Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
 
 

FREEDOM HOUSE

A CFR FRONT



By Barbara Aho

The Council on Foreign Relations is the U.S. branch of the Illuminati, its British counterpart being the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Both are outgrowths of the Round Table conceived by Cecil Rhodes for the establishment of a future world government dominated by Britain and the U.S. The CFR is composed of both right and left political persuasions, as noted by Joseph Kraft in Harper's Magazine:

[T]he Council [on Foreign Relations] plays a special part in helping to bridge the gap between the two parties, affording unofficially a measure of continuity when the guard changes in Washington. In theory at least, the Council comes close to being an organ of what C. Wright Mills has called the Power Elite -- a group of men, similar in interest and outlook, shaping events from INVULNERABLE positions behind the scenes...It has been called a government in exile. 1.
This dichotomy is also mentioned by Michael Howard in The Occult Conspiracy:
Initially the CFR was regarded by its critics as an elitist, right-wing power group and it was even accused of helping finance Hitler's rise to power... Following the Second World war however, the CFR has been labeled a promoter of international socialism through the United Nations. Conspiracy theorists claim it was the CFR who supported Henry Wallace's plan to have the Illuminist symbol of the eye in the triangle on the one dollar note [1945]. The CFR's apparent contradictory political ideals are said to be typical of modern Illuminati front groups which allegedly use both right and left ideologies to further their cause which transcends conventional politics.
In the eyes of their opponents, the CFR is currently dedicated to destroying the sovereignty of the United States, reversing the democratic process which instigated the 1776 American Revolution, promoting internationalism and the foundation of a world super state embracing both capitalism and communism in a new political order. The evidence for this seems to be largely based on the neutral stance adopted by the CFR in American politics. It has recruited its membership from both the Democratic and Republican parties, and leading members of the CFR have included Adlai Stevenson, Robert and Edward Kennedy, Hubert Humphrey, John Foster Dulles, Robert McNamara, Henry Kissinger and Nelson Rockefeller. Several men who later became Presidents of the United States were CFR members earlier in their political careers such as Eisenhower, John Kennedy, Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter. 2.
Dr. Carroll Quigley, CFR member, college mentor of President Clinton and author of Tragedy and Hope, identified the Council on Foreign Relations as a joint venture of the private sector with the objective of controlling government:
... the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.
In "The Shadow Government of the United States and The Decline of America," (11/94) Richard D. Eastman stated that CFR domination of the last three Administrations reveals 347 under Reagan, 382 under Bush, and 387 under Clinton (over 1 in 8 of their total membership).

The Occult Conspiracyalso described the Internationalist Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission:

Both the Bilderbergs and the Trilateralists act as shadow governments promoting internationalist policies of European unity and world government. They act as a form of political Freemasonry offering world leaders and national insiders the chance to meet in secret to exchange information and discuss undisclosed social changes which can be put into practice in their respective countries. 3.
The Trilateral Commission was created by David Rockefeller and CFR member Zbigniew Brezinski with the goal of economic linkage between Japan, Europe, and the United States, and: "...managing the world economy...a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global system." Brezenski, National Security Advisor to President Carter, CFR member and first Director of the Trilateral Commission wrote of a society controlled by a Power Elite in his 1970 book, Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era:
The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.
Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites...[whose] ties cut across national boundaries... It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook....
Within a few years the rebels in the more advanced countries who today have the most visibility will be joined by a new generation making its claim to power in government and business... accepting as routine managerial processes current innovations such as planning-programming-budgeting systems (PPBS) ... A national information grid that will integrate existing electronic data banks is already being developed.... The projected world information grid, for which Japan, Western Europe, and the United States are most suited, could create the basis for a common educational program, for the adoption of common academic standards....
The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty. ... In the economic-technological field, some international cooperation has already been achieved, but further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.
The previous report on Hudson Institute documented that the crafters of the Freedom from Religious Persecution Act (HR2431) are the very Power Elites who gave us GOALS 2000, the federal government's plan to radically restructure American education and society.

Knowing this and having Mr. Brezinski's assurance that said elites would be unrestrained by traditional values, we are not surprised that Hudson Institute is directed by members of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group:

Freedom House

According to We Hold These Truths, in 1996 Hudson Scholar, Michael Horowitz, teamed up with Nina Shea, head of the Freedom House Puebla Institute for Religious Freedom, to launch a high-priced campaign for promotion of the federal religious monitoring bill:

At least $2 million dollars was spent entertaining leaders of the Christian right in order to condition them to accept, and even demand, the... WOLF-SPECTER BILL, HR2431. This figure is the author's estimate of the Warmaker's investment, based upon a conservative guess of cost of the promotion detailed by Nina Shea in her book [IN THE LION'S DEN], more money than Trotsky carried in his brief case when he was shipped to Russia in 1917 to buy a government!
Freedom House, which aspires to monitor democracy and human rights worldwide, presents itself as apolitical and humanitarian:
Non-partisan and broad-based, Freedom House is led by a Board of Trustees composed of leading Democrats, Republicans, and independents; business and labor leaders; former senior government officials; scholars; writers; and journalists.

Freedom House's Center for Religious Freedom, which was established in 1986 as the Puebla Institute, reports on the persecution of religious believers around the world and undertakes advocacy on their behalf. It is now at the forefront of the widely-publicized national campaign to defend those suffering severe oppression for their faith. The Center documents and publicizes the repression, torture, imprisonment, and exile of groups and individuals for religious reasons.

Omitted is the fact (revealed by WHTT) that the founders of Freedom House also established the United Nations and that the Freedom House board is dominated by a majority of CFR members:
FREEDOM HOUSE was founded in 1943 by Wendell Wilkey (sic) and Eleanor Roosevelt to promote world government, and specifically for the creation of the United Nations, which was accomplished three years later. Nineteen members of the inter-nationalist COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS dominate its Board.
Our own research identified twenty-five (25) CFR members on the board of Freedom House. Most are heavyweights in the international scene.

Freedom House Board of Trustees
Freedom House Free Cuba Center
National Forum Foundation

[NFF merged with Freedom House in 1997]

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Bette Bao Lord, Chairman of the Board (CFR, Bilderberg)

(Husband Winston Lord was Chairman of CFR, Trilateral, Bilderberg, Skull & Bones)
Max M. Kampelman, Chair Emeritus (CFR; Vice Pres., United States Institute of Peace)

Leo Cherne, Chair Emeritus (CFR, Founding member Hudson Institute, Founder International Rescue Committee [CIA conduit for neo-Bukharinite {fascist} operations]; B'nai B'rith)

Mark Palmer, Vice Chairman (CFR; President and CEO Television Development Partners, Inc.; U.S.Ambassador to Hungary from 1986-90; Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in 1982-86)

Kenneth L. Adelman, Secretary (CFR; Former Dir. U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency; Nat. Editor, The Washingtonian)

Adrian Karatnycky, President (CFR, Publisher Freedom Review Publisher; Conservative author, American Spectator)

TRUSTEES

Morton Abramowitz (CFR; President of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research)

Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR; First Director of Trilateral Commission/former National Security Adviser)

William C. Doherty, Jr. (CFR; President, American Institute for Free Labor Development)

Richard Gardner (CFR, TC, Former Ambassador to Spain, Italy, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs under Presidents Kennedy and Johnson)

Theodore J. Forstmann (CFR, Director, International Rescue Committee, Director, Nelson Mandela Children’s Fund)

Samuel P. Huntington (CFR, Formerly on National Security Council, Professor of Government, Harvard, Chairman, Olin Center for Strategic Studies. Author, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Clash Of Civilizations)

John T. Joyce (CFR, Pres. Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, Vice Chair, Center for National Policy)

Lane Kirkland (Former President of CFR, TC, Former Pres. AFL-CIO)

Jeanne J. Kirkpatrick (Former Director of CFR; Ambassador to UN; TC; Co-Director, Empower America; Board Member, American Spectator)

Morton Kondracke (CFR; Executive Editor, Roll Call; PBS TV McLaughlin Group Panelist)

Anthony Lake (CFR; Director, CIA/IPS)

Jay Mazur (CFR, TC; UNITE President-Elect; President, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union; Vice President, Executive Council AFL-CIO.

John Norton Moore (CFR; Chairman, U.S. Institute for Peace)

Susan Kaufmann Purcell (CFR)

Richard Ravitch (CFR; Treasurer and Trustee, Twentieth Century Fund)

Peter Rodman (CFR; Senior Editor, National Review)

Wendell L. Wilkie II (Chairman of Board, Twentieth Century Fox) [Wendell Wilkie I was CFR and founder of Freedom House]

Jacques D. Wimpfheimer (CFR; Trustee Emeritus, Thoroughbred Breeders & Owners Assoc.)

Paul Wolfowitz (CFR, Bilderberg; Dean, Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Johns Hopkins University; Former Ambassador to Republic of Indonesia; Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, U.S. Department of Defense; Visiting Distinguished Fellow, National Defense University; Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs; Director of Policy, U.S. Department of State)

Andrew Young (CFR, TC, Mason; Former civil rights leader; UN ambassador; President, National Council of Churches)

The House of Lord

The chairman of the board of Freedom House is Bette Bao Lord, whose husband Winston Lord served as Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations from 1977 to 1985, when he was appointed U.S. Ambassador to China. Winston Lord is currently the Assistant Secretary for East Asian/Pacific Affairs (State Dept.) and special envoy to Red China. Red China has recently received an unconditional MFN trade status with the U.S. in spite of the fact that over 10,000 Chinese dissidents have been murdered since Tianemen Square. Winston Lord wrote in the August 4-ll, 1978 issue of "W" magazine: "The Tri Lateral Commission doesn't secretly run the world, the Council of Foreign Relations does that."

Bette Bao Lord has written books about China including Legacies: A Chinese Mosaic, Spring Moon, Eighth Moon, and In The Year of the Boar & Jackie Robinson. An Interview with Brian Lamb portrayed Mrs. Lord as an advocate of the oppressed.

In December 1997, Bette Bao Lord attended the state dinner honoring Chinese President Jiang Zemin immediately after addressing a Washington gathering of Chinese dissidents in exile and other protesters of the human rights violations in China. To explain her duplicity, Mrs. Lord, a native Chinese, stated that she chose to appear at the different forums to show Jiang that "people who disagree in America" are not threats to stability.

The following excerpt from Unholy Alliances reveals Freedom House officers to be seated with the Rockefellers and Clintons at the fulcrum of Illuminist power, i.e., the Order of Skull & Bones, Council on Foreign Relations, Institute for Policy Studies, the United Nations and National Council of Churches:

. . . Other privileged notables associated with The Order of Skull & Bones include the Lord family. Oswald Bates Lord (initiated 1926) married Mary Pillsbury of the Pillsbury flour family and Charles Edwin Lord II (initiated 1949) became acting Comptroller of the Currency 1981. The son of Oswald Bates Lord and Mary Pillsbury is Winston Lord (initiated 1959) who was chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1983 and today cavorts with David Rockefeller in creating friendly business with the 'world community,' especially Communist China.

The Lord family legacy goes back much farther than 1926. Since 1854, at least six members of the Lord family have been initiated into The Order of Skull & Bones. In 1854 George Deforest Lord was initiated into The Order. He became a New York lawyer. Together with his father, Daniel Lord, the law firm of Lord, Day and Lord was established. Today, one of Lord's clients is the Samuel Rubin Foundation. Samuel Rubin was a registered member of the Communist Party. The Office of the Samuel Rubin Foundation in which Samuel Rubin's daughter Cora Weiss was president, is located at 777 United Nations Plaza, which is known as the 'Church Center to the United Nations.'...The Rubin Foundation is one of the Communist financiers for the radical Institute for Policy Studies which has infiltrated itself thoroughly into the American government.

The history of the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) goes like this:

In 1960, James Jeremiah Wadsworth, a member of The Order of Skull & Bones (initiated 1927), and Arthur Waskow set up the Peace Research Institute. In 1963 this organization was incorporated by Marcus Raskin, a staff member of the National Security Council and an aide to Skull & Bones' McGeorge Bundy (initiated 1940). Co-Contributors were: Arthur Waskow, David Reisman, Michael Maccoby and Council on Foreign Relations member James Warburg. Grants came from the Samuel Rubin Foundation and the Stern Family Fund. Samuel Rubin was himself a member of the elite Comintern of the Communist Party, founded by none other than Lenin himself. Billionaire Armand Hammer assisted Rubin in making the fortunes which helped launch IPS. Philip Stern, an IPS trustee, was the president of Stern Fund. The executive director of the Stern Fund, David R. Hunter, was previously an official of The National Council and the World Council Of Churches.

Here lies The Order's tie-in with the Clintons. Hilary Clinton funded the IPS and other Communist organizations when she was Director and Chair of the Board of Directors of the New World Foundation in 1987-1988. Hillary had funded and praised The Order's pro-Marxist IPS which the FBI had investigated for murders, espionage, terror bombings and kidnapping. Bill Clinton has now appointed many known IPS members to high government posts and one of his closest friends and advisors is IPS-Marxist Derek Shearer, a top economic advisor. Another top IPS-Marxist appointee is ANTHONY LAKE, now Clinton's National Security Advisor. 4.

Anthony Lake & the IPS

The Lord family is connected with Freedom House trustee and present National Security Advisor, Anthony Lake, through the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS). In Covert Cadre: Inside The Institute For Policy Studies, Dr. S. Powell stated:

The Institute for Policy Studies is the preeminent intellectual center for Marxism today in this country... their agenda parallels the objectives of the Soviets - active measures and propaganda... 5.
The IPS "five principal programs are: global economic justice, sustainable communities, economic and social rights, real security, and culture":
The Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) is dedicated to ushering in a new progressive era in American history. From its inception in 1963, IPS has sought to strengthen the country's most important social movements: the civil-rights and anti-war movements in the 1960s, the women's and environmental movements in the 1970s, and the peace and anti-apartheid movements of the 1980s. Today, IPS continues to work with social movements, such as those promoting fair trade and sustainable communities.
For obvious reasons, syndicated column "Behind The Headlines" strongly protested Anthony Lake's appointment as National Security Advisor and the President’s designee to head the Central Intelligence Agency:
Anthony Lake Is Wrong Man for Job

The problem with Tony Lake, says Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy, is that he 'has shown a certain insouciance, to put it mildly, about the Kremlin's efforts to infiltrate and suborn American intelligence agencies.' Anthony Lake is the cabinet nominee who, in an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press last fall, expressed uncertainty as to the guilt or innocence of the Soviet Union's most notorious American agent, convicted perjurer Alger Hiss.

Gaffney argues that such dainty diffidence 'about the abiding counterintelligence threat from Moscow is clearly not what is needed in the next director of Central Intelligence. Moreover, as national security adviser, Tony Lake has evinced little appreciation of the necessity for an aggressive, proactive U.S. counterintelligence program.' Gaffney charges that 'the job of thwarting KGB penetrations before they occur has been made significantly more difficult by an initiative promoted by Mr. Lake in his capacity as the president's top political appointee responsible for formulating and executing security policy.' The Clinton administration has given Moscow 'unprecedented access to America's most sensitive agencies and fostered a climate that is antithetical to rigorous counterintelligence practices.'

"Gaffney is also troubled by Lake's association 'with radical Left organizations such as the Institute for Policy Studies and Center for National Security Studies during the 1970s and early 1980s.' That association 'put him in league with people who sought assiduously to curb the tools available to the FBI for domestic counterintelligence and to stymie or disrupt the CIA's clandestine operations. The insidious long-term effects of those efforts,' Gaffney contends, 'are still being felt in today's intelligence community.'

Gaffney considers the recent revelations about Russian spies 'a helpful reminder that, whatever else may have changed following the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Kremlin's acute interest in collecting intelligence against the United States has not.' Knowing that Russian spies have infiltrated our intelligence agencies, can we not assume that Chinese spies have done the same? We can, and must, says Gaffney, for it is simply not plausible that the Chinese would ignore 'the same opportunities that Moscow has so skillfully exploited over the past decade or so.'

Anthony Lake's record with regard to China is even less reassuring. Gaffney reminds us that Lake 'has overseen the Clinton administration's relentless campaign to improve relations with Beijing. He has presided over presidential decisions that have had the effect of making American military installations, laboratories, technology, universities, and government entities more accessible to China. In particular, he had to have been aware of the 'strategic access' to the Clinton White House enjoyed by China.' Under the circumstances, Gaffney concludes, 'Tony Lake is clearly the wrong man for the CIA job.

Andrew Young & the NCC

Another Freedom House Trustee is the recently-elected President of the National Council of Churches, Andrew Young formerly a civil rights leader, UN ambassador , and currently a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Young once said that reputed communist Nelson Mandela, Marxist President of the Republic of South Africa, is "as close to being a saint as can be." 6.

The NCC withheld endorsement of the Religious Persecution bill until certain qualifications were met which broaden the powers of the commission to penalize all human rights violations according to the U.N. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The NCC recently began nationwide implementation of a "Church and Government" Program, an effort to establish better cooperation between church and state. This program is part of a "Partnership for Trust in Government" initiative supported by the Ford Foundation, which funds and whose members serve as trustees on the CFR. Ford Foundation’s Trust in Government project -- a program to develop citizen support of the federal government -- does its work through a network of public policy institutes based at leading universities across the United States.

James Wardner recorded: "Dr. Walter Rauschenbusch of the Fabian Society wrote in 1893: The only power that can make socialism succeed, if it is established, is religion. It cannot work in an irreligious country. Speaking of Rauschenbusch, Major Edgar Bundy, in his book, Collectivism in the Churches, said, 'Socialism, thus was his first concern. Religion was only a means toward achieving socialism.'" 7.

Unholy Alliances documents that the National Council of Churches (originally the Federal Council of Churches) was vital to Rockefellers' plan for a One World Religion:

The Federal Council of Churches of Christ in America was used routinely by the Rockefellers to further their personal interests in church circles. Rockefeller donated to the Federal Council's Department of Church and Economic Life and promoted the concept of an international church. This is how 'ecumenism' got its beginning as Rockefeller became the most important financier of liberal and ecumenical Protestantism.

Whenever Rockefeller influence prevails, there are consistently found interlocking relationships with the Council on Foreign Relations. Three members of the Council on Foreign Relations involved with the Federal Council of Churches were:

1. Rev. Walter van Kirk - Federal Council Secretary and consultant to the American Delegation of the United Nations Conference...

2. Rev. Henry P. Van Dusen - Professor of Systematic Theology and President of Union Theological Seminary [a Rockefeller subsidiary]...
3. Rev. Reinhold Niebhur - Professor of Applied Christianity and Dean of the Union Theological Seminary...

"John Foster Dulles, a Rockefeller kinsman and agent, for many years dominated the Federal Council of Churches... For many years no conference or meeting of the Council was complete without an address by Dulles or one of the Rockefellers... The Federal Council of Churches changed its name to the National Council of Churches (NCC) on November 28, 1950.

"John Foster Dulles was a founder of the infamous Council on Foreign Relations and was Eisenhower's Secretary of State. Eisenhower, in typical Masonic style, laid the cornerstone for the new building of the National Council of Churches, which just happened to stand across the street from the Rockefeller Riverside Church. The National Council of Churches' building and the Riverside Church are even connected by an underground tunnel! 8.

Freedom House War On Sudan

Freedom House, obviously a front for the Council on Foreign Relations, is also committed to destroying national sovereignties and establishing world government. According to President Adrian Karatnycky, Freedom House, which has a staff of 40 and offices in New York, Washington, DC, Budapest, Bucharest, and KIEV, has influenced events for the better (or worse) in former Yugoslavia:

"China is the one great counter-example and an important one. But in Haiti, Bosnia, Burma and now in Serbia, there's a decent and credible record. This is an activist Administration that looks for opportunities to press things in the right direction, when we can exert influence and lend our voice to ongoing events, like Serbia."
According to WHTT, Freedom House (a.k.a. CFR) is also seeking to destroy the Sudanese government:
Sudan has been victimized by a massive propaganda blitz organized primarily through certain non-government organizations (NGOs), notably Freedom House, Christian Solidarity International and the defense establishment related Hudson Institute. Michael Horowitz, Director, Projects for Civil Justice at Hudson Institute, the author of the so-called FREEDOM FROM RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION ACT (HR2431), circulated a memo dated October 16th that goes hand in glove with Mr. Clinton’s action and does much to explain the administration’s move to sanction Sudan.

In his memo, Michael Horowitz, has boasted a predetermined purpose of his bill was to overthrow the elected Government of Sudan. He has also implicated Congressman Frank Wolf in the scheme. Horowitz also stated that U.S. covert military aid is already being used to that end, in spite of diplomatic relations with The Republic of Sudan at the time.

In the 'Memorandum' dated October 16, 1997, written by Michael Horowitz to Frank Wolf (R-VA), Horowitz states, '--WOLF-SPECTER’S SUDAN PROVISIONS -- OPERATING IN CONCERT WITH COVERT U.S. MILITARY AID ALREADY PROVIDED TO OVERTHROW THE SUDANESE REGIME-- SHOULD AND WILL RAPIDLY HELP BRING DOWN THE SUDANESE REGIME PRECISELY AS ANTI-APARTHEID LAWS CAUSED [IT] TO HAPPEN TO SOUTH AFRICA’S FORMER REGIME.' (1) (emphasis is ours) Frank Wolf is the Congressional Sponsor of HR2431. The Memorandum further states that Wolf is the only Congressman to have visited Sudan. But the Sudanese Embassy has no record of issuing a visa to Wolf, although it has offered visas to any Congressman who will go to Sudan. It is believed Congressman Wolf entered the country illegally.

Freedom House Sudan Symposium

On November 6, 7 at Georgetown University [Roman Catholic Institution], the Center for Religious Freedom of Freedom House sponsored a conference for Christian college students from both secular and religious campuses. The purpose is to consider a "National Campaign of Conscience led by College Christians in Support of Persecuted Christians in Sudan."

Speakers include: Freedom House author and promoter of HR2431/S772 Nina Shea, Most Rev. Edwin F. O'Brien (Catholic Military Archdiocese), Bill Bennett, Baroness Caroline Cox, Michael Horowitz, Steve McFarland and Charles Colson. Steve McFarland of the Christian Legal Society takes much credit for the passage of HR 2431. Of the keynote speaker, Baroness Cox, founder of Christian Solidarity International, more will be said in a forthcoming report.

Discussion Points

Although the agenda appears to begin with discussion of whether or not there are Biblical grounds for Christians to be activists, the progression of discussion points seems to assume that there is such a mandate. This is clearly a Process situation in which the opinions of group members are initially solicited, but the agenda has already been planned to follow a predetermined course.

Remember that in The Process, a facilitator frames the topic of discussion in a biased context and then skillfully carries the discussion along to its desired end -- consensus. Peer pressure is used by the facilitator to keep independent thinkers in line until the discussion reaches the final phase, which is already included in The Agenda:

Discussion of such efforts as the American Civil Rights movement, the anti-Vietnam War protests, environmental awareness campaigns and the campaign against South African Apartheid. Common threads? Role of colleges, college students?

Can Christian college students generate a campaign that will ignite the consciences of their colleagues and local communities? The country? Discuss special character -- strengths and limitations -- of Christian colleges, Christian students, and Christian student chapters at secular colleges.

Ramifications of a decisive commitment by American Christian college students to denounce the murder and persecution of Christians in Sudan. How will this commitment effect the world's view of America? How will it effect other American groups' view of Christians?

Drafting a Statement of Principles?

Objectives of a Campaign and Modes of Protest.
College Symposium on Sudan Endorsements include:
Cardinal Newman Society [Roman Catholic]
Christian Legal Society
*Coalition for Christian Colleges & Universities
Ethics & Religion Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention
Institute on Religion and Democracy
InterVarsity Christian Fellowship
*The Coalition for Christian Colleges & Universities

Parents of students in Christian colleges would hardly suspect that the Coalition for Christian Colleges & Universities interacts with the following Globalist Organizations and Programs:

Summer Programs:
Ford Foundation
'Trust in Government Project'

For over a century, Oxford University has been a planning center for a world government and religion. Ford Foundation grants are given to Oxford University for globalist projects, i.e.,

Ford Foundation also funds the Council on Foreign Relations. Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation in 1954, stated to Congressional Reese Commission investigator Norman Dodd:
"We operate here under directives which emulate from the White House...The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the United States so that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union." 9.
President Clinton is an Oxford educated Rhodes Scholar who also attended Georgetown University, the venue of the Sudan Symposium.
"It is Clinton's solid Rhodes background that should say the most about where his trend of executive orders is headed. Bill Clinton was a Rhodes scholar at Oxford University and since becoming president, he has surrounded himself with Rhodes scholars in his administration.

"Much has been written about British diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes, founder of the Rhodes Scholarship. Briefly, he was dedicated to establishing a socialist one-world government controlled by a small group of elite -- a world view he received from John Ruskin, his socialist professor at Oxford. After making his fortune in diamonds, Rhodes established a secret society in the form of a scholarship to promote this ideal should it fail to materialize before his death. Rhodes biographer Sarah Millin wrote: 'The government of the world was Rhodes' simple desire.'"

[For more information see: The Cecil Rhodes-Milner Roundtable]
Interestingly, the National Council of Churches' "Church and Government Program" to establish better cooperation between church and state is part of the Ford Foundation's "Partnership for Trust in Government."
"The Trust in Government Project at the Graduate School of Public Affairs focuses on the growing public attitude of cynicism and widespread distrust for government in the United States. In 1985, GSPA embarked on a three-year project aimed at exploring the issues leading to, and revolving around, public trust in government. The project intends to reach beyond the boundaries of campus by involving the public, local and state governments, non-profit organizations, the news media and businesses in exploration of this critical issue."
Researcher Dana Hoard, who attended a Trust in Government meeting at the University of Washington in February 1998. reported an intensive campaign by the Ford Foundation and organizations, such as Young Americans for Freedom, to mobilize high school and college students:
"The key thing I gleaned from the [UW 'Trust in Government'] meeting is that ALL University Public Policy centers will be focusing on this 'government trust.'
"Ford is also sponsoring Youth Summits. This is where the students get to input communities to influence their direction as far as mobilization goes. [Of course there is a pre-determined agenda for these.] I visited the Ford Foundation Grant web site. Many grants are given out for Community Assets and Development [something like that.]
"The Technotrust web site is connected to the Graduate School of Public Affairs at the University of Washington.
"Notes of the forum which I attended are on the web site... They are generally accurate. My greatest discovery RE: TechnoTrust was the Ford Foundation’s involvement and the network of public policy institutes at the universities; also the F.F.’s funding of the youth summits where students are ‘empowered’ and directed towards advocating on legislative issues.
"Paul Hill is listed as a member of the GSPA faculty [Paul Hill of RAND Corporation working with the WA business Roundtable on GOALS 2000 and promoting charter schools; Research Professor of Public Affairs; Ph.D., Ohio State University, 1972 (Political Science); Politics and Reform of K-12 Education, Role of Business in Public Policy, Urban Politics]
"Tina Podlodowski is on the staff of Technotrust/GSPA. [Retired early from Microsoft as a millionaire & is a politically active lesbian.]
"Walt Williams, U. of WA GSPA. International Affairs, Faculty Advisor, Professor of Public Affairs, University of Washington [Walter Williams may be the same person who sits in for Rush Limbaugh occasionally.]
"Another faculty advisor, Marc. M. Lindenberg, Dean and Professor of Public Affairs - area of expertise: International Development Policy and Globalization of the Non-Profit Sector…
"[In November 1998] Young Americans for Freedom [YAF]/Ron Robinson held a conference in Seattle for college and high school students. Overnight lodging at an airport hotel was free for registering students. I believe YAF is the organization William Buckley [CIA] founded. The keynote speaker was Oliver North. (YAF recently bought the Ronald Reagan ranch for future youth seminars.)"
The Hegelian Dialectic

How have Christians come to the point of trusting a Power Elite -- the rich men of this world who are committed to the destruction of nations and the establishment of oligarchy? Looking to the Word of God, we search in vain for counsel to turn to the world system to relieve the suffering of the Church. Quite the contrary, Christians have been warned not to become entangled in this evil system. History reveals that when the Church becomes involved in the world system, the system always controls the Church, rather than the reverse.  Moreover, it defies all reason that Christian leaders would demand legislation that provides statutory authority for the present morally and ethically-compromised President [Bill Clinton] to appoint a commission to monitor religion -- a commission chaired by a presidentially-appointed ambassador-at-large!

The reason for the present irrational position of the Church has been explained by Power Elites. Freedom House Trustee Richard Gardner (CFR/TC, Rhodes Scholar, former Ambassador to Spain, Italy, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs under Presidents Kennedy and Johnson) wrote an article entitled "The Hard Road to World Order" which was printed in the CFR's Foreign Affairs (4/74). Gardner understood that practical implementation of Hegel's Dialectic required dismantling existing systems, not by decree, but by mobilizing public opinion and transforming it into an instrument of revolution:

"The 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down..., but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault..." 10.
Zbigniew Brezinski, a member of all three "shadow governments" (CFR/TC/B) and first director of the Trilateral Commission, envisioned a controlled society:
"In the technetronic society the trend seems to be toward…effectively exploiting the latest communication techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason.... Human beings become increasingly manipulable and malleable ... the increasing availability of biochemical means of human control ... the possibility of extensive chemical mind control.... "
The Church has been processed by the Power Elite, who have trained professional facilitators to use the latest communication techniques to manipulate the emotions and control the reasoning processes of entire church communities. As a result, a significant number of Christians have seemingly lost their capacity to THINK through issues and are clamoring for legislation that is diametrically opposed to what they actually stand for! MIT Professor, apologist of socialism and author of Keeping the Rabble in Line, Noam Chomsky's revelation of the Power Elites' strategy for controlling the masses has a practical application to the Church:
"The bewildered herd are a problem. We've got to prevent their rage and trampling. We've got to distract them. They should be watching the Super Bowl or sitcoms or violent movies or something. Every once in a while you call on them to chant meaningless slogans like 'Support Our Troops', and you've got to keep them pretty scared because unless they're scared properly and frightened of all kinds of devils that are going to destroy them from outside or inside or somewhere, they may start to think, which is very dangerous because they're not competent to think, and therefore it's important to distract and to marginalize them."
Power Elites alone understand the Hegelian principle by which they have achieved their stunning success. Knowing that Christians are averse to sitcoms and violent movies, they have cleverly substituted mass rallies, conferences and televangelism to fearmonger the religious masses into advocacy of pseudo-spiritual and patriotic causes. Don McAlvany, a member of the elite Council for National Policy, perceptively defined the Hegelian Dialectic in his book, The New World Order: The Countdown to Armageddon:
"A 3-step process authored by Hegel and perfected by the Marxist/Leninists: Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis. The first step (thesis) is to create (or fabricate) a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic, hysteria). The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem in step 1 - change which would have been impossible to impose on the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages 1 and 2." 11.
Forthcoming reports will focus on those Christian organizations that have promoted the Religious Persecution legislation and the secret alliance of Christian ministries and elite globalists where plans are laid to mobilize the Christian Right, elect candidates and advance legislation which will establish a New World Order.

International Day of Prayer for Persecuted Church
Christian Solidarity Worldwide
The John Birch Society
Council for National Policy

Freedom From Religious Persecution


 
 

REFERENCES

Watchman on the Wall provides a partial listing of CFR members in government today.

1. Dr. James W. Wardner, Unholy Alliances, 1996, p. 131.
2. Michael Howard, The Occult Conspiracy, Destiny Books, 1989, pp. 165-66.
3. Ibid., pp. 169-70.
4. Unholy Alliances, pp. 124-5.
5. Ibid., p. 129.
6. Calvary Contender, 2/1/87.
7. Unholy Alliances, p. 153.
8. Ibid., pp. 152, 154, 157, 159.
9. Ibid., p. 124; http://www.hevanet.com/nitehawk/nwo48.html
10. Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D., "President Clinton Will Continue the New World Order," Goals 2000/America 2000 Research Manual, p. 28.
11. Donald F. McAlvany, The New World Order: The Countdown to Armageddon, Phoenix, AZ, Western Pacific Publishing Co., 1992, p. 50.