contact between business partners at different
locations. Howe (2000) states that ?the new CU-SeeMe version is initially
designed to support three images at a time, but it can go up to 12 images at a
time or more or down to just one person for more face-to-face conversation?
(p.1). An increasing number of companies use this communication-facility as an
attractive cost- and time-saving alternative.
While the
CU-SeeMe video chatting system is still in a phase of being perfected with its
focus mainly based on visibility, other software developers are working on
eliminating keyboards as the interface to transmit messages to computers. Voice
recognition software will eliminate the use of keyboards over time. Roger
Matus, vice president of marketing for Dragon systems, a voice interface software
maker, explains, ?in 10 years it will be very rare that you?ll get a device
with a keyboard? (Zito, 2000, p.2). According to Matus keyboards will be
completely unknown in the next century. Still it has to be admitted that voice
recognition software only makes slow progress and is not yet as widely used, as
the developers would like. Unlike Cu-SeeMe, which is used by business people
and home PC-users alike, voice recognition software is currently mostly used in
large organizations, ?particularly those with busy customer service centers
where voice recognition helps them route calls? (Zito, 2000, p.1). Selected
groups such as medical and legal professionals and disabled people also prefer
voice recognition software for convenience. Some of the major problems that
voice recognition will have to overcome are the limited vocabulary of the
software and its lack of understanding accents. Nevertheless, it will be a
matter of time before a solution to those relatively futile shortcomings will
be found and every computer-user will be seen mumbling to his or her wireless
computer while driving from one destination to another.
Not too long ago
everybody would have brushed wireless computers off as ridicule, but with the
breakthrough of wireless connections in the past years, ?handhelds have become
wildly popular? (Adam, 2000, p.86). In
Adam?s article titled ?Internet everywhere? he cites Dave Oros, CEO of wireless
startup Aether Systems, who states that ?they used to say every home will have
a PC. I believe every pocket will have a handheld? (p.86). Even though
handhelds are still a little slower than desktops, their development and hence,
their speed-increase is picking up fast. The speed is currently already higher
in buildings than when walking on the streets or driving. Whether the
predictions in Adam?s article are accurate or just utopian is hard to tell. He
mentions the possibility of your handheld alerting you when you walk pass a
store that has one of the items on your to-do-list, merely by picking up
information from that particular store through the Internet. Adams illustrates
yet another revolutionary development in handhelds in the aforementioned
article by stating, ? as handheld devices evolve, users will be able to choose
their preferred way of getting this instantaneous information; they?ll decide,
for instance, whether they want to listen to information, read it or both?
(p.93).
The importance
of technology and communication as tools for human well being was recently
emphasized when Motorola presented a new message alert system to physicians and
hospitals shortly after President Clinton had mentioned that U.S. hospitals
needed to take steps to reduce medical errors. ?According to the Institute of
Medicine, medical errors kill more Americans than traffic accidents, breast
cancer or AIDS? (PR Newswire, 2000). In the same article Jim Hubbard, business
communicator of Motorola?s Healthcare Communications Solutions group explains
that ?inadequate communication technology is considered one of the factors
contributing to the medical errors problem? (p.1). Motorola?s new DocLink
system will reduce cycle- and response time between drug orders, deliveries,
and clinician availability.
With all these
dazzling developments going on, it needs to be clarified that there is a
significant threat that organizations, especially the ones operating in the
business environment, nowadays are so caught in the process of applying the
latest technology gadgets, thereby heavily investing in information technology,
that they sometimes forget to also focus on other important aspects in the
process. In his article ?Information technology and New Product Development;
Opportunities and Pitfalls?, Ozer (1999) explains that issues like ?up-front
market and technical assessment, having a sharp product definition, market
orientation, and implementing a complete new product development process
without any corner cutting? (p.8), sometimes suffer from the attention given to
innovative technology and communication. It is important for leaders and managers
to understand that ?because IT is relatively new to companies and individuals,
companies need to adopt a flexible strategy to adjust their systems based on
the unanticipated outcomes of IT? (p.7).
Of course there is always another side to the coin. When IT is not
implemented at all, companies, or even countries, will suffer tremendously. The
rapid changes in a rapidly changing world are not as easy to keep up with as
some may think. At a Singapore meeting in March 2000, professor Lester Thurow argued
that ?the key source of wealth creation for individuals and countries in the
New Economy is the possession and control of knowledge, and that the
acquisition of skills is the single most important requirement for individuals
to thrive in a knowledge-based world? (Tan, 2000, p.60). Thurow?s speech
included a comparison between countries that are holding on to natural
resources as a way to generate wealth, and countries that timely shifted to the
New Economy, in which they generate wealth ?through creating, possessing and
controlling knowledge? (Tan, p. 60). He strikingly illustrates the problem by
setting an example of a person, comfortably speeding along the Old Economy
road, only to find that there is now a ?new superhighway called the New
Economy? (p.61). The art will be to ?safely turn off from the Old Economy road?
(p.61) and drive up to the superhighway.
While in some regions of the world whole countries are still almost
IT-illiterate, others experience an increasing affection toward technology and
communication within their population. Even the older generation wants to enjoy
the advantage of computerized communication. In the United Kingdom the ?Silver
Surfers? are on the rise. Silver Surfers are the older generation people who
find that for too long they ?have been excluded from the routes to political
and social influence? (Papworth, 2000, p.8). Even if they do not have their own
computers, they demand to be transported to public libraries and local colleges
to get access to the Internet. Many websites have already started to anticipate
on the growing interest of seniors in the Internet. Throughout her article
?Silver Surfers ride: Growing numbers of older people in our society are
expanding their power and influence through the net?, Papworth (2000) mentions
the existence of sites like www.helptheaged.org.uk, www.ageconcern.org.uk, www.bbb.org.uk, www.arp.org.uk,
and several others that provide an abundance of useful information to
seniors.
Through all the aforementioned influences of the Internet on
organizations and people all over the world, American politics surprisingly seem
to have remained scot-free. Bruce Bimber, a Santa Barbara professor in
Technology, set up a research team to investigate on this issue. Bimber states
that nowadays ?more people have access to more information, more quickly and at
less cost than at any other time in history? (Lee, 2000, p. 12). Bimber formed
a team of instructors from all interests to talk about the impact of the
Internet on the American political system. Up till now the team does not think
that the Internet has changed or will change political outcomes, because
?people who are better informed are not necessarily more active politically?
(Lee, p.13).
What leaders should do
Today?s
leaders should become increasingly aware of the necessity of incorporating the
latest technological inventions within their organizational communication as an
efficiency measurement in the application of their leadership. This is made
clear by Humphrey & Stokes (2000) in their statement, ?the 21st
century supervisor will need to be more informed and better equipped to make
successful business decisions as well as to be able to develop people on the
front line of the workplace? (p.185). However, the importance of effective
communication driven by inventive technology is not just limited to functioning
within organizations, but also extends itself to regional and global levels. As
Coffman (2000) presents it, ?the competition we confront day in and day out is
literally world-class? (p.490).
Abramic-Dilger, H.
(2000). 'Dot-com' your plant floor. Business and Management Practices,
13 - 15.
Adam,
J. (2000). Internet everywhere. Technology Review., 86 - 93.
Anonymous.
(2000). Better Communication Technology Could Help Reduce Medical Errors. PR
Newswire.
Coffman, V. (2000).
Help wanted: "Busineers": Our ability to "out-invent" the
world. Vital Speeches of the Day, 66(16), 488-492.
Humphrey, B., &
Stokes, J. (2000). The 21st century supervisor. HR Magazine, 45(5),
185-192.
Howe,
P. (2000). New Technology from Cornell University, N.Y., Allows Visual
Communication. The Boston Globe.
Kowalski, R., & Campbell, M. (2000).
Leadership skills help financial managers achieve career success. Healthcare
Financial Management, 54(4), 50-52.
Lee,
D. (2000). Science Watch: Taking a broader look at Internet's influence. Science
Watch, 12.
Melymuka,
K. (2000). Born to lead projects. Computerworld, 34(13), 62-63.
Myburgh,
S. (2000). The convergence of information technology & information
management. Information Management Journal, 4-16.
Northouse, P. (2000). Leadership Defined. Leadership
Theory and Practice, (2), 3.
Ozer,
M. (1999). Information Technology and New Product Development; Opportunities
and Pitfalls. Industrial Mareketing Management, 29(5).
Papworth,
J. (2000). Silver Surfers Ride: Growing numbers of older people in our society
are expanding their power and influence on the net. The Guardian (London),
8.
Tan,
T. (2000). "Creative destruction" needed in New Economy. The
Strait Times (Singapore), 60.
Tapsell, S. (2000). Learning pays--so what? New
Zealand Management, 47(4), 30-32.
Wren,
T. (1995). The Leader's Companion. New York: The Free Press.
Zito, K. (2000). Voices of the
future. The San Francisco Chronicle.
Zubac,
A., & Dooley, J. (2000). Innovation: Positioning for the future. Australian
CPA, 70(3), 20-22.