Banks lead market dynamism
..Republic's merger plan may boost its share price
Stock Market Review
Last year was the most phenomenal one in the history of the
Trinidad and Tobago market. And, judging from the first three
weeks of 1996, we may be in for another very busy year.
By the end of the first month, the market was already close
to surpassing the 1994 volume of 67,565,027 stock units. It has
already passed the halfway mark of the 1995 volume of 105,354,432.
So far, Republic Bank was been the big player in the market.
On January 9, 1996, Republic Bank purchased 52,605,000 stock
units in CIBC (WI) Holdings with a value of just under $200 million.
Stock Dilution
This trade was expected because Republic had stated in its
1995 Annual Report that it intends to maintain its given the
dilution of its 20 percent holdings.
In its move to acquire Bank of Commerce (BOC), Republic also
purchased over one million BOC stocks on the market during the
month.
This, together with its purchase of two holding companies
previously owned by Rupert Indar and Kyffin Simpson, gave them
53.34% of the equity of BOC. Republic has had effective control
of BOC since February 2, 1994 when CIBC Canada sold its 48.40%
holding to Republic (23%), Kyffin Simpson's Inter Americana Trading
Corporation (18.50%) and Dr Rupert Indar's VHS Holdings which
brought the remaining 6.90%. Republic then initiated a change
in the Board and top management.
New Dynamism
BOC was not a dynamic bank until Republic took effective control.
Republic changed BOC's style of operations with BOC becoming
more aggressive. The new management upgraded the information
system, established a corporate division and restructured the
branch network along functional lines.
Within the first year it had full inter-branch capabilities,
and introduced a line of VISA cards. This new dynamism was reflected
in BOC's performance.
BOC Profits
Its after tax profits grew from $13,729 million in 1993, the
last full year before the management change to $23,133 million
in 1995, an increase of 68.50%.
The significant benefits that would derive from a full merger
would undoubtedly enhance the profitability of the combined entity.
Republic would not only be getting an increase in market share
but also greater economies of scale in its operations. The synergies
presented by this deal include lower cost for premises and staff,
the two largest costs for a bank.
It would also achieve greater economies of scale in areas
such as information technology, training and risk management.
Takeover Risks
The inherent risks of takeovers such as loss of customers,
different corporate cultures and high integration cost should
be mitigated in this case. Republic has effectively run BOC for
the past two years and its management always hoped some day to
fully acquire it. Therefore, BOC may already be operating in
the same style as Republic.
During BOC's information technology upgrade, it probably became
more compatible with Republic. However, there could potentially
be high cost in the short term, resulting from a reduction in
staff and relocation, the benefits of which would only be realized
in the medium to long term.
For this bid to be successful, the remaining major shareholder
would have to agree to accept Republic's offer, which is not
a foregone conclusion.
Price Boost
Takeovers are usually at a premium to current market price
but Republic has stated that $6.93 is the final offer price.
We anticipate that some BOC shareholders may sell their holdings
and switch to Republic, which would put some upward pressure
on Republic's stock price. The bid itself and the benefits to
be derived from it would increase demand for Republic's stock,
as such we anticipate an upward movement in its stock price.
If Republic does not get the required 90% shareholding to
invoke Section 153 of the Companies Act to receive acceptances
for the full 100%, it will operate BOC as a subsidiary which
would also be beneficial to Republic's stockholders.
In other news, the 1996 Budget removed the dividend income
allowance which was a major contributor to the stock market's
phenomenal performance in 1995.
While this loss would be a major disincentive to individuals
and Pension Funds, we believe that the market's reaction would
not be overly negative.
We have based this opinion on the fact that most equity investors
invest for capital appreciation. The loss of the allowance, while
substantial, would be partly made up by improved dividends because
of improvements in profits brought about by lower taxes and the
resurgence in the domestic economy.
Thus, while we do expect another 69.55% increase in the Composite
Index, we also expect the market to continue to appreciate.
This is based on the continued resurgence in the domestic
economy and more importantly, the renewal in confidence in the
direction the economy is headed.
The new Government headed a Budget which stressed continued
fiscal responsibility, a tenet religiously followed by the previous
two administrations and which is mainly responsible for the bright
outlook for the domestic economy.
We hope the new Government continues the policy of divesting
part of its equity in state enterprises on the market.
New Offerings
The previous Government had planed to divest a further 29%
of National Flour Mills and 18% of Telecommunications Services
of Trinidad and Tobago (TSTT) on the market.
This would go a long way towards adding some much needed dynamism
to the market. In 1995, only one listed company, Caribbean Communications
Network (CCN), raised funds through a Rights issue on the market.
It is our hope that other companies take the opportunity to
raise funds on the market either through Rights issues or new
offerings.
While there are disadvantages to listing, such as stricter
disclosure requirements, which cause a loss of privacy, the benefits
to be derived from listing far outweigh these obstacles.
Another wish we have for 1996 is that individuals become more
interested in the stock market, especially small savers. It has
been proven by various empirical studies that return on investment
from equities far outweighs the returns from any other form of
investment, as long as you invest sensibly and with the long-
term view in mind. It is a simple process and even the smallest
of investors can benefit.
Yes, the Government has removed almost all the incentives
to save, but as responsible individuals we should continue to
save as it the only way to ensure long term financial security.
There are no longer tax credits for the Unit Trust First Scheme
nor any dividend income allowance, but this should not stop us
from saving.
This may have been the greatest challenge Government may have
given to the population; it has put more money back in our hands.
Are we going to spend it all, or save for our long-term financial
security?
|