| In Brief: Alerting Queensland Voters and their Parliamentary Representatives to Act Against The Constitution Bill 1998 which makes Vital Unlawful Changes. This Proposed Act has been prepared by the Legal, Constitutional and Administrative Review Committee (LCARC) to Supercede our original Constitution without first holding a Referendum. Web Release 13/5/99 |
| skip to Details of unauthorized changes and amendments needed |
| or Site Tour Complete. Click for Rona's Index » |
UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO QUEENSLAND CONSTITUTION
Exposed by Mrs. Rona Joyner,
E-mail: Mrs. Rona Joyner
| As President of | Qld. Festival of Light/Community Standards Organization |
| As Director of | Life & Liberty Literature Centre |
| As Coordinator for | Australians Loyal to Crown & Constitution |
Alerting Queensland Voters and their Parliamentary Representatives
to Act Against a New Bill Making Vital Unlawful Changes.
The Constitution Act 1998
This Proposed Act has been Prepared by the
Legal, Constitutional and Administrative Review Committee (LCARC)
to Supercede Our Original Constitution Without First Holding a Referendum.
For a full copy of Rona's Red Alert Report E-mail to:
Mrs. Rona Joyner
requesting AlterCon.txt (text format) or AlterCon.Doc (WORD6 format)
Page 1. Detailing unauthorized changes and the amendments needed
SECTION A. An Historical Overview - Political Vandalism Must be Rectified
A1. 1867 QUEENSLAND CONSTITUTION BEING REPLACED BY REPUBLICAN VERSION
A2. WHY ARE OUR STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BEING IGNORED BY POLITICIANS?
A2.(1) How can Parliament justify blatantly breaching Section 53 in 1985 and now again in 1998/9?
A2.(2) Why is LCARC perpetuating defects, and not restoring the people’s entrenched sections?
A2.(3) Why is Article 9 of the 1689 Bill of Rights to be “expressly incorporated” in the Constitution Bill.
A2.(4) How do LCARC members stand in the light of the Criminal Code Section 44 on Sedition?
A2.(5) Why were the terms of reference ignored to the extent that the Constitution was totally eroded?
A2.(6) As a Member of Parliament, is your allegiance to the Queen, or to the United Nations?SECTION B. Power Under Control (Monarchy) > Power Out of Control (Republic)
B1. PROPOSED CONSTITUTION ILLEGALLY GIVES GOVERNMENT UNFETTERED POWER
B2. GOVERNMENT FLOUTS LAW OF ALLEGIANCE TO GOD AND MONARCH
B3. OUR STATE CONSTITUTION PROVIDES FOR DELEGATED AUTHORITY (NOT POWER):SECTION C. Can Queensland Parliament Avoid Culpability?
C1. THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR MANIPULATING CHANGES TO STATE CONSTITUTION
C2. PARLIAMENT CANNOT ESCAPE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES
In 1977, Section 53 was inserted in the Queensland Constitution, specifically to require the prior consent of the people (by referendum) to changes to certain critical sections. However, unauthorized changes to those sections (without the required referendum) were made by the Australia Act in 1986.
The Report to Parliament by the Legal, Constitutional and Administrative Review Committee (LCARC) recommends a new Constitution embodying changes to these protected (entrenched) sections.
Entrenched Sections 11A, 11B, and 14 have been unlawfully altered by the invalid Australia Act so as to remove the Queen’s authority over the Governor and make the royal checks and balances ineffective against the excesses and lawlessness of government. These changes were made without the people’s consent under Sec.53.
Sections 11A, 11B and 14 must be amended by loyal Parliamentarians, to rid the Constitution of the evil effects of the unlawful passing of the invalid Australia Act 1986. The words that were unlawfully removed by that Act must be restored. Members who vote to retain the changes show they have divided loyalties. They will have broken their sworn Oath and defrauded the people of their rights, which is a crime that should be punished.
| Section 11A - |
defined the office of the “Queen’s representative” and forbade any “abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor” “except in accordance with section 53” [which requires a referendum.] NOTE: Section 11A (3)(a) had much of its distinctive Monarchical content omitted by Sec.13 of the First Schedule of the Australia Act to suit republicans. |
| Section 11B - |
defined the duty of the Governor to obey the Queen’s instructions expecially re “his powers” “of assenting to or dissenting from or for reserving for” Her Majesty’s pleasure Bills to be passed by the Legislative Assembly”. NOTE: Through the unlawful amendment of this Section 11B by Sec.13 of the First Schedule of the Australia Act, this section was grossly changed, so that now Governors are not to obey the instructions of the Queen to protect Her subjects from bad laws. |
| Section 14 - |
Governor’s power to appoint and dismiss certain officers [ministers] was “subject to 11B”. NOTE: Section 13 of the First Schedule of the Australia Act, again removes the Constitutional requirement for the Governors to obey the Queen whom they represent. |
The unlawful changes to Sections 11A, 11B and 14 must not be perpetuated by the LCARC Bill.
This Bill also unlawfully proposes to alter entrenched Sections 1, 2, 2A and 53 without authority from the people. It is obvious that these changes are to try to make it easier for Queensland to be changed to a republic.
Sections 1, 2, 2A and 53 must not be allowed to be changed. Those Parliamentarians who take their Oath of loyality seriously must reject these unlawful alterations, and retain for the people our entrenched sections - legally protected by Section.53 - that are being stolen from us by treacherous collusion.
Any attempt to alter the original Preamble must also be rejected. Parliamentarians are not above the Law.
| Section 1 - |
gave to the “Colony of Queensland” the means of independent self-government.
NOTE: “Colony” is being changed to “State”, and renumbered as Sec.3. |
| Section 2 - |
defined “Her Majesty’s” power to make laws “within” the said independent “Colony”. NOTE: Republican-friendly terms “State” and “Sovereign” are substituted for the protective Monarchical terms “Colony” and “Her Majesty” |
| Section 2A - |
defined “Parliament” as “the Queen and the Legislative Assembly”, and declared that Bills passed “shall be of no effect unless” “duly assented to by or in the name of the Queen”. NOTE: The republican-friendly term “Sovereign” is substituted for “Queen” |
| Section 53 - |
demands a referendum before the “abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor” or passing what “expressly or impliedly in any way affects any” entrenched sections, including “this sec. 53” NOTE: Without a referendum, this has been renumbered as Sec.71 and “Sovereign” substituted for “Queen”. It retains the necessity for a pproval by electors or an act is of no effect, but has not applied this to this proposed Constitution Bill. |