I have read stallman, hes a smart guy! No denying that, and his ideas are revolutionary.

But there is no denying that money, and proprietary software have created good things in the industry and indeed pushed it forward in many ways. Im sure you could argue either way on this, but the point at hand is this:

Why shouldent a programmer who works hard at his code, not be able to sell it? Why should he not be able to reap the benifits?

Should writers be forced to allow everyone to distribute photocopys of their hard work?

Should studios allow their movies to be duplicated by third parties and distributed freely?

What is so bad about proprietary software?

I mean, free software is fantastic too! And it's a great idea. But I don't see what makes you evil if you sell someone bianarys you worked hard on.

Now, to some extent I agree. Maybe copywright laws like those on Drugs or books should be imposed. Laws that say you can keep the source closed for only X amount of years, before you have to realease it to the public. This would ensure returns for both parties neh?

That's one idea.

Well, heres the debate. Why, or why not free software?

My personal opinion is, if it's well made and the price is right, I don't mind paying.