Only the Coen
brothers could intermingle existentialism, film noir, UFO’s,
piano prodigies, fortunetellers and barbers into a compelling
piece of cinematic art. The
Man who Wasn’t There is a stylish, sometimes languishing, but
never dull look at how ordinary people act and react under
extraordinary circumstances.
Think about it, less than 2% of the population is known by
about 98% of it. Name
off a list of 20 celebrities and/or athletes, and odds are,
someone will recognize a name on that list.
Most of us who exist in that 98% walk around, wondering,
questioning, thinking, pondering, but usually never finding, our
reason or purpose for being here.
We walk around, unnoticed by most, each of us with our own
dilemmas, joy’s, and pain’s and life events that we react to,
as if we are unique. We
feel like ghosts on the grand stage of life, some like it, others
don’t, but we still continue on, moving forward towards a
destination that we don’t know, following a path we sometimes do
not understand. This film embodies that feeling, without flaunting it in our
faces, capitalizing and overreacting as most movies would have.
Director Joel, and writer Ethan, take a simple tale of a
barber, his unfaithful wife, a department store manager, an
entrepreneur and a talented teen, and use their magic to create a
powerful message about life.
Since the film is in black and white, the characters and
dialogue are more noticeable, yet the Coen’s obviously learned
from Hitchcock and Welles, amongst others, and use lighting,
shadows, angles and smoke to give the look of the film a life of
its own. The end
result is a cinematic gift, which, if patient, will pay off in
ways that will stay with you long after the smoke has cleared.
Since the
revelation, explanation, and resolution of the plot are part of
the movie’s noir-esque magic, I will layout only the basics, and
leave the Coen’s best intentions to do the rest. It is 1940’s, Anytown USA, Thornton is Eddie Crane, a
simple barber, married to Doris, who is emotionally, just about
the exact opposite of Eddie.
She is lively, and passionate, and as extroverted as Eddie
is introverted. Eddie
has dreams, buried deep inside him, which seep out just as slowly
as his walk and his voice. He
wants, what most people want, success, money, and happiness, he
just goes about in his own low-key manner, figuring that
simplicity and commonality will pay off in the long run.
Doris works at a local department store, for Big Dave
Brewster, who loves to weave his manly tales of war and battle.
Eddie also befriends a young girl, Birdy, the daughter of a
nearly unconscious attorney, who has a natural talent for the
piano. Throw in some UFO’s, an egotistical piano teacher, an
Italian picnic, and a fast-talking entrepreneur and you have only
a story that the Coen's could pull off. In its classic unveiling,
Man Who Wasn’t There seems to be, American Beauty, filtered
through Hitchcock, and told by Raymond Chandler.
It twists so slowly, yet drastically, that’s its almost
frighteningly real and believable in all its dark touches.
The story is carried by its look; a Citizen Kane style
combination of shadows, light and the always-present cigarette
smoke. The thing I
love about black and white photography is that it leaves most
things to the imagination, and gives the storytellers, carte
blanche to build something, without the distraction of color.
Here, it sets the mood for what’s to come, in a way that
color may have tainted. The
background, the costumes, the scenery, all seem to disappear, as
if they are not as important as the people moving around within
them. There are
so many evidences, and inferences, as to Eddie not being
“there” that I will let the viewer discover them on their own,
and discuss later, and believe me, you will be talking about this
movie, if you have patience, and let it seep its way slowly inside
you.
The characters
become the key in this story, since there are really only two
instances of exuberant emotion or action.
The key to all is Thornton, playing Crane down to near
Prozac overdose level, by using his words to show his emotions,
rather than his facial expression or action.
Think Karl Childers, with a flat top and cigarettes.
He is a simple man, a man who isn’t there, yet walks
around in the body of a man who is.
Thornton, for all his recent eccentricities, was the
perfect choice for this role.
He has shown a penchant for the simple man, conflicted,
fighting within himself to do what is right, and here, he keeps it
all bottled inside like a volcano that erupts with a patience that
is nearly unrecognizable. Also
pitch perfect in supporting roles are Gandolfini, showing yet
another aspect of his acting ability, playing the oafish, wanna-be
tough guy, struggling to be cute and succeed, McDormand, who just
naturally slips into her woman wanting more, but settling for what
she has, Badalucco, as the lovable, huggable, best friend, who may
or may not have more going on behind his façade, and the
underrated Johannsen (whom I still believe was robbed of a
nomination for Horse Whisperer) who walks the line of playful
innocence and mature poise with a frightening ease.
Along with Thornton though, I beg the Academy to pay
attention to the scene stealing Shalhoub, as lawyer Freddy
Reidenschneider. This
was obviously a role written to be the antithesis of Crane, and
given the most color of any character in the film, hence it could
have easily been overdone, or hammed up by the wrong actor.
But Shalhoub injects the right amount of swagger and
sarcasm into this role, offsetting nearly every other performance
in the film, yet fitting right, in the Coen’s own version of the
world.
Ultimately,
The Man Who Wasn’t There is a darkly noir-ish look at the
existential thoughts, which bounce around in everyone’s mind and
souls, but are rarely vocalized.
While the pacing is a bit languishing, and the film is not
for the impatient, those who recognize and are observant, will
notice that the characters each independently reflect differing
aspects of the same battle. We
are each soldiers in the battle to find our purpose and place in
the world, whether we silently walk through life, waiting for
things to fall in our laps, or we go after them with a confidant,
or braggadocios swagger, or seek the simple satisfaction, even
when confront with opportunity, or even if we just dream out loud,
those of us who haven’t “made it” each have our own way of
seeking the answers and truth as to our existence.
Each of the characters emotions and characters embody
differing aspects of people on the outside looking in, and how
they react when extraordinary situations present themselves The
Coen’s simply put these into bodies, took away the color, and
let it come from the characters, their reactions, and the
situations presented. The
result is an instant classic which everyone should see, because it
is a beautiful piece of classic film making, with homage’s,
obviously to Hitchcock, Billy Wilder and Orson Welles, but that
not every one may have the patience to stick with or understand.
Just open your mind, and let the Coen’s show you their
version of the answer, as sought by the simplistic dreamers of
Santa Rosa, who are more like you and me then we care to admit. ($$$$
out of $$$$$)
Agree?
Disagree, Questions? Comments?
Tell Me Here
(Clint
Eastwood, (2001), performed by Gorillaz, written by Damon
Albarn) |