Red Planet
View Date: November 11th, 2000
Cast :
Val Kilmer | Gallagher | |
Carrie-Anne Moss | Commander Kate Bowman | |
Benjamin Bratt | Ted Santen | |
Tom Sizemore | Dr. Quinn Burchenal | |
Simon Baker | Chip Pettengill | |
Terence Stamp | Chantilas |
Writer: Chuck Pfarrer
Director: Antony Hoffman
Red Planet is a movie about a search for something new, amidst a dying existence. This plot description parallels the film industrys search for that next new, hip and original touch in movies. Unfortunately, most filmmakers feel that the way to do this is to modify and rehash an existing idea, rather than coming up with something on their own. Projects like Being John Malkovich and Pi show that there is new blood in Hollywood, but they are the exception rather than the norm, as most people are in it for the buck rather than the art of creativity. Red Planet has a nice visual touch, not near as good as its predecessor Mission to Mars, but like a child prodigys finger painting, the great potential and vision it shows lacks any kind of depth or substance and ultimately crumbles upon itself into an abyss of dull absurdity.
The plot is fairly
simply, yet rehashed from most space travel movies. Either
they have to rescue someone, or save humanity or in this case, it
would be the second option. A crew of ragtag astronauts and
scientists are sent to Mars to discover a secret to help save
humanity. Seeing this crew, including a scene where they
create a distillery from lab equipment, made me have as much
faith in them saving the universe, as I would have watching a
Florida governments bingo night. We are given the
obligatory introductions and intermingling, which are obviously
going to come back into play later, so if youre interested
in following this film at all, get their early, and take notes.
There are the necessary humor scenes, usually courtesy of Kilmer
who gets to be cute, funny and somehow tries to be touch and
loveable as well. The rest of the interplanetary explorers suffer
the same fate as the unrecognizable crew member on Star Trek
episodes, becoming nothing more than victims whose demise is more
a matter of when, instead of if. There is of course
the romantic touch, between Kilmer and the Matrixs Moss,
who is reduced to pacing around in a series of panicked
soliloquies once the others become stranded on the planet. The
main problem is that none of this ever comes together, becomes
coherent, or ever seems to serve any real purpose. Just for
excitement purposes, we are given a military robot, which just
has to come back into play, plus some exploding bugs, mechanical
problems and, oh yeah, some personality conflicts between the
crew. Obviously they were arguing over who got to die first
and escape having to read anymore lines from the dreadful
screenplay. This screenplay is a mess, flowing choppily
from scene to scene, from planet to ship, etc. None of the
characters are given any reason for us to care about them, save
the fact that we dont really want anyone stranded in space
(except for Pauly Shore, NSync, Vanilla Ice, and these
writers). Kilmer is the only one who is given anything
interesting to say or do (including the only thing to generate
any emotion from, his line about Algebra finally serving him well
during an initial surveillance of the planet, and the simplicity
of the tale is morosely dragged over two hours. The three
cinematic Rs of space and war movies are present, romance,
rebellion and rescuer. The effects, the only saving grace
of the other Mars movie, are nothing to get excited about, nor
are they really that bad. While Mission
had some nice space sequences, and a unique look on the actual
planet, this one has some average space shots, and a planet that
looks like the wilds of Utah shot through a sepia tinted lens.
Unfortunately, changing the hue of the look cannot hide the lack
of anything interesting for the characters to say or do.
The makers obviously wanted to focus on the story, rather than
visuals, but someone in the writing department didnt get
this message.
Ultimately, Red Planet almost makes Mission to Mars tolerable, because as inane and predictable as Mission was, at least it kept my attention and gave me something appealing to distract me away from the lack of anything intelligible coming from the characters mouths. There can be a delicate balance between effects-laden movies, and special effects showcases. The director should watch the Alien series then consult Mr. Cameron, and Mr. Lucas (sans Phantom Menace) regarding how to do this. Hopefully, Hollywood has learned that in the search for the secret of life, or even anything intelligent out there, that by looking off into space, the simplicity of what lies right in front of you blinds you. Make us care about the human race, and about the people saving it, use the effects as support, if you want the story to be noticed, but at least give us a story to be noticed. Bury this in the red sand next to its Mission counterpart and pray that at least someone making these films gets the message.($ out of $$$$)
Agree? Disagree, Questions? Comments?
Also see my reviews at:
Cast information and links courtesy of