Wanted man,
companion killed in drive-by shooting
By
Jaime Hall
Police inspecting the vehicle that bore several bullet holes yesterday morning. (Cullen Bess Nelson pictures) |
Whyte and Lynch were both occupants of a motorcar proceeding west along New Road, Vreed-en-Hoop around 23:00 hours on Friday evening when gunmen in another
SHOT DEAD: Wanted man, Delroy Whyte. |
Police said the victims were attacked by gunmen from another car who were apparently tracing them. The gunmen opened rapid fire as they proceeded along New Road. This resulted in the driver of the car losing control of the vehicle which subsequently ran off the road
The vehicle in which wanted man Delroy Whyte, and Stacy Lynch were travelling. |
|
Whyte
and Lynch were both occupants of a motorcar proceeding west along New Road,
Vreed-en-Hoop around 23:00 hours on Friday evening when gunmen in another
vehicle opened fire on them.
Another
woman, who was also an occupant of the car, was up to yesterday in a critical
condition at the Georgetown Public Hospital.
Police
said the victims were attacked by gunmen from another car who were apparently
tracing them. The gunmen opened rapid fire as they proceeded along New Road.
This resulted in the driver of the car losing control of the vehicle which
subsequently ran off the road.
Lynch
was killed on the spot while Lynch, the driver of the car, later died of
gunshot wounds at the Georgetown Public Hospital. The car had several bullet
holes on its right side and both windscreens were shattered.
Glass from the shattered windscreen and blood on the back seat of the vehicle. |
Police
early yesterday morning removed the car from the scene of the shooting.
Several spent shells were recovered from the scene.
A West
Demerara man who lives in the vicinity where the shooting occurred said he was
in his bed when he heard a series of loud and rapid explosions.
He
thought it was "lightening and thunder". But after looking out from
his window, he saw a very bright beam of light shining towards his fence.
It was
that of the car in which the victims of the shooting were. The car had ended
up alongside a tree near the trench outside his fence. He said Police officers
who arrived at the scene shortly after the shooting, took an injured woman
from the car. They rushed her to the hospital.
Two
other persons, a man and woman who he said appeared to be dead, were also
taken away from the scene by the Police. He said the woman’s head was partly
blown off.
Commission
of Inquiry begins work
Invites
information from public
(GINA)
- THE Presidential Commission of Inquiry into allegations of Home Affairs
Minister Ronald Gajraj's involvement in extra-judicial killings has begun its
work and is inviting information from the public.
On May
14, President Bharrat Jagdeo, acting under Section 2 of the Commissions of
Inquiry Act, Chapter 19:03, appointed the three-man Commission - Chairman
Justice of Appeal Ian Chang, former Army Chief of Staff Major General Norman
McLean and former Chancellor of the Judiciary Keith Massiah - to conduct an
Inquiry under the Terms of Reference "Whether and to what extent there is
evidence of a credible nature to support the allegations that the Minister of
Home Affairs, Ronald Gajraj has been involved in promoting directing or
otherwise engaging in activities which have involved the extra judicial
killings of persons."
A notice
issued by the Commission invited the general public to "submit such
information as may be of assistance in their inquiry. Information relating to
the above shall be in writing which must bear the signature, full name and
address of the informant".
All statements or memoranda must be addressed to the: Secretary , Presidential Commission of Inquiry, Conference Room of the Law Library, Supreme Court Compound, South Road and King Street, Georgetown Demerara.
All
statements will be subject to the dictates of fairness, shall be treated in
the strictest confidence, the notice stated, adding that statements or
memoranda must be submitted on or before Monday, August 30, 2004.
Persons
who may be in need of assistance in the preparation of statements or memoranda
can receive such assistance from Counsel for the Commission or his Assistant
at the Law Library, Supreme Court Compound, South Road and King Street,
Georgetown, Demerara between 13:00 hours and 16:00 hours Monday to Friday.
Hearings
will be conducted in the Conference Room of the Library, Supreme Court
Compound, South Road and King Street, Georgetown Demerara and at other
locations in the Regions. Notice of other locations will be published in the
newspapers.
Hearings
will begin the earliest possible date after submissions would have closed.
"The
Commissioners may summon persons who have not submitted statements or
memoranda to attend and give evidence in the inquiry as they may deem
necessary, and such persons will be bound to attend and give evidence as fully
in all respects as witnesses are bound to obey subpoenas issued by the High
Court. The Commissioners may, in any case it considers appropriate take the
evidence or part of the evidence of any Witness in camera, "the Notice
indicated.
Also,
"Where the Commissioners perceive that a Witness or potential Witness is
in need of protection in the interest of his own security, the Commissioners
shall request the Commissioner of Police to offer and provide such
protection", the Notice signed by the Chairman of the Commission Ian
Chang stated.
We
publish below is an outline of the proposed procedure for conducting the
Presidential commission of inquiry as issued by the Commission.
`The
Commissioners shall conduct the Inquiry strictly within and in accordance with
the terms of reference.
The
Inquiry is inquisitorial and not adversarial. Therefore, the rules which
obtain in litigation with its adversarial type confrontations between
disputants do not apply. The Inquiry shall be conducted in the manner which,
in the opinion of the Commissioners, will best serve the task of reporting to
His Excellency, the President on the matters mentioned in the terms of
reference, subject to the provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, Cap.
19:03.
The
Commissioners may in any case it considers appropriate take the evidence or
part of the evidence of any Witness in camera.
The
Commissioners alone shall decide what witnesses will be called to give
evidence in the Inquiry and/or to produce documents, books, plans etc.
As a
matter of generality, the Commissioners' decision as to what witnesses to call
will be based on the relevance of the contents of written statements or
memoranda (and the need to avoid superfluity).
Persons
wishing to testify before the Commissioners will be required to submit in
advance written signed statements or memoranda containing the nature and
substance of their proposed evidence. Persons wishing to tender documents,
books, plans, etc will be required to submit copies of such documents, books,
plans etc, along with their written statements or memoranda. The address of
such persons must be stated in the statements or memoranda.
A
deadline date will be set for submission of statements or memoranda to the
Secretariat and will be published in advertisements in the newspapers in which
the public will be invited to submit their statements or memoranda before
testifying before the Commission.
The
Commissioners will consider all the statements or memoranda submitted on or
before the deadline date. The Commissioners are not obliged or bound to
consider but may consider statements or memoranda submitted after the deadline
date.
Without
prejudice to the statutory right of the Commissioners to summon any person to
attend and testify or produce documents, books, plans, etc., no person will be
allowed to testify before the Commissioners and/or to produce documents,
books, plans etc., unless his or her written and signed statement or
memorandum is made available to the Commissioners before he or she is allowed
to testify.
In view
of the subject matter of the Inquiry, the Honourable Minister of Home Affairs,
Mr. Ronald Gajraj to whom the Inquiry relates will be entitled under Section
13 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, Cap. 19:03 to be represented by Counsel
during the whole Inquiry. Legal representation to any other person or body
will not be permitted except with leave of the Commissioners.
Since
the Inquiry is inquisitorial and not adversarial, no one, except the
Commissioner, has a right to cross-examine any witness. Therefore,
cross-examination, if any by Counsel for the Commissioners or for any witness
or person, will be allowed only with leave of the Commissioners.
Cross-examination
of witnesses will be allowed only to the extent that the Commissioners think
it is helpful towards eliciting information on matters under investigations.
All
witnesses will be examined first by Counsel for the Commissioners and then
cross examined by Counsel for the Minister (with leave) and then re-examined
by Counsel for the Commissioners (if necessary). Without prejudice to the
right of the Commissioners to ask such questions of a witness at any stage of
his or her testimony, the Commissioners may then ask questions of the witness
and then further cross-examination and re-examination may be allowed.
Witnesses
have no right to silence and therefore cannot withhold evidence. However,
there is a statutory exception against self-incrimination. Section 12(3) of
the Commissions of Inquiry Act, Cap 19:03 provides that a person giving
evidence before the Commissioners shall not be compellable to criminate
himself or herself.
Since
there is no provision in the Act which precludes the use of evidence given in
the Inquiry in any future criminal or civil proceedings, the Commissioners
propose to inform all witness before the commencement of their testimony of
their statutory right not to give self-incriminating evidence. Witnesses will
also be so warned whenever the Commissioners perceive that an answer to any
question is likely to be self-incriminating. However, self-incriminating
evidence is receivable.
In so
far as the Commissioners see it necessary in the interest of fairness to do
so, the Commissioners will furnish to the Minister or his Counsel copies of
statements of witnesses which are not already in the possession of the
Minister or his Counsel before such witnesses are called upon to testify.'
.