S
Some of us had an interesting online exchange Wednesday.
It started when I saw a post on Linn County GOP Facebook Fan Page.
It was a post giving a link to the
LCRCC Election Message & Potential Candidates
I commented
"It is inappropriate to put One candidate on a post that is for this topic
The Post says Potential Candidates not a Post for One single one."
We already had single Posts for the individual Nominees. I felt that the Post of the link to the Page with all of them should have been Neutral.
Later I made the same comment on the Linn County GOP Group Page for the same reason.
Disalogue ensued.
The thread on the Group Page has been removed somehow,
But I saved it
- Daniel W Kauffman Jr It is inappropriate to use One candidates photo in a general post about potential nominees and we do not need 8 or 9 of this post
- James Knox It is a link to the newsletter and you complained previously when it was the chair with her letter to the body...get over it Dan
- Daniel W Kauffman Jr It is inappropriate to use ANY single candidates photo on a post like this I hope the body takes note of this type of activity when it casts its votes
- Brett Mason Seriously, Dan? Chairperson candidates ought to be first. Given that no other person has submitted a statement of intent and a picture, in accordance with the rules, how could you possibly have any problem with this?
Secondly, every person in the LCRCC is an adult. Cognizant and educated, there is no hidden secret advantage here.
Thirdly, isn't this just another method you use to obstruct the business of the Central Committee from proceeding?
Fourthly, we have 21 months until the General Election of 2016. Every month matters, and that is the continued focus of at least some of us. Would you like to join in?
Let me see where do I start?
I never said anything about single posts for each candidate.
I said that the Post giving the link to the Webpage of ALL candidates should be neutral ie IMO
"inappropriate to put One candidate on a post that is for this topic
The Post says Potential Candidates not a Post for One single one."
I stand by that position.
I never said anything about which Individual Post came first.
Argue with me about what I have said.
I am trying to figure out what Mr Mason means about my comment being a method to obstruct the business of the Central Commitee from proceeding.
I have noted that He and some others seem to feel that the Constitution, the ByLaws and the Rules of Order sometimes get in the way of the Central Commitee proceeding.
Which seem to be to a large part concerned with Adjourning No later than 8:30 PM
They do not seem to be overly concerned with the large amount of Committtee work left undone,
Like the FIVE issues I understand the Finance Sub-Committee wished to present to the Body and were not given the Time to do so.
Later I found out that a particular claim was made about my behavior
Updated: Thursday, 12 February 2015 2:26 AM CST
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink | Share This Post
![](https://ly.lygo.net/af/d/blog/patriotic/tanstardivider.gif)