In response to a query on whether blocking has been confirmed yet in any invertebrates, Brembs (personal email, 22 December 2002) wrote:
In response to a query as to whether there had been any research that settled the question of whether blocking occurs in the nematode worm C. elegans, I received this reply from a neurobiologist who specialises in this area (Nuttley, personal email, 18 July 2003):
Nuttley has investigated the occurrence of two forms of higher-order associative learning - sensory preconditioning and second-order conditioning - in the nematode worm C. elegans, with mixed success (personal email, 18 July 2003). Sensory preconditioning was observed, while second-order conditioning was not. Nuttley believes that the likely explanation is extinction - the lack of reinforcement following exposure to the compound AB extinguished the worms' conditioned response to a reinforcement of A, so they failed to respond to B as well.
The mixed results, coupled with the rapidity with which the original reinforced response was extinguished, hardly inspires confidence that we can talk about mindful behaviour here.
As far as I have heard, the jury is still out, whether there is blocking, although those that have found it still claim that there is no dispute about their data. There are a few finds, but alternative explanations have not been ruled out, yet. So far, blocking, if it is there, is definitely not as universal and general as in vertebrates, at the least.
As for blocking, a student has been looking at that and although the trends are all encouraging and the data looks pretty good, we fall just short of making stats. A few changes to the protocol and I think we will be able to demonstrate blocking, but so far no.
*** SUMMARY of conclusions reached