Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

 

AIDS

 

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome AIDS is a destruction of the immune system resulting from infection with the human immunodeficiency virus HIV. With the loss of immune function a clinical syndrome (a group of various illnesses that together characterize a disease) occurs over time and results in death from opportunistic infections or cancers. In HIV-infected individuals there is a gradual loss of immune cells (called CD4 T-lymphocytes) and immune function so that the patient becomes vulnerable to pneumonia, fungal infections and other common ailments.

 

The mechanisms by which HIV causes immune deficiency are still not completely understood. It generally takes six to ten years from the point of infection to develop AIDS. In the early 1980’s deaths by opportunistic infections, previously observed mainly in transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, were recognized in otherwise healthy homosexual men. In 1983 Luc Montagnier and scientists at the Pasteur Institute in Paris isolated what appeared to be a new human retrovirus from the lymph node of a man at risk of developing AIDS. Nearly simultaneously, both Robert Gallo's group at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and a group headed by Jay Levy at University College San Francisco isolated a retrovirus from AIDS patients and from people with contact with AIDS patients. All three groups had isolated what is now known as HIV—the etiological agent of AIDS.

 

 

Detection and Diagnosis

With the identification of HIV in 1983 came the opportunity to develop a method of specific detection. Importantly in 1984 Robert Gallo's group at the NCI developed a method for continuous production of HIV, providing an abundant source of virus to use in the initial diagnostic test. These tests now have improved specificity. This means the proportion of disease-free people who react negatively to a test: the higher the specificity, the fewer the “false positives”. Improved specificity has been achieved through the use of recombinant DNA technology, and the tests detect if an individual has serum antibodies against HIV—an indication of exposure to the virus. An estimated 50 million blood samples are tested each year in the United States alone by blood banks, plasma centers, reference laboratories, private clinics, and health departments. Separate serological tests were developed to detect both HIV-1 and HIV-2, due to the major differences in the protein components of these two related viruses. As new strains of HIV are identified from around the world, they too will need to be evaluated for detection by these tests. There is a brief period (normally four to eight weeks) after exposure to HIV where an individual will remain negative on these serological detection tests because the immune response has not had enough time to make antibodies against HIV. During this period, other methods that detect some component of the virus itself (and not just antibodies against it) can determine if an individual is infected with HIV.

 

Being HIV infected does not necessarily imply that a person has AIDS, although “having AIDS” is often mistakenly used to mean “HIV-positive”. A person can remain HIV-positive for a long period—greater than 10 years—without developing the clinical illness that defines and constitutes a diagnosis of AIDS. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta established an authoritative definition for the diagnosis of AIDS: in an HIV-positive individual, the CD4 count must be below 200 cells per cu mm of blood, or there must be the clinical appearance of an initial AIDS-defining opportunistic infection, including Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), oral candidiasis (thrush), pulmonary tuberculosis or invasive cervical carcinoma. In Europe, HIV-positive people must have an AIDS-defining opportunistic illness to be diagnosed with AIDS; a CD4 count below 200 is not in itself grounds for the diagnosis of AIDS.

 

Nature of the Disease

 

Clinical Progression of AIDS

The progression from the point of HIV infection to the clinical diseases that define AIDS may take six to ten years or more. The progression to disease in HIV-infected individuals can be monitored using surrogate markers, laboratory data that correlate with disease progression or clinical endpoints, illnesses that are associated with more advanced disease. Surrogate markers for the various stages of HIV disease include the progressive loss of CD4 T-lymphocytes (CD4 T-cells), the major white blood cell lost due to HIV infection. In general, the lower the patient's CD4 T-cell count, the more advanced the immunosuppressed disease state. The amount of HIV circulating in the blood is a second surrogate marker. Using new sensitive detection techniques, the quantities of HIV in the blood correlate with the clinical stage of the disease and appear to predict the rate of disease progression and the response to antiviral therapy. An infected individual's immune response to the virus (the ability to produce antibodies against HIV proteins) can also be used to determine the progression of AIDS. However, this surrogate marker is less precise during more advanced AIDS due to the overall loss of immune function.

 

A well-recognized progression of disease occurs in HIV-infected individuals. Within one to three weeks after infection with HIV many individuals experience non-specific flu-like symptoms (fever, headache, skin rash, tender lymph nodes and malaise) lasting approximately one to two weeks. This phase termed acute retroviral syndrome is important because HIV reproduces itself to very high levels, circulates through the blood and establishes infections throughout the body, especially in the lymph nodes. Patients' CD4 cell counts fall briefly but return to near-normal levels as the immune system responds to the infection and limits HIV replication and spread.

 

Individuals then enter a prolonged asymptomatic phase that can last ten years or more. During this period, the infected individuals remain in good health, with levels of CD4 cells in the low-normal range (750-500 cells per cu mm). HIV continues to replicate during the asymptomatic phase, although maintained at low levels, to cause a progressive destruction of the immune system. Eventually, the immune system declines and patients enter the early symptomatic phase. This phase can last from only a few months to several years and is characterized by rapidly falling levels of CD4 cells (500-200 cells per cu mm) and non-life-threatening opportunistic infections. From this phase, patients undergo more extensive immune destruction and serious illness that characterize the late symptomatic phase. The late phase again can last from only a few months to years and patients may have CD4 cell levels below 200 along with other AIDS-defining opportunistic infections. A wasting syndrome of progressive weight loss and debilitating fatigue is observed in a large proportion of patients in this stage. The immune system is now in severe failure and patients eventually enter the advanced AIDS phase, where CD4 cell numbers are below 50 and death from severe life-threatening opportunistic infections and cancers is imminent, within one to two years.

 

Opportunistic Illnesses

Death from AIDS is generally not due to HIV infection itself, but due to opportunistic infections. These infections occur when the immune system can no longer provide protection against agents normally found in the environment. The appearance of any one of more than 20 different opportunistic infections, termed AIDS-defining illnesses, provides the clinical diagnosis of AIDS in HIV-infected individuals.

 

The most common opportunistic infection seen in AIDS is Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) caused by a fungus (P. carinii) that exists in the airways of all individuals. Bacterial pneumonia (due to several types of bacteria including Streptococcus and Haemophilus) and tuberculosis (TB: a bacterial respiratory infection caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis) are also commonly associated with AIDS. In late-stage AIDS, disseminated infection by Mycobacterium avium intracellulare complex (MAI or MAC) can cause fever, weight loss, anaemia, and diarrhoea. Additional bacterial infections of the gastrointestinal tract (from Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shigella or other bacteria) commonly cause diarrhoea, weight loss, anorexia and fever.

 

Besides PCP other fungal infections or mycoses are frequently observed in AIDS patients. Oral candidiasis is seen early in the symptomatic phase in a high proportion of patients. Other mycoses include infections with Cryptococcus species a major cause of meningitis in up to 13% of AIDS patients. Also disseminated histoplasmosis, due to Histoplasma capsulatum, affects up to 10% of AIDS patients causing general weight loss, fever and respiratory complications or severe central nervous system complications, including forms of dementia, if the infection reaches the brain.

Viral opportunistic infections, especially with members of the herpes virus family, are common in AIDS patients. One herpes family member, cytomegalovirus (CMV), infects the retina and can result in blindness. Another herpes virus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) may result in a cancerous transformation of blood cells. Also common are infections with herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2 that result in progressive oral, genital, and perianal lesions.

 

Many AIDS patients develop cancers the most common being Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) and B-cell lymphoma. KS (a cancer of blood vessels resulting in purple lesions on the skin that can spread to internal organs and cause death) occurs with unusually high frequency among HIV-positive homosexual men but is rare among other HIV-infected persons. This and other aspects of KS epidemiology suggested that a sexually transmitted agent might be involved and a link between a new herpes-like virus known as Kaposi's sarcoma associated herpes virus (KSHV) or human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8), and KS was recently described.

 

 

Cause of Aids

 

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)

The widely accepted etiological agent of AIDS is HIV, a human retrovirus. HIV is an enveloped virus, meaning that the viral genetic material is surrounded by a lipid membrane derived from the host cell. Into this lipid membrane, HIV inserts its envelope glycoprotein, called gp120, that specifically recognizes and binds to the CD4 molecule (a cell surface protein important for normal immune interactions) on human cells. The gp120-CD4 interaction allows HIV to fuse with and infect those cells, eventually leading to viral replication and death of the host cell.

 

Any human cell that expresses the surface CD4 molecule is a potential target for HIV infection. However, it is the specific class of human white blood cells, called helper T-lymphocytes, that are most affected during AIDS because these cells express high levels of the CD4 molecule; they are therefore referred to as “CD4 T-cells”. HIV replication in CD4 T-cells can directly kill them or they may be killed or rendered dysfunctional by indirect means without ever being infected with HIV. CD4 T-cells are critical in the normal immune system because they help other types of immune cells respond to invading organisms. Therefore, as CD4 T-cells are specifically targeted and lost during HIV infection (a hallmark feature of AIDS), no help is available for immune responses. General immune system failure occurs and permits the opportunistic infections and cancers that characterize the clinical picture of AIDS.

 

While it is generally agreed that HIV is the virus that causes AIDS and HIV replication can directly kill CD4 T-cells, the large variation among patients in the time of progression to AIDS has led to speculation that other factors can influence the course of disease. The exact nature of these factors remains uncertain; possible candidates include herpes virus infections, genetic factors, and the nature of the infected person's immune response to HIV. However, it is very clear that HIV must be present for the development of AIDS.

 

Modes of Transmission

HIV is spread by either homosexual or heterosexual contact with an infected person and this route represents the majority of transmissions. Present in the sexual secretions of both men and women, HIV gains access to the bloodstream of the uninfected partner by infecting cells in mucous membranes or via small abrasions that occur as a consequence of intercourse. HIV is also spread by sharing needles or syringes, most commonly done by those using intravenous (IV) drugs, that results in a direct exposure to the blood from an infected individual. HIV transmission through medical transfusions or blood-clotting factors is now very rare (less than 1 in 100,000) because of extensive screening of the blood supply. HIV can also be transmitted from an infected mother (either before giving birth, or through breastfeeding), but only about 30% of babies born to HIV-infected mothers actually become infected.

 

Although these routes of HIV transmission are well established, public fear still exists concerning the potential for transmission by other means. There is no evidence that HIV can be transmitted through the air or by biting insects. If this were the case, the pattern of HIV infections would be dramatically different from what has been observed and cases of AIDS would be reported more frequently in individuals with no identifiable risk for infection (now only a very small percentage of reported cases).

 

Although HIV is a very fragile virus and does not survive well when exposed to the environment, fear also exists for HIV transmission by casual contact in a household, school, workplace, or food-service setting. No documented cases of HIV transmission by casual contact with, or even kissing an infected individual have been identified. However, practices that increase the likelihood of blood contact, such as sharing toothbrushes or razors, should be avoided.

 

Public fear has also persisted for HIV transmission from infected health care workers, because of a single case of transmission from a dentist to several patients. This now appears to be an extremely rare and isolated case of transmission and, in general, infected health care workers pose no risk to their patients. There is no risk of HIV transmission while donating blood.

Occurrence

 

In 1995 HIV was estimated to infect almost 20 million people worldwide with the cumulative estimate of AIDS cases being several million. The epidemiology (incidence and distribution) of AIDS is an evolving picture. Initially in the United States HIV infection was mainly concentrated in the homosexual community, where widespread transmission occurred because of unprotected anal intercourse and in hemophiliacs and people receiving other blood products. HIV infection became established among IV drug users, among whom were prostitutes who spread it by heterosexual contact into all groups of society through high-risk sexual practices.

Currently, homosexual behavior and IV drug use account for about 50 and 25% of transmissions, respectively. Heterosexual spread in the United States, especially male to female, is continuing an alarming increase and now contributes to 10% of the cases. Thanks to effective screening, HIV transmission by blood products is now relatively rare, constituting 1% of cases.

 

By December 1995, 11,872 cases of AIDS had been registered in Britain, of whom 8,200 (69%) had died. New cases of AIDS among homosexual men are leveling out, while there has been an increase in cases of heterosexually spread infection. Over 25,600 cases of HIV infection had been reported, of which 15% were among women. Of the over 500,000 accumulative AIDS cases in the United States, 88% are males, 12% are females. In 1992, AIDS became the leading cause of death in men aged 25 to 44 years, the fourth leading cause of death among women in that same age group, and the eighth leading cause of death overall in the United States.

 

On a global scale, the AIDS epidemic continues a frightful expansion. Although Africa represents less than 10% of the world's population, the continent now contains more than 60% of HIV infections among adults (North America and South America combined account for less than 20% of the adult HIV infections). More than 90% of HIV infection in Africa is thought to be due to heterosexual transmission. AIDS in western Africa is also caused by HIV-2, a closely related “cousin” of HIV-1 (the major AIDS virus in Europe, the United States and central Africa). An AIDS epidemic is also emerging in Asia, where new HIV infections increased by 100 per cent in the past three years, and estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO) indicate that AIDS in Asia will cause unprecedented rates of infection and death.

 

Other distantly related strains of HIV-1 have been identified in various geographical areas of the world. Although some strains cannot be detected using the current blood-screening methods, there is thought to be little risk of spread across continents because of the geographical isolation of the viruses. Even with HIV-2, spread outside of Africa is rare.

 

Treatment

Although never considered to be a cure for HIV infection, the hope was that drugs would have a significant impact on the progression of AIDS. They were initially used one at a time in sequence, but their effects were disappointingly short-lived. Greater success has been achieved by using them in combination regimens, which can significantly delay the onset of opportunistic infections and prolong life. Nevertheless, they can cause a relatively high rate of side-effects.

 

Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

The development of antiviral drugs to attack HIV has targeted specific stages in the viral replication cycle. One such target is the requirement for HIV to undergo reverse transcription (the conversion of viral genomic RNA into DNA—See Nucleic Acids) at an early stage of infecting a host cell; this is a process unique to retroviruses and performed by the viral enzyme, reverse transcriptase (RT).

The first anti-HIV drugs to be developed were all RT inhibitors. At present, five RT inhibitors have been licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): zidovudine (also known as AZT and made by Glaxo Wellcome with the brand name Retrovir), didanosine (ddI or Videx, from Bristol-Myers Squibb), zalcitabine (ddC or HIVID from Roche), stavudine (d4T or Zerit from Bristol-Myers Squibb), and 3TC (Epivir from Glaxo Wellcome). In Britain, AZT, ddl, and ddC have been fully approved by the Medicines Control Agency (MCA). Stavudine and 3TC have been recommended for approval by late 1996 by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA). All the drugs are nucleoside analogues that work as “DNA chain terminators”. That is, because each appears to be a normal nucleotide base (the building blocks of DNA), the RT enzyme mistakenly inserts the drug into the growing viral DNA chain. However, unlike normal nucleotide bases, the drugs cannot be further elongated (no additional DNA bases can be added once the drug is inserted) and therefore viral DNA synthesis is “terminated”.

 

Protease Inhibitors

More recently, a new class of anti-HIV agents has been developed which specifically interferes with the action of the HIV protease enzyme. Protease is employed at a later stage of the viral replication cycle, when new virus particles are being produced within an HIV-infected cell. The protein from which the core and envelope of the new particles will be formed is initially synthesized in a long strip, which has to be cut up by protease into smaller functional proteins. When the protease enzyme is inhibited, an HIV-infected cell can only produce immature, non-infectious viral progeny. In the United States, three protease inhibitors are licensed by the FDA: saquinavir (Invirase, from Roche), indinavir (Crixivan, from Merck Sharp & Dohme), and ritonavir (Norvir, from Abbott). Ritonavir will be licensed by the EMEA. Others are yet to be approved in the United Kingdom but are available in named-patient schemes in the United Kingdom. A fourth, nelfinavir (Viracept, from Agouron), is in advanced stages of development.

 

One problem with all anti-HIV drugs produced to date is the development of viral resistance. HIV's replication process is relatively imprecise, resulting in the steady production of mutant variants of the virus, some of which are resistant to the effects of specific anti-HIV agents. The selective pressure exerted by treatment drugs means that within treated people these drug-resistant strains have a survival advantage over “wild-type” drug-sensitive strains. The constant high rate of HIV replication allows resistant strains to become dominant within a matter of weeks.

 

Clinicians are still developing experience in the optimum use of anti-HIV drugs. Extremely pronounced anti-HIV effects have been seen from the use of two nucleoside analogues and a protease inhibitor in combination therapy regimens. Researchers believe that a regimen that can rapidly suppress viral replication to very low levels should also minimize the chances of drug-resistant HIV mutants emerging.

Other anti-HIV drugs currently in development include agents that inhibit HIV's integrase enzyme, used to insert the viral DNA into the host cell's DNA after reverse transcription has been completed. Some therapeutic consideration has also been given to targeting cellular processes that are strictly required for viral replication. Inhibiting these processes should not incur a risk of viral resistance because the selective pressure will not be directed at the virus itself, although toxicity is a concern. Several drugs have shown preliminary promise, most notably hydroxyurea.

 

Gene Therapy

Gene therapy is also being studied as a potential treatment for HIV-infected persons. One approach uses small molecules called anti-sense oligonucleotides which bind to the viral RNA strand, preventing it from acting as a template for viral proteins. Another anti-viral strategy uses molecules called ribozymes that can detect specific parts of HIV's RNA within infected cells and splice it, rendering it inactive. Other researchers are using gene therapy to insert a gene into immune cells taken from infected people, either to boost the cellular immune response against HIV or to protect the CD4 cells from infection. This is called adoptive cell therapy. The main problems with all these gene therapy approaches are delivering the new genes into cells, and ensuring that the altered cells are not identified as “foreign” and attacked by the host immune system.

 

Immune System Responses

Considerable research is continuing into the basic biology of HIV and its interactions with the immune system. Many scientists believe that better medicines could be developed if there was a fuller understanding of pathogenesis (the mechanisms by which HIV causes disease). Researchers are also intensively studying individuals who have been infected with HIV for many years without suffering immune damage, and those who have been exposed to HIV on multiple occasions yet have so far remained uninfected. The hope is that there may be some unique characteristics of their immune responses or genetic make-up that could be utilized in the development of treatments or vaccines.

 

Prophylactic Treatments

Many of the improvements in quality and quantity of life among people with HIV have resulted from better drugs to prevent or treat the AIDS-associated opportunistic infections. The use of prophylactic (preventative) antibiotics has dramatically reduced the incidence of PCP and toxoplasmosis, and clinicians have grown increasingly skilled at preventing and treating fungal infections. Consequently, many HIV-infected people do not now develop an AIDS-defining illness until they reach an advanced stage of immune suppression, when they become vulnerable to infections that are still challenging to treat or to prevent, such as CMV and MAI. Intravenous drugs such as foscarnet, ganciclovir and cidofovir are available to treat CMV disease and an oral formulation of ganciclovir has been introduced for maintenance therapy and potentially for prophylaxis.

 

Vaccines

Efforts are underway to develop an effective vaccine for HIV that could be either protective (preventing infection if an immunized person is exposed) or therapeutic (slowing immune destruction or prolonging survival in people who are already infected).

 

Most of the current experimental vaccines consist of one or more of HIV's structural proteins, such as the core protein p24 or the outer “envelope” proteins gp120 and gp160, used in combination with an adjuvant to boost the immune response.

 

Trials to date have been largely discouraging. Studies of therapeutic vaccines have found that some are immunogenic, but have not yet shown any evidence of effects on disease progression or survival rates.

 

Researchers working on preventive vaccines face a range of technical problems, including the difficulty of producing a vaccine that might offer protection against the range of HIV sub-types found around the world and the varying strains caused by HIV's high mutation rate. An effective vaccine would need to protect the individual against infection when exposed to either free HIV particles or HIV-infected cells and to stimulate effective immune responses when the virus enters the body through the blood (such as during injecting drug use or occupational exposure) or across mucous membranes (such as during sexual intercourse).

 

Prevention

HIV infection and AIDS are considered by many to be completely preventable, because the routes of HIV transmission are so well documented. It is clear that a reliable protective vaccine will not be available for many years. In the absence of a vaccine, the only means of preventing the spread of infection is to avoid personal behaviors that carry a risk of transmission. This has been the focus of AIDS education campaigns throughout the world.

 

Globally, the most common route of HIV transmission is through unprotected anal or vaginal intercourse. The risk can be eliminated by avoiding intercourse, or minimized by using a condom, since HIV cannot pass through an intact latex barrier. HIV transmission through oral sex is possible but rare and AIDS organizations in most countries do not routinely recommend condom use for this activity. HIV transmission through drug-injecting equipment can be prevented by avoiding injecting drug use or by only using sterile equipment.

 

Many safer sex campaigns have been conducted to encourage the general public and the groups most at risk from HIV to avoid unprotected sex. However, research on health promotion repeatedly shows that the simple provision of information is usually not in itself sufficient to lead to behavior changes. That may require additional factors; for example, campaigns are more likely to succeed if they present acceptable and achievable options, and are reinforced by peer pressure in favor of certain forms of behavior and against others. The most successful safer sex campaigns were those conducted by and for urban gay communities in the 1980’s, where the reduction in unprotected anal intercourse has been identified as the greatest health-related behavior change ever achieved.

 

Prevention efforts to promote sexual awareness through open discussion and condom use through distribution in schools have raised opposition from certain groups in society from fear that these efforts promote sexual promiscuity among young adults. Prevention efforts involving identification of HIV-infected individuals and notification (in the United States) of the sexual partners and HIV testing at the time of marriage or pregnancy have been criticized as an invasion of personal privacy. In these cases, the issue of personal privacy has to be weighed against the responsibilities of society to ensure public health and control the spread of HIV.

 

Needle exchange programs have been introduced in many countries to minimize HIV transmission among drug users. In the United States such schemes are controversial as some regard them as condoning illegal drug use, but studies consistently show that needle exchanges are effective, leading to a lower incidence of HIV infection among injecting drug users.

In recent years there has been intense debate about the proper allocation of AIDS education funds. In many countries, HIV transmission still occurs primarily among definable population groups and their sexual partners, yet the majority of resources has been spent on campaigns targeted at the general population rather than at the groups most at risk. In the United Kingdom, the Department of Health has recognized these criticisms and in late 1995 published an AIDS strategy stressing the importance of directing campaigns at gay and bisexual men and injecting drug users.

 

In the early years of the epidemic many cases of HIV transmission occurred through contaminated blood products and transfusions; the introduction of screening and heat treatment procedures means that infection through these routes is now extremely unlikely.

 

Social Issues

Prevention efforts through public awareness have been propelled by community-based organizations, such as the Terrence Higgins Trust in Britain, that provide current information to HIV-infected and at-risk individuals. Public figures and celebrities who are themselves HIV-infected or have died from AIDS, including Ervin “Magic” Johnson, Rock Hudson, and Freddie Mercury, have given a recognizable face to AIDS for society to come to terms with the enormity of the epidemic. In memory of those individuals who died from AIDS, especially in the early years of the epidemic, a giant quilt was made in 1986 by the US-based NAMES Project, where each panel of the quilt was in memory of an individual AIDS death.

 

In the United States, the government has also attempted to assist HIV-infected individuals through legislation and additional community funding measures. In 1990, HIV-infected individuals were included in the Americans with Disabilities Act so that it became illegal to discriminate against such individuals for jobs, housing, and other social benefits. A community funding program to major US cities designed to assist the daily lives of individuals living with AIDS was established. There are currently no equivalent provisions made by central government in the United Kingdom and local health authorities and local councils may offer help to AIDS patients according to their own separate funding and policy provisions.