I really like this video
Nope I don't Exist to Serve the State either
AND I will also Add, I don't exist to serve the Chamber of Commerce
Vote NO March 6!
Updated: Thursday, 16 February 2012 6:06 PM CST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
« | February 2012 | » | ||||
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
I really like this video
Nope I don't Exist to Serve the State either
AND I will also Add, I don't exist to serve the Chamber of Commerce
Vote NO March 6!
For Generations
The Public has sent the Government
More Money each Year
Than the Year Before
For Generations
The Government has spent
More Money than We sent them
And Wanted More
Where Does it Stop?
Vote NO March 6
When they talk to You about the Local Option Sales Tax Extension
Ask then why we needed the Extra Expense of a Special Election
Rather than doing it on the June Ballot
Vote NO March 6
Because
That Sucking Sound You may be hearing is
Your Paycheck going down the Drain at City Hall
Cedar Rapids PrecinctsCedar Rapids Precincts Effective January 15, 2012
Marion Precincts Marion Precincts Effective January 15, 2012
|
For the first time, that I am aware of, a Computer AI has made an ethical and moral choice and It's a Social Conservative
|
Is a Classic Movie Line
But now we seem to have an Administration that lives by a modification of it
Congress?
We Don't Need No Stinking Congress.
Recently Congress decided it had no interest in some Legislation called the Dream Act. The attempt to ride it through was made after the last Election, it got through the House but did not make the 60 Vote bar in the Senate.
So
The Adminstration decided to implement it by itself.
Which is a lot like the Fate of
But again a Congressionla rejection was no problem for an Administration that could just tell the EPA to do it anyway.
EPA Cap-and-trade Regulations Would Circumvent Congress
They ran into the same problem when the FCC decided to regulate the Internet.
A Federal Judge inconvieniently ruled that CONGRESS must pass Legislation authorizing a Federal Agency to regulate something,
Not a problem, This Adminstration just told the FCC to do it anyway.
Then of course there was Libya.
Wasn't it nice of President Obama to ask the permission of NATO and the UN, but wouldn't it have been nicer if he had bothered to discuss it with Congress?
I mean there are such picky things like the Constitution and the War Powers Act that should be considered.
Or not as is the case with the present Administration.
All these things can be clearly understood if we stop and think about the background of the President in office now,
In Dugan Romanos work on Intercultural Relatiohships the claim is made that everyone acts out of their own Cultural Matix.
President Obama's Cultural Matrix as far as Politics is concerned, derives from Cook County.
Some time ago a young man named Barry, a product of an exclusive Prep School in Hawaii, arrived at the People's Republic of Chicago and became
Barrak Husein Obama, the disciple of Bill Ayers and Saul Alynsky.
In that environment the Daley Machine has had full One Party control for generations.
Yes Conservatives and Republicans are Seen and Not---
Well maybe not even seen, The Machine has been able to pretty much do as it wills,
Thus we have a Presidency that treats the United States like it was Cook County
Government by Executive Order Fiat.
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't that one of the origninal complaints against George the Third??
Obama Ag Secretary says rise in food stamps is putting people to work
Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack told MSNBC’s Morning Joe that the Obama administration has a jobs program already in place — and it’s food stamps. When asked about new numbers that show one in every seven Americans now receiving food stamps from the federal government, Vilsack said that’s good news. Food stamps create jobs, Vilsack insisted, and managed to even come up with a new multiplier effect number:
So here’s the question. If food stamps create jobs, like Vilsack says here, and we’re putting record numbers of Americans on food stamps, then why aren’t we seeing record job creation? If every dollar spent on food stamps creates $1.84 in production, as Vilsack argues, and the number of food stamp recipients keeps rising, then why haven’t the GDP numbers reflected that fabulous growth?
The one little detail left out is the penalty we pay when we take money out of the general economy for a government program.
So for every dollar we spend it creates $1.84 in the economy?
If this were a Fairy Tale, the money would magically appear in the hands of the food stamp recipient.
But it is not a Fairy Tale the money comes from Tax Payers, nor is it Star Trek, Scotty does not beam the money into the hands of them either,
Funds for these programs must grind their way through the Federal Government and that is not without cost..
Take as an example the Cash for Clunkers Program, it gave out $4500 Tax Credits and the Cost Per Car was $20,000, Round it up for each dollar in Tax Credits the Tax Payers shelled out 4 dollars.
If those same figures hold true for th eFood Stamp Program for each dollar sent out in Food Stamps we paid 4 dollars in over head.
So if that one dollar returned $1.84 in economic activity those same 5 dollars left in the hands of the Tax Payers would have returned $9.20 in economic activity.
Now I am not saying we should cut that program I AM saying that for each dollar spent there is a net loss to the economy of (using their figures) $7.36.
That is NOT something to Crow about.
But feeding American who have fallen on hard times is a much better use of Tax Payers money than the Program that was part of the Stimulas Bill that spent 2.6 Million Dollars to teach Chinese Prostitutes how to drink responsibly.
I doubt that stimulated our eonomy. The only stimulas it could have produced would have been stimulating Chinese Johns,
Or maybe the administrators, Who knows the Girls might have been grateful and expressed that in a tangible manner?
The picture of Government Agencys as Pimps I find somehow Apt.
They are after all into Tax Payer Bondage,
Team 10' project is a campaign to solicit ideas from the public on the Tenth Amendment and how it can be used to restrict Federal regulations.
Here is a proposed letter to Congress,
Read it and if you find yourself in accord send it to your Senators and Representative in the House.
Dear Members of the House and Senate:
We are writing you as activists in the tea party and 912 movements, and as believers in the 10th Amendment to the Constitution, which states:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The recent debt ceiling agreement set up an inadequate, centralized system of trying to find $1.5 trillion in savings over the next 10 years by empowering just 12 out of 535 members.
We believe every member of the Congress has an obligation to participate in cutting 3.25% from the budget, which is a little over three cents out of every dollar.
Therefore we ask that in early September, every committee and subcommittee should hold hearings on enforcing the 10th Amendment.
We are convinced that if you will take seriously the complaints from state and local officials about unnecessary red tape, unnecessary federally imposed expenses and federally mandated waste, you will find a lot of the savings you need.
We would also urge you to insist that the “Super Committee” of 12 include a significant amount of 10th Amendment enforcement in its deliberations.
After all, if the federal government did not require so much reporting by businesses, doctors, hospitals and state and local government, billions could be saved in unnecessary compliance costs.
If the federal government allowed businesses, hospitals, doctors and state and local governments to exercise common sense, a lot of federal aid could be eliminated and the money saved.
If you begin the fall session in September with a series of hearings in which the appropriate subcommittees and committees hear from the American people on these topics, you will have a huge menu of savings on your plate by mid October.
Ultimately, our goal is not a less expensive centralized bureaucracy in Washington, but government that is efficient, limited and Constitutional. The best way to do that is to enforce the 10th Amendment and return power to the states respectively, or the people.
Team 10' project is a campaign to solicit ideas from the public on the Tenth Amendment and how it can be used to restrict Federal regulations.
Here is a proposed letter to Congress,
Read it and if you find yourself in accord send it to your Senators and Representative in the House.
Dear Members of the House and Senate:
We are writing you as activists in the tea party and 912 movements, and as believers in the 10th Amendment to the Constitution, which states:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The recent debt ceiling agreement set up an inadequate, centralized system of trying to find $1.5 trillion in savings over the next 10 years by empowering just 12 out of 535 members.
We believe every member of the Congress has an obligation to participate in cutting 3.25% from the budget, which is a little over three cents out of every dollar.
Therefore we ask that in early September, every committee and subcommittee should hold hearings on enforcing the 10th Amendment.
We are convinced that if you will take seriously the complaints from state and local officials about unnecessary red tape, unnecessary federally imposed expenses and federally mandated waste, you will find a lot of the savings you need.
We would also urge you to insist that the “Super Committee” of 12 include a significant amount of 10th Amendment enforcement in its deliberations.
After all, if the federal government did not require so much reporting by businesses, doctors, hospitals and state and local government, billions could be saved in unnecessary compliance costs.
If the federal government allowed businesses, hospitals, doctors and state and local governments to exercise common sense, a lot of federal aid could be eliminated and the money saved.
If you begin the fall session in September with a series of hearings in which the appropriate subcommittees and committees hear from the American people on these topics, you will have a huge menu of savings on your plate by mid October.
Ultimately, our goal is not a less expensive centralized bureaucracy in Washington, but government that is efficient, limited and Constitutional. The best way to do that is to enforce the 10th Amendment and return power to the states respectively, or the people.
I have heard it said that anyone who uses the expression, "as easy as taking candy from a baby",
Has never TRIED to take candy from a baby.,
BUT, the experience would stand you in good stead for trying to explain to a politician, why government Spending should be Cut, or Taxes Lowered,
They sit in DC, in State Houses, County Seats and City Halls gazing at the Electorate with the fixation of a Toddler who has just spotted a bowl of candy within reach,
And what candy it is.
The Cash for Clunkers Program gave a $4500 tax break and cost per car $20,000.
The New Home Purchase Program gave a $8500 tax break and cost per home $50,000.
The Mortgage Recovery Program covered homes with an average value of $170,00 and cost per home $871,000.
Now while it would not surprise most of us that there are Federal Employees sitting around doing nothing, we also doubt that someone like that would have been put to work managing these programs
If that is what you think you would probably be correct for Federal Employees, rose 10% while the rest of the country lost jobs,
Call this Job Creation You CAN Believe in.
Of course all those new Employees needed a way to get to work so it makes sense that the Federal Limosene Fleet increased by 7%
From those according to their abilities to those according to their needs
These days when you turn on the TV, listen to the Radio on the way to work, or open up a Newspaper,
Everyone seem to be talking about the Deficit and the Debt Crises.
The one thing they all can agree on, is this is NOT a good thing
But they do disagree on what to do about it.
Some say, we need to raise taxes, which would give the Government more Revenue and fix the problem.
Others say no, raising taxes would dampen a weak economy and that instead we should lower taxes, stimulate the economy and that would give the Government more Revenue and fix the problem.
Now both of them can't be right,
But both of them CAN be
Dead Wrong
You see, for generations the American People with just a few exceptions HAS been sending DC more money each year than the year before.
But for generations with just a few exceptions DC has SPENT more money than we sent them.
So Raising Revenue
Has NOT been Working!
If it was, we would not have this problem.
Just to give an example of our present reality,'
Picture the Federal Government as a household making 40K a year,
The MidEast Conflict would be like them taking out a Loan for 20K and paying for 8 years on it at the rate of $50 a week.
That is like something a lot of us have done.
But this last year was like that same family spending 70K.
If that should be a member of your family, you might try to talk to them,
If you found that they did not see any problem and in fact planned on doing the same thing next year and the year after and so on.
You would probably be talking to the rest of the Family about getting them some help.,
We need to get Uncle Sam some help.
Right now and for SURE
Next November.