RETURN TO
MAIN PAGE


http://www.wikio.com



Search Engine Optimization and SEO Tools Opposing Views

Samuel Adams

American Patriot & Politician

1722 - 1803

If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« March 2015 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Iraq War
>
You are not logged in. Log in

Hot Issues From Linn County Iowa
Friday, 6 March 2015
Boolean Algebra, Logic And The County Constitution

Well Friends and Neighbors whispers of rumors have been wafting their way from the New Executive Board to your humble chronicler that they think they have found in our Founding Documents a passage that gives them the Power.

To disolve Any Standing Rule of the Committee or Sub-Committee they chose to.

It is found in the County Constitution  here

 

V. OFFICERS

The officers of this Central Committee shall be a chairman, co-chairman, secretary and

treasurer, and such other members as the County Central Committee in its by-laws may

provide. The Central committee shall organize following each general election, but no later

than the following April 1. 

 Of course for their interpretation to be correct 

THEY MUST IGNORE 

IV. MEMBERSHIP OF CENTRAL COMMITTEE

The County Central Committee shall consist of two precinct committee members elected from

each precinct at the precinct caucuses. The Constitution of the Republican Party of Iowa

permits a provision to be adopted in the County by-laws for the election of additional Central

Committee members from each precinct in a number proportionate to the Republican vote

cast in the precinct at the last preceding general election for President of the United States or

for the Governor of Iowa, as the case may be.

The general management of the affairs of the party in Linn County is vested in the Linn

County Central Committee, subject to direction from time to time by the County convention of

the party.

The Linn County Central Committee shall have such officers and administrative

personnel as it may determine and shall organize its operations to attain the objectives of the

Republican Party, and shall have power to adopt by-laws to carry out its duties and the

purposes of this Constitution, provided such by-laws are not in conflict with the provisions of

the Republican National Convention, the Constitution of the Republican Party of Iowa or this

Constitution.

When elected, a member of the County Central Committee must be a resident of the precinct

from which elected. The term of office of a member of the County Central Committee shall

begin on the day following the precinct caucus and shall continue until the next precinct

caucus and untuil his or her successor is elected and qualified. A member may be removed

by the County Central Committee for inattention to duty, incompetence, or active support of

an opponent of a Republican nominee. Vacancies on the County Central Committee shall be

filled by the County Central Committee. 

 

And they must also IGNORE 

 

 VIII. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

The Executive Committee shall consist of the Chair, Co-Chair, Secretary and Treasurer of the

Linn County Central Committee. The Executive Committee shall transact the routine business

of the Linn County Central Committee during the interim of the meetings of the Linn County

Central Committee. Any business transacted or action taken shall be reported to the Linn

County Central Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting.

The Executive Committee is subject to the orders of the Linn County Central Committee, and none of its acts 

shall conflict with actions of the Linn County Central Committee.

I take note of the Fact that while the Central Commitee may be given directions by the County Convention and that the Executive Board is "Under the Orders" of the Central Commitee

NOWHERE does it state or give any credence to the Claim that the Central Commitee is "Under the Orders" of or "Given Direction" by the Executive Board.

Quod Erat Demonstradum.

I do want the THANK the Executive Committee however for encouraging me to look at our Founding Documents carefully.

I have read them many times over the years but never before has one passage sprung out with the pristine clarity that it did last night

It is a section in the By Laws on the Treasurers duties

4. The duties of the Treasurer are to keep records of all receipts and disbursements. All

checks shall be signed b the Treasurer and countersigned by the Chair or Co-Chair.

Checks in excess of $500.00 and not previously budgeted shall have the approval of the

County Central Committee. The Treasurer shall prepare a two-year budget for approval

of the County Central Committee and the same shall be presented at the first meeting of

the non-elective calendar year.

Let me pull this one little gem out and place it all by itself

 Checks in excess of $500.00 and not previously budgeted shall have the approval of the County Central Committee.

THIS Friends and Neighbors is what is called in the Fields of Boolean Algebra or Symbolic Logic as an

AND Statement 

 An And Statement with Two Conditions formally represented as

 

If A AND B then C

Or by the Venn Diagram representation at the beginning of this post.

Now the thing about AND statements IS

For the Statement to be True BOTH Initial Conditions Must Be True 

So while the common interpretation is that if the Expenditure is less than $500 the Exective Board may issue a check without Approval of the Body

It turns out that IF the Expenditure has NOT been previously Budgeted?

They must not only INFORM the Body but the Body must APPROVE the Expenditure.

Otherwise?

Should the Body NOT approve the expenditure?

They must make the Treasury Whole and replace the funds.

Not to do so would be Misappropriation of Funds

And THAT would be an ETHICS Violation.

Some may dispute what I have written

But the Rules of Symbolic Logic on AND Statements are clear and it would be like arguing that One plus One does Not equal Two

Yes I know ther are 10 types of people in the world thos who understand binary and those who do  not but binary 10 is still Two

However if anyone wishes to take issue with my presentation?

Have your Seconds present Your Card to My Seconds and I will meet you on the Field of Mathematics with

Logic Texts of YOUR choice.

By the Way, have I mentioned that before I took my present occupation and moved to Iowa among other things I TAUGHT Boolean Algebra and Symbolic Logic at a Collegiate level? 

I do have one further announcement to make

I must rise early tomorrow and  journey to one of our South Eastern Cities,

So I will not have time to put out a Saturday Post.

We will return in time Saturday Night for a Communications Sub-Committee meeting at 8:30 PM at the Starlite.

I understand our Treasurer and New Co-Chair may attend and attempt to broker

Peace in Our Time.

Which is the Reason for this IMO PG Level Post instead of the 

Turn the Unrighteous into Pillars of Salt Post that I am holding in abeyance to see what they wish to convey to us, 

 


Posted by ky/kentuckydan at 1:50 AM CST
Updated: Friday, 6 March 2015 9:57 AM CST
Post Comment | View Comments (4) | Permalink | Share This Post

Friday, 6 March 2015 - 10:22 AM CST

Name: "David Chung"
Home Page: http://www.dchung.com

As a mathematician, I have to differ with the way you have applied formal logic to the bylaws.

I would have done it this way:

Checks in excess of $500.00 and not previously budgeted shall have the approval of the County Central Committee.

A - Check > 500
B - Previously budgeted
C - Requires LCRCC Approval

The statement formally is then: 

A and not B --> C

I don't think I can paste an image here so this is the link to the resultant truth table:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=truth+table+A+and+not+B+implies+C

To simplify the truth table:

1) Checks less than $500 do not requre the explicit approval of the committee
2) Checks that have been previously (regardless of amount) budgeted do not requre the explicit approval of the committee
3) Checks that over $500 that have not been previously budgeted do requre the explicit approval of the committee

My memory may be faulty here but I think I was the author of both sections of the bylaws that you cite

"The Executive Committee is subject to the orders of the Linn County Central Committee, and none of its acts shall conflict with actions of the Linn County Central Committee."

and

"Checks in excess of $500.00 and not previously budgeted shall have the approval of the County Central Committee."

As the author of both of these sections (or at least as a participant in their drafting) I will assert that the application of formal logic in this case is in every way consistent with the original intent when these items were drafted.

Q.E.D.

Friday, 6 March 2015 - 11:29 AM CST

Name: "David Chung"
Home Page: http://www.dchung.com

For those readers not familiar with "math Latin", Quod Erat Demonstradum or Q.E.D. means, "which was to be shown". It is usually attached at the end of a proof to indicate that the author has inded proven or shown what he set out to.

The colloquial English translation is "so there!"

Friday, 6 March 2015 - 3:07 PM CST

Name: ky/kentuckydan
Home Page: https://www.angelfire.com/ky/kentuckydan

Point and Match to Mr Chung 

Yes I messed that up but there is always a silver lining

David has come out on the record that in addition to other portions

he was at least one of the authors of

"My memory may be faulty here but I think I was the author of both sections of the bylaws that you cite


"The Executive Committee is subject to the orders of the Linn County Central Committee, and none of its acts shall conflict with actions of the Linn County Central Committee."

I am on my way out the door to work but we WILL pursue the Original Intent of those secions in a latter post 

 

Friday, 6 March 2015 - 6:58 PM CST

Name: "John Haible "

QED was also replaced by SOS, first to use the new distress call was HMS Titanic.

View Latest Entries