SELF | 81 - 83 |
S.B. Karavashkin |
|
This last is caused by the fact that (5) cannot note the equality of w w0 subtend velocities, because the -vicinity is usually chosen with respect to the most distanced point w ( z ) corresponding to z and falling in the -vicinity of z0 . But if 82 we outline the real border of the mapping z w, then dependently on f ( z ) it can take any complex form (e.g., () in Fig. 1). But the inconstancy of w w0 subtend velocity dependently on the subtend direction causes that the relation |
|
|
(9) |
becomes dependent on the w w0 subtend direction. 83 As is known, (9) determines the total derivative of the complex function f ( z ) with respect to complex argument z. As we can see from this analysis, this function is a complex analogue of the derivative with respect to direction in vector algebra. In order to reveal the salient features of the total complex derivative, determine the differentials of z and w. To determine the differential of z, pick on the complex plane Z the -vicinity of the point z0 (see Fig. 2). Pick in this -vicinity a point z1(x1 , y1 ), and let |
|
|
(10) |
We see from the construction in Fig. 2 that |
|
|
(11) |
|
(12) |
Tending z1 z0 and noting (10), we yield in the limit |
|
|
(13) |
Contents: / 77 - 78 / 78 - 79 / 80 - 81 / 81 - 83 / 84 - 86 / 86 - 88 /