Quills
View Date: February 17th, 2001
Cast :
Geoffrey Rush | The Marquis de Sade |
Kate Winslet | Madeleine |
Joaquin Phoenix | Abbe |
Michael Caine | Dr. Royer-Collard |
Billie Whitelaw | Madame LeClerc |
Patrick Malahide | Delbene |
Amelia Warner | Simone |
Writers: Doug Wright
Director: Philip Kaufman
Phillip Kaufman’s Quills asks and
answers many questions. Is it
possible to tell a story of one of the most deviant souls in history, without
displaying excessive violence or sexual images?
Is it possible to tell this tale in the same manner that De Sade wrote,
using words to replace and describe said activities and still elicit the desired
emotions? Is it possible to create
a powerful historical period piece without boring the viewers into a lull with
flowery images and language? The
answer to all these questions is an unequivocal yes.
Kaufman has used his power of words and storytelling to preach a tale of
indulgence, without turning it into an orgy of writhing bodies and graphic
depictions. Instead, he creates a
powerful tale of not being afraid to be yourself, being honest about it
and not being afraid to admit it.
He generates and maintains interest with words rather than images and in
the end
Our twisted little tale of love, lust, religion and the power of words begins with de Sade’s institutional imprisonment. His caretaker is Abbe (Phoenix), an outwardly moral, but inwardly conflicted religious man. Abbe has provided the Marquis with luxuries thanks to the donations of de Sade’s societally tormented wife. When word gets to Napoleon that de Sade’s therapeutic writings are getting out into the public, he orders Caine to reform the Marquis in his special way. Caine takes his young wife and takes over care of De Sade, thusly beginning the moral and religious battles between the 3 of them, and the source of de Sade’s words leaking out, a curiously tempted laundry girl (Winslet). Together, they all dance in unison to the tune of De Sade’s wicked melody, without even realizing it. Wrights words become their symphony. The movie also becomes a direct reflection of its subject matter. Both the movie, and the main character show the true power of words, and how they can set you free, without ever having to act upon them. De Sade showed that even while imprisoned, he could free the beast inside him by simply being honest and true to himself. . The battle of religion versus morality is reflected in the main characters. Morality is portrayed as a strength of faith while the religious aspects are shown as masks of denial hiding true wants and desires. Writer Doug Wright (who wrote the screenplay this is based upon) and director Phillip Kaufman use touches of humor which is never tasteless but always flirting and skirting the edges or moral acceptability without ever really crossing them
In order to pull off this story
successfully, the right mix and combination of actors and performers is
required. Each one cast here rises to the occasion.
Rush, shows why he is one of the greatest, most versatile actors working.
It’s hard to imagine anyone else in this role.
Rush has always reveled in playing those characters who were either
cerebral madmen (Shine, Elizabeth)
gleefully insane and loving every second of it (Mystery
Men, Shakespeare
in Love), rather than physically intimidating ones.
His madness is based in intellect or talent, but he can play it with
delicious glee, but is almost always justified, bringing a human aspect to each
of his characters. Winslet, regains
her dark edge from Heavenly Creatures (which she subsequently drowned amidst the
muck of Titanic), by toning it down and playing on the curiousity of youth, and
the energy of bridled desire. Phoenix,
whose Oscar nomination is more a combination of this performance and Gladiator
takes a one dimensional character and makes it his own.
Obviously, noone plays morally conflicted characters quite like Phoenix
(Gladiator, 8mm, and his best role, Return
to Paradise). Someday, he will
get his due recognition. Caine is
cunning in his silent, hypocritical wickedness.
He has always had a playfully energetic nature which teeters towards an
uncertainty of his motives. Here,
he revels deliciously in it all, as Rush’s adversary, definitely worth the
price of admission just to see these two classically trained geniuses, along
with Phoenix’s up and coming talent interact with each other.
Agree? Disagree, Questions? Comments?
Also see my reviews at:
Cast information and links courtesy of