One World Government, or World Domination?

Currently the UN or United Nations is working towards the goal of a one world government. One essential part of this goal to disarm the peoples of all countries, so that the UN’s visions may be implemented. UN visions
1. To disarm all people whom are non law enforcement and military in nature.
2. To expand governmental control in the daily lives citizens
3. To create detailed files on each individual to include bar coded military id and drivers licenses
4. To locate all opposing forces to the UN’s ideals i.e. militias, patriots, and gun owners.
5. To allow each country no matter the size to have an equal vote in the UN council on worldly matters

These are currently the top 5 visions the UN has achieved is achieving or will achieve. Vision 1 is a top priority and the paperwork is top secret. However inside beauracratical sources have leaked this knowledge onto us. The summary is as follows. A government cannot coexist with persons whose ideals differ than the goals of the government when there is the threat of violence by those whom have the radical beliefs and is accompanied by weapons they are legally allowed to own. Therefore the disarming of all persons non military or law enforcement is essential to the continual goals of the UN to achieve world harmony. It is up to the individual country to disarm there citizens in a peaceful and acceptable manner.

The current US plan of attack. It is essential that militia groups, radicals and all domestic terrorism be controlled with in the US. Currently the US government is very worried about a future revolt against the government. The reasons are as follows. With in the US 1 percent of the population controls 40 percent of the wealth, this is referred to the dominant morality. This one percent is the power and represents the government. Next there is the rich the rich are just outside the center or dominant morality. Far away is the ever shrinking middle class which is the tax base, and finally on the very out skirts exists the poor. The police represent the dominant morality, that is they serve the "E" Economic part of society although they believe they serve the "S" the social part of society representing all that is just and fair. Depending on what class of society you represent you perceived the law and ultimately the government differently than others. If you are poor you perceived the police as controlling, intruding, and unjust representatives of a part of society that wants you contained within the confines of your own poor neighborhoods, you threaten the rich and dominant morality and you must be surpressed. If you are middle class then you fear becoming poor as taxes rise and the cost of living increases your salary’s do not and you are slowly slipping into poverty, thus your experiences with those whom are suppose to serve you are becoming negative and you resent being hassled by the law because they see you as a threat to the dominant morality. If you are rich you like the law they work for you, and protect you from the so called scum of the earth, you are referred to as sir or ma’am and when you call the police there response is swift and sure, for if they dare challenge you, you have the means to sue, and cost people there jobs. If you are the Dominant Morality then you own the police. They protect you, they work directly for you, and they keep the scum of society away from your neighborhoods and protect you from reality. You may say no one needs to own guns as life is easy going and care free, that big government is good and that the sooner guns are banned the sooner the threat will go away, the threat of someone else getting a chunk of the pie. Or opposing your ideals or beliefs.

It is OK for you to circumvent the law it is easily rationalized as you are the one in power and it is OK for you to do things others cannot after all you are not scum like the majority of Americans. It is OK for the government to swarm a compound or kill a mans family with out repercussion, it is OK to treat drugs as a crime worse than murder instead of a medical crisis. It is OK to spend tax payers money how you want, and to take money from social security and not pay it back. It is OK to give your self a 40 percent pay raise as you voted on it. It is OK to ban weapons and pass antiterrorism laws to monitor militia groups and so called radicals. Lastly it is OK to circumvent law as you are the law so it is justifiable and non punishable as you do things for the benefit of all Americans. This is how you may think if you are the dominant morality, now you can understand from there perspective why Americans should not be allowed to own guns. If people become so fed up with the beuracrcy and they slip into a poor class, then they have hit rock bottom. That is when government becomes there target and people unite to overthrow a monarchy of sorts, it is when the government calls out a military martial law only to find that polls show the military will not act against American citizens causing massive battles between the military itself. This then leads to bitter hatred by all Americans which is irreversible and the government is changed forever. However this cannot happen if laws seem innocently introduced to slowly widdle away gun owners rights, it starts with the disappearance of the carrying permit, then the registration of all firearms, then the ban on all assault weapons, then the confiscation of all assault weapons and pistols, and finally the disappearance of the shotgun, then the threat is gone. This is a sum of current upcoming policies and foreseen problems with the United States today, political analysts know this and this is why the disarming processes have started. This is why all veterans are considered a threat as well as militias, and gun owners, this is why someday in the future America will be at war with her self, the best country only lasts 200 years and our time is running out.

Back to the Conspiracies Page

Email: jazzgod1@yahoo.com