Cast: Ed Pekurny - Matthew McConaughey
Director: Ron Howard (Parenthood, Apollo 13, Ransom)
Personally, I dont think I could do it. Dont get me wrong, I enjoy lots and lots of money, just like the next person, but to put my friends, and family, through what the characters here go through, nope, no way Jose! I enjoy my quiet time, and my private time, and that, would basically be relegated to bathroom breaks, based upon this movie. I may become a coffee drinkin fool based upon that (oh, wait, I already am that..silly me)
Once I got these initial thoughts out of my head, I sat back and enjoyed things a bit more. The problem was, that Howard made the first part of this movie more humorous and satirical than the second half did. It was during this first part that I was contemplating, and putting myself into Eds shoes imagining what could be. By the time I snapped out of that, courtesy of some very funny sequences, including a new version of the chicken dance from Harrelson, the laughs were all but gone. They were basically relegated to whenever Martin Landau, as Eds wheelchair bound stepfather, appeared onscreen. Landau had the standout comic performance, but all of the characters in general, were well written and entertaining. Elfman is still as cute and adorable as ever, even when her natural spunk, energy and appearance are downplayed by a more emotion-filled role. McConaugheys slow drawl, and playful, tip-o-the-hat manner is played up a bit more than hes done in a while (I dont count that silly over-the-top elephant movie either!) He just seems to be having fun here, as does the entire cast. Basically, they are entertaining, and well-written, not too deep but not too shallow. They are being real people!
This has long been a trademark on Ron Howard movies. He always makes them pleasant and entertaining movies. They are never shallow and empty, but also never really too deep, or conversation provoking. He doesn't usually tackle controversial subject matter, and its when he tries to make too much of a message, that he fails slightly. That is the case here as well. This movie works best, when it is lighthearted, satirical fun, with a serious message. When he tries to drive the message down your throat, as in a lot of movies lately, it's a bit too far. But that doesn't detract from the sheer joy of this movie. The characters and scenarios give this movie it's power, and even make a statement. Kudos to the use advertisements, progressing them from local, to national, as the show grows, but negative points, on the Elizabeth Hurley storyline, it seemed a bit pointless, even if it was done to show the effect of public opinion on the direction of a show. The movie would not have lost anything if that scene wasnt included.
Finally, a subject that I stayed away from, because I didnt feel it was relevant, even though most of the advance word on the movie said otherwise. Was this movie, a copy of The Truman Show. I can now unequivocally say no. Howard put it best, when presented this question recently. He stated that the writers Lowell Ganz, and Babaloo (yes thats his name) Mandel, swore off of seeing it, for fear of influencing their writing. Howard, however, chose to see it, as soon as it hit a "theater near him". After seeing it, Howard said that he felt this movie and Truman, are, at best, distant cousins. I couldnt have said it better. They start with the same idea, someones life on television, but then depart down different paths. Truman dealt with the effects of television on the public, EdTV turns the tables and shows the effects that the public has on Television. Ultimately, both movies work, and can coexist, Truman is better, by far, but EdTV, when its having fun, does have its moments. Catch a matinee, or a discount, but for godsakes, get away from the television! ($$1/2 of $$$$)Go To Reel Rambling Page
Go To Main Page
You can also see my reviews at the Online Film Critics Society, of which I am a proud member.