I discussed this theory later with Shipka and she disagreed. Unfortunately Shipka did not elaborate further on why she disagrees nor did Shipka provide further enlightenment as to why she disagreed with the premise. I am continuing my studies in this area and have not found anything so far that contradicts my thinking. The only fallacy I perceive is that the term infinite is incorrect. Looking upon this thought now, I believe her objection IS with the word infinite and that in real terms there are only a finite number of representations and re-representations that may be applied to making meaning through the five human senses. “This” would mean that Number Theory and Combinatorial Mathematics could and should be applied to prove that there is not an infinite number of boxes but a finite number of boxes but even so, that infinite number could turn out to be significantly large before someone begins to repeat the same message the same way.

"This" image is shared between the 324 CO1 and 407 CO1 and demonstrates a convergence of thinking across the two individual communicative objectives.