CK15
PRINCE CHARLES SPECIAL ENVOY TO MIDEAST
Mideast envoy role for UK prince?
October 20, 2001 Posted: 9:46 AM EDT (1346 GMT)
Prince Charles has close links to the Saudi royals
---------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
LONDON, England -- The Prince of Wales may act as an unofficial envoy in the war against terrorism, it has emerged.
It is understood his close contacts with Saudi Arabia and sympathetic understanding of Islam would help the international coalition shore up support in the Arab world.
St James' Palace -- the prince's official residence in London -- and Downing Street both refused to give details of what the Prince's role could be, but sources confirmed it was something that was being looked at.
St James' Palace told the Press Association: "The Palace and the Government are in touch over a whole range of issues on a regular basis."
A Downing Street spokesman said: "It's well-known that the Prince of Wales has long been interested in Islam and has a high reputation in the Muslim world.
( See is Prince Charles The Mahdi ? )
"We would of course support any efforts he made to promote good relations in the Muslim community."
Prime Minister Tony Blair and Foreign Secretary Jack Straw have both undertaken diplomatic missions to Muslim countries to seek their support against the terrorists responsible for the attacks on America.
But it is thought Prince Charles, who has close links with the Saudi Arabian royal family and has previously expressed an affinity with Islam, could play a key role in maintaining that support.
( see The Great Monarch of Europe who calms threat from the kings of the east. )
Following the attacks last month, the prince visited a mosque in east London to show his support for the British Muslim community.
"I very much wanted to come here to show how much I minded about and cared about the Islamic community in this country, particularly at a time when it's so difficult for everybody," he said.
"And also to show, above all, my support for those people of whatever faith who utterly reject violence.
"And, at the same time, to show my support for those who believe more than anything else in the overwhelming importance of tolerance, compassion and understanding -- and I hope we can get that message across."
( See Prince Charles : A Man For All Faiths. )
Prince Charles of Arabia
by Ronni L. Gordon and David M. Stillman
Ronni L. Gordon and David M. Stillman are associate scholars of the Middle East Forum
[T]he effort for these years to live in the dress of Arabs, and to imitate their mental foundation, quitted me of my English self, and let me look at the West and its conventions with new eyes: they destroyed it all for me.
- T.E.Lawrence Seven Pillars of Wisdom1
Prince Charles has often surprised his future subjects, but few shocks match the allegations of a newspaper article that appeared in October 1996:2
The idea of the Prince of Wales lugging around a prayer mat and turning to face Mecca five times a day sounds a tad unlikely - but, then again, so did confessing to adultery on prime-time television a couple of years ago. So perhaps no one should be shocked by the suggestion in a forthcoming book that Prince Charles has converted to Islam.
This claim was put forward by no less a personage than the grand mufti of Cyprus: "Did you know that Prince Charles has converted to Islam. Yes, yes. He is a Muslim. I can't say more. But it happened in Turkey. Oh, yes, he converted all right. When you get home check on how often he travels to Turkey. You'll find that your future king is a Muslim."3 "Nonsense," replied a Buckingham Palace spokesman, denying Charles's supposed conversion. Lord St. John of Fawsley, a constitutional expert, is no less dubious, commenting that "The Prince of Wales is a loyal member of the Church of England."4 Some time later, a leak to the press told of Charles's "desire to play a greater role in the Church of England," an apparent attempt to reinforce the prince's Anglican credentials.5
Rumors about the Prince of Wales's conversion to Islam may well be inaccurate; even so, the fact that spokesmen official and unofficial felt compelled to deny this fact results from persistent speculation about Charles's religious loyalties that arises out of his statements and actions of recent years. And these, in turn, reflect a larger trend in Western society.
CHARLES'S PUBLIC STATEMENTS ABOUT ISLAM
The future Charles III has made several strong public statements endorsing Islam as the solution to the spiritual and cultural ills of Britain and the West. His public advocacy of Islam appears to go back to 1989, when Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued an edict (fatwa) against Salman Rushdie, a British citizen, for blaspheming the Prophet Muhammad in his novel The Satanic Verses.6 Rather than defend Rushdie's freedom of speech, Charles reacted to the death decree by reflecting on the positive features that Islam has to offer the spiritually empty lives of his countrymen.
Charles first delivered a major address on Islam on October 27, 1993, at the Sheldonian Theatre at Oxford where he is a vice patron of the Centre for Islamic Studies.7 He declared that the usual attitude to Islam
suffers because the way we understand it has been hijacked by the extreme and the superficial. To many of us in the West, Islam is seen in terms of the tragic civil war in Lebanon, the killings and bombings perpetrated by extremist groups in the Middle East, and by what is commonly referred to as "Islamic fundamentalism."
The Prince of Wales then explained the causes for this distorted understanding:
Our judgement of Islam has been grossly distorted by taking the extremes to the norm. . . . For example, people in this country frequently argue that the Sharia law of the Islamic world is cruel, barbaric and unjust. Our newspapers, above all, love to peddle those unthinking prejudices. The truth is, of course, different and always more complex. My own understanding is that extremes, like the cutting off of hands, are rarely practised. The guiding principle and spirit of Islamic law, taken straight from the Qur'an, should be those of equity and compassion.
Charles suggests that European women may even find something to envy in the situation of their Muslim sisters:
Islamic countries like Turkey, Egypt and Syria gave women the vote as early as Europe did its women-and much earlier than in Switzerland! In those countries women have long enjoyed equal pay, and the opportunity to play a full working role in their societies.
Charles considers Christianity inadequate to the task of spiritual restoration and denigrates science for having caused the West to lose its spiritual moorings. Echoing a common Muslim theme, he declares that "Western civilisation has become increasingly acquisitive and exploitive in defiance of our environmental responsibilities." Instead, he praises the "Islamic revival" of the 1980s and portrays Islam as Britain's salvation:
Islam can teach us today a way of understanding and living in the world which Christianity itself is poorer for having lost. At the heart of Islam is its preservation of an integral view of the Universe. Islam-like Buddhism and Hinduism-refuses to separate man and nature, religion and science, mind and matter, and has preserved a metaphysical and unified view of ourselves and the world around us. . . . But the West gradually lost this integrated vision of the world with Copernicus and Descartes and the coming of the scientific revolution. A comprehensive philosophy of nature is no longer part of our everyday beliefs.
He concludes by suggesting that "there are things for us to learn in this system of belief which I suggest we ignore at our peril."
Among the many titles borne by the British sovereign is "Defender of the Faith," a reference to the fact that the monarch heads not only the government but also the Church of England. But the prince has reservations about this title. In a June 1994 television documentary he declared his preference to be known as "Defender of Faith" rather than "Defender of the Faith,"8 leading to a rash of speculation that he favors the disestablishment of the Church of England.9
Charles has continued to discuss the role of Islam in the United Kingdom. In a speech at the Foreign Office Conference Centre at Wilton Park in Sussex on December 13, 1996, he called on Islamic pedagogy and philosophy to help young Britons develop a healthier view of the world.10 Praising Islamic culture in its traditional form for trying to preserve an "integrated, spiritual view of the world in a way we have not seen fit to do in recent generations in the West," he went on to say:
There is much we can learn from that Islamic world view in this respect. There are many ways in which mutual understanding and appreciation can be built. Perhaps, for instance, we could begin by having more Muslim teachers in British schools, or by encouraging exchanges of teachers. Everywhere in the world people want to learn English. But in the West, in turn, we need to be taught by Islamic teachers how to learn with our hearts, as well as our heads.
The results of this study will help Westerners
to rethink, and for the better, our practical stewardship of man and his environment-in fields such as health-care, the natural environment and agriculture, as well as in architecture and urban planning.
In addition to these comments on Islam, Charles has taken steps to give that religion a special status. For example, he set up a panel of twelve "wise men" (in fact, eleven men and one woman) to advise him on Islamic religion and culture.11 This caused much talk, especially as the group was reported to have met in secret. Some noted that no comparable body exists to inform the crown prince about other faiths practiced in his future realm.
REACTIONS
Muslim world. Charles has traveled extensively in the Muslim world, with recent visits to Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, and Bangladesh. He has visited Turkey so often that some observers believe that to be the country where his rumored conversion to Islam took place. In addition, he has visited mosques in the United Kingdom, for example, dropping in on one at the end of Ramadan in April 1996.
Some offices of the British government have found a practical use for the prince's affection for Islam. In particular, the Foreign Office uses him as a point man for British business interests in Muslim countries, leading one journalist to comment that "the Charles of Arabia phenomenon is here to stay," for it helps assure British commerce with the Muslim world.12
Although some Britons may be bewildered at Prince Charles's infatuation with Islam, he has become a hero among Muslims. His February 1997 visit to Saudi Arabia
got moderate coverage in the British press-but it was huge news in the host country. In Saudi Arabia, the overwhelming theme of the welcoming addresses was of the Prince as candid friend of the Islamic world. The warmth of his welcome was extraordinary.
The writer of this account, John Casey of Cambridge University, warns that the British public lacks a clear understanding of Charles's standing in the Muslim world:
The extent to which the Prince is admired by Muslims-even to the point of hero-worship-has not yet sunk into the consciousness of the British public. When it does, that public may or may not be pleased.
Casey concludes that the prince of Wales's "hero status" in the Arab world is permanent. "No other Western figure commands this sort of admiration."13
Charles's Muslim admirers can be generous in their gratitude. At a private dinner with prince Charles in May 1997, Prince Bandar bin Sultan of Saudi Arabia announced a donation by King Fahd of $33 million to Oxford University to construct a new Centre for Islamic Studies at Oxford, a gift designed "to establish Islamic studies at the heart of the British education system."14
Great Britain. Charles's speeches provoked a flurry of comments in England. In the popular perception, he is a spiritual dilettante, something of a religious butterfly, flitting from faith to faith and veering, increasingly, towards Islam. . . . The sight of the Prince in yet another prayer shawl only compounds the image of a well-intentioned eccentric seeking divine inspiration.15
Others wonder if Charles is aware of the punishments Islamic law metes out to adulterers-and whether he "exacted some sort of guarantee" before traveling to the Muslim world that he would not be "stoned or beaten by devout Saudi or Bangladeshi natives."16
Some Englishmen took their prince's statements more seriously. Patrick Sookhdeo, director of the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity, raised questions about the coherence of Charles's approach to Islam, commenting that "It is not fair to compare the best ideals of the Islamic faith with the worst of Western cultural decadence." Sookhdeo also reminded Charles that many Muslims see in Western traditions the solution to their own problems:
What do Muslims living in a Muslim context feel? Are they content to continue submitting to authority in every detail of their lives? Many are not. We hear much about radical Islamists seeking an even closer adherence to the original teachings of Islam. But we hear little about the opposite phenomenon: the Muslims who are attracted by democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, respect for the rights and worth of the individual and other characteristics of Western society.17
Another commentator reversed Charles's argument and held that some of Britain's million and a half Muslims need instruction in British values:
it would be interesting to know who they [the Muslim leaders with whom Charles associates] are. Do they include Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammad, who supports Hamas, agitates for an Islamic state, and recently called for homosexuals to fling themselves off Big Ben? Or the dissident Dr. al-Mas'ari, who has used the new freedom of speech which we in this country have given him to call for the extermination of the Jews?18
Prime Minister John Major reacted to Charles's sentiment about wanting to be known as "Defender of Faith" with the understated comment that "it would be a little odd if Prince Charles was defender of faiths of which he was not a member."19
The conflict between Charles's enthusiasm for Islam and his subjects' leeriness played itself out recently at Oxford, where the reaction to King Fahd's huge gift to the Islamic center met with little enthusiasm. Oxford faculty oppose the gift, claiming its proposed location-on a greenfield site near the heart of the city-would constitute "overdevelopment."20 Presumably their ecological opposition hides other motives as well.
Interestingly, Charles himself has mildly experienced the wrath of fundamentalist Islam. Just after Ayatollah Khomeini issued his death decree against Salman Rushdie, Charles was in the Persian Gulf and Tehran radio denounced his presence there "as a snub to Islam."21 Because of "heightened security concerns in the wake of Muslim furor over The Satanic Verses,"22 the prince was forced to withdraw from a polo match in Dubai. But this brush with Muslim extremists has not dissuaded Charles from reassuring others that Islam's problem is only one of image.
It bears noting that Charles is not the royal family's only link to the Muslim world, for Princess Diana, Charles's ex-wife, has often been linked to Hasnat Khan, a London-based cardiac surgeon. Just as Charles donned a Muslim prayer shawl, Di wore a traditional shalwar kameez during her visit to Khan's family in Pakistan. London's Sunday Mirror23 reports that Khan's family has approved a possible marriage of the divorced 35-year-old princess and their son, then quoted the princess (via a "friend") to the effect that she hoped Khan would father a half-sister to her two sons, princes William and Harry. While Diana's divorce from the heir to the British throne removes her personally from the royal family, her sons could be the first heirs to the British throne with a Muslim stepfather.
CONCLUSION
The denigration of the West at the expense of a foreign tradition that Charles engages in occurs quite commonly among the West's intellectual elite. For some it is Islam, for others Tibetan Buddhism, Maoist thought, or American Indian spirituality. In all cases, the alien is assumed superior to the familiar. Arthur Schlesinger replies to this that there remains
a crucial difference between the Western tradition and the others. The crimes of the West have produced their own antidotes. They have provoked great movements to end slavery, to raise the status of women, to abolish torture, to combat racism, to defend freedom of inquiry and expression, to advance personal liberty and human rights.24
Should Charles persist in his admiration of Islam and defamation of his own culture, it could be, as The Independent puts it, that his accession to the throne will indeed usher in a "different kind of monarchy."
As you can see from the article below , thse words of prince charles are being echoed and agreed to in the muslim world, his thoughts are welcomed and grounbreaking form an Islamic point of view, his voice is a tool in the armour of the muslims veiw of the world and especially where the mideast east is converned , prince charles is a vital tool in offering an alternative view of the schism of relgion and politics and culture beset the middle east.
Yet his views directly oppose those of God and his Son our Lord Jesus Christ.
Prince Charles Presents Muslims an Opportunity That May Not Come Again
by Abdul Qater Tash
March 1997, pg. 12
Once again, Prince Charles, heir to the British throne, has spoken of his deep admiration for Islam. Addressing a select gathering of academics, businessmen, religious leaders and British officials concerned with Middle Eastern issues at Wilton Park, the headquarters of the British Foreign Ministry, recently, he spoke glowingly of Islam as a religion and culture that the world had much to learn from.
The Times and The Daily Telegraph gave the speech front-page coverage, both publishing it under the headline, “Learn from Islam”a headline that carries deep meaning and significance.
Earlier, in October 1993, the prince had made a similar speech at Oxford University, commending Islam and highlighting the pioneering role Islamic civilization had played in the development of modern Western civilization. Dwelling at length on the contributions Islam had made to the making of contemporary Europe, he pointed out that Islam was part of the legacy of Europe and not something independent of, or distant from, the Europeans. Calling upon the West to learn from Islam, he had argued that Islam could teach the Europe of today how to understand and how to live…Islam in its essence, he said, preserved an integrated view of the universe and rejected the separation of man from nature, religion from science, and mind from matter. Islam had a metaphysical vision of man and the world around him as an organic whole, the prince went on to say.
It is obvious that the prince lays great emphasis on the need for a return to that integrated view, which looks at the universe as an indivisible whole. The rejection of that view is the real cause of the misery that modern materialistic civilization has brought for man.
That was the reason why the Prince of Wales pointed out, in his speech at Wilton Park, that “Modern materialism is unbalanced and increasingly damaging in its long-term consequences…During the past three centuries, in the Western world at least, a dangerous division has occurred in the way we perceive the world around us. Science has tried to assume a monopoly—even a tyranny—over our understanding. Religion and science have become separated…Science has attempted to take over the natural world from God; it has fragmented the cosmos and relegated the sacred to a separate and secondary compartment of our understanding, divorced from practical, day-to-day existence.”
Science Alone Not Enough
This harsh criticism of science by Prince Charles does not mean that science is an evil which should be gotten rid of. The problem does not lie in science as it is, but in separating it from moral values and spiritual and social goals. This is what the prince meant when he said: “Science has done the inestimable service of showing us a world much more complex that we ever imagined. But in its modern, materialist, one-dimensional form, it cannot explain everything…As science and technology have become increasingly separated from ethical, moral and sacred considerations, so the implications of such a separation have become more somber and horrifying as we see in genetic manipulations or in the consequences of the kind of scientific arrogance so blatant in the scandal of BSE [mad cow disease].”
Prince Charles believes that only Islam can save contemporary civilization from its present crisis, because “Islamic culture in its traditional form has striven to preserve this integrated, spiritual view of the world in a way we have not seen fit to do in recent generations in the West. There is much we can learn from that Islamic world view in this respect.”
The prince goes further when he advocates practical steps to translate this idea into reality: “We in the West need to be taught by Islamic teachers how to learn with our hearts, as well as our heads.” He believes that the way to build mutual understanding and appreciation between Muslims and the West is for the West to learn from Islam. That is absolutely true, for the West has misunderstood Islam for a long time and has considered it hostile to Western existence and civilization.
The speech by the prince has gone far beyond a strong defense of a much-maligned religion before a Western audience. It was an open call to the West to study Islam and learn from its values and ideals.
It is a new horizon that the Prince of Wales has opened before us. The question is: Now that we have such an opportunity, what are we going to do with it? Will we strengthen the hand of the prince and try to make use of this fine opportunity to introduce Islam to those who want to learn from it? Or are we going to be quite content with enjoying the praise, and do nothing? If that is our option, we will be missing an opportunity that may never come again.
